Swiss-Prot entry, 840 aa, "Multifunctional non-homologous end joining protein
LigD". Three autonomous domains: N-terminal 3'-phosphoesterase (PE, 7-162),
central ATP-dependent ligase (219-521, active-site Lys238 N6-AMP), C-terminal
polymerase/primase (Pol, 549-793). NCBIfam TIGR02776 NHEJ_ligase_prk, PANTHER
PTHR42705:SF2. [file:PSEAE/ligD/ligD-uniprot.txt "N6-AMP-lysine intermediate"]
The ligase activity itself is not described in the 15520014 abstract beyond
"autonomous DNA ligase domain"; UniProt (curated, ECO:0000269 PubMed:15520014)
records that the Lig domain "functions as an independent domain", and the EC
6.5.1.1 nick-sealing activity of PaeLigD is well established. The IDA is
accepted (defer to curator; abstract-only).
Seeds from .cache/paint/IBD.gaf; Mtb LigD (P9WNV3) experimental rows from
QuickGO 2026-11-05.
| PTN node | node term | n_seeds | leaf IBAs | seed annotation (term, evidence, PMID) | verdict | rationale | other seeds | IBD stands without this seed? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTN001627042 | GO:0003910 DNA ligase (ATP) activity | 2 | 15 (10 taxa) | GO:0003910, IDA, PMID:15520014 (PseudoCAP; same row from UniProt) | SOUND | Purified PaeLigD with an autonomous ATP-dependent ligase domain; Ku-stimulated end joining (PMID:20018881). Exact activity, suits a LigD clade. | M. tuberculosis LigD P9WNV3 (GO:0003910 IDA PMID:12215643, 16023671, 16476729) | Yes |
| PTN001627042 | GO:0003887 DNA-directed DNA polymerase activity | 2 | 15 (10 taxa) | GO:0003887, IDA, PMID:15520014 (PseudoCAP; same row from UniProt) | SOUND | Templated extension of a primer-template by the purified Pol domain, abolished by D669A/D671A. | P9WNV3 (GO:0003887 IDA PMID:15499016) | Yes |
Other IBDs at this node that ligD receives but does not seed:
- GO:0006303 NHEJ (seed P9WNV3 only): sound, and true of PaeLigD (PMID:20018881). ACCEPT.
- GO:0006269 DNA replication, synthesis of primer (seed P9WNV3 only, MTBBASE
IDA PMID:16023671): LigD Pol has in vitro primase-like activity, but LigD acts
in NHEJ DSB repair, not chromosomal replication. The node term does not suit
the clade. MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED with a GO_CENTRAL CHECK (now PROBABLE
after the tree check below; the Mtb paper was still not read).
No PSEUDOCAP defects. One GO_CENTRAL defect (GO:0006269, PROBABLE).
Topology of PTN001627042 in PTHR42705 fetched with
projects/PSEUDOCAP/panther_tree.py node PTN001627042 --depth 5. The node is a
SPECIATION node (LUCA), 15 leaves, PTHR42705:SF2 12 + SF3 3.
| Child node | Event | Leaves | Subfamilies | Contents | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTN005127089 | SPECIATION (Eukaryota) | 2 | SF2 | Monosiga MONBRDRAFT_36321 "DNA ligase D", Gossypium LOC107941224 "DNA ligase (ATP)" | LigD-type ligase |
| PTN000048875 | SPECIATION (Eubacteria) | 13 | SF2 10, SF3 3 | the two clades below | LigD-type ligases |
| PTN008085115 | SPECIATION (Terrabacteria) | 7 | SF2 4, SF3 3 | PTN000048869 (DUPLICATION, 6: Streptomyces SCO5308/SCO6709/SCO6498 + Mtb LigD P9WNV3), B. subtilis LigD O34398 | NHEJ LigD + Streptomyces ligase paralogs |
| PTN005127091 | SPECIATION (Proteobacteria) | 6 | SF2 | Bradyrhizobium bll6773; PTN005127092 (Gammaproteobacteria, 5: Coxiella CBU_1934, two Xanthomonas ligases, and PTN005127093 HORIZ_TRANSFER with Ricinus RCOM_0053280 and PAO1 LigD Q9I1X7) | NHEJ LigD |
Verdict: the clade is homogeneous - every leaf is a LigD-type or
ATP-dependent DNA ligase, the two fully named ones (Mtb, B. subtilis) are
bifunctional NHEJ proteins, and there is no replicative primase or DnaG-type
enzyme anywhere below the node. So the concern is not a node-placement problem
that a narrower clade would solve: GO:0006269 is the wrong kind of term for the
whole family, and the fix is to remove the IBD rather than move it. The two
activity IBDs at the same node (GO:0003910, GO:0003887) and the GO:0006303 NHEJ
IBD do suit the clade and already cover what the primase assay shows.
Confidence raised SUSPECTED -> PROBABLE: the tree is primary data and settles
that relocation is not the remedy, but whether the Mtb seed paper
(PMID:16023671) describes something genuinely replicative was not checked, and
only reading it would settle that.