acrIF3

UniProt ID: L7P7R7
Organism: Pseudomonas phage JBD5
Review Status: COMPLETE
πŸ“ Provide Detailed Feedback

Gene Description

AcrF3 (AcrIF3) is a 139-residue homodimeric anti-CRISPR protein of Pseudomonas phage JBD5. It binds the type I-F Cas2/3 helicase-nuclease, stabilizes an ADP-bound state and masks surfaces required for recruitment to the DNA-bound Csy surveillance complex. Target recognition by Csy is retained, but downstream DNA destruction and Cas3-dependent primed spacer acquisition are inhibited. The target-bound, nuclease-free surveillance complex can consequently repress transcription.

Existing Annotations Review

GO Term Evidence Action Reason
GO:0046872 metal ion binding
IEA
GO_REF:0000043
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED
Summary: The electronic metal-binding annotation is associated with calcium contacts in a crystal structure, but physiological metal dependence has not been established.
Reason: Retain MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED: deposited metal contacts are real observations, but they do not establish a physiological metal-binding function. The demonstrated inhibitory mechanism is sequestration of Cas2/3 and masking of recruitment surfaces. A metal requirement is not established by the cited structural and inhibition work.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:27585537
our structural analysis of the Cas3-AcrF3 complex revealed that the AcrF3 dimer binds to HD, Linker and CTD domains of the Cas3 protein, therefore blocking the replaced non-complementary DNA access of Cas3
PMID:27455460
AcrF3 forms a homodimer that locks PaCas3 in an ADP-bound form, blocks the entrance of the DNA-binding tunnel in the helicase domain, and masks the linker region and C-terminal domain of PaCas3, thereby preventing recruitment by Cascade and inhibiting the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system.
GO:0140311 protein sequestering activity
IDA
PMID:27455460
Structural basis of Cas3 inhibition by the bacteriophage pro...
NEW
Summary: The AcrF3 homodimer binds the host Cas2/3 helicase-nuclease and masks the linker region and C-terminal domain that the Csy surveillance complex uses to recruit it, so Cas2/3 can neither interact with its partner complex nor reach the R-loop where it acts. Two independent crystal structures of the AcrF3-Cas3 complex, both solved with this exact accession, establish the interaction and the occluded surfaces.
Reason: GOA holds no process or mechanism term for L7P7R7 at all, only the keyword-derived metal ion binding row. GO:0140311 is asserted because its definition fits literally and in both of its clauses, namely binding a protein to prevent it from interacting with other partners, and inhibiting its localization to the area of the cell or complex where it is active. This is the one anti-CRISPR mechanism in modules/anti_crispr_suppression.yaml for which GO already has a precise molecular-function term, so no new term is proposed. The evidence code is IDA rather than ISS because PDB 5B7I, 5GNF and 5GQH all carry chains spanning residues 1 to 139 of this accession, so the structural work was done on this sequence. GO:0005515 protein binding would be the uninformative alternative and is avoided.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:27455460
AcrF3 forms a homodimer that locks PaCas3 in an ADP-bound form, blocks the entrance of the DNA-binding tunnel in the helicase domain, and masks the linker region and C-terminal domain of PaCas3, thereby preventing recruitment by Cascade and inhibiting the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system.
PMID:27585537
our structural analysis of the Cas3-AcrF3 complex revealed that the AcrF3 dimer binds to HD, Linker and CTD domains of the Cas3 protein, therefore blocking the replaced non-complementary DNA access of Cas3
PMID:26416740
The third anti-CRISPR protein operates by binding to the Cas3 helicase-nuclease and preventing its recruitment to the DNA-bound CRISPR-Cas complex.
GO:0098672 symbiont-mediated suppression of host CRISPR-cas system
IDA
PMID:26416740
Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR-Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR...
NEW
Summary: Sequestering Cas2/3 suppresses the host type I-F CRISPR-Cas system at the interference step and, because recruitment of Cas2/3 is also required for primed spacer acquisition, at the memory-updating step as well. GO:0098672 is the correct and maximally specific process term.
Reason: AcrF3 directly performs CRISPR suppression by sequestering Cas2/3 and preventing its recruitment to the target-bound Csy complex. The process is established by the inhibition and recruitment assays, independently of the annotation state of other inhibitors.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:26416740
The third anti-CRISPR protein operates by binding to the Cas3 helicase-nuclease and preventing its recruitment to the DNA-bound CRISPR-Cas complex.
PMID:27585537
DNA degradation via inhibiting recruitment of Cas3 by Csy complex. In addition, inhibition of Cas3-guided DNA degradation also blocks primed spacer acquisition. In summary, the AcrF3 dimer overcomes the CRISPR system at both the crRNA interference and the primed acquisition stages.
GO:0030430 host cell cytoplasm
IC
PMID:26416740
Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR-Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR...
NEW
Summary: AcrF3 is translated from the JBD5 genome inside the infected Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell and sequesters the host Cas2/3 protein there. Inhibition, and the conversion of the host system into a transcriptional repressor, are both demonstrated in living cells, so the protein must act in the host cytoplasm; the structures were determined in vitro, so the location is inferred rather than measured.
Reason: The UniProt taxon for this entry is the phage, so the host-qualified component term is the correct one and GO:0005737 cytoplasm would be wrong for a viral protein acting in another organism. The same assignment with the same IC code was made for the type I-F inhibitors AcrF8 (genes/BPZF4/AcrF8) and gp30 (genes/BPD31/orf30).
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:26416740
In vivo, this anti-CRISPR can convert the CRISPR-Cas system into a transcriptional repressor
PMID:26416740
The third anti-CRISPR protein operates by binding to the Cas3 helicase-nuclease and preventing its recruitment to the DNA-bound CRISPR-Cas complex.

Core Functions

Binds the host type I-F Cas2/3 helicase-nuclease as a homodimer, locking it in an ADP-bound state and masking the linker region and C-terminal domain through which the crRNA-guided Csy surveillance complex recruits it, so that Cas2/3 cannot interact with the complex or localise to the bound target; target recognition is left fully intact and only the destruction step is lost, which additionally blocks primed spacer acquisition

Supporting Evidence:
  • PMID:27455460
    AcrF3 forms a homodimer that locks PaCas3 in an ADP-bound form, blocks the entrance of the DNA-binding tunnel in the helicase domain, and masks the linker region and C-terminal domain of PaCas3, thereby preventing recruitment by Cascade and inhibiting the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system.
  • PMID:26416740
    The third anti-CRISPR protein operates by binding to the Cas3 helicase-nuclease and preventing its recruitment to the DNA-bound CRISPR-Cas complex.
  • PMID:27585537
    DNA degradation via inhibiting recruitment of Cas3 by Csy complex. In addition, inhibition of Cas3-guided DNA degradation also blocks primed spacer acquisition. In summary, the AcrF3 dimer overcomes the CRISPR system at both the crRNA interference and the primed acquisition stages.

References

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

Suggested Questions for Experts

Q: Does AcrF3 sequestration of Cas2/3 leave the host with a functional sequence-specific DNA-binding module that has physiological consequences of its own, beyond the reported transcriptional repression, for instance interference with replication at self-targeting loci?

Suggested experts: Alan R. Davidson, Karen L. Maxwell

Q: Is the Ca(2+) seen at the AcrF3 N-terminus and surface in PDB 5GNF conserved across AcrF3-family members, or is it unique to that crystal form, which would settle the GO:0046872 question definitively?

Suggested experts: Yanli Wang

Q: Cas3 sequestration has no counterpart against class 2 systems, where recognition and cleavage sit in one protein. Is that why class 2 inhibitors converged instead on domain blockade, as AcrIIC1 does, and guide destruction, as AcrVA1 does?

Suggested experts: Joseph Bondy-Denomy

Suggested Experiments

Experiment: Measure AcrF3 dimerisation by size-exclusion chromatography with inline light scattering, and AcrF3-Cas2/3 affinity by isothermal titration calorimetry, in buffers with saturating Ca(2+), with no added divalent cation, and with EDTA, then test inhibition of Cas2/3-dependent plasmid degradation under the same three conditions. Calcium-independence across all three readouts would support removing the keyword outright rather than only marking the annotation over-annotated.

Hypothesis: Calcium is not required for AcrF3 function, so the GO:0046872 annotation reflects crystallisation conditions rather than biology.

Type: metal-dependence titration with paired binding and activity readouts

Experiment: Reconstitute the licensed interference intermediate by assembling Csy complex on a matched protospacer duplex and recruiting purified Cas2/3, then add AcrF3 either before or after recruitment and score target degradation and complex composition by native gel and mass photometry. An order-of-addition effect is the prediction; its absence would mean AcrF3 is an active disassembly factor rather than a sequestering agent, which would change the molecular function assigned here.

Hypothesis: AcrF3 can only intercept free Cas2/3 and cannot displace an already recruited nuclease.

Type: order-of-addition reconstitution assay

Experiment: Challenge Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 carrying an intact type I-F system with a partially mismatched protospacer plasmid while inducing either AcrF3 or the Csy-blocking gp30, then deep sequence the CRISPR arrays for newly acquired spacers. The mechanisms predict different outcomes, since a Csy blocker prevents the initial recognition that priming starts from whereas AcrF3 permits recognition but removes the nuclease, so comparing them tests whether priming requires Cas2/3 activity or only target engagement.

Hypothesis: AcrF3 blocks primed spacer acquisition in vivo, and does so to a greater extent than inhibitors that act on the surveillance complex.

Type: CRISPR array deep sequencing with paired inhibitor comparison

Knowledge Gaps

What is not known β€” curated, literature-grounded statements of the open unknowns (the inverse of core functions).

Gap: It is undetermined whether AcrF3 can extract Cas2/3 that is already engaged with a licensed R-loop, or whether it can only intercept free Cas2/3 before recruitment.

OPEN BIOLOGY

What is known: That AcrF3 prevents recruitment, and which Cas3 surfaces it masks, are both established structurally. The ambiguity concerns the order of events, not the interaction.

Significance: The two possibilities differ in what they demand of the phage. Intercepting free Cas2/3 requires only that AcrF3 reach inhibitory concentration before the first target is licensed, which is a race the phage can win by expressing early. Displacing an engaged nuclease would make the inhibitor effective at any point in the infection, and would also explain how a phage rescues itself after a delay.

What would resolve it: Assemble Csy complex on a target duplex, recruit Cas2/3, then add AcrF3 and follow dissociation and DNA degradation, comparing against addition of AcrF3 before recruitment.

Provenance (the field's own admissions):

πŸ“š Additional Documentation

Notes

(acrIF3-notes.md)

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

πŸ“„ View Raw YAML

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)