-
The report explicitly acknowledges that PP_4230 has no target-specific experimental support.
"1. **No PP_4230-specific experimental study exists.** The entire annotation is inferential. There is no published enzyme assay, knockout, structure, or complementation experiment for PP_4230 itself."
-
The report incorrectly treats a heterologous XodC experiment as native PP_4230-locus evidence.
"Crucially, the relevance of an XdhC-type factor to *P. putida* KT2440 xanthine oxidase has now been shown experimentally in this very organism."
-
The report's comparison table incorrectly puts PP_2482, rather than PP_2483, in the second predicted MocA cluster.
"| **PP_2483** | isoquinoline-1-oxidoreductase-like | PP_2478 (Mo/β-subunit), PP_2479 (cyt *c*), PP_2480 (XdhC), PP_2482 (MobA-like) |"
-
The report presents an AlphaFold result that was not saved as a reproducible local artifact.
"The AlphaFold model of Q88F68 is high-confidence (**mean pLDDT 91.9**) and shows a folded N-terminal Rossmann-like nucleotidyltransferase domain (res ~5–162) plus a short C-terminal acceptor-binding extension (res ~163–188) — the domain that, per Neumann et al., confers dedication to a specific acceptor molybdoenzyme."