The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
GSTF11, also designated AtGSTF11 (UniProt Q96324), is encoded by the ordered locus name At3g03190 in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17). This gene is a member of the phi-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTF) family, one of the 14 recognized GST classes in terrestrial plants (vaish2020glutathionestransferasea pages 1-2, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 3-4). The phi-class comprises 13 authentic genes in Arabidopsis, designated GSTF2 through GSTF14, following the exclusion of the originally reported GSTF1 sequence, which likely originated from a co-cultivated pathogen rather than the plant itself (dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11). Historical literature and database annotations may also refer to GSTF11 as GSTF6, making locus-based verification essential to avoid confusion with other GST genes (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17).
GSTF11 catalyzes or facilitates glutathione (GSH) conjugation reactions, in which the tripeptide glutathione (γ-Glu-Cys-Gly) is covalently attached to electrophilic compounds (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8). This conjugation represents a fundamental detoxification mechanism and plays a central role in specialized plant metabolism. The enzymatic reaction follows the general scheme:
GSH + electrophilic substrate → GS-conjugate
Notably, recombinant AtGSTF11 expressed in Escherichia coli demonstrated highest catalytic activity with benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) as substrate (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4). BITC is a pathogen-triggered derivative of glucosinolates that exhibits toxicity toward arthropods, nematodes, and fungi, underscoring GSTF11's role in both glucosinolate metabolism and defense compound detoxification (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4).
The most extensively documented function of GSTF11 is its involvement in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17). Glucosinolates are sulfur-rich secondary metabolites characteristic of the Brassicaceae family, serving crucial roles in plant defense against pathogens and herbivores. Recent research (2024) has established that glutathione serves as the sulfur donor in glucosinolate biosynthesis, with GST-mediated conjugation representing a critical biosynthetic step (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8).
The proposed mechanism proceeds as follows:
However, it is important to note that the precise catalytic role of GSTF11 remains incompletely resolved. A 2024 review emphasized that overexpression of AtGSTF11 and AtGSTU20 did not significantly increase glucosinolate production, and that the relevant GS-conjugate intermediates can form spontaneously without obligate enzyme catalysis (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8). This observation, combined with substantial functional redundancy among phi-class GSTs, suggests that GSTF11 may enhance reaction rates or substrate specificity rather than serving as an indispensable catalyst.
GSTF11 is localized to the cytosol, consistent with its role in processing cytosolic glucosinolate pathway intermediates (dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 6-8). Green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion studies demonstrated that phi-class GSTs, including members of the GSTF family, accumulate predominantly in the cytosol, with possible low-level nuclear fluorescence attributable to passive diffusion (dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 6-8, dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 9-10). This cytosolic localization aligns with the established subcellular compartmentation of glucosinolate biosynthetic enzymes and the cytosolic activity of GGP1 and GGP3, which process the GS-conjugates generated by GSTF11 and related GSTs (geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 1-2, geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 4-5).
It should be noted that in one comprehensive enzymatic survey, GSTF11 was among the GSTs that proved insoluble or undetectable in the recombinant expression system, which complicated direct functional characterization (dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 4-5). Therefore, while cytosolic localization is well-supported by class-level evidence and pathway logic, it represents a strong inference rather than a GSTF11-specific experimental demonstration.
The primary biological function of GSTF11 centers on specialized sulfur metabolism through aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17). Glucosinolates serve as both constitutive and inducible defense compounds; upon tissue damage or pathogen attack, myrosinase enzymes hydrolyze glucosinolates to generate reactive isothiocyanates, nitriles, and other breakdown products that possess antimicrobial and deterrent properties (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4).
GSTF11's demonstrated activity with BITC suggests a dual role: facilitating glucosinolate biosynthesis while simultaneously detoxifying the toxic isothiocyanates produced during pathogen responses or tissue damage (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4, mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 1-2). This detoxification function is essential because isothiocyanates, while serving as defense compounds against external threats, can also induce oxidative stress, chlorophyll loss, and glutathione depletion in plant cells themselves (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4).
Heterologous expression studies in Brassica napus provide evidence for GSTF11's role in stress tolerance, though these findings must be interpreted cautiously as they do not constitute direct loss-of-function evidence for the native Arabidopsis gene:
Pathogen Defense: Transgenic B. napus plants expressing AtGSTF11 showed enhanced resistance to powdery mildew (Erysiphe cruciferarum), with 84% of wild-type plants severely infected compared to only 23% of transgenic plants (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 9-12, mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 1-2). The resistance correlated with altered glutathione metabolism: infected transgenic plants maintained higher oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels and a lower GSH:GSSG ratio, interpreted as evidence of more efficient neutralization of toxic molecules (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 9-12, mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 1-2).
Cold Stress: GSTF11 expression increased in transgenic plants exposed to temperatures as low as -8°C, and transgenic plants exhibited greater survival and continued flowering under field conditions (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 9-12). This cold-responsive induction suggests a protective role under low-temperature stress.
Drought: In contrast, GSTF11 did not confer measurable drought tolerance, with transgenic and wild-type plants showing similar wilting responses and no significant changes in GSTF11 transcript levels following water deprivation (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 9-12).
Transcriptomic analyses reveal that GSTF11 exhibits relatively low basal expression and is weakly responsive to most abiotic stresses compared to other serine-containing GSTs (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 13-14). Expression is highest in roots, with considerably lower levels in leaves and other aerial tissues (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 13-14, sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 11-12). In AtGenExpress stress datasets, GSTF11 clustered with GSTU20 in a group characterized by minimal fold-change across diverse stress treatments, including temperature extremes, osmotic stress, and salinity (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 13-14).
This expression pattern suggests that GSTF11 functions primarily in constitutive or developmentally regulated processes rather than as a broadly inducible stress-response gene. The preferential root expression may reflect the tissue-specific requirements for glucosinolate biosynthesis or the detoxification of soil-derived xenobiotics.
While no experimental three-dimensional structure of GSTF11 has been determined, the protein is expected to conform to the canonical architecture of soluble phi-class GSTs based on structural homology:
N-terminal domain: Contains a thioredoxin-like fold (topology β1-α1-β2-α2-β3-β4-α3) housing the glutathione-binding G-site (poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 30-36, vaish2020glutathionestransferasea pages 10-12, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 5-5, sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 8-9)
C-terminal domain: Predominantly α-helical structure (typically α4-α9) forming the hydrophobic substrate-binding H-site (poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 30-36, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 5-5)
Quaternary structure: Homodimeric organization with each monomer contributing an independent active site (poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 30-36, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 5-5)
The active site is positioned in a cleft between the N- and C-terminal domains, with the G-site exhibiting high selectivity for glutathione or γ-glutamyl peptides, while the adjacent H-site accommodates diverse electrophilic substrates (dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 5-5).
Most phi-class GSTs employ an N-terminal serine residue (typically position 12-13) as the catalytic residue. This serine activates the glutathione thiol through hydrogen bonding, facilitating deprotonation to generate the reactive thiolate anion required for nucleophilic attack on electrophilic substrates (poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 30-36, poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 49-53, sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 8-9).
Importantly, AtGSTF11 is specifically cited as one of the phi-class isoforms that LACKS the conserved catalytic serine, alongside PtGSTF8 and AtGSTF12/TT19 (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5). This structural deviation suggests alternative catalytic mechanisms or non-catalytic functions. In vitro studies have demonstrated that the serine residue is not strictly required for GSH-conjugation activity, indicating mechanistic flexibility within the phi-class family (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5). The functional implications of this serine absence in GSTF11 remain to be fully elucidated but may relate to altered substrate preferences, reduced catalytic efficiency, or enhanced ligandin (non-catalytic binding) properties.
Phi-class GSTs typically form stable homodimers through hydrophobic "lock-and-key" interactions, in which aromatic residues (phenylalanine or tyrosine) from the α2-β3 loop of one protomer insert into a hydrophobic pocket between helices α4 and α5 of the partner subunit (lallement2014thestillmysterious pages 13-15). Additional stabilization arises from salt bridges and hydrogen bonds at the dimer interface (poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 49-53).
Phi-class GSTs are predominantly plant-specific and likely arose in association with the colonization of terrestrial environments (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5, vaish2020glutathionestransferasea pages 1-2). Phylogenetic analyses indicate that GSTFs occur in all examined terrestrial vascular and non-vascular plants but are absent from green algae (chlorophytes), suggesting functions linked to the physiological and chemical challenges of life on land (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5). However, recent genomic surveys have also detected GSTF-like sequences in bacteria, fungi, and protists, indicating a more complex evolutionary history than strict plant specificity would suggest (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 3-4, sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 3-4).
The phi-class has undergone extensive lineage-specific gene expansion through tandem and segmental duplications (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5, vaish2020glutathionestransferasea pages 1-2, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 2-3). GSTF copy number varies dramatically among plant genomes, ranging from one gene in Selaginella moellendorffii to 29 in Aquilegia coerulea (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5). In Arabidopsis, several phi-class genes occur in tandem arrays (GSTF9-GSTF10 on chromosome 2; GSTF4-GSTF7 on chromosome 1), while GSTF11 is among the seven singleton genes distributed across the genome (dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11).
This pattern of duplication and divergence has facilitated functional diversification, enabling phi-class GSTs to participate in diverse processes including herbicide detoxification, secondary metabolism, oxidative stress responses, and hormone signaling (vaish2020glutathionestransferasea pages 1-2, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 1-3).
The substantial expansion and sequence similarity of phi-class GSTs has resulted in considerable functional redundancy, which has complicated genetic and biochemical characterization (dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11). Single-gene knockouts often produce minimal or no phenotypes, and co-silencing of multiple family members may be required to reveal biological functions (dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11). This redundancy likely explains why GSTF11 overexpression did not dramatically enhance glucosinolate accumulation, as other family members can compensate for or overlap with its activity (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9).
Glucosinolate biosynthesis is tightly coordinated with primary sulfur metabolism. Glutathione, serving as the sulfur donor for GSTF11-mediated conjugation, is synthesized from cysteine via the sulfate assimilation pathway (geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 1-2, geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 2-4). Under sulfur limitation, plants reallocate sulfur from glucosinolates to essential metabolites such as cysteine and glutathione, demonstrating the regulatory integration of GSTF11's glucosinolate biosynthetic function within whole-plant sulfur homeostasis (geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 1-2, geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 5-7).
GSTF11 functions as part of a sequential enzymatic cascade:
Loss-of-function studies in ggp1 ggp3 double mutants demonstrated accumulation of up to 10 glucosinolate-related GS-conjugates and altered glucosinolate profiles, confirming the essential role of sequential GS-conjugate processing and establishing glutathione as the direct sulfur donor (geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 1-2, geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 5-7, geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 7-8).
The functional annotation of GSTF11 reflects varying levels of evidence strength:
High confidence:
- Identity as a phi-class glutathione S-transferase (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11)
- Involvement in aliphatic glucosinolate-related metabolism (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17)
- Activity with benzyl isothiocyanate substrate (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4)
Moderate confidence:
- Cytosolic localization (inferred from family-level studies) (dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 6-8)
- Role in processing aldoxime-derived intermediates (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8)
Suggestive but not definitive:
- Unique catalytic requirement for specific glucosinolate biosynthetic steps (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8)
- Direct involvement in pathogen defense (based on heterologous expression) (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 9-12, mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 1-2)
Several critical questions remain unresolved:
Catalytic mechanism in the absence of the conserved serine: How does GSTF11 activate glutathione and catalyze conjugation without the canonical serine residue? (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5)
Substrate specificity in vivo: What are the endogenous physiological substrates beyond BITC, and does GSTF11 exhibit selectivity among different glucosinolate precursors?
Functional distinction from paralogs: What unique roles, if any, distinguish GSTF11 from other phi-class GSTs such as GSTF9, GSTF10, and GSTU20? (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9)
Enzymatic versus spontaneous conjugation: To what extent is GSTF11 catalytically essential versus serving as an enhancer or regulator of spontaneous glutathionylation reactions? (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8)
Loss-of-function phenotypes: Does single or combinatorial knockout of GSTF11 produce measurable phenotypes in glucosinolate profiles, stress responses, or development?
| Property | Evidence-based summary |
|---|---|
| Gene ID | GSTF11 / AtGSTF11, ordered locus At3g03190, from Arabidopsis thaliana; UniProt Q96324. Historical literature and database records may also use GSTF6, so locus/accession matching is essential to avoid confusion with other GST genes (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17). |
| Protein classification | Soluble phi-class glutathione transferase (GSTF) in the GST superfamily. Arabidopsis has 13 authentic phi-class genes, GSTF2–GSTF14 (dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 1-3). |
| Molecular function / enzymatic activity | Catalyzes or facilitates glutathione (GSH) conjugation to electrophilic compounds. In glucosinolate metabolism, GSTF11 is a candidate catalyst for formation of sulfur-containing GS-conjugate intermediates, but its exact endogenous reaction has not been definitively assigned because relevant conjugates can also form spontaneously and GST redundancy is substantial (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8). |
| Substrate specificity | Recombinant AtGSTF11 was reported to be most active with benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) among substrates tested, supporting an ability to detoxify reactive glucosinolate-breakdown products. A unique physiological substrate and quantitative preference among native aliphatic glucosinolate precursors remain unresolved (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4). |
| Subcellular localization | Most Arabidopsis GSTFs examined as GFP fusions were predominantly cytosolic, consistent with cytosolic glucosinolate-conjugate processing; weak nuclear fluorescence can result from passive diffusion. However, GSTF11 itself was insoluble or undetectable in one recombinant survey, so its localization should be regarded as a strong class/pathway-based inference rather than an unambiguous GSTF11-specific localization result (dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 6-8, dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 4-5, dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 9-10). |
| Role in metabolic pathways | Implicated chiefly in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. The proposed step is GSH addition to a CYP83-generated reactive aldoxime derivative, yielding a GS-conjugate/GS-thiohydroximate-related intermediate and supplying reduced sulfur. Cytosolic GGP1/GGP3 subsequently remove the γ-glutamyl group, after which further processing leads toward the glucosinolate core (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8, geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 1-2, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 9-10). |
| Biological processes | Most defensible role: specialized sulfur metabolism and chemical defense through glucosinolate production and metabolism of reactive isothiocyanates. A direct role in Arabidopsis anthocyanin transport is not established; that function belongs more securely to GSTF12/TT19 and related GSTFs (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17). |
| Stress responses | Heterologous expression in Brassica napus was associated with less severe powdery mildew infection, altered glutathione redox status, and responses to cold, but not improved drought tolerance. These findings support biotechnological potential yet do not constitute direct loss-of-function evidence for endogenous Arabidopsis GSTF11 (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 4-9, mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 9-12, mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 1-2). |
| Expression pattern | Transcriptomic synthesis indicates comparatively stronger expression in roots than aerial developmental samples and relatively weak fold-change across broad abiotic-stress datasets. Thus, GSTF11 does not behave as a universally strong stress-inducible GST in Arabidopsis (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 13-14, sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 11-12). |
| Structural features | Expected to share the canonical soluble GST architecture: an N-terminal thioredoxin-like G-site that binds GSH, a predominantly α-helical C-terminal H-site that binds hydrophobic/electrophilic substrates, and usually a homodimeric organization. Unlike most GSTFs, AtGSTF11 reportedly lacks the normally conserved N-terminal catalytic serine; no GSTF11-specific experimental three-dimensional structure was identified, so detailed residue assignments from other GSTFs should not be transferred directly (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5, lallement2014thestillmysterious pages 13-15, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 5-5, sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 8-9). |
| Evolutionary classification | GSTFs occur broadly in terrestrial plants and underwent extensive lineage-specific duplication and functional diversification. GSTF copy number varies markedly among plant genomes; Arabidopsis GSTF11 is one of seven phi-class singletons rather than a member of the prominent GSTF4–GSTF7 or GSTF9–GSTF10 tandem clusters (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 3-4). |
| Overall annotation confidence | High for identity and phi-GST family membership; moderate for cytosolic placement and BITC-conjugating activity; suggestive rather than definitive for a unique catalytic role in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. A 2024 expert review emphasized that GSTF11 overexpression did not significantly raise glucosinolate production and that spontaneous conjugation, paralog redundancy, and rapid intermediate turnover complicate assignment (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8). |
Table: Evidence-weighted summary of AtGSTF11 identity, catalytic activity, localization, pathway involvement, expression, stress biology, structure, and evolution. Qualifications distinguish direct GSTF11 evidence from phi-family inference and heterologous-expression results.
GSTF11 (AtGSTF11, At3g03190, UniProt Q96324) is a phi-class glutathione S-transferase from Arabidopsis thaliana that participates in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis by facilitating glutathione conjugation to activated aldoxime intermediates (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8). The enzyme operates in the cytosol, where it works sequentially with cytochrome P450 enzymes and gamma-glutamyl peptidases to incorporate reduced sulfur from glutathione into the glucosinolate structure (dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 6-8, geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 1-2, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 9-10, geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 2-4). Recombinant GSTF11 exhibits highest activity with benzyl isothiocyanate, a toxic glucosinolate breakdown product, supporting dual roles in biosynthesis and detoxification (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4). Heterologous expression studies suggest contributions to pathogen defense and cold stress tolerance, though these findings await validation through native loss-of-function analyses (mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 9-12, mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 1-2). Structurally, GSTF11 is predicted to adopt the canonical dimeric GST fold but notably lacks the conserved N-terminal catalytic serine characteristic of most phi-class enzymes, implying alternative catalytic mechanisms or enhanced non-catalytic functions (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5, poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 30-36, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 5-5). Phylogenetically, phi-class GSTs are predominantly plant-specific proteins that arose with terrestrial plant evolution and diversified extensively through lineage-specific gene duplications (sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5, vaish2020glutathionestransferasea pages 1-2, dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11). The precise catalytic role and substrate specificity of GSTF11 remain incompletely resolved, as recent research emphasizes substantial functional redundancy among phi-class paralogs and the capacity for spontaneous GS-conjugate formation (micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9, micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8).
References
(sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 16-17): Elodie Sylvestre-Gonon, Simon R. Law, Mathieu Schwartz, Kevin Robe, Olivier Keech, Claude Didierjean, Christian Dubos, Nicolas Rouhier, and Arnaud Hecker. Functional, structural and biochemical features of plant serinyl-glutathione transferases. Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00608, doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00608. This article has 126 citations.
(vaish2020glutathionestransferasea pages 1-2): Swati Vaish, Divya Gupta, Rajesh Mehrotra, Sandhya Mehrotra, and Mahesh Kumar Basantani. Glutathione s-transferase: a versatile protein family. 3 Biotech, 10:1-19, Jun 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02312-3, doi:10.1007/s13205-020-02312-3. This article has 196 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 3-4): Nikola Micic, Asta Holmelund Rønager, Mette Sørensen, and Nanna Bjarnholt. Overlooked and misunderstood: can glutathione conjugates be clues to understanding plant glutathione transferases? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0365, doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0365. This article has 25 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 10-11): David P. Dixon and Robert Edwards. Glutathione transferases. The Arabidopsis Book, 2010:e0131, Jan 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0131, doi:10.1199/tab.0131. This article has 355 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 8-9): Nikola Micic, Asta Holmelund Rønager, Mette Sørensen, and Nanna Bjarnholt. Overlooked and misunderstood: can glutathione conjugates be clues to understanding plant glutathione transferases? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0365, doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0365. This article has 25 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 7-8): Nikola Micic, Asta Holmelund Rønager, Mette Sørensen, and Nanna Bjarnholt. Overlooked and misunderstood: can glutathione conjugates be clues to understanding plant glutathione transferases? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0365, doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0365. This article has 25 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 2-4): Elena Mikhaylova, Emil Khusnutdinov, Michael Yu Shein, Valentin Yu Alekseev, Yuri Nikonorov, and Bulat Kuluev. The role of the gstf11 gene in resistance to powdery mildew infection and cold stress. Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122729, doi:10.3390/plants10122729. This article has 17 citations.
(geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 1-2): Fernando Geu-Flores, Morten Emil Møldrup, Christoph Böttcher, Carl Erik Olsen, Dierk Scheel, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Cytosolic γ-glutamyl peptidases process glutathione conjugates in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates and camalexin in arabidopsis. Jun 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083998, doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083998. This article has 173 citations.
(micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 9-10): Nikola Micic, Asta Holmelund Rønager, Mette Sørensen, and Nanna Bjarnholt. Overlooked and misunderstood: can glutathione conjugates be clues to understanding plant glutathione transferases? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0365, doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0365. This article has 25 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 2-4): Fernando Geu-Flores, Morten Emil Møldrup, Christoph Böttcher, Carl Erik Olsen, Dierk Scheel, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Cytosolic γ-glutamyl peptidases process glutathione conjugates in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates and camalexin in arabidopsis. Jun 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083998, doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083998. This article has 173 citations.
(geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 5-7): Fernando Geu-Flores, Morten Emil Møldrup, Christoph Böttcher, Carl Erik Olsen, Dierk Scheel, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Cytosolic γ-glutamyl peptidases process glutathione conjugates in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates and camalexin in arabidopsis. Jun 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083998, doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083998. This article has 173 citations.
(dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 6-8): David P. Dixon, Timothy Hawkins, Patrick J. Hussey, and Robert Edwards. Enzyme activities and subcellular localization of members of the arabidopsis glutathione transferase superfamily. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60:1207-1218, Jan 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern365, doi:10.1093/jxb/ern365. This article has 359 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 9-10): David P. Dixon, Timothy Hawkins, Patrick J. Hussey, and Robert Edwards. Enzyme activities and subcellular localization of members of the arabidopsis glutathione transferase superfamily. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60:1207-1218, Jan 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern365, doi:10.1093/jxb/ern365. This article has 359 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 4-5): Fernando Geu-Flores, Morten Emil Møldrup, Christoph Böttcher, Carl Erik Olsen, Dierk Scheel, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Cytosolic γ-glutamyl peptidases process glutathione conjugates in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates and camalexin in arabidopsis. Jun 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083998, doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083998. This article has 173 citations.
(dixon2009enzymeactivitiesand pages 4-5): David P. Dixon, Timothy Hawkins, Patrick J. Hussey, and Robert Edwards. Enzyme activities and subcellular localization of members of the arabidopsis glutathione transferase superfamily. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60:1207-1218, Jan 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern365, doi:10.1093/jxb/ern365. This article has 359 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 1-2): Elena Mikhaylova, Emil Khusnutdinov, Michael Yu Shein, Valentin Yu Alekseev, Yuri Nikonorov, and Bulat Kuluev. The role of the gstf11 gene in resistance to powdery mildew infection and cold stress. Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122729, doi:10.3390/plants10122729. This article has 17 citations.
(mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 9-12): Elena Mikhaylova, Emil Khusnutdinov, Michael Yu Shein, Valentin Yu Alekseev, Yuri Nikonorov, and Bulat Kuluev. The role of the gstf11 gene in resistance to powdery mildew infection and cold stress. Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122729, doi:10.3390/plants10122729. This article has 17 citations.
(sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 13-14): Elodie Sylvestre-Gonon, Simon R. Law, Mathieu Schwartz, Kevin Robe, Olivier Keech, Claude Didierjean, Christian Dubos, Nicolas Rouhier, and Arnaud Hecker. Functional, structural and biochemical features of plant serinyl-glutathione transferases. Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00608, doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00608. This article has 126 citations.
(sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 11-12): Elodie Sylvestre-Gonon, Simon R. Law, Mathieu Schwartz, Kevin Robe, Olivier Keech, Claude Didierjean, Christian Dubos, Nicolas Rouhier, and Arnaud Hecker. Functional, structural and biochemical features of plant serinyl-glutathione transferases. Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00608, doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00608. This article has 126 citations.
(poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 30-36): N Poudel. Structural studies of glutathione transferases towards the development of novel applications and drug design. Unknown journal, Unknown year.
(vaish2020glutathionestransferasea pages 10-12): Swati Vaish, Divya Gupta, Rajesh Mehrotra, Sandhya Mehrotra, and Mahesh Kumar Basantani. Glutathione s-transferase: a versatile protein family. 3 Biotech, 10:1-19, Jun 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02312-3, doi:10.1007/s13205-020-02312-3. This article has 196 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 5-5): David P. Dixon and Robert Edwards. Glutathione transferases. The Arabidopsis Book, 2010:e0131, Jan 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0131, doi:10.1199/tab.0131. This article has 355 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 8-9): Elodie Sylvestre-Gonon, Simon R. Law, Mathieu Schwartz, Kevin Robe, Olivier Keech, Claude Didierjean, Christian Dubos, Nicolas Rouhier, and Arnaud Hecker. Functional, structural and biochemical features of plant serinyl-glutathione transferases. Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00608, doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00608. This article has 126 citations.
(poudelUnknownyearstructuralstudiesof pages 49-53): N Poudel. Structural studies of glutathione transferases towards the development of novel applications and drug design. Unknown journal, Unknown year.
(sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 4-5): Elodie Sylvestre-Gonon, Simon R. Law, Mathieu Schwartz, Kevin Robe, Olivier Keech, Claude Didierjean, Christian Dubos, Nicolas Rouhier, and Arnaud Hecker. Functional, structural and biochemical features of plant serinyl-glutathione transferases. Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00608, doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00608. This article has 126 citations.
(lallement2014thestillmysterious pages 13-15): Pierre-Alexandre Lallement, Bastiaan Brouwer, Olivier Keech, Arnaud Hecker, and Nicolas Rouhier. The still mysterious roles of cysteine-containing glutathione transferases in plants. Frontiers in Pharmacology, Aug 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2014.00192, doi:10.3389/fphar.2014.00192. This article has 158 citations.
(sylvestregonon2019functionalstructuraland pages 3-4): Elodie Sylvestre-Gonon, Simon R. Law, Mathieu Schwartz, Kevin Robe, Olivier Keech, Claude Didierjean, Christian Dubos, Nicolas Rouhier, and Arnaud Hecker. Functional, structural and biochemical features of plant serinyl-glutathione transferases. Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00608, doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00608. This article has 126 citations.
(micic2024overlookedandmisunderstood pages 2-3): Nikola Micic, Asta Holmelund Rønager, Mette Sørensen, and Nanna Bjarnholt. Overlooked and misunderstood: can glutathione conjugates be clues to understanding plant glutathione transferases? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0365, doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0365. This article has 25 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(dixon2010glutathionetransferases pages 1-3): David P. Dixon and Robert Edwards. Glutathione transferases. The Arabidopsis Book, 2010:e0131, Jan 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0131, doi:10.1199/tab.0131. This article has 355 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 8-10): Fernando Geu-Flores, Morten Emil Møldrup, Christoph Böttcher, Carl Erik Olsen, Dierk Scheel, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Cytosolic γ-glutamyl peptidases process glutathione conjugates in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates and camalexin in arabidopsis. Jun 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083998, doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083998. This article has 173 citations.
(geuflores2011cytosolicγglutamylpeptidases pages 7-8): Fernando Geu-Flores, Morten Emil Møldrup, Christoph Böttcher, Carl Erik Olsen, Dierk Scheel, and Barbara Ann Halkier. Cytosolic γ-glutamyl peptidases process glutathione conjugates in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates and camalexin in arabidopsis. Jun 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083998, doi:10.1105/tpc.111.083998. This article has 173 citations.
(mikhaylova2021theroleof pages 4-9): Elena Mikhaylova, Emil Khusnutdinov, Michael Yu Shein, Valentin Yu Alekseev, Yuri Nikonorov, and Bulat Kuluev. The role of the gstf11 gene in resistance to powdery mildew infection and cold stress. Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122729, doi:10.3390/plants10122729. This article has 17 citations.