xcpQ (PA3105, P35818) review notes

Review session 2026-10-28 (PseudoCAP IBA-seed protocol)

Fetched with just fetch-gene PSEAE xcpQ; accession P35818 matches the worklist entry
(rank 52, PA3105, reviewed Swiss-Prot entry GSPD_PSEAE). No deep-research provider key was
available, so these notes are manual, from the cached publications, the UniProt record and
the cached PAINT table interpro/panther/PTHR30332/PTHR30332-paint.tsv.

What XcpQ is

PseudoCAP row details

PAINT node context

interpro/panther/PTHR30332/PTHR30332-paint.tsv shows the family carries two IBD-bearing nodes:
PTN000768388 (T2SS: GO:0015627 seeded by P35818/Q9I2M7/Q9I5P0, GO:0015628 sole-seeded by
P35818) and PTN009110345 (T3SS: GO:0030257 seeded by P35672, GO:0030254 sole-seeded by pscC
Q9I319), with an IRD at PTN009110348 removing the T3SS terms in a plant-associated subclade.
The family therefore keeps the T2SS and T3SS secretin assertions on separate nodes, which is the
right shape: a shared "bacterial secretin" node would propagate T2SS terms onto T3SS members.

PseudoCAP IBA-seed assessment

PTN node node term n_seeds leaf IBAs seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) verdict rationale
PTN000768388 GO:0015627 type II protein secretion system complex 3 (not sole) 23 (13 taxa) GO:0015627, IDA, PMID:9466268 SOUND XcpQ is the GspD secretin of the Xcp T2SS, purified as a ring-forming homomultimer (PMID:9466268) and resolved as a pentadecameric secretin complex by cryo-EM (PMID:29042496). The node is the GspD-specific subnode of PTHR30332 (the T3SS secretins sit on PTN009110345), so a T2SS-complex term fits the clade.
PTN000768388 GO:0015628 protein secretion by the type II secretion system 1 (sole seed) 23 (13 taxa) GO:0015628, IDA, PMID:9818381 SOUND (term); evidence code WRONG (cited paper is a review with no original secretion data; full text checked) The claim is correct — XcpQ is the outer-membrane conduit of the Xcp T2SS and its deletion abolishes export of the Xcp substrates (UniProt disruption phenotype from PMID:29042493). But PMID:9818381 is a review, so IDA cannot stand; the IBD conclusion is unaffected and the seed should be re-keyed rather than the node dropped. Same defect as the xcpX seed on the identical reference.
PTN001251149 GO:0009306 protein secretion 2 (not sole) 0 GO:0015628, IDA, PMID:9818381 SOUND (term) The general node carries no leaf IBAs, so nothing propagates; the parent term is true of XcpQ. The same wrong evidence code applies to the underlying row.

Open questions