ccoP1 (PA1552, Q9I3G5) review notes

Review session 2026-11-05 (PseudoCAP IBA-seed protocol, tier 2)

Fetched with just fetch-gene PSEAE Q9I3G5 --alias ccoP1 (symbol fetch hit
UniProt rate limits). Accession Q9I3G5 matches the worklist (rank 324).
Unreviewed TrEMBL entry, 318 aa. Reviewed together with ccoP2 (Q9I3G2), the
other seed of the same PAINT node. No deep-research provider was used; PubMed
searches returned API errors on 2026-11-05, so only the PseudoCAP-cited paper
was read (abstract only).

Identity

Literature

Clade check (cached PAINT IBD/leaf GAF, 2026-11-05)

PseudoCAP IBA-seed assessment

PTN node node term n_seeds leaf IBAs seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) verdict rationale other seeds IBD stands without this seed?
PTN002435498 GO:0004129 cytochrome-c oxidase activity 2 32 (12 taxa) GO:0004129, IMP, PMID:14763990 (PseudoCAP) OVER-SPECIFIC The cbb3-1 operon is needed for cbb3-1 oxidase activity, and CcoP1 is a subunit of that enzyme, so it contributes to the activity. But CcoP is the electron-entry diheme cytochrome c, not the catalytic subunit, and the same IMP was applied to all eight subunits of both operons; the right qualifier is contributes_to. PSEUDOCAP WRONG_QUALIFIER (PROBABLE). ccoP2 Q9I3G2 only (same paper, same issue) No. Both seeds are PseudoCAP subunit rows from one operon-level paper, and the node is a broad c-type cytochrome clade (cytochromes c4/c552/c554, bc1 QcrC, PvcD) for which COX activity is wrong. GO_CENTRAL WRONG_TERM (REPOINT to GO:0009055, CONFIRMED from the leaf list) filed here once; ccoP2 cross-references it.

Defects filed here: PSEUDOCAP WRONG_QUALIFIER (PROBABLE) on the IMP row;
GO_CENTRAL WRONG_TERM (CONFIRMED) for PTN002435498 on the IBA row. The node
defect is recorded only here (cbb3-1 is the isoform with the growth phenotype
in the paper); genes/PSEAE/ccoP2/ccoP2-notes.md points here.

Decisions summary