csy2 / Cas5f (Q02MM0) — Pseudomonas aeruginosa UCBPP-PA14 — curation notes

Deep research was unavailable in this environment (no provider API keys), so this file
is my own literature journal. Every assertion carries an inline PMID plus a verbatim
quote from the cached record in publications/.

What this protein is

PA14_33320, 327 aa, "CRISPR-associated protein Csy2" = Cas5f. It sits with Cas8f in
the PAM-proximal tail of the surveillance complex:
PMID:32170016, within
PMID:32170016. The PA14 complex was first characterised biochemically as
PMID:21536913. GOA's two
GO:0005515 rows are the IntAct Csy2–Csy1 pair (Q02MM0–Q02ML9, NbExp=6).

Structural work is on the P. aeruginosa complex:
PMID:28985564.

What Cas5f does

Caps and reads the crRNA 5' handle. This is Cas5f's defining job across type I:
PMID:32170016, and critically the contacts are base-specific, not backbone-only:
PMID:32170016.

Contributes a thumb to the target-duplex pocket.
PMID:28985564, with one Cas5f residue in the pocket:
PMID:28985564. Note the "especially": the DNA contacts are
dominated by Cas8f. I therefore do not propose a DNA-binding term for Cas5f — see
below.

Required in vivo for crRNA. Csy2 is in the strict-requirement class:
PMID:21398535. UniProt records this as "Absolutely required for
crRNA production or stability" and, for the disruption mutant, "Loss of production of
crRNA" — a loss, not a decrease, unlike csy1 and csy3. Mechanistically this is
assembly-dependent stabilisation: unprotected crRNA is degraded, and
PMID:22522703.

Adaptation also needs the intact complex:
PMID:26586803.

Curation decisions

Aspect correction (follow-up). My first pass proposed
part_of GO:0032991 protein-containing complex as the replacement, reasoning from the
E. coli comparator where all five Cascade subunits carry exactly that. That was wrong
in form: these GOA rows carry qualifier: enables, so they are molecular-function
rows, and a gene product cannot enable a cellular component. However
well-supported complex membership is, it cannot be expressed by swapping a CC term
into an enables MF row. The E. coli reviews were not making this mistake — their
GOA already contained separate part_of GO:0032991 rows, which they MODIFY to
GO:1990904; their enables GO:0005515 rows went to GO:0005198 instead.
Reconciled to the same convention:

Gaps identified (missing annotations)

Not proposed, and why