just deep-research-falcon human DNAH8 failed twice (Edison/FutureHouse API: "Failed to authenticate"). No deep-research file exists; literature was gathered directly from PubMed E-utilities (DNAH8[tiab], 49 hits) and cached with just fetch-pmid.The earlier standalone NEW GO:0030317 proposal duplicated the same term already proposed as the replacement for the imported GO:0060285/NAS/PMID:9373155 annotation. The functional participation argument remains supported: DNAH8 is a force-generating component of the sperm outer dynein arm. This correction removes only the redundant authored proposal and consolidates its unique supporting citations into that existing MODIFY review. All 27 genuine source annotations, their original identities, every other review decision, the integrated core, products and reference list are preserved. No additional verbatim excerpts were introduced; the earlier proposal remains available in the append-only Git/history record.
The prior PR #5009 approval remains part of the provenance. This correction addresses duplicate coverage, not a withdrawal of the positive motility evidence or a new completion-credit decision.
DNAH8 supplies the heavy-chain motor component of the sperm outer dynein arm, which performs the work of flagellar movement. This participation rationale is more specific than observing infertility alone. The human localization study found DNAH8 along sperm axonemes but not the examined respiratory cilia; its mutation subjects had DNAH17 variants, so their phenotype is not relabeled as a DNAH8-variant experiment PMID:31178125(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31178125/). Separate DNAH8 studies report human sperm abnormalities and a Dnah8-knockout mouse phenotype PMID:32619401(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32619401/), PMID:32681648(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32681648/). These phenotypes support the sperm-flagellar requirement but are not purified motor-kinetics measurements. This bounded follow-up read the complete cached abstracts of these papers and the original NAS reference, without claiming a new reading of their full Methods PMID:9373155(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9373155/).
The previously stated comparator check is now supported by a genuine QuickGO exact-term mouse query, captured on 2026-10-17 and reused from the adjacent DNAH17 assessment. The first 200 of 458 records contain all five named examples. Dnah1 (E9Q8T7) and Dnah11 (E9Q7N9) include IMP records, whereas the recovered Dnah7a (E9Q0T8), Dnah7b (A0A571BD48/L7N1Y0), and Dnah7c (A0A087WR13) records are electronic. These establish positive annotation examples in the same motor-subunit role, not equally strong experimental support for every comparator or an independent proof of the human function. The remaining query pages and comparator primary papers were not inspected for this check.
The specific GO:0030317 process remains the replacement for the imported GO:0060285 NAS annotation, with the later human and mouse evidence attached explicitly to that review. A second authored NEW row would provide the same process coverage; removing it did not discard an imported experimental assertion or change the evidence code of the original NAS source. The GO:0060294 rationale now points to that existing replacement. The mouse knockout quotation has been moved from the broader row, and the prior human DNAH8 excerpt is restored at the specific process decision without repeating its separate findings excerpt. All prior journal text and histories are preserved.