The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
The target protein is Silent information regulator 3 (Sir3) from budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain S288c, encoded by SIR3/YLR442C (UniProt P06701). The literature synthesized here explicitly concerns S. cerevisiae Sir3 and its role in Sir2/3/4-dependent transcriptional silencing (yeast heterochromatin) at the silent mating-type loci and telomeres, and matches the domain logic implied by UniProt (BAH domain; Orc1/Cdc6-like relationship; AAA-like region). (buchberger2008sir3nucleosomeinteractionsin pages 1-2, connelly2006structureandfunction pages 1-2, currie2024thebahdomain pages 1-4)
In S. cerevisiae, “silent chromatin” (often treated as a heterochromatin analog) is a highly stable transcriptionally repressed state classically found at HML/HMR (silent mating-type loci) and subtelomeres, assembled by the SIR complex. A recent review emphasizes that silencing is not simply static occlusion; rather, it is probabilistic and dynamic, where silencers increase Sir protein residence time and domain formation reflects many weak, cooperative interactions that bias chromatin configurations toward repression. (dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 1-2, dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 2-4)
Across classic biochemistry and structural work, Sir3 is the principal nucleosome-binding/structural subunit of the Sir2/3/4 complex. It binds chromatin via its conserved N-terminal BAH (bromo-adjacent homology) domain, and it oligomerizes and participates in spreading/compaction through additional conserved regions, including a C-terminal AAA-like domain (lacking canonical ATPase activity). (onishi2007roleofthe pages 1-2, buchberger2008sir3nucleosomeinteractionsin pages 1-2, currie2024thebahdomain pages 1-4)
BAH domain as a nucleosome reader. Sir3 contains an N-terminal BAH domain that directly binds nucleosomes and is sensitive to histone modification state, a key aspect of how silent chromatin is specified. (currie2024thebahdomain pages 4-8, currie2024thebahdomain pages 1-4)
Structural basis. A landmark structure solved a 3.0 Å crystal structure of the Sir3 BAH domain bound to the nucleosome, showing that Sir3 BAH forms extensive contacts primarily with histones (not DNA), including the H4 N-terminal tail and the H3/H4 LRS surface; critically, the structure orders and implicates residues such as H4K16 and H3K79, whose modification state regulates silencing. (armache2011structuralbasisof pages 1-3, armache2011structuralbasisof pages 3-4)
Visual evidence of this interaction and contact mapping is available in the original figure crops. (armache2011structuralbasisof media 2905dd00, armache2011structuralbasisof media b38d5437, armache2011structuralbasisof media faf51ee3)
A widely used mechanistic model is an iterative “read–write” logic in which Sir2 deacetylates histone H4K16, creating binding-competent nucleosomes; Sir3 preferentially recognizes deacetylated H4K16 nucleosomes and, together with Sir4-mediated assemblies, supports cooperative binding and cis-spreading of the silent domain outward from silencers. (yuan2024minimalrequirementsfor pages 1-2)
Using sensitive reporters, Fouet & Rine (2023) quantified that Sir-dependent repression at HML/HMR can reach roughly ~10^4-fold but is not absolute: transient silencing failures at HML occurred at about ~10⁻³ per generation in their CRASH assay framework. (fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 1-2)
Importantly, escapes can be gene-specific within a silenced locus: silencing-loss at an HML α2 reporter was reported to be ~10-fold higher than at α1, consistent with the observation that α2 is more highly expressed than α1 when unsilenced (e.g., ~8-fold difference in one construct; smaller in RT-qPCR). (fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 12-13, fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 1-2)
A 2023 study used Nanopore-MetID (in vivo methylation footprinting read out by nanopore sequencing) to map Sir3 chromatin contacts beyond what ChIP-seq typically detects. It reported:
The same work emphasized that Sir3 binding and turnover are highly dynamic during nutrient transitions: after release from growth arrest, Sir3 exchange and degradation rise sharply, and Sir3 bound at subtelomeric/HM loci is largely replaced by newly synthesized Sir3 by the end of the first cell cycle after release. (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 24-26, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 22-24)
Functionally, reduced Sir3 supply caused large silencing defects: silencing was reported 15–30× less efficient after release and 200–500× less efficient in mid-log in a Sir3 hypomorph compared with WT. (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 24-26)
Dhillon & Kamakaka (2024) synthesize an updated picture of silencing as a stochastic, non-equilibrium process in which silencers chiefly work by increasing local Sir concentration and residence time, and robustness is produced by domain-wide cooperativity/avidity while individual components remain dynamic. (dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 1-2, dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 2-4)
Two 2024 PNAS studies highlight how the field is converging on quantitative/constructive models:
Sir3-mediated silencing remains a major experimental system for:
These are “real-world” implementations in molecular genetics and synthetic/quantitative epigenetics because the yeast SIR system is experimentally tractable and can be re-engineered, including transplantation of heterochromatin-like feedback designs into yeast. (yuan2024minimalrequirementsfor pages 1-2)
Recent work illustrates how Sir3 supports development and validation of mapping assays:
A key expert synthesis (Dhillon & Kamakaka 2024) argues that silencers primarily increase Sir residence time and local concentration, while the output is probabilistic because regulatory DNA can transiently become accessible (nucleosome breathing, transient TF binding). In this view, Sir proteins shift the distribution of chromatin configurations toward repressed states, and silencing robustness emerges from sub-optimized, distributed cooperativity rather than a single dominant step. (dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 1-2, dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 2-4)
A structural and mechanistic synthesis (Currie et al. 2024) frames the Sir3 BAH domain as a histone/nucleosome reader whose binding is impaired by H4K16 acetylation and H3K79 methylation, connecting “epigenetic marks” to a concrete binding interface. (currie2024thebahdomain pages 4-8, currie2024thebahdomain pages 1-4)
Key recent quantitative observations for Sir3 and Sir-mediated silencing include:
A consolidated table of mechanistic points and quantitative findings is provided below.
| Topic | Key finding (with numbers where available) | System/assay | Source (author year, venue) | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target identity and core function | SIR3/P06701 in S. cerevisiae is the structural, nucleosome-binding silencing subunit of the Sir2/3/4 complex; it contains an N-terminal BAH domain and a C-terminal AAA-like region implicated in chromatin interactions and oligomerization (buchberger2008sir3nucleosomeinteractionsin pages 1-2, currie2024thebahdomain pages 1-4) | Genetics/biochemistry/structural synthesis | Currie et al. 2024, Chromatin Readers in Health and Disease; Buchberger et al. 2008, MCB | https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823376-4.00006-9 ; https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01210-08 |
| BAH–nucleosome structure | Sir3 BAH was solved bound to the nucleosome at 3.0 Å; two Sir3 BAH domains bind one nucleosome (one per face) and make extensive contacts with all four core histones (armache2011structuralbasisof pages 1-3, armache2011structuralbasisof pages 3-4) | X-ray crystallography of Sir3 BAH–nucleosome complex | Armache et al. 2011, Science | https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210915 |
| Histone-mark sensitivity | The Sir3 BAH domain binds the H4 tail and contacts the H3/H4 LRS region; silencing-relevant residues H4K16 and H3K79 are directly implicated, and H4K16 acetylation/H3K79 methylation impair Sir3 association with nucleosomes (armache2011structuralbasisof pages 1-3, currie2024thebahdomain pages 4-8, armache2011structuralbasisof pages 3-4) | Structural biology plus biochemical/genetic synthesis | Armache et al. 2011, Science; Currie et al. 2024, book chapter | https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210915 ; https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823376-4.00006-9 |
| Canonical read–write logic of spreading | Sir2 deacetylates H4K16; Sir3 recognizes deacetylated H4K16-containing nucleosomes; Sir3 dimers, linked through Sir4 dimers, support cooperative binding to paired nucleosomes and cis-spreading of silent chromatin from silencers (yuan2024minimalrequirementsfor pages 1-2) | Mechanistic synthesis/engineered silent chromatin design | Yuan & Moazed 2024, PNAS | https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2318455121 |
| Silencing initiation and propagation | Silencers recruit Sir proteins via ORC/Rap1/Abf1/Sum1; iterative Sir2 deacetylation and Sir3/Sir4 binding across adjacent hypoacetylated nucleosomes propagate the domain; current expert view emphasizes probabilistic, dynamic, domain-wide cooperativity rather than static occupancy (dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 1-2, dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 2-4) | Review of genetic, chromatin, and live-cell evidence | Dhillon & Kamakaka 2024, Epigenetics & Chromatin | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-024-00553-7 |
| Heterochromatin bistability | A 2024 HMR model/validation study supports two-way feedback between chromatin compaction and histone modification state: compaction promotes SIR binding, which removes activating marks and drives further compaction, explaining bistable silent vs expressed states (miangolarra2024twowayfeedbackbetween pages 1-2) | Theory plus experimental validation at HMR | Miangolarra et al. 2024, PNAS | https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2403316121 |
| Subtelomeric Sir3 occupancy extent | Stable, high-density Sir3 occupancy is concentrated about ±2 kb around subtelomeric SIR nucleation sites; ChIP-seq falls to background by ~4 kb downstream of XCS, but transient low-density contacts extend to ~30 kb (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 4-7, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 7-9) | Nanopore-MetID (Sir3Dam/EcoG2), ChIP-seq | Radman-Livaja et al. 2023, Research Square preprint | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1 |
| Genome-wide transient contacts | Sir3 makes contacts with >1,000 euchromatic genes; 1,197 genes (~19% of genes) were identified as Sir3 contacts; at least 15% of promoters and 7% of CDS had non-zero Sir3Dam methylation probability (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 4-7, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 7-9, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 22-24) | Nanopore-MetID genome-wide mapping | Radman-Livaja et al. 2023, Research Square preprint | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1 |
| Contact frequency vs distance from telomeres | ~50% of genes within 0–20 kb of subtelomeric nucleation sites are contacted by Sir3, dropping to ~20% in the next 20 kb and remaining ~20% farther toward centromeres; similarly, ~50% of genes within 20 kb of telomere ends are contacted, dropping to ~20% beyond 50 kb (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 24-26, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 7-9) | Nanopore-MetID positional analysis | Radman-Livaja et al. 2023, Research Square preprint | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1 |
| Methylation density readout for Sir3 contacts | Sir3EcoG2 methylated ~0.08% of adenines genome-wide (~6,000 A/genome); methylation near XCS averaged ~0.45%, at Yp ~0.4%, and even at HML/HMR was not >1.5%; signal dropped to ~0.1% at 4–15 kb and ~0.02% farther away (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 4-7, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 7-9) | Nanopore-MetID with adenine methylation readout | Radman-Livaja et al. 2023, Research Square preprint | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1 |
| Fraction of cells with Sir3 contact | Yp and XCS nucleation sites were methylated in ~72% of cells; high-density binding around nucleation sites occurred in ~70% of cells, whereas distal transient contacts up to ~30 kb were present in ~10–20% of cells and at ~5-fold lower density (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 4-7, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 7-9) | Single-molecule/nanopore contact frequency inference | Radman-Livaja et al. 2023, Research Square preprint | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1 |
| Sir2/Sir4 dependence of Sir3 chromatin contacts | Subtelomeric Sir3 methylation is abolished in sir2Δ and reduced about 2-fold in sir4Δ, consistent with Sir3 acting within the Sir2/3/4 complex (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 7-9) | Nanopore-MetID in mutant backgrounds | Radman-Livaja et al. 2023, Research Square preprint | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1 |
| Sir3 exchange dynamics | During growth arrest, Sir3 exchange is slow; after nutrient repletion, exchange and degradation increase sharply, and Sir3 bound at subtelomeric and HM loci is largely replaced by newly synthesized Sir3 by the end of the first cell cycle after release (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 24-26, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 22-24) | RITE tag-switch, ChIP-seq, nutrient-shift experiments | Radman-Livaja et al. 2023, Research Square preprint | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1 |
| Effect of reduced Sir3 supply on silencing | In a Sir3 hypomorph, SIR-dependent silencing after exit from arrest was 15–30× less efficient, and in mid-log cells 200–500× less efficient than WT; ON rates scaled with Sir3 dosage whereas OFF rates were similar (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 24-26) | RITE hypomorph plus silencing assays | Radman-Livaja et al. 2023, Research Square preprint | https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1 |
| Magnitude of repression at HM loci | Sir-dependent repression at HML/HMR reduces transcription by roughly four orders of magnitude (~10^4-fold), while Sir proteins subsequently occupy nucleosomes across these loci (fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 1-2) | CRASH reporter context and prior silencing literature synthesis | Fouet & Rine 2023, Genetics | https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyac180 |
| Frequency of transient silencing loss | Using the sensitive CRASH assay, transient silencing failures at HML occurred at about 10^-3 per generation, showing that Sir-based repression is strong but not absolute (fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 1-2) | CRASH recombinase assay at HML | Fouet & Rine 2023, Genetics | https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyac180 |
| Gene-specific differences within a silent locus | Silencing loss at the HML α2 reporter was ~10-fold higher than at α1; when unsilenced, CRE expression was ~8-fold higher for α2 than α1, and RT-qPCR in WT showed a smaller ~4-fold difference, indicating transient failure can be gene-specific rather than locus-wide (fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 12-13, fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 1-2) | CRASH reporters and RT-qPCR | Fouet & Rine 2023, Genetics | https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyac180 |
Table: This table summarizes core mechanistic and quantitative findings for budding yeast Sir3/SIR3 (P06701), emphasizing structural nucleosome recognition, histone-mark dependencies, silencing dynamics, and 2023–2024 measurements of chromatin contacts and silencing escape.
Sir3 functions in the nucleus on chromatin, with classical sites of action at HML/HMR and telomere-proximal/subtelomeric regions, where it binds nucleosomes as part of the Sir2/3/4 silencing machinery (onishi2007roleofthe pages 1-2, yuan2024minimalrequirementsfor pages 1-2, fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 1-2). Recent mapping adds that Sir3 also makes transient direct contacts with euchromatin at large scale, beyond canonical silent domains. (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 7-9, radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 22-24)
The core structural mechanism of Sir3 nucleosome recognition is anchored by high-confidence peer-reviewed structural biology (Science 2011). (armache2011structuralbasisof pages 1-3, armache2011structuralbasisof media 2905dd00)
For 2023–2024 “latest research,” key quantitative advances include peer-reviewed work on escape frequencies (Genetics 2023) and mechanistic reviews/models (Epigenetics & Chromatin 2024; PNAS 2024), as well as a 2023 preprint providing substantial quantitative mapping of transient contacts and dynamics; preprint conclusions should be interpreted with appropriate caution until peer-reviewed. (radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 24-26, fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 1-2, dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 2-4, miangolarra2024twowayfeedbackbetween pages 1-2)
References
(buchberger2008sir3nucleosomeinteractionsin pages 1-2): Johannes R. Buchberger, Megumi Onishi, Geng Li, Jan Seebacher, Adam D. Rudner, Steven P. Gygi, and Danesh Moazed. Sir3-nucleosome interactions in spreading of silent chromatin in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nov 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01210-08, doi:10.1128/mcb.01210-08. This article has 79 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(connelly2006structureandfunction pages 1-2): Jessica J. Connelly, Peihua Yuan, Hao-Chi Hsu, Zhizhong Li, Rui-Ming Xu, and Rolf Sternglanz. Structure and function of the saccharomyces cerevisiae sir3 bah domain. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 26:3256-3265, Apr 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.26.8.3256-3265.2006, doi:10.1128/mcb.26.8.3256-3265.2006. This article has 91 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(currie2024thebahdomain pages 1-4): Mark A. Currie, Reza Behrouzi, and Danesh Moazed. The bah domain: a versatile histone modification reader. Chromatin Readers in Health and Disease, pages 13-30, Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823376-4.00006-9, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823376-4.00006-9. This article has 1 citations.
(dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 1-2): Namrita Dhillon and Rohinton T. Kamakaka. Transcriptional silencing in saccharomyces cerevisiae: known unknowns. Epigenetics & Chromatin, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-024-00553-7, doi:10.1186/s13072-024-00553-7. This article has 4 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(dhillon2024transcriptionalsilencingin pages 2-4): Namrita Dhillon and Rohinton T. Kamakaka. Transcriptional silencing in saccharomyces cerevisiae: known unknowns. Epigenetics & Chromatin, Sep 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-024-00553-7, doi:10.1186/s13072-024-00553-7. This article has 4 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(onishi2007roleofthe pages 1-2): Megumi Onishi, Gunn-Guang Liou, Johannes R. Buchberger, Thomas Walz, and Danesh Moazed. Role of the conserved sir3-bah domain in nucleosome binding and silent chromatin assembly. Molecular cell, 28 6:1015-28, Dec 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.004, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.004. This article has 213 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(currie2024thebahdomain pages 4-8): Mark A. Currie, Reza Behrouzi, and Danesh Moazed. The bah domain: a versatile histone modification reader. Chromatin Readers in Health and Disease, pages 13-30, Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823376-4.00006-9, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823376-4.00006-9. This article has 1 citations.
(armache2011structuralbasisof pages 1-3): Karim-Jean Armache, Joseph D. Garlick, Daniele Canzio, Geeta J. Narlikar, and Robert E. Kingston. Structural basis of silencing: sir3 bah domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 å resolution. Science, 334:977-982, Nov 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210915, doi:10.1126/science.1210915. This article has 326 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(armache2011structuralbasisof pages 3-4): Karim-Jean Armache, Joseph D. Garlick, Daniele Canzio, Geeta J. Narlikar, and Robert E. Kingston. Structural basis of silencing: sir3 bah domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 å resolution. Science, 334:977-982, Nov 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210915, doi:10.1126/science.1210915. This article has 326 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(armache2011structuralbasisof media 2905dd00): Karim-Jean Armache, Joseph D. Garlick, Daniele Canzio, Geeta J. Narlikar, and Robert E. Kingston. Structural basis of silencing: sir3 bah domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 å resolution. Science, 334:977-982, Nov 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210915, doi:10.1126/science.1210915. This article has 326 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(armache2011structuralbasisof media b38d5437): Karim-Jean Armache, Joseph D. Garlick, Daniele Canzio, Geeta J. Narlikar, and Robert E. Kingston. Structural basis of silencing: sir3 bah domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 å resolution. Science, 334:977-982, Nov 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210915, doi:10.1126/science.1210915. This article has 326 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(armache2011structuralbasisof media faf51ee3): Karim-Jean Armache, Joseph D. Garlick, Daniele Canzio, Geeta J. Narlikar, and Robert E. Kingston. Structural basis of silencing: sir3 bah domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 å resolution. Science, 334:977-982, Nov 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210915, doi:10.1126/science.1210915. This article has 326 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(yuan2024minimalrequirementsfor pages 1-2): Andy H. Yuan and Danesh Moazed. Minimal requirements for the epigenetic inheritance of engineered silent chromatin domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2318455121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2318455121. This article has 7 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 1-2): Marc Fouet and Jasper Rine. Limits to transcriptional silencing in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, Dec 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyac180, doi:10.1093/genetics/iyac180. This article has 5 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(fouet2023limitstotranscriptional pages 12-13): Marc Fouet and Jasper Rine. Limits to transcriptional silencing in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, Dec 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyac180, doi:10.1093/genetics/iyac180. This article has 5 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 4-7): Marta Radman-Livaja, Pritha Bhattacharjee, Alain Camasses, Hrvoje Galic, Ana Hrgovcic, Lara Demont, Linh Nguyen, and Pauline Vasseur. The budding yeast heterochromatic protein sir3 modulates genome-wide gene expression through transient direct contacts with euchromatin. Unknown journal, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1.
(radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 7-9): Marta Radman-Livaja, Pritha Bhattacharjee, Alain Camasses, Hrvoje Galic, Ana Hrgovcic, Lara Demont, Linh Nguyen, and Pauline Vasseur. The budding yeast heterochromatic protein sir3 modulates genome-wide gene expression through transient direct contacts with euchromatin. Unknown journal, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1.
(radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 22-24): Marta Radman-Livaja, Pritha Bhattacharjee, Alain Camasses, Hrvoje Galic, Ana Hrgovcic, Lara Demont, Linh Nguyen, and Pauline Vasseur. The budding yeast heterochromatic protein sir3 modulates genome-wide gene expression through transient direct contacts with euchromatin. Unknown journal, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1.
(radmanlivaja2023thebuddingyeast pages 24-26): Marta Radman-Livaja, Pritha Bhattacharjee, Alain Camasses, Hrvoje Galic, Ana Hrgovcic, Lara Demont, Linh Nguyen, and Pauline Vasseur. The budding yeast heterochromatic protein sir3 modulates genome-wide gene expression through transient direct contacts with euchromatin. Unknown journal, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1, doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3495250/v1.
(miangolarra2024twowayfeedbackbetween pages 1-2): Ander Movilla Miangolarra, Daniel S. Saxton, Zhi Yan, Jasper Rine, and Martin Howard. Two-way feedback between chromatin compaction and histone modification state explains saccharomyces cerevisiae heterochromatin bistability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Apr 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2403316121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2403316121. This article has 13 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.