SRP40 (YKR092C, P32583) — curation notes

Autonomous AI review journal. Provenance recorded inline as [PMID:xxxx "verbatim quote"]
or [file:...]. SRP40 is an understudied ("dark") S. cerevisiae nucleolar protein.

Identity and basic facts

• UniProt P32583, SRP40_YEAST; SGD S000001800; systematic name YKR092C; ORF YKR412A.
• 406 aa, 41 kDa, acidic pI ~3.9, ~49% serine.
• RecName in UniProt is a historical misnomer: "Suppressor protein SRP40" — named as a
  weak suppressor of a mutant of the AC40 subunit shared by RNA polymerases I and III
  (Lalo, Carles, Sentenac, Thuriaux 1993, PMID:8516295, the naming paper). UniProt FUNCTION
  line: "Not known; weak suppressor of a mutant of the subunit AC40 of DNA dependent RNA
  polymerase I and III." SRP40 here = "Suppressor of RNA Polymerase, 40 kDa", NOT signal
  recognition particle.

Domain / sequence architecture (inline bioinformatic reasoning from the UniProt record)

• The protein is almost entirely intrinsically disordered: UniProt annotates
  REGION 1..335 /note="Disordered" (MobiDB-lite), i.e. the N-terminal ~82% of the protein.
• The disordered region is dominated by serine-rich low-complexity tracts interspersed
  with acidic (Asp/Glu) and basic (Lys/Arg) charge clusters — multiple COMPBIAS
  features "Low complexity" and "Basic and acidic residues". The raw sequence shows long
  runs of SSSSSSSSS... and DSDSDSDS... (serine/aspartate repeats). This is the classic
  Nopp140/Treacle-type acidic-serine-rich (poly-S / SR-like, CK2-substrate) architecture,
  not a folded catalytic domain.
• The only recognizable folded module is the C-terminal SRP40_C domain
  (Pfam PF05022, InterPro IPR007718), roughly the last ~70 aa. This is the region that is
  59% identical to the C-terminus of rat Nopp140 PMID:8702624. No enzymatic motif is present; this
  domain family has no assigned catalytic activity.
• Interpretation: the sequence is consistent with a scaffold / chaperone / RNP-assembly
  factor that works through disordered, highly-phosphorylatable acidic-serine tracts plus a
  conserved C-terminal interaction module — NOT with a specific enzymatic molecular function.
  A specific biochemical activity cannot be assigned from sequence.

Post-translational modification

• Extensively phosphorylated by casein kinase II (CK2), like Nopp140, but to a much
  lesser degree than the vertebrate protein PMID:8702624.
• Multiple mapped phosphosites (large-scale MS): pSer133, pThr289, pSer293, pSer394
  (UniProt MOD_RES; PMID:17287358, 17330950, 18407956, 19779198). Cdk1 substrate
  (PMID:19779198).
• Unusual serine pyrophosphorylation by the inositol pyrophosphate 5-IP7
  (5-diphosphoinositol pentakisphosphate): a Mg2+-dependent, enzyme-independent transfer of
  a β-phosphate onto a pre-phosphorylated serine (UniProt PTM; PMID:15604408, PMID:17873058).
  This is a PTM of the protein, not a molecular function of the protein.

What is KNOWN (evidence-supported)

1. Nucleolar localization. SRP40 localizes to the yeast nucleolus
   PMID:8702624; GOA IDA C:nucleolus from
   PMID:8702624, assigned by SGD. Also nucleolus ISS/IBA. SGD C = nucleolus.
2. Yeast homolog of rat Nopp140. Immunologically and structurally related; C-terminus
   59% identical [PMID:8702624 "identifies the yeast SRP40 gene product as immunologically
   and structurally related to rat Nopp140"; "bona fide yeast Nopp140 homolog"]. Rat Nopp140
   functionally complements loss of SRP40 PMID:12700234.
3. Proposed snoRNP chaperone / role in ribosome biogenesis. Srp40p is "proposed to
   function as a chaperone for over 100 small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein particles that are
   required for rRNA maturation" PMID:12700234. Depletion of SRP40 (in the srp40Δ shm2 ade3
   synthetic-lethal background) specifically depletes box H/ACA snoRNAs
   PMID:12700234. This links SRP40 to box H/ACA snoRNP stability, i.e. the
   pseudouridylation snoRNP branch of ribosome biogenesis.
4. Dosage-sensitive, nonessential. Deletion is viable; SRP40 is "required at a specific
   cellular concentration for optimal growth as indicated by the negative effect on cell
   growth of both overexpression and deletion of its gene" PMID:8702624. "Srp40p is a
   nonessential yeast nucleolar protein" PMID:12700234. SGD: viable; overexpression
   decreases growth rate. Extensive genetic interaction network (SGD ~284 genes).
5. Historically a weak suppressor of the RNA Pol I/III AC40 (rpc40) mutant — the origin
   of the gene name PMID:8516295; a genetic, not mechanistic, observation.

The Nopp140 shuttling / NLS-binding "chaperone in ribosome biogenesis" model is a property
established for rat Nopp140 PMID:8702624. It is
the basis of the SRP40 ISS annotation to nucleocytoplasmic transport (transferred from the
mammalian ortholog P41777), but the shuttling / NLS-binding activity has NOT been directly
demonstrated for yeast Srp40p itself — the 1996 paper notes yeast/vertebrate disparities in
nucleolar dynamics.

What is NOT known (the gap)

• No specific molecular function has been experimentally assigned. UniProt FUNCTION =
  "Not known"; SGD MF = "molecular_function" (ND, GO:0003674); the protein is disordered with
  no catalytic motif. Whether Srp40p acts as an RNA chaperone, a snoRNP-assembly scaffold, a
  phosphoprotein hub, or a charge-based crowding/condensate component is undetermined.
• The precise step in ribosome biogenesis is undefined. SRP40 is linked to box H/ACA
  snoRNP stability genetically (in a sensitized srp40Δ shm2 ade3 background), but its direct
  molecular role (which snoRNP components it binds, whether it acts on assembly, stability,
  transport, or recycling) is not established. The chaperone-of-snoRNPs role is stated as a
  proposal PMID:12700234.
• Redundancy / dosage biology unexplained. Nonessential yet dosage-sensitive in both
  directions; the buffering partner(s) that make it dispensable, and the reason overexpression
  is toxic, are unknown.
• Nucleocytoplasmic transport role not directly shown in yeast. The shuttling/NLS-binding
  activity is a Nopp140 (rat) property transferred by ISS; not directly demonstrated for
  yeast Srp40p.

Annotation-by-annotation plan (GOA, 6 rows)

1. GO:0005730 nucleolus IBA (is_active_in, GO_REF:0000033) — ACCEPT. Consistent with IDA;
   phylogenetically robust (Nopp140 family is nucleolar).
2. GO:0005654 nucleoplasm IBA (is_active_in, GO_REF:0000033) — KEEP_AS_NON_CORE. Plausible
   phylogenetic transfer (Nopp140/Treacle family members are nucleoplasmic/coiled-body too),
   but the direct yeast evidence is for nucleolus; keep, non-core, secondary location.
3. GO:0005730 nucleolus IEA (located_in, GO_REF:0000117 ARBA) — ACCEPT (redundant with IDA;
   electronic confirmation of the well-supported nucleolar localization).
4. GO:0003674 molecular_function ND (enables, GO_REF:0000015) — ACCEPT. Honest "no data"
   root MF annotation; correctly reflects that no specific MF is known. This is the honest
   dark-gene MF state; do not fabricate an MF term.
5. GO:0005730 nucleolus IDA (located_in, PMID:8702624) — ACCEPT. Core; primary experimental
   localization.
6. GO:0006913 nucleocytoplasmic transport ISS (involved_in, PMID:8702624, from
   UniProtKB:P41777 = rat Nopp140) — KEEP_AS_NON_CORE (lean) / consider MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED.
   Rationale: the transport/shuttling role is a rat-Nopp140 property transferred by similarity;
   not directly demonstrated in yeast. It is not wrong on family grounds, but it is peripheral
   and unverified in S. cerevisiae. Keep as non-core with a clear caveat rather than REMOVE
   (ISS from a curator-selected ortholog; per guidelines do not REMOVE on paralog/ortholog
   grounds). The core supportable role is nucleolar snoRNP-chaperone/ribosome-biogenesis, not
   the transport aspect. NOTE: ribosome biogenesis (GO:0042254) is a better-supported BP for
   this gene but is not in GOA; capture it via core_functions + proposed reasoning, and note
   the snoRNP/box H/ACA link from PMID:12700234.

core_functions plan

• Nucleolar localization (CC): GO:0005730 nucleolus — strongly supported (IDA).
• Ribosome-biogenesis / snoRNP-associated role (BP): the best-supported functional statement
  is participation in ribosome biogenesis via box H/ACA snoRNP chaperoning (GO:0042254
  ribosome biogenesis; PMID:12700234). No specific MF term is assignable — leave MF dark and
  document in knowledge_gaps. Avoid protein binding.

References to add

• PMID:8702624 (Meier 1996) — HIGH, VERIFIED (abstract-only; primary yeast localization +
  homology).
• PMID:12700234 (Yang & Meier 2003) — HIGH, VERIFIED (abstract-only; snoRNP-chaperone
  proposal, box H/ACA link, Nopp140 complementation).
• PMID:8516295 (Lalo et al. 1993) — MEDIUM, VERIFIED (gene-naming / AC40 suppressor origin).
• GO_REF:0000015, GO_REF:0000033, GO_REF:0000117 — annotation-method refs.

2026-09-29 IBA re-review

GOA traces both SRP40 IBA rows, GO:0005730 nucleolus and GO:0005654
nucleoplasm, to PANTHER:PTN001144152. SRP40 has no DR PANTHER line in the
UniProt cache, and neither P32583 nor human NOLC1 Q14978 appears in any current
local interpro/panther/*-entries.csv, so the family assignment is asserted
from external GOA/PAINT knowledge rather than corroborable here.

The actions stayed unchanged, but the node is not stale: the cached upstream
PANTHER IBD.gaf still places the 2020 GO:0005654 IBD and the 2025 GO:0005730
IBD at PTN001144152. Nucleolus remains ACCEPT and NO_FAILURE_CORE because
the PAINT placement is concordant with direct yeast IDA evidence from Meier 1996
PMID:8702624. Nucleoplasm remains
KEEP_AS_NON_CORE and NO_FAILURE_NON_CORE: it is plausible from the
Nopp140-family shuttling context, but direct yeast evidence only establishes
Srp40p's nucleolar localization.

PubMed/web searches for newer SRP40/Nopp140-family papers found Zhang et al.
2024, an abstract-only Srp40p/isobutanol strain-engineering paper; because that
work tests srp40 overexpression in engineered W303-1A derivatives, it was added
as a low-relevance direct SRP40 reference but did not support a new native yeast
GO assertion. The search also found Meznad et al. 2026, a mammalian Nopp140
study that demonstrates phosphorylation-dependent multivalent contacts with
snoRNP-core IDRs and the RNA polymerase I-associated factor PAF49
PMID:41298079. The paper reinforces the family model for IDR/charge-driven snoRNP concentration, but it is not yeast-specific and did not justify a new yeast GO assertion.

2026-10-01 current GOA refresh

Refreshing current GOA backfilled exact WITH/FROM values on the two
PANTHER:PTN001144152 IBA rows, the ARBA nucleolus row, and the rat-Nopp140
ISS row for nucleocytoplasmic transport. All six current GOA rows now match
live reviewed rows, and the single GO:0042254 ribosome biogenesis NEW
proposal remains an intentional non-GOA row.

The PAINT decisions themselves did not change: GO:0005730 nucleolus remains
the core direct and inherited Srp40p location, while GO:0005654 nucleoplasm
remains a plausible non-core Nopp140-family localization. I reduced each
propagation_review.source_entities list to the single ancestral source node,
PANTHER:PTN001144152, leaving the extant mouse, rat, worm, yeast, fly, and
human PAINT evidence only in GOA's supporting_entities.

After Claude review I also tightened the GO:0005654 rationale to avoid treating
the shorter GOA WITH/FROM list as a measure of weaker IBA support. The IBA stands
or falls on the PAINT node placement at PTN001144152; the reason we keep
nucleoplasm as non-core is simply that the direct yeast Srp40p localization is
nucleolar only. Local panther.obo does contain SRP40-named PANTHER families, so
the remaining local-cache caveat is narrower: panther-members.tsv does not map
P32583 or human NOLC1 Q14978 to a family slice we can inspect here.

The 2024-2026 PubMed refresh did not find a newer direct S. cerevisiae SRP40
functional paper than the Zhang et al. 2024 isobutanol overexpression study,
and the 2026 mammalian Nopp140 IDR-condensate paper remains useful family
context rather than direct yeast evidence.

2026-10-05 post-merge review follow-up

Post-merge Claude review caught that the intentional GO:0042254 ribosome biogenesis NEW proposal was encoded as IGI without WITH interactors. Because
the supporting claim is the SRP40-depletion phenotype - box H/ACA snoRNAs are
destabilized after SRP40 loss - rather than a curated interaction with SHM2 or
ADE3, the row now uses IMP, matching the RRB1 GO:0042254 comparator for a
similar chaperone-depletion phenotype.

ND literature-search citations (2026-11-06)

• existing_annotations[3], GO:0003674 molecular_function (ND, GO_REF:0000015), ACCEPT: the ND may be stale. SRP40-deep-research-falcon.md cites yeast work (Verheggen et al. 2001, on box C/D snoRNA trafficking to the nucleolar body) reporting that snoRNAs interact with Srp40p in the nucleolar body, and a textbook source (Nierhaus 2004) for Srp40p associating with both snoRNP classes and with the largest subunit of RNA polymerase I. Those reports may identify a binding or snoRNP-chaperone molecular function for this gene product in S. cerevisiae. The primary papers are not cached, so a curator should check whether any of them supports an MF annotation. The review action was left unchanged.