AIGR Deep Research — K9IFT7 (DESRO): beta-defensin orthology and CCR6 binding OpenScientist openscientist-autonomous 4 artifacts 2026-09-21T01:15:47.419244

AIGR Deep Research — K9IFT7 (DESRO): beta-defensin orthology and CCR6 binding

Gene: K9IFT7 / Desmodus rotundus (vampire bat, NCBITaxon:9430) — GenBank JAA44743.1, RefSeq XP_071076263.1
Focus: function_assignment — does K9IFT7 directly have GO:0031731 "CCR6 chemokine receptor binding"?
Source: genes/DESRO/K9IFT7/K9IFT7-ai-review.yaml (free-text seed)


Executive Judgment

Verdict: PARTIALLY SUPPORTED (homology-plausible but unverified; not the core function).

Bottom line for the curator: the CCR6-binding term is defensible only as a low-confidence, homology-transferred (IEA), non-core molecular function. Do not upgrade it to an experimental code; do not treat the absence of a bat assay as refutation. The best-supported annotations are antimicrobial defense response and extracellular localization.


Evidence Matrix

Citation Evidence type Supports/Refutes/Qualifies/Competing Claim tested Key finding Context Confidence & limitations
UniProt K9IFT7 (DB record) computational/database Qualifies Term provenance GO:0031731 is IEA:TreeGrafter (phylogenetic graft to PANTHER SF9 "beta-defensin 1"); no experimental code D. rotundus TrEMBL entry High that it is IEA; weakest GO evidence tier
This report (NW alignment) structural/evolutionary (computational) Supports (orthology) Which human defensin is closest Mature K9IFT7 most identical to DEFB1/hBD-1 (59.1%); canonical 6-Cys motif, net +4, N-term Leu in-silico vs human panel Moderate; simple global alignment, not a phylogeny/tree reconciliation
PMID 23411029 (Vampirome) localization/expression (primary) Qualifies/Competing Documented function Bat salivary accessory submandibular gland antimicrobial (with lysozyme, lactotransferrin); no CCR6 assay D. rotundus glands, RNA-seq + LC-MS/MS High for antimicrobial/secreted role; silent on CCR6
PMID 10521347 (Yang 1999, Science) direct assay/binding (primary) Supports (family-level) Beta-defensin–CCR6 binding Human beta-defensin chemotactic via CCR6; competitively displaced ¹²⁵I-LARC/CCL20 on CCR6 transfectants (foundational MF evidence) CCR6-transfected cells, iDC, memory T cells High; peptide used was primarily hBD-2, not DEFB1/hBD-1
PMID 25122636 (Diao 2014) direct interaction (primary) Supports Ortholog CCR6 binding Human DEFB1 interacts with CCR6 and triggers Ca²⁺ mobilization Human sperm High for DEFB1; different tissue/species than K9IFT7
PubMed (no hits) absence of evidence Qualifies Bat defensin function No functional characterization of any chiropteran/bat beta-defensin (CCR6 or antimicrobial assay) was found Chiroptera Confirms annotation rests entirely on cross-mammal homology
PMID 29207656 direct assay (primary) Supports CCR6 as DEFB1-linked receptor CCR6 required for ligand-induced CatSper activation Human sperm Corroborates DEFB1–CCR6 axis
PMID 20022113 (Tyrrell 2010) mutant/structure-function (primary) Supports (plausibility) CCR6 determinants N-terminal Leu/Ile essential for CCR6 chemotaxis; K9IFT7 mature N-term = Leu Defb14 peptide derivatives Determinant present in K9IFT7 = plausibility, not proof
PMID 17705135 (Soruri 2007) direct assay (primary) Competing/Refutes (family-level) Is CCR6 a real beta-defensin receptor "CCR6 is not a functional receptor for beta-defensins"; CCR6-transfectants unresponsive to hBD-2/-3 Human/murine cells, CCR6 transfectants Direct conflict; challenges the whole annotation basis
PMID 20483750 (Röhrl 2010) direct interaction (primary) Qualifies/Competing Receptor exclusivity hBD-2/-3 (and mouse orthologs) bind CCR2, not only CCR6 HEK293-CCR2, human monocytes Shows multiple receptors; CCR6 not sole/obligate
PMID 15009427 (Niyonsaba 2004) direct assay (primary) Qualifies hBD-1 vs hBD-2 receptor usage "hBD-2, but not hBD-1" chemoattracts neutrophils via CCR6 TNF-treated human neutrophils Receptor/activity is defensin- and cell-type-specific
PMID 21434867 (Morgera 2011) cellular assay (primary) Qualifies CCR6 dependence iDC responses to hBD2 occur via "CCR6-dependent and -independent" mechanisms Human iDC/monocytes CCR6 partial contributor

GO Curation Implications


Mechanistic Scope

The tested molecular function is direct binding of the secreted mature beta-defensin peptide to the CC chemokine receptor CCR6 (a GPCR), which for human beta-defensins couples to Gαi and drives chemotaxis of immature dendritic cells / memory T cells and Ca²⁺ mobilization. This is distinct from, and must be separated from:
- Antimicrobial activity (membrane-disruptive killing of bacteria/fungi) — the evidenced core role in bat saliva.
- Salivary/glandular expression (localization, not activity).
- Chemotaxis via other receptors (CCR2, or CCR6-independent membrane effects).
For K9IFT7 specifically, CCR6 binding is inferred by homology, not demonstrated; the antimicrobial role is documented.


Conflicts and Alternatives

  1. Family-level receptor conflict: PMID 17705135 directly reports CCR6 is not a functional beta-defensin receptor — a fundamental challenge to the annotation's premise.
  2. Multiple/alternative receptors: CCR2 usage (PMID 20483750) and CCR6-independent mechanisms (PMID 21434867) mean "CCR6 binding" may overstate specificity.
  3. Defensin-specific variability: hBD-1 behaves differently from hBD-2 (PMID 15009427); transferring a CCR6 phenotype across the whole SF9 subfamily risks paralog over-annotation.
  4. Orthology uncertainty: 59% mature identity to DEFB1 with an expanded bat beta-defensin repertoire means K9IFT7 may be a bat-specific paralog rather than a true DEFB1 ortholog; TreeGrafter subfamily assignment can misplace fast-evolving lineage-specific defensins.
  5. Context mismatch: the strongest DEFB1–CCR6 evidence is in human sperm (PMID 25122636/29207656), a context unrelated to a bat salivary antimicrobial.

Knowledge Gaps

Gap What was checked Why it matters Resolving evidence
No assay of K9IFT7 (or any bat defensin) vs CCR6 PubMed; Vampirome Annotation rests entirely on homology transfer Direct binding/chemotaxis assay of recombinant K9IFT7 on CCR6⁺ cells
True orthology (DEFB1 vs bat-specific paralog) NW identity, PANTHER SF9 Determines validity of subfamily transfer Phylogenetic tree reconciliation of chiropteran beta-defensin cluster; synteny
Correct mature N-terminus / cleavage UniProt Chain 24-67 vs domain 34-66 N-terminal Leu is a CCR6 determinant; propiece removal could alter it Proteomic N-terminal sequencing of the salivary peptide
Whether CCR6 is a genuine receptor at all PMID 17705135 vs 25122636 Field disagreement undermines the term Reproducible receptor-transfectant binding across labs

Discriminating Tests

  1. Direct receptor assay: recombinant/synthetic K9IFT7 (correctly folded, 3 disulfides) in a CCR6-transfectant binding + chemotaxis/Ca²⁺-flux assay, with CCR6-knockout and CCL20 competition controls.
  2. Receptor panel: test CCR2 and CCR6 side-by-side to establish specificity vs the known CCR2 cross-reactivity.
  3. Antimicrobial vs chemotactic split: MIC assays (Gram±) to anchor the core function; compare potency to chemotactic EC50.
  4. Phylogenomics: reconcile the D. rotundus beta-defensin cluster against human DEFB1/DEFB4/DEFB103 to confirm or refute DEFB1 orthology and detect lineage-specific expansion.
  5. Structure: AlphaFold model (AlphaFoldDB K9IFT7 exists) + electrostatics to check the CCR6-binding surface and N-terminal helix.

Curation Leads (require curator verification)


Provenance Artifacts

Computed tables saved alongside the gene directory (genes/DESRO/K9IFT7/):
- K9IFT7_GO_decision_table.csv — per-term curation leads (MF/BP/CC, evidence codes, basis).
- K9IFT7_evidence_matrix.csv — literature evidence matrix with stance tally.

Orthology identities were computed by Needleman–Wunsch alignment of the K9IFT7 mature peptide against a UniProt-fetched human/mouse beta-defensin panel (executed in-session; DEFB1 59.1% > hBD-3 53.7% > DEFB118 52.3%). The 6-cysteine motif (inter-Cys gaps 7-5-10-7-1), net charge +4, and N-terminal Leu were computed directly from the sequence.

Limitations

TrEMBL (unreviewed) entry; no functional data exist for any chiropteran/bat beta-defensin (PubMed returned no hits), so every functional claim is cross-mammal homology transfer. Orthology inference used a simple global-alignment identity rather than a full phylogeny, and the human mature-peptide boundaries were not cleanly parsed for all panel members (alignments partly include propieces); nonetheless the DEFB1-closest ranking was stable across both runs, with hBD-3 (53.7%) and DEFB118 (52.3%) as near neighbors — i.e., subfamily assignment is confident but exact DEFB1 orthology is only moderately supported. The foundational beta-defensin–CCR6 evidence (Yang 1999, PMID 10521347) used hBD-2; direct DEFB1–CCR6 evidence (Diao 2014, PMID 25122636) is human sperm, a non-salivary context. All computational orthology statements are inference, clearly distinguished from the primary literature.

Artifacts