ACTRT2 bioinformatics: nucleotide site, filament interface, IBA source audit, PAINT node audit, interaction and annotation censuses
-
ACTRT2 is identical to actin at all ten literature-named phosphate-loop, cation-site and sensor positions (D11, S14, G15, K18, Q137, D154, G156, D157, V159, R183), confirming the 2001 sequence-inspection claim where it matters most; the adenine/ribose region has diverged, with two non-conservative substitutions among the 19 computed ATP contacts. Retaining the pocket makes nucleotide binding untested rather than demonstrated.
"| phosphate loops, cation site, sensor | D11, S14, G15, K18, Q137, D154, G156, D157, V159, R183 | 10 | 0 | 0 | none |"
-
All five reported members of the sperm perinuclear-theca ARP complex have lost His161, while every panel member that extends or nucleates a filament retains it; ACTL7B, which is testis-specific but not a reported complex member, retains it too.
"Internal control: ACTL7B is testis-specific but is not a reported member of that complex, and it **retains** His161"
-
ACTRT2's protomer-protomer interface is below every filament builder in the panel but not below the Arp2/3 subunits, so the measurement argues against filament extension without excluding an Arp2/3-like role.
"So the measurement argues against ACTRT2 extending an F-actin filament; it does not exclude an Arp2/3-like role, and no such role has been proposed for it."
-
Every resolved WITH/FROM source on both IBA rows carries its own experimental evidence for the term it donated, so any objection to those rows must concern propagation rather than donor quality.
"So any objection to these rows has to be about propagation, not about donor quality."
-
ACTRT2 and ACTRT3 are the only reported perinuclear-theca complex members with no experimental biological-process annotation in either human or mouse.
"Reported PT-complex members with no experimental biological-process annotation in either human or mouse: **ACTRT2, ACTRT3**."
-
ACTRT2's GO:0015629 IBA row is byte-identical to ACTL8's and its GO:0005200 IBA row is byte-identical to ACTR10's, so those two merged reviews' verdicts are verdicts on the same rows and must agree.
"| ACTL8 | GO:0015629 (IBA) | **True** | 25 / 25 |"
-
PMID:33961781 is the source of 9514 GOA annotations, all of them GO:0005515 and all assigned by IntAct, so the term the row carries conveys nothing specific to ACTRT2.
"| PMID:33961781 | 9514 |"
-
The mouse GO:0033011 IDA that both perinuclear-theca rows descend from is not a blanket projection: the curator gave the term to 12 of the 19 entities the calicin paper touches, so it was assigned per protein.
"A curator who assigned the term to a strict subset of the proteins named in the paper"