The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
NCU08990 is not ambiguous in the supplied database context: UniProt Q7S2X9 links the locus NCU08990 and EMBL protein EAA29782.2 to Neurospora crassa strain OR74A/74-OR23-1A—also deposited under the strain designations listed in the question—and annotates the product as the eukaryotic large-ribosomal-subunit protein eL39 (traditional name 60S ribosomal protein L39). Its InterPro assignments IPR000077 and IPR023626 and Pfam assignment PF00832 are mutually consistent with that identity. Retrieved genomic literature independently confirms OR74A as the standard N. crassa reference and the use of NCU locus identifiers, but it does not independently map NCU08990, Q7S2X9, or EAA29782.2 to eL39 (bosnjak2018investigationoftranscriptional pages 68-74, sharpton2009comparativegenomicanalyses pages 7-8).
The gene symbol is therefore best described as unambiguous in UniProt but sparsely represented in primary literature. Exact-identifier searches found no NCU08990-specific publication and no conflicting gene with the same symbol. Consequently, its precise annotation rests mainly on the supplied curated record plus strong family-level structural and evolutionary inference—not on direct functional experiments in N. crassa.
The most defensible primary function is that NCU08990 encodes a small, non-enzymatic structural protein of the cytosolic 60S ribosomal subunit. eL39 lines part of the nascent-polypeptide exit tunnel and its vestibule, helping construct the rRNA–protein environment through which newly synthesized proteins emerge. It therefore participates in ribosome biogenesis and cytosolic translation, with potential effects on nascent-chain folding and recruitment of cotranslational factors. It is not an enzyme or transporter, has no catalytic reaction or transported substrate, and should not presently be assigned a dedicated signaling or specialized-ribosome function.
| Annotation claim | Best evidence | Evidence level | Confidence | Key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity: NCU08990 encodes Q7S2X9, annotated as large ribosomal-subunit protein eL39 in Neurospora crassa OR74A/74-OR23-1A and synonymous deposited strains | The supplied UniProt metadata explicitly links NCU08990, Q7S2X9, EMBL EAA29782.2, the specified N. crassa strain, and the eL39/L39 description. Retrieved literature confirms use of OR74A as the N. crassa reference genome but does not independently map these identifiers (bosnjak2018investigationoftranscriptional pages 68-74, sharpton2009comparativegenomicanalyses pages 7-8) | Provided UniProt record; organism context supported by Neurospora literature | High for database identity; moderate for independently published validation | No retrieved primary publication independently identified NCU08990, Q7S2X9, or EAA29782.2 as eL39 |
| Family/domain assignment: member of the eukaryotic eL39 family, with Ribosomal_eL39/PF00832 fold | InterPro IPR000077/IPR023626 and Pfam PF00832 are stated in the supplied record; eL39 is independently recognized as a eukaryote-specific ribosomal protein in comparative eukaryotic structures (liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 1-3) | Provided UniProt record plus general eukaryotic structural inference | High | No retrieved NCU08990-specific domain experiment, solved structure, or sequence-alignment analysis |
| Primary molecular function: a non-enzymatic structural component of the cytosolic 60S subunit, not an enzyme or transporter | eL39 forms part of the eukaryotic large-subunit architecture and contributes to the peptide-exit region; no catalytic reaction, substrate specificity, or transport activity is associated with the family (mishra2023atomicstructureof pages 9-12, liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 1-3) | Ortholog structural evidence plus general eukaryotic inference | High for family-level function; moderate-high for NCU08990 | Direct incorporation of NCU08990 into purified N. crassa 60S/80S particles was not located |
| Structural site: eL39 lines the nascent-polypeptide exit tunnel and contributes to its wider vestibule near the exit port | Eukaryotic tunnel reviews place eL39 in the vestibule; the tunnel is approximately 10–20 Å wide, broadens about 50 Å from the peptidyl-transferase center, and ends in an approximately 20 Å vestibule (liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 1-3). Mammalian-system work reports that eL39 lines the tunnel and can crosslink to a nascent peptide (tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 6-8, tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 8-9) | Ortholog structural/biochemical evidence | High for conserved eL39 location; moderate for exact Neurospora geometry | Dimensions and crosslinks were not measured in N. crassa |
| rRNA interaction: eL39 is embedded in the rRNA-rich tunnel architecture | In wheat 60S/80S structures, 5.8S-rRNA Gm75 directly contacts eL39 (mishra2023atomicstructureof pages 9-12) | Ortholog structural evidence | Moderate | The Gm75 modification is not universal—yeast was noted as an exception—and the equivalent contact has not been demonstrated in N. crassa |
| Mature-cell localization: predominantly on cytosolic 60S subunits and 80S ribosomes, including free and ER-associated translating ribosomes | This follows from its conserved assignment as a canonical cytosolic 60S protein and exit-tunnel component (miller2024regulationofsecretory pages 41-49, liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 1-3) | General eukaryotic inference | Moderate-high | No NCU08990-specific fluorescence microscopy, fractionation, or ribosome-proteomics evidence was retrieved; mitochondrial localization is not supported |
| Biogenesis localization: likely synthesized in the cytosol, imported into the nucleus/nucleolus for pre-60S assembly, and exported with the mature subunit | This is the canonical pathway for nuclear-encoded eukaryotic ribosomal proteins and 60S biogenesis, but no NCU08990-specific assembly-stage or trafficking evidence was found (islam2023ribosomalbiogenesisand pages 2-4) | General eukaryotic inference | Moderate | Nuclear/nucleolar residence, import signals, assembly timing, and export have not been demonstrated for this Neurospora protein |
| Biological process/pathway: ribosome biogenesis and cytosolic translation; structural contribution rather than a discrete signaling pathway | Conserved eL39 placement supports participation in 60S assembly/function and translation. Current reviews recognize that ribosome composition can influence translation, but require direct incorporation and substrate-selective effects before assigning specialization (islam2023ribosomalbiogenesisand pages 2-4, lindahl2024ribosomestructuralchanges pages 10-12, miller2023specializedribosomesin pages 1-3) | General eukaryotic inference | High for translation; low for specialized regulation | No evidence that NCU08990 selectively translates particular mRNAs or acts in a dedicated signaling pathway |
| Cotranslational folding context: eL39 may help shape the physicochemical environment encountered by emerging nascent chains | The exit tunnel shields roughly 30–40 residues and its geometry can affect nascent-chain compaction and folding (liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 1-3, liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 3-5). In a mammalian Kv1.3 system, eL39 was implicated in position-dependent helix formation over roughly 10 residues/30 Å (tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 8-9) | Ortholog mechanistic evidence plus general eukaryotic inference | Moderate for contextual role; low for sequence-specific Neurospora effects | The mechanistic experiments used mammalian-channel constructs, not NCU08990 or native Neurospora nascent chains |
| Chaperone/tunnel-exit context: eL39 provides part of the docking neighborhood for cotranslational protein-biogenesis factors | In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hsp70 Ssb crosslinked to 6.3-kDa Rpl39/eL39 near the tunnel exit; the product appeared in wild type but not an ssb1 ssb2 double deletion (gumiero2016interactionofthe pages 2-3) |
Fungal ortholog biochemical evidence | Moderate-high for conserved proximity; moderate for Neurospora | No direct interaction between NCU08990 and Neurospora chaperones, SRP, translocon, or RAC was found |
| Catalytic or substrate-specific activity: none established | eL39 is a ribosomal structural protein; reported contacts involve rRNA, nascent peptides, and neighboring biogenesis factors rather than catalysis (mishra2023atomicstructureof pages 9-12, gumiero2016interactionofthe pages 2-3, tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 6-8) | Ortholog structural/biochemical evidence | High | Absence of catalytic evidence does not exclude poorly characterized extra-ribosomal interactions |
| Gene-specific phenotype, essentiality, expression regulation, and localization: presently unresolved in the retrieved literature | Searches for NCU08990, Q7S2X9, and EAA29782.2 produced no gene-specific primary studies; available Neurospora genome sources use OR74A and NCU identifiers but do not discuss this locus (bosnjak2018investigationoftranscriptional pages 68-74, bosnjak2018investigationoftranscriptional pages 99-103, sharpton2009comparativegenomicanalyses pages 7-8) | Direct Neurospora literature search: no specific evidence found | High confidence in evidence gap | Search failure is not proof that no unpublished, unindexed, or database-only data exist |
| Recent 2023–2024 status: no NCU08990-specific study located; recent work instead refines general exit-tunnel and ribosome-heterogeneity concepts | A 2023 wheat structure identified the Gm75–eL39 contact (mishra2023atomicstructureof pages 9-12); 2023–2024 reviews emphasize that compositional variation alone does not prove functional ribosome specialization (islam2023ribosomalbiogenesisand pages 2-4, lindahl2024ribosomestructuralchanges pages 10-12, miller2023specializedribosomesin pages 1-3) | Recent ortholog evidence/general expert analysis | High regarding the literature gap; moderate for transferability | Recent findings concern plants, animals, budding yeast, or general eukaryotic ribosomes and must not be presented as direct Neurospora evidence |
Table: Conservative assessment of the identity, function, localization, and biological context of NCU08990/Q7S2X9. The table distinguishes supplied UniProt metadata from direct literature and orthology-based inference.
The supplied UniProt record gives a coherent chain of identifiers:
Published Neurospora work confirms that OR74A assemblies are routinely used as reference genomes and that NCU-style identifiers denote annotated loci. However, none of the retrieved genome papers mentioned the three queried identifiers specifically (bosnjak2018investigationoftranscriptional pages 68-74, bosnjak2018investigationoftranscriptional pages 99-103, sharpton2009comparativegenomicanalyses pages 7-8). This means that the exact locus-to-protein mapping was verified from the supplied UniProt context, not independently by a primary article.
The assignment is biologically coherent. eL39 is a eukaryotic large-subunit protein associated with the nascent-polypeptide exit tunnel. Comparative descriptions place eL39 in the eukaryotic tunnel vestibule, where it supplements the conserved rRNA and ribosomal-protein framework (liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 1-3). No literature retrieved associated NCU08990 with another protein class, organism, enzyme family, or transporter.
Verification outcome: proceed with annotation as N. crassa eL39, while labeling all organism-specific mechanistic claims as inferred unless directly tested in NCU08990.
NCU08990 is predicted to encode a constitutive structural component of the cytosolic 60S ribosomal subunit. Its role is architectural rather than catalytic: eL39 contributes to the wall and vestibular region of the nascent-polypeptide exit tunnel, helping establish the physical and electrostatic environment encountered by a growing polypeptide.
The eukaryotic exit tunnel is approximately 10–20 Å wide, broadens roughly 50 Å from the peptidyl-transferase center, and terminates in a wider vestibule of approximately 20 Å. Whereas bacterial vestibules are shaped mainly by uL23 and uL24, eukaryotic ribosomes additionally contain eL39 in this region. The upper approximately 80 Å of the tunnel can protect about 30–40 nascent-chain residues, although the protected length varies with chain conformation and folding (liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 1-3).
The actual peptide-bond-forming catalyst is the ribosomal RNA-centered peptidyl-transferase center; the available evidence does not assign catalytic chemistry to eL39. Accordingly:
Experimental work in a mammalian translation system identifies eL39 as a tunnel-lining protein extending toward the exit port; it can be crosslinked to a nascent peptide and contacts the translocon environment (tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 6-8, tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 8-9). These observations strongly support the family-level annotation but should not be represented as direct measurements of NCU08990.
A 2023 wheat-ribosome cryo-EM study found that 2′-O-methylated G75 of 5.8S rRNA, Gm75, directly contacts eL39 in 60S and 80S structures. The authors linked this conserved rRNA–protein neighborhood to nascent-peptide sensing in the exit tunnel. Importantly, the paper noted yeast as an exception to the general conservation of this G75 methylation, so the same modification or contact cannot be assumed for N. crassa without structural or modification-mapping data (published May 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.22.541707) (mishra2023atomicstructureof pages 9-12).
The ribosomal tunnel is not merely a passive pipe. Its geometry, electrostatics, and local contacts can delay, promote, or redirect nascent-chain compaction. A review reported tunnel electrostatic potentials of approximately −8 to −22 mV, folding-generated forces up to 8 pN, and accommodation of some compact domains smaller than about 10 kDa or 70 residues within the first 80 Å of the tunnel (published January 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010097) (liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 3-5).
In rabbit-reticulocyte translation experiments using the mammalian Kv1.3 S2 transmembrane segment, extending the nascent chain by only two residues displaced it approximately 6 Å toward the exit and promoted compaction. eL39 was proposed to help orient the conserved WF motif and influence helix formation over an effective range of roughly 10 residues or 30 Å (published June 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.04.022) (tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 6-8, tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 8-9). This is compelling evidence that the eL39-containing tunnel can influence folding, but it is a substrate-specific mammalian experiment and does not establish an NCU08990-specific nascent-chain preference.
The closest fungal biochemical evidence comes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chemical crosslinking showed that the cotranslational Hsp70 Ssb contacts Rpl39/eL39, Rpl35, and Rpl19 near the tunnel exit. Rpl39 was reported as a 6.3-kDa protein; the expected Rpl39-containing crosslink appeared in wild-type extract but not in an ssb1 ssb2 double-deletion extract (published November 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13563) (gumiero2016interactionofthe pages 2-3). This supports a conserved fungal role for the eL39 neighborhood in docking or positioning protein-biogenesis machinery, but no NCU08990–chaperone interaction has been measured.
The appropriate pathway-level annotation is the cytosolic ribosome-biogenesis and translation system, not a conventional metabolic or signal-transduction pathway. The predicted sequence of events is:
Steps 2–4 are canonical expectations for a nuclear-encoded cytosolic eukaryotic ribosomal protein; they have not been directly demonstrated for NCU08990. No retrieved study established its assembly timing, import sequence, nuclear-export dependence, or necessity for processing a particular N. crassa rRNA intermediate.
Ribosome abundance and composition respond broadly to growth, nutrients, and stress, but no evidence links NCU08990 specifically to the circadian clock, carbon sensing, unfolded-protein response, TOR signaling, or another defined Neurospora signaling pathway. Assigning such roles from the general importance of translation would be overinterpretation.
Recent expert reviews consider ribosome heterogeneity real but distinguish it from proven functional specialization. A specialized ribosome should contain a demonstrated compositional adaptation that causes selective, physiologically relevant translation of a defined transcript set—not merely show altered ribosomal-protein expression. Required evidence includes physical incorporation into intact ribosomes, compositional or structural confirmation, selective translation effects, controls for global ribosome abundance and stress, and preferably perturbation-rescue or reconstitution (published March and August 2023; DOIs: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076334 and https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes7030017) (islam2023ribosomalbiogenesisand pages 2-4, miller2023specializedribosomesin pages 1-3). A 2024 perspective similarly argues that ribosomal variants are more likely to change biochemical preferences across groups of mRNAs than to become machines dedicated to one transcript (published October 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011186) (lindahl2024ribosomestructuralchanges pages 10-12).
No such evidence exists for NCU08990 in the retrieved literature. It should therefore be annotated as a canonical eL39, not a specialized-ribosome determinant.
There is no retrieved NCU08990-specific GFP localization, cell-fractionation, affinity-purification, or ribosome-proteomics result. Mitochondrial, extracellular, plasma-membrane, or secreted localization is not supported.
The most directly relevant recent structural result is the 2023 observation of a wheat 5.8S-rRNA Gm75–eL39 contact (mishra2023atomicstructureof pages 9-12). Recent reviews have shifted the conceptual model of ribosomes from completely uniform machines toward regulated, heterogeneous populations, while emphasizing that composition changes alone do not prove specialization (islam2023ribosomalbiogenesisand pages 2-4, lindahl2024ribosomestructuralchanges pages 10-12, miller2023specializedribosomesin pages 1-3). No 2023–2024 paper specifically investigating NCU08990 was located.
A 2024 yeast preprint on variable rRNA 2′-O-methylation placed several modifications in the exit tunnel and examined effects on nascent-peptide folding, but the supplied structural excerpt concerned uL4, uL22, and eL42 rather than eL39. It should not be cited as direct evidence for NCU08990 or even for an eL39-specific mechanism (published August 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.07.607065) (gillot2024variablerrna2’omethylation pages 41-42).
Structural annotation and comparative genomics. The eL39 domain assignment can identify this small ribosomal component in fungal genomes and help distinguish cytosolic eukaryotic ribosomes from bacterial or organellar systems. For NCU08990, this is presently the principal practical application.
Cotranslational-folding and protein-engineering research. Exit-tunnel geometry and eL39-adjacent contacts can be exploited to study or tune membrane-protein helix formation, folding kinetics, stalling, and targeting. Force-profile assays can measure folding forces up to approximately 8 pN, while sequence or codon changes can reposition folding events along the tunnel (tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 8-9, liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 3-5). These are research and engineering principles, not demonstrated industrial uses of NCU08990.
Ribosome-targeted drug discovery. High-resolution eukaryotic ribosome structures enable structure-guided analysis of translation inhibitors for infectious disease, cancer, and genetic disorders. One structural program examined 16 eukaryote-specific inhibitors on the S. cerevisiae ribosome and produced a 3.0-Å model; examples included blasticidin S at the peptidyl-transferase center, G418 at the decoding center, and pactamycin/edeine at the small-subunit mRNA–tRNA site (published March 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0184) (yusupova2017crystalstructureof pages 5-6). These compounds do not establish eL39 as their binding target, but they demonstrate the translational machinery’s real-world pharmacological relevance.
Chaperone and secretory-pathway studies. Because eL39 lies near tunnel-exit docking sites, its structural neighborhood is relevant to studying Hsp70/RAC, signal-recognition particle, translocon engagement, and protein quality control. The direct yeast Ssb–Rpl39 crosslink provides a concrete fungal example (gumiero2016interactionofthe pages 2-3).
No direct NCU08990 data were retrieved for expression, essentiality, knockout phenotype, subcellular localization, ribosome incorporation, assembly defects, interactions, post-translational modification, or transcript-selective translation. The most informative experiments would be:
NCU08990/Q7S2X9 is best annotated as the Neurospora crassa cytosolic large-subunit ribosomal protein eL39: a non-catalytic structural constituent of the 60S subunit that forms part of the nascent-polypeptide exit tunnel/vestibule and participates in cytosolic translation. Its mature functional location is the cytosolic 60S/80S ribosome; transient nuclear/nucleolar localization during pre-60S assembly is probable but unverified. Conserved eL39 evidence supports contacts with rRNA, nascent chains, and the cotranslational chaperone environment, but no NCU08990-specific phenotype, interaction, localization experiment, catalytic activity, substrate preference, or specialized-ribosome function has yet been established in the retrieved literature.
References
(bosnjak2018investigationoftranscriptional pages 68-74): Natasa Bosnjak. Investigation of transcriptional and translational regulation of the neurospora crassa alternative oxidase. Text, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.7939/r3x63bn22, doi:10.7939/r3x63bn22. This article has 0 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(sharpton2009comparativegenomicanalyses pages 7-8): Thomas J. Sharpton, Jason E. Stajich, Steven D. Rounsley, Malcolm J. Gardner, Jennifer R. Wortman, Vinita S. Jordar, Rama Maiti, Chinnappa D. Kodira, Daniel E. Neafsey, Qiandong Zeng, Chiung-Yu Hung, Cody McMahan, Anna Muszewska, Marcin Grynberg, M. Alejandra Mandel, Ellen M. Kellner, Bridget M. Barker, John N. Galgiani, Marc J. Orbach, Theo N. Kirkland, Garry T. Cole, Matthew R. Henn, Bruce W. Birren, and John W. Taylor. Comparative genomic analyses of the human fungal pathogens coccidioides and their relatives. Genome research, 19 10:1722-31, Oct 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.087551.108, doi:10.1101/gr.087551.108. This article has 415 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 1-3): Marija Liutkute, Ekaterina Samatova, and Marina V. Rodnina. Cotranslational folding of proteins on the ribosome. Jan 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010097, doi:10.3390/biom10010097. This article has 149 citations.
(mishra2023atomicstructureof pages 9-12): Rishi Kumar Mishra, Prafful Sharma, Faisal Tarique Khaja, Adwaith B. Uday, and Tanweer Hussain. Atomic structure of wheat ribosome reveals unique features of the plant ribosomes. bioRxiv, May 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.22.541707, doi:10.1101/2023.05.22.541707. This article has 0 citations.
(tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 6-8): LiWei Tu and Carol Deutsch. Determinants of helix formation for a kv1.3 transmembrane segment inside the ribosome exit tunnel. Jun 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.04.022, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.04.022. This article has 15 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(tu2017determinantsofhelix pages 8-9): LiWei Tu and Carol Deutsch. Determinants of helix formation for a kv1.3 transmembrane segment inside the ribosome exit tunnel. Jun 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.04.022, doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2017.04.022. This article has 15 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(miller2024regulationofsecretory pages 41-49): SC MILLER. Regulation of secretory proteins by the human signal recognition particle. Unknown journal, 2024.
(islam2023ribosomalbiogenesisand pages 2-4): Rowshan Ara Islam and Charalampos Rallis. Ribosomal biogenesis and heterogeneity in development, disease, and aging. Epigenomes, 7:17, Aug 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/epigenomes7030017, doi:10.3390/epigenomes7030017. This article has 16 citations.
(lindahl2024ribosomestructuralchanges pages 10-12): Lasse Lindahl. Ribosome structural changes dynamically affect ribosome function. Oct 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011186, doi:10.3390/ijms252011186. This article has 18 citations.
(miller2023specializedribosomesin pages 1-3): Sarah C. Miller, Clinton C. MacDonald, Morgana K. Kellogg, Zemfira N. Karamysheva, and Andrey L. Karamyshev. Specialized ribosomes in health and disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24:6334, Mar 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076334, doi:10.3390/ijms24076334. This article has 45 citations.
(liutkute2020cotranslationalfoldingof pages 3-5): Marija Liutkute, Ekaterina Samatova, and Marina V. Rodnina. Cotranslational folding of proteins on the ribosome. Jan 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10010097, doi:10.3390/biom10010097. This article has 149 citations.
(gumiero2016interactionofthe pages 2-3): Andrea Gumiero, Charlotte Conz, Genís Valentín Gesé, Ying Zhang, Felix Alexander Weyer, Karine Lapouge, Julia Kappes, Ulrike von Plehwe, Géza Schermann, Edith Fitzke, Tina Wölfle, Tamás Fischer, Sabine Rospert, and Irmgard Sinning. Interaction of the cotranslational hsp70 ssb with ribosomal proteins and rrna depends on its lid domain. Nature Communications, Nov 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13563, doi:10.1038/ncomms13563. This article has 64 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(bosnjak2018investigationoftranscriptional pages 99-103): Natasa Bosnjak. Investigation of transcriptional and translational regulation of the neurospora crassa alternative oxidase. Text, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.7939/r3x63bn22, doi:10.7939/r3x63bn22. This article has 0 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(gillot2024variablerrna2’omethylation pages 41-42): Sandra Gillot, Virginie Marchand, Yuri Motorin, Agnès Baudin-Baillieu, and Olivier Namy. Variable rrna 2’-o-methylation fine-tunes ribosome function insaccharomyces cerevisiae. Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.07.607065, doi:10.1101/2024.08.07.607065. This article has 0 citations.
(yusupova2017crystalstructureof pages 5-6): Gulnara Yusupova and Marat Yusupov. Crystal structure of eukaryotic ribosome and its complexes with inhibitors. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372:20160184, Mar 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0184, doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0184. This article has 78 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.