Branch: cdsa-review. Review target recorded as the outstanding gap in
LIPID_DIVIDE and in
modules/bacterial_phosphatidic_acid_synthesis-notes.md.
modules/bacterial_phosphatidic_acid_synthesis.yaml deliberately ends at
phosphatidic acid (PA); modules/bacterial_phosphatidylglycerol_cardiolipin_biosynthesis.yaml
and modules/bacterial_phosphatidylethanolamine_biosynthesis.yaml both begin at
CDP-diacylglycerol (CDP-DAG). CdsA is the single reaction in that join and was
modelled in no bacterial module and reviewed in no bacterial gene folder (only
genes/yeast/CDS1). This review supplies the gene-level half of that join. It
does not create a module; that remains a curation item for the project page.
No deep-research provider key is available, so no -deep-research-<provider>.md
file exists and none was authored by hand (CLAUDE.md forbids it).
just mod-description-deep-research ECOLI cdsA → cdsA skipped: no MOD
provider configured for organism 'ECOLI'. Expected: ECOLI is not one of thecdsA-uniprot.txtcdsA-goa.tsv, the four GOA-citeduv run ai-gene-review fetch-pmid:interpro/panther/PTHR46382/ (entries CSV +-paint.tsv), genes/yeast/CDS1/CDS1-goa.tsv (for thegrep -r PTN000349517 across the repository.All four GOA-cited publications are abstract-only in publications/
(full_text_available: false): PMID:2995359, PMID:30751 (PMC218635 returned
403 on fetch), PMID:6273438, PMID:15919996. Every supporting_text quoted from
them is therefore an abstract-level statement, and no claim in this review
depends on an unseen figure. Where the abstract does not settle a detail
(e.g. which detergent-solubilised fraction PMID:30751 assayed, or whether
PMID:15919996 reported a full topology model for b0175 rather than only the
C-terminal reporter result), the review defers to the curator rather than
second-guessing, per CLAUDE.md.
CdsA is the CDP-diacylglycerol synthase of E. coli: it activates phosphatidic
acid with CTP to give CDP-diacylglycerol plus pyrophosphate
[file:ECOLI/cdsA/cdsA-uniprot.txt, CC:CATALYTIC ACTIVITY, "a 1,2-diacyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate + CTP + H(+) = a CDP-1,2-"].
UniProt places it at "step 3/3" of CDP-diacylglycerol biosynthesis from
sn-glycerol 3-phosphate [file:ECOLI/cdsA/cdsA-uniprot.txt, CC:PATHWAY].
UniProt: "Cell inner membrane {ECO:0000269|PubMed:15919996}; Multi-pass membrane
protein {ECO:0000255}", eight predicted helical TRANSMEM segments, and one
experimentally determined TOPO_DOM 285 /note="Periplasmic"
/evidence="ECO:0000269|PubMed:15919996" from the Daley et al. global
C-terminal-reporter study [PMID:15919996, "we established the periplasmic or cytoplasmic locations of the C termini for 601 inner membrane proteins"].
In a diderm bacterium the inner (cytoplasmic) membrane is the plasma
membrane, so GO:0005886 is the right CC term and GO:0016020 membrane is a
strict parent of it. The integral/multi-pass character has two independent
lines: the experimental C-terminal topology assignment above, and the
biochemistry — the protein required a different detergent at every purification
step, "illustrating the refractory hydrophobic nature of this protein"
PMID:2995359, and had to be extracted from the cell envelope with digitonin
PMID:30751. It does not support a side-of-membrane term: the single
experimental topology datum is the C-terminus, and the catalytic site has not
been localised to a face.
Correction (2026-11-11, from the PR #6268 review). An earlier draft of this
review added GO:0005887 integral component of plasma membrane as an IC row on
the strength of the above. That term is obsolete: QuickGO resolves
GO:0005887 to GO:0005886, and GO:0016021 likewise to GO:0016020, in GO's
membrane-topology merge. Post-merge the row would simply have restated
GO:0005886, which this gene already carries on four rows and which the
GO:0016020 MODIFY also targets, so the row was dropped rather than re-pointed.
Note the asymmetry in evidence strength, too: only the C-terminal TOPO_DOM
datum is experimental, while the eight transmembrane helices and the multi-pass
assignment are ECO:0000255 predictions. The integral/polytopic finding is real
and is kept here; the ontology's inability to express it after the merge is
raised as a suggested_questions entry instead.
No magnesium, metal-binding or lipid-binding row exists in GOA, and the UniProt
record has no BINDING, metal or ACT_SITE features at all. The 1985 purification
reports "Apparent physical effects of EDTA on the enzyme" PMID:2995359 but
does not establish a catalytic metal requirement for the E. coli enzyme, so
nothing about Mg(2+) is asserted here. (Structural work on the Thermotoga
CdsA establishing a bound metal was not checked and would be a separate review.)
Three papers from the Nishiyama group, all cited by UniProt's FUNCTION with
ECO:0000269, implicate CdsA in biosynthesis of MPIase, the glycolipid
"membrane protein integrase" of the E. coli inner membrane.
Why this gets a NEW process row and not a NEW molecular function.
Against CLAUDE.md's NEW bar, the entity performing the GlcNAc-1-phosphate
transfer step is reported to be CdsA itself, not another gene product, so this
is participation rather than the "my gene is merely required" pattern. The
process term asserted is GO:0009247 glycolipid biosynthetic process (IMP,
PMID:30718729): the depletion result is the cleanest evidence, and MPIase has no
GO term of its own. What is not asserted:
proposed_new_terms entry for one. The chemistry was shown with invertedGO:0032978-type integration terms would be exactly the necessity-for-the-NEW bar warns about.PANTHER:PTN000349517|UniProtKB:P0ABG1. The sibling nodegenes/yeast/CDS1/CDS1-goa.tsv, seeded by human CDS1/CDS2, Drosophila,PTN000349517 appears nowhere in the repository except this gene's GOA andinterpro/panther/PTHR46382/ contains only -entries.csv and-metadata.yaml, no -paint.tsv. So the IBD at the node cannot be readDR PANTHER; PTHR46382; PTHR46382:SF1 line and fromPTHR46382-entries.csv, which lists P0ABG1 (and B. subtilis O31752,CIRCULAR_OR_REDUNDANT.| Term | Evid | Ref | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0004605 | EXP | PMID:2995359 | ACCEPT — purified enzyme, EC 2.7.7.41 |
| GO:0004605 | IDA | PMID:30751 | ACCEPT — partially purified activity |
| GO:0004605 | IBA | GO_REF:0000033 | ACCEPT — node inside family, own EXP among seeds |
| GO:0004605 | IEA | GO_REF:0000120 | ACCEPT — Rhea/EC mapping matches the assayed reaction |
| GO:0016024 | IDA | PMID:30751 | ACCEPT (+ WRONG_QUALIFIER defect) |
| GO:0016024 | IMP | PMID:6273438 | ACCEPT — PA accumulation, liponucleotide pool collapse |
| GO:0016024 | IBA | GO_REF:0000033 | ACCEPT |
| GO:0016024 | IEA | GO_REF:0000041 | ACCEPT — UniPathway UPA00557 |
| GO:0005886 | IDA | PMID:15919996 | ACCEPT — inner membrane proteome/topology |
| GO:0005886 | IDA | PMID:30751 | ACCEPT — activity in the cell envelope |
| GO:0005886 | IBA | GO_REF:0000033 | ACCEPT — is_active_in; the chemistry is membrane-embedded |
| GO:0005886 | IEA | GO_REF:0000044 | ACCEPT — SL-0037 cell inner membrane |
| GO:0016020 | IEA | GO_REF:0000002 | MODIFY → GO:0005886 (already carried) |
| GO:0016772 | IEA | GO_REF:0000002 | MODIFY → GO:0004605 (already carried) |
Plus one NEW row: GO:0009247 (IMP, PMID:30718729). A second NEW row for
GO:0005887 was dropped before merge because that term is obsolete; see the
correction above.
Nothing is REMOVEd. Every row here is a true claim about the gene; the two
MODIFYs are refinements to terms the gene already carries, as CLAUDE.md
directs, not deduplication.
The two EcoCyc GO:0016024 rows use acts_upstream_of_or_within. For the IDA
row (PMID:30751) that is too weak: CdsA performs the committed reaction of
CDP-DAG biosynthesis, so involved_in is the right qualifier. Recorded as a
WRONG_QUALIFIER source defect against ECOCYC on that row (confidence
PROBABLE, since we cannot see the full text the curator used and the IMP row's
mutant-phenotype evidence can justify the weaker qualifier).
-paint.tsv for PTHR46382).