Functional annotation of *snai2* in *Xenopus laevis* Falcon Edison Scientific Literature 56 citations 2 artifacts 2026-10-01T23:51:24.414364

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Functional annotation of snai2 in Xenopus laevis

Identity and principal function

The protein specified here by UniProt Q91924 is Xenopus laevis Snai2, historically called Slug, XSlug, or slug-alpha. It is not Snai1/Snail: Xenopus studies examine Snail and Slug as distinct, related genes and place Snail earlier in the neural-crest regulatory cascade. The supplied UniProt designation is consistent with the literature’s Snail-family zinc-finger transcriptional repressor. A genomic comparison found two expressed X. laevis Slug pseudoalleles whose predicted proteins have five identical zinc fingers; the available papers do not independently establish which pseudoallele corresponds to accession Q91924. Consequently, conclusions from experiments described simply as “XSlug” should not automatically be assigned to one pseudoallele. (zhang2006annfκband pages 1-2, aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 1-2, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-7, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 3-3)

Primary molecular role: Snai2 is a sequence-directed transcriptional repressor that helps establish and maintain a viable, appropriately migratory neural-crest population. Its C-terminal C2H2 zinc fingers provide DNA-recognition capacity, while its N-terminal SNAG region participates in assembling a repression complex. It is neither an enzyme with a catalytic substrate nor a membrane transporter. Snail-family factors recognize E-box-related DNA sequences; experimentally characterized mammalian Snai2 recognizes E2-boxes including CAGGTG/CACCTG, but the complete target-site specificity of X. laevis Q91924 has not been established by equivalent protein–DNA experiments. In Xenopus embryos, a fusion of the Slug zinc-finger region to an alternative Engrailed repression domain rescues loss of Slug-dependent neural-crest development, whereas the zinc-finger region alone does not. This is particularly persuasive evidence that DNA targeting coupled to repression, rather than zinc-finger binding alone, is central to its developmental activity. (zhang2006annfκband pages 1-2, langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 5-6, villarejo2014differentialroleof pages 1-2)

Where it acts

At the tissue level, slug/snai2 RNA is detectable after snai1 during gastrulation—approximately stage 12.5 in the examined Xenopus embryos—and is present in the presumptive cranial neural crest at the neural-plate border. Analyses distinguishing the two X. laevis pseudoalleles found overlapping expression in presumptive cephalic neural-crest territory at stage 14. Their promoter reporters were active at the neural-plate border, most strongly in cranial crest around stage 19, and remained detectable, more weakly, in migrating cells entering the branchial arches at stage 25. Early zygotic Slug RNA has also been reported in dorsal mesendoderm, consistent with functional effects on mesodermal markers. These are principally RNA-expression and promoter-reporter observations, not measurements of endogenous Slug protein abundance. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 3-3, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 4-6, zhang2006annfκband pages 1-2, aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 2-3)

At the subcellular level, its DNA-directed repression and interaction with nuclear corepressor machinery place the functional transcription-factor activity in the nucleus; it should not be annotated as secreted or as a cell-surface receptor. Nuclear Snail–Ajuba association and promoter recruitment were directly demonstrated in cultured cells, alongside Xenopus genetic evidence that related Ajuba proteins support XSlug function. Those experiments do not, however, amount to direct immunolocalization of endogenous X. laevis Q91924. Thus nuclear function is strongly supported mechanistically, while the precise endogenous nuclear-versus-cytoplasmic distribution of this particular protein remains less directly documented. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 2-4, langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 5-6, langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 1-2, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 3-3)

Mechanism and developmental pathways

Wnt input into snai2. Canonical Wnt signaling acts upstream of Slug transcription through LEF/β-catenin. In a promoter study using X. laevis embryos, purified LEF1 bound a Slug-promoter fragment, β-catenin joined the DNA-bound complex, and deletion of eight bases from the LEF site reduced promoter-driven GFP RNA to approximately basal reporter levels. This establishes a specific cis-regulatory Wnt connection; it does not mean that LEF’s site in the snai2 promoter is itself a DNA target bound by Snai2 protein. Promoter-region cooperation indicates that the LEF element alone does not account for the complete neural-crest-specific expression pattern. Current neural-plate-border models additionally incorporate BMP and FGF signaling and factors such as Pax3/Zic1, but their individual connections to Slug should not be given the same direct-promoter evidentiary status as LEF/β-catenin. Vallin et al., Journal of Biological Chemistry, August 2001, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103167200; Esmaeli et al., International Journal of Developmental Biology, July 2024, https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.230231me. Visual evidence: the original study’s cropped Figure 7 shows the DNA-binding assays and loss of reporter activity after LEF-site deletion. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-7, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-8, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization media d6d9b910, esmaeli2024molecularsignalingdirecting pages 4-5)

Repression and corepressors. Xenopus XSlug requires Ajuba-family LIM proteins XLIMD1 and XWTIP for its neural-crest-promoting activity. Depleting either cofactor diminishes crest-marker expression; excess cofactor cannot expand neural crest when XSlug is depleted; and XSlug overexpression does not restore expansion when the cofactors are depleted. The Engrailed–Slug zinc-finger fusion bypasses the cofactor-depletion defect, supporting a model in which these proteins enable Snail-family transcriptional repression, rather than acting only by increasing Slug expression. Biochemical interaction through SNAG and recruitment of Ajuba to an E-cadherin promoter were established largely in mammalian cultured cells; these results strengthen the mechanism but should not be recast as chromatin-occupancy proof for a particular endogenous X. laevis Slug target. Langer et al., Developmental Cell, March 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 2-4, langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 4-5, langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 5-6, langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 6-9)

Specification, movement, and survival. Gain-of-function and dominant-negative experiments place Snail upstream of Slug and implicate both in neural-crest specification and migration. In one migration assay, Slug overexpression increased the population of Slug-positive migrating crest cells in 77% of embryos (47 examined). These assays show developmental causality but do not isolate a direct Slug-regulated migration gene. Separately, XSlug depletion increases apoptosis and disrupts mesodermal and neural-crest-related markers. Anti-apoptotic Bcl-xL suppresses the apoptosis phenotype and restores expression of affected markers: Sox9 expression was unaffected in 26/35 rescued embryos and Xbra in 26/32. RelA/NF-κB activity is implicated in a feedback circuit that promotes Slug/Snail expression, while Slug supports NF-κB-responsive output. Zhang et al. classified downregulation of pro-apoptotic caspase-9 RNA as a direct Slug regulatory response using inducible-factor/protein-synthesis-dependence logic; they did not establish direct binding of Q91924 to a mapped caspase-9 promoter by ChIP or binding-site mutagenesis. The Bcl-xL rescue supports a substantial survival component to developmental phenotypes, not proof that every loss of a crest marker reflects a primary specification defect. Aybar et al., Development, February 2003, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00238; Zhang et al., PLoS ONE, December 2006, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106. (aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 7-8, zhang2006annfκband pages 7-9, zhang2006annfκband pages 4-5, zhang2006annfκband pages 5-7, zhang2006annfκband pages 9-10, zhang2006annfκband pages 2-3)

Timing by protein turnover. The Xenopus F-box protein Ppa recognizes Snail-family proteins, including Slug, as part of ubiquitin–proteasome-dependent control of their abundance. This offers a mechanism for restricting the timing of neural-crest epithelial-to-mesenchymal changes even when snai2 RNA is present. The 2011 paper’s new interaction and degradation experiments focus mainly on other EMT regulators and cite earlier Slug-specific Ppa work; they should not be described as newly demonstrating every Slug-specific phenotype. Lander et al., Journal of Cell Biology, July 2011, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201012085. (lander2011thefboxprotein pages 2-4, lander2011thefboxprotein pages 1-2, lander2011thefboxprotein pages 4-6)

A qualification to the conventional “Slug removes E-cadherin to permit movement” model is important in this species. Mammalian promoter experiments support E-cadherin repression by Snail-family proteins, but an independent X. laevis study found that migrating cranial crest cells retain E-cadherin, alongside other cadherins. E-cadherin depletion impaired their migration and protrusions, and other tested classical cadherins did not replace it. That study did not perturb Slug directly; rather, it shows why Slug-associated crest migration cannot be equated with complete E-cadherin elimination in Xenopus. Huang et al., Developmental Biology, March 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.007. (huang2016ecadherinisrequired pages 1-2, huang2016ecadherinisrequired pages 4-6)

Recent results and research applications, 2023–2024

A 2023 X. laevis Adam11-knockdown study found expanded Slug/Snai2-positive neural-crest territory, alongside Sox8/Sox9 changes and increased canonical Wnt readouts. This adds an upstream context in which Snai2 expression responds to altered signaling; it does not quantify an intrinsic Snai2 biochemical activity or show that Snai2 mediates all Adam11 effects. Pandey et al., Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, September 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178. (pandey2023adam11anovel pages 4-6, pandey2023adam11anovel pages 6-10)

In a practical 2024 Xenopus animal-cap differentiation protocol, BMP-receptor inhibition with K02288 plus Wnt-pathway activation with CHIR99021 induced snai2 expression in 82/82 stage-17 explants, versus 0/59 vehicle controls. Treatment also raised β-catenin approximately two- to threefold and lowered phospho-SMAD1/5/8 by more than 80% at the measured stages. Thus snai2 serves as a robust readout for induced neural-crest identity in an experimentally useful model; these data alone do not test whether Snai2 is necessary for reprogramming. Huber and LaBonne, Developmental Biology, January 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.10.004. (huber2024smallmoleculemediatedreprogramming pages 3-4)

A separate 2024 comparative analysis reported increasing Xenopus snai2 expression from blastula to later neural-crest stages and showed that perturbing Pou5f3, an upstream regulator, changes snai2 expression. It is evidence for the emerging regulatory context, not a 2024 Snai2 loss-of-function study. York et al., Nature Ecology & Evolution, July 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02476-8. Moreover, a frequently cited later-stage snai2:eGFP reporter and Wnt-dependent re-expression study used X. tropicalis, not X. laevis; its differentiating-crest observations are informative comparative evidence, not direct localization or functional proof for Q91924. Li et al., Scientific Reports, August 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47665-9. (york2024sharedfeaturesof pages 4-6, york2024sharedfeaturesof pages 6-7, li2019anewtransgenic pages 1-2)

The following summary distinguishes direct functional results from gene-expression readouts and cross-species mechanistic inference. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 5-6, huber2024smallmoleculemediatedreprogramming pages 3-4, pandey2023adam11anovel pages 4-6)

Feature Strongest X. laevis evidence and limits Representative peer-reviewed publication
Identity and domain architecture Two X. laevis Slug/snai2 pseudoalleles show similar expression; their proteins have five identical zinc fingers. This supports the supplied Q91924 family assignment but does not independently map Q91924 to a specific pseudoallele. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-7, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 3-3) Vallin et al., J. Biol. Chem. (2001), 10.1074/jbc.M103167200
Upstream Wnt control Lef-1 bound a conserved site in the Slug/snai2 promoter; β-catenin formed a ternary complex, and deleting 8 bp from the site reduced reporter expression to near-background. This is an upstream element controlling snai2, not a downstream DNA target bound by Snai2 protein. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-7, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization media d6d9b910) Vallin et al., J. Biol. Chem. (2001), 10.1074/jbc.M103167200
Repressor mechanism and Ajuba cofactors Depleting XLIMD1/WTIP blocked XSlug-dependent neural-crest development; an Engrailed repression domain fused to Slug zinc fingers rescued the defect, whereas zinc fingers alone did not. Embryo genetics strongly supports repression, but direct XSlug occupancy of an endogenous X. laevis target promoter was not shown. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 5-6, langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 6-9) Langer et al., Developmental Cell (2008), 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005
Survival and NF-κB/Bcl-xL circuit Slug depletion increased apoptosis; Bcl-xL rescued TUNEL and developmental-marker defects, with Sox9 rescued in 26/35 embryos and Xbra in 26/32. NF-κB perturbations support a feedback circuit. Caspase-9 was called a direct Slug target using protein-synthesis-dependence criteria, but promoter binding or site mutagenesis was not demonstrated. (zhang2006annfκband pages 7-9, zhang2006annfκband pages 4-5, zhang2006annfκband pages 2-3) Zhang et al., PLoS ONE (2006), 10.1371/journal.pone.0000106
Recent upstream modulation Adam11 knockdown expanded the Slug/Snai2-positive territory together with Sox8/Sox9 and increased canonical Wnt readouts. Snai2 was principally an expression marker; the study did not perturb Snai2 or quantify a Snai2-specific fold change. (pandey2023adam11anovel pages 4-6, pandey2023adam11anovel pages 6-10) Pandey et al., Front. Cell Dev. Biol. (2023), 10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178
Current experimental application BMP inhibition plus Wnt activation induced endogenous snai2 in 82/82 blastula explants versus 0/59 vehicle controls; β-catenin rose 2–3-fold and pSMAD1/5/8 fell by >80%. This validates snai2 as a neural-crest-state readout, not as proof of Snai2 necessity. (huber2024smallmoleculemediatedreprogramming pages 3-4) Huber & LaBonne, Developmental Biology (2024), 10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.10.004

Table: Species-specific evidence supporting the identity, regulation, repressor activity, survival function, and current experimental use of Xenopus laevis Slug/Snai2. The table separates direct mechanistic findings from marker-based or inferential evidence.

Annotation conclusion: The best-supported assignment for X. laevis Q91924 is a nucleus-acting Snail-family, C2H2 zinc-finger transcriptional repressor within the Wnt-responsive neural-crest gene-regulatory network. Xenopus perturbation experiments support roles in crest development, appropriately timed migration-related behavior, and cell survival; direct repression of specific endogenous Xenopus promoters and endogenous protein-level localization are less completely resolved than its developmental function. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 5-6, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-7, zhang2006annfκband pages 2-3, vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 3-3)

References

  1. (zhang2006annfκband pages 1-2): Chi Zhang, Timothy F. Carl, Evan D. Trudeau, Thomas Simmet, and Michael W. Klymkowsky. An nf-κb and slug regulatory loop active in early vertebrate mesoderm. PLoS ONE, 1:e106, Dec 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000106. This article has 63 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 1-2): Manuel J. Aybar, M. Angela Nieto, and Roberto Mayor. Snail precedes slug in the genetic cascade required for the specification and migration of the xenopus neural crest. Development, 130:483-494, Feb 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00238, doi:10.1242/dev.00238. This article has 303 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  3. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-7): Jérôme Vallin, Raphaël Thuret, Emiliana Giacomello, Marisa M. Faraldo, Jean P. Thiery, and Florence Broders. Cloning and characterization of threexenopus slug promoters reveal direct regulation by lef/β-catenin signaling*. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276:30350-30358, Aug 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m103167200, doi:10.1074/jbc.m103167200. This article has 214 citations.

  4. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 3-3): Jérôme Vallin, Raphaël Thuret, Emiliana Giacomello, Marisa M. Faraldo, Jean P. Thiery, and Florence Broders. Cloning and characterization of threexenopus slug promoters reveal direct regulation by lef/β-catenin signaling*. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276:30350-30358, Aug 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m103167200, doi:10.1074/jbc.m103167200. This article has 214 citations.

  5. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 5-6): Ellen M. Langer, Yunfeng Feng, Hou Zhaoyuan, Frank J. Rauscher, Kristen L. Kroll, and Gregory D. Longmore. Ajuba lim proteins are snail/slug corepressors required for neural crest development in xenopus. Developmental cell, 14 3:424-36, Mar 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005, doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005. This article has 146 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (villarejo2014differentialroleof pages 1-2): Ana Villarejo, Álvaro Cortés-Cabrera, Patricia Molina-Ortíz, Francisco Portillo, and Amparo Cano. Differential role of snail1 and snail2 zinc fingers in e-cadherin repression and epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289:930-941, Jan 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m113.528026, doi:10.1074/jbc.m113.528026. This article has 216 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 4-6): Jérôme Vallin, Raphaël Thuret, Emiliana Giacomello, Marisa M. Faraldo, Jean P. Thiery, and Florence Broders. Cloning and characterization of threexenopus slug promoters reveal direct regulation by lef/β-catenin signaling*. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276:30350-30358, Aug 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m103167200, doi:10.1074/jbc.m103167200. This article has 214 citations.

  8. (aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 2-3): Manuel J. Aybar, M. Angela Nieto, and Roberto Mayor. Snail precedes slug in the genetic cascade required for the specification and migration of the xenopus neural crest. Development, 130:483-494, Feb 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00238, doi:10.1242/dev.00238. This article has 303 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 2-4): Ellen M. Langer, Yunfeng Feng, Hou Zhaoyuan, Frank J. Rauscher, Kristen L. Kroll, and Gregory D. Longmore. Ajuba lim proteins are snail/slug corepressors required for neural crest development in xenopus. Developmental cell, 14 3:424-36, Mar 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005, doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005. This article has 146 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 1-2): Ellen M. Langer, Yunfeng Feng, Hou Zhaoyuan, Frank J. Rauscher, Kristen L. Kroll, and Gregory D. Longmore. Ajuba lim proteins are snail/slug corepressors required for neural crest development in xenopus. Developmental cell, 14 3:424-36, Mar 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005, doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005. This article has 146 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  11. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-8): Jérôme Vallin, Raphaël Thuret, Emiliana Giacomello, Marisa M. Faraldo, Jean P. Thiery, and Florence Broders. Cloning and characterization of threexenopus slug promoters reveal direct regulation by lef/β-catenin signaling*. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276:30350-30358, Aug 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m103167200, doi:10.1074/jbc.m103167200. This article has 214 citations.

  12. (vallin2001cloningandcharacterization media d6d9b910): Jérôme Vallin, Raphaël Thuret, Emiliana Giacomello, Marisa M. Faraldo, Jean P. Thiery, and Florence Broders. Cloning and characterization of threexenopus slug promoters reveal direct regulation by lef/β-catenin signaling*. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276:30350-30358, Aug 2001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m103167200, doi:10.1074/jbc.m103167200. This article has 214 citations.

  13. (esmaeli2024molecularsignalingdirecting pages 4-5): Mojtaba Esmaeli, Mahdi Barazesh, Zeinab Karimi, Shiva Roshankhah, and Ali Ghanbari. Molecular signaling directing neural plate border formation. The International journal of developmental biology, 68 2:65-78, Jul 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.230231me, doi:10.1387/ijdb.230231me. This article has 10 citations.

  14. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 4-5): Ellen M. Langer, Yunfeng Feng, Hou Zhaoyuan, Frank J. Rauscher, Kristen L. Kroll, and Gregory D. Longmore. Ajuba lim proteins are snail/slug corepressors required for neural crest development in xenopus. Developmental cell, 14 3:424-36, Mar 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005, doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005. This article has 146 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  15. (langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 6-9): Ellen M. Langer, Yunfeng Feng, Hou Zhaoyuan, Frank J. Rauscher, Kristen L. Kroll, and Gregory D. Longmore. Ajuba lim proteins are snail/slug corepressors required for neural crest development in xenopus. Developmental cell, 14 3:424-36, Mar 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005, doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005. This article has 146 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  16. (aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 7-8): Manuel J. Aybar, M. Angela Nieto, and Roberto Mayor. Snail precedes slug in the genetic cascade required for the specification and migration of the xenopus neural crest. Development, 130:483-494, Feb 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00238, doi:10.1242/dev.00238. This article has 303 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

  17. (zhang2006annfκband pages 7-9): Chi Zhang, Timothy F. Carl, Evan D. Trudeau, Thomas Simmet, and Michael W. Klymkowsky. An nf-κb and slug regulatory loop active in early vertebrate mesoderm. PLoS ONE, 1:e106, Dec 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000106. This article has 63 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  18. (zhang2006annfκband pages 4-5): Chi Zhang, Timothy F. Carl, Evan D. Trudeau, Thomas Simmet, and Michael W. Klymkowsky. An nf-κb and slug regulatory loop active in early vertebrate mesoderm. PLoS ONE, 1:e106, Dec 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000106. This article has 63 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  19. (zhang2006annfκband pages 5-7): Chi Zhang, Timothy F. Carl, Evan D. Trudeau, Thomas Simmet, and Michael W. Klymkowsky. An nf-κb and slug regulatory loop active in early vertebrate mesoderm. PLoS ONE, 1:e106, Dec 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000106. This article has 63 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  20. (zhang2006annfκband pages 9-10): Chi Zhang, Timothy F. Carl, Evan D. Trudeau, Thomas Simmet, and Michael W. Klymkowsky. An nf-κb and slug regulatory loop active in early vertebrate mesoderm. PLoS ONE, 1:e106, Dec 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000106. This article has 63 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  21. (zhang2006annfκband pages 2-3): Chi Zhang, Timothy F. Carl, Evan D. Trudeau, Thomas Simmet, and Michael W. Klymkowsky. An nf-κb and slug regulatory loop active in early vertebrate mesoderm. PLoS ONE, 1:e106, Dec 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000106. This article has 63 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  22. (lander2011thefboxprotein pages 2-4): Rachel Lander, Kara Nordin, and Carole LaBonne. The f-box protein ppa is a common regulator of core emt factors twist, snail, slug, and sip1. The Journal of Cell Biology, 194:17-25, Jul 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201012085, doi:10.1083/jcb.201012085. This article has 172 citations.

  23. (lander2011thefboxprotein pages 1-2): Rachel Lander, Kara Nordin, and Carole LaBonne. The f-box protein ppa is a common regulator of core emt factors twist, snail, slug, and sip1. The Journal of Cell Biology, 194:17-25, Jul 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201012085, doi:10.1083/jcb.201012085. This article has 172 citations.

  24. (lander2011thefboxprotein pages 4-6): Rachel Lander, Kara Nordin, and Carole LaBonne. The f-box protein ppa is a common regulator of core emt factors twist, snail, slug, and sip1. The Journal of Cell Biology, 194:17-25, Jul 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201012085, doi:10.1083/jcb.201012085. This article has 172 citations.

  25. (huang2016ecadherinisrequired pages 1-2): Chaolie Huang, Marie-Claire Kratzer, Doris Wedlich, and Jubin Kashef. E-cadherin is required for cranial neural crest migration in xenopus laevis. Developmental biology, 411 2:159-171, Mar 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.007, doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.007. This article has 72 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  26. (huang2016ecadherinisrequired pages 4-6): Chaolie Huang, Marie-Claire Kratzer, Doris Wedlich, and Jubin Kashef. E-cadherin is required for cranial neural crest migration in xenopus laevis. Developmental biology, 411 2:159-171, Mar 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.007, doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.007. This article has 72 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  27. (pandey2023adam11anovel pages 4-6): Ankit Pandey, Hélène Cousin, Brett Horr, and Dominique Alfandari. Adam11 a novel regulator of wnt and bmp4 signaling in neural crest and cancer. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Sep 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178, doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178. This article has 12 citations.

  28. (pandey2023adam11anovel pages 6-10): Ankit Pandey, Hélène Cousin, Brett Horr, and Dominique Alfandari. Adam11 a novel regulator of wnt and bmp4 signaling in neural crest and cancer. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Sep 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178, doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178. This article has 12 citations.

  29. (huber2024smallmoleculemediatedreprogramming pages 3-4): Paul B. Huber and Carole LaBonne. Small molecule-mediated reprogramming of xenopus blastula stem cells to a neural crest state. Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.10.004, doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.10.004. This article has 10 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  30. (york2024sharedfeaturesof pages 4-6): Joshua R. York, Anjali Rao, Paul B. Huber, Elizabeth N. Schock, Andrew Montequin, Sara Rigney, and Carole LaBonne. Shared features of blastula and neural crest stem cells evolved at the base of vertebrates. Nature ecology & evolution, 8:1680-1692, Jul 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02476-8, doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02476-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  31. (york2024sharedfeaturesof pages 6-7): Joshua R. York, Anjali Rao, Paul B. Huber, Elizabeth N. Schock, Andrew Montequin, Sara Rigney, and Carole LaBonne. Shared features of blastula and neural crest stem cells evolved at the base of vertebrates. Nature ecology & evolution, 8:1680-1692, Jul 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02476-8, doi:10.1038/s41559-024-02476-8. This article has 15 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  32. (li2019anewtransgenic pages 1-2): Jiejing Li, Mark Perfetto, Christopher Materna, Rebecca Li, Hong Thi Tran, Kris Vleminckx, Melinda K. Duncan, and Shuo Wei. A new transgenic reporter line reveals wnt-dependent snai2 re-expression and cranial neural crest differentiation in xenopus. Scientific Reports, Aug 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47665-9, doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47665-9. This article has 27 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

Citations

  1. huber2024smallmoleculemediatedreprogramming pages 3-4
  2. aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 1-2
  3. vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-7
  4. vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 3-3
  5. langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 5-6
  6. villarejo2014differentialroleof pages 1-2
  7. vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 4-6
  8. aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 2-3
  9. langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 2-4
  10. langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 1-2
  11. vallin2001cloningandcharacterization pages 7-8
  12. esmaeli2024molecularsignalingdirecting pages 4-5
  13. langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 4-5
  14. langer2008ajubalimproteins pages 6-9
  15. aybar2003snailprecedesslug pages 7-8
  16. lander2011thefboxprotein pages 2-4
  17. lander2011thefboxprotein pages 1-2
  18. lander2011thefboxprotein pages 4-6
  19. huang2016ecadherinisrequired pages 1-2
  20. huang2016ecadherinisrequired pages 4-6
  21. york2024sharedfeaturesof pages 4-6
  22. york2024sharedfeaturesof pages 6-7
  23. li2019anewtransgenic pages 1-2
  24. 10.1074/jbc.M103167200
  25. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005
  26. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000106
  27. 10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178
  28. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.10.004
  29. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103167200;
  30. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.230231me.
  31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005.
  32. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00238;
  33. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106.
  34. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201012085.
  35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.007.
  36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178.
  37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.10.004.
  38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02476-8.
  39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47665-9.
  40. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103167200
  41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005
  42. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106
  43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178
  44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.10.004
  45. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000106,
  46. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00238,
  47. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m103167200,
  48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2008.01.005,
  49. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m113.528026,
  50. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.230231me,
  51. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201012085,
  52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.007,
  53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1271178,
  54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.10.004,
  55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02476-8,
  56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47665-9,