BUB3.1

UniProt ID: Q9LJN8
Organism: Arabidopsis thaliana
Review Status: DRAFT
📝 Provide Detailed Feedback

Gene Description

BUB3.1 is a WD40-repeat containing spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) protein in Arabidopsis thaliana. It functions as part of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) with MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 to ensure proper chromosome segregation during cell division. Uniquely in plants, BUB3.1 (along with BUB3.2) has acquired an additional function in phragmoplast-mediated cytokinesis through interaction with the microtubule-bundling protein MAP65-3. Recent studies (2024) have clarified that Arabidopsis has three BUB3 paralogs with distinct functions: BUB3.1/BUB3.2 primarily function in cytokinesis at the phragmoplast midline, while BUB3.3 mediates the kinetochore-localized SAC function. BUB3.1 is essential for gametophyte development and displays cell cycle-regulated expression peaking at G2/M.

Existing Annotations Review

GO Term Evidence Action Reason
GO:0007094 mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint signaling
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: BUB3.1 is a core component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in plants. IBA annotation is supported by phylogenetic conservation and experimental evidence in Arabidopsis. BUB3.1 interacts with MAD2 and BUBR1, localizes to unattached kinetochores upon SAC activation, and shows cell cycle-regulated expression with G2/M peak [PMID:19710914].
Reason: Core function of BUB3 family proteins. Experimental evidence from Caillaud et al. (2009) demonstrates BUB3.1 localization to kinetochores following SAC activation and interaction with other MCC components. This represents a conserved function from yeast to plants.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
the plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 partners identified in this study are all in place at the unattached kinetochores and may therefore fulfil the evolutionarily conserved functions of SAC proteins, delaying anaphase until all the chromosomes are attached to both poles of the spindle
GO:1990298 bub1-bub3 complex
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: BUB3.1 forms complexes with BUB1-related proteins in Arabidopsis. The BUB1/BUB3 complex is a conserved component of the SAC across eukaryotes. Experimental evidence supports BUB3.1 interactions with BUBR1/MAD3 family proteins [PMID:19710914, PMID:21687678].
Reason: Phylogenetically conserved complex. Y2H and BiFC experiments confirm BUB3.1 interactions with BUBR1 and other SAC components. The BUB1-BUB3 complex is essential for checkpoint signaling.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
Coexpression of BUBR1:Cub:URA3 with either Nub:BUB3.1 and Nub:MAD2 conferred resistance to 5-FOA, indicating that BUBR1 interacted with both BUB3.1 and MAD2
PMID:21687678
Binding of AtCDC20.1 and AtCDC20.2 was detected to MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 and a weaker one to BUB3.1
GO:0000776 kinetochore
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: BUB3.1 localizes to kinetochores upon SAC activation. IBA annotation is consistent with experimental IDA evidence from PMID:19710914 showing kinetochore localization.
Reason: Conserved localization supported by direct experimental evidence. BUB3.1-GFP localizes to unattached kinetochores in propyzamide-treated cells and to kinetochores in MG132-treated metaphase-arrested cells.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
At a prometaphase-like stage, following treatment with the microtubule-destabilizing herbicide propyzamid, which prevents the formation of microtubule-kinetochore attachments, the MAD2 fusion protein was found to cluster strongly in bright spots on condensing chromosomes corresponding to unattached kinetochores (n = 20; Fig. 3). Similar localisation was observed for the BUB3.1 and BUBR1 fusion proteins (n = 20; Fig. 3).
GO:0005654 nucleoplasm
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: BUB3.1 shows nuclear localization during interphase. This is consistent with its role as a cell cycle checkpoint protein and is supported by experimental evidence.
Reason: BUB3.1-GFP is detected in the nucleus during interphase, consistent with phylogenetic inference and direct experimental observation.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
BUB3.1:GFP and MAD2:GFP were detected in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm
GO:0009524 phragmoplast
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: BUB3.1 localizes to the phragmoplast midline during cytokinesis. This plant-specific function is well-supported by experimental evidence. IBA annotation is appropriate as this function appears conserved across plant species.
Reason: Plant-specific core function of BUB3.1. Multiple studies demonstrate phragmoplast midline localization and interaction with MAP65-3 for cytokinesis regulation.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
Unexpectedly, BUB3.1 was also found in the phragmoplast midline during the final step of cell division in plants
GO:0043130 ubiquitin binding
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Ubiquitin binding is inferred for BUB3.1 based on phylogenetic analysis. While BUB3 proteins interact with the APC/C complex which is involved in ubiquitination, direct evidence for ubiquitin binding by BUB3.1 is limited. This may be inferred from the WD40 domain architecture and complex formation with ubiquitin ligase machinery.
Reason: While BUB3 proteins are involved in SAC signaling that ultimately regulates APC/C-mediated ubiquitination, ubiquitin binding per se is not a core molecular function of BUB3.1. The primary functions are protein scaffolding and checkpoint signaling. This annotation may reflect the broader complex context rather than intrinsic BUB3.1 activity.
GO:0000776 kinetochore
IEA
GO_REF:0000120
ACCEPT
Summary: IEA annotation for kinetochore localization. This is consistent with the IBA and IDA annotations for the same term. Redundant with more specific evidence.
Reason: Consistent with experimental evidence. IEA provides additional computational support for a well-established localization.
GO:0005634 nucleus
IEA
GO_REF:0000044
ACCEPT
Summary: IEA annotation for nuclear localization based on UniProtKB subcellular location mapping. Consistent with experimental observations of nuclear/nucleoplasm localization.
Reason: Supported by experimental evidence showing BUB3.1-GFP in the nucleus during interphase. This is a more general term than nucleoplasm (GO:0005654) but both are correct.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
BUB3.1 and MAD2 proteins were localised to the nucleus and gave a weak cytoplasmic signal during interphase (n = 30; Fig. 5A).
GO:0005819 spindle
IEA
GO_REF:0000044
ACCEPT
Summary: BUB3.1 associates with spindle structures during mitosis. This is consistent with experimental observations of spindle microtubule association.
Reason: Experimental evidence shows BUB3.1 association with spindle microtubules in arrested metaphase cells. The term spindle is appropriate.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
Three hours after MG132 treatment, the initially diffuse spindle BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2:GFP staining accumulated progressively onto MT-like structures within the spindle
GO:0007059 chromosome segregation
IEA
GO_REF:0000043
ACCEPT
Summary: IEA annotation from UniProtKB keyword mapping. BUB3.1 is involved in ensuring proper chromosome segregation through its role in the spindle assembly checkpoint. This is a correct but somewhat general annotation.
Reason: BUB3 function in the SAC is essential for proper chromosome segregation. The checkpoint delays anaphase until chromosomes are properly attached, preventing mis-segregation.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
In eukaryotes, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a sophisticated surveillance mechanism that ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation during mitosis
GO:0009524 phragmoplast
IEA
GO_REF:0000044
ACCEPT
Summary: IEA annotation for phragmoplast localization. Redundant with IBA annotation but correctly assigned based on UniProtKB subcellular location vocabulary.
Reason: Consistent with IBA and experimental evidence. Phragmoplast localization is a well-established feature of BUB3.1.
GO:0051301 cell division
IEA
GO_REF:0000043
ACCEPT
Summary: IEA annotation from UniProtKB keyword mapping. BUB3.1 plays roles in both mitotic checkpoint and cytokinesis, making this a broadly appropriate term.
Reason: General but accurate term. BUB3.1 functions in cell division through both SAC signaling and phragmoplast-mediated cytokinesis.
GO:0051321 meiotic cell cycle
IEA
GO_REF:0000043
MODIFY
Summary: IEA annotation from UniProtKB keyword mapping. UniProt lists "Meiosis" as a keyword, likely derived from the observation that BUB3.1 disruption affects gametophyte development. However, the experimental evidence primarily demonstrates MITOTIC functions. There is no direct experimental evidence showing BUB3.1 functions specifically in meiosis as opposed to the mitotic divisions during gametophyte development.
Reason: This appears to be an over-annotation. While BUB3.1 is essential for gametophyte development (PMID:18508582), the gametophyte defects could result from mitotic errors during the post-meiotic mitoses, not meiosis itself. The primary experimental evidence (PMID:19710914) focuses on mitotic cells. BUB3 proteins are general cell cycle checkpoint proteins - they function in any dividing cell. The annotation to "meiotic cell cycle" implies a meiosis-specific function that is not experimentally supported for BUB3.1. In Arabidopsis, BUB3.3 appears to be the paralog with specialized kinetochore checkpoint functions, while BUB3.1/BUB3.2 are specialized for cytokinesis. A more appropriate annotation would be the parent term "cell cycle" (GO:0007049) or "mitotic cell cycle" (GO:0000278).
Proposed replacements: mitotic cell cycle
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
We conclude that plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 proteins may have the SAC protein functions conserved from yeast to humans
GO:0005634 nucleus
ISM
GO_REF:0000122
ACCEPT
Summary: ISM annotation from AtSubP analysis predicting nuclear localization. Consistent with experimental evidence and other annotations.
Reason: Computational prediction confirmed by experimental observation.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:19710914
Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserve...
MODIFY
Summary: IPI annotation based on demonstrated interactions with MAD2 and BUBR1 in Caillaud et al. (2009). While the interactions are real and well-documented, "protein binding" is a generic term that provides little functional information.
Reason: "Protein binding" is too generic and uninformative. The specific binding partners are MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3. More informative annotations would be to the specific complexes or binding activities. Since BUB3.1 forms the bub1-bub3 complex (GO:1990298) which is already annotated, and functions in mitotic checkpoint complex formation, the generic "protein binding" annotation adds little value. Consider replacement with a more specific term or removal as redundant with complex annotations.
Proposed replacements: mitotic checkpoint complex
GO:0005828 kinetochore microtubule
IDA
PMID:19710914
Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserve...
ACCEPT
Summary: IDA annotation based on localization to kinetochore microtubules in Caillaud et al. (2009). In MG132-treated cells arrested in metaphase, BUB3.1 accumulated on MT-like structures and was confirmed to colocalize with spindle microtubules.
Reason: Direct experimental evidence demonstrates BUB3.1 association with kinetochore microtubules during SAC activation. This is part of the core checkpoint function.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
In cases of 'wait anaphase', plant SAC proteins were associated with both kinetochores and kinetochore microtubules
GO:0005876 spindle microtubule
IDA
PMID:19710914
Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserve...
ACCEPT
Summary: IDA annotation based on localization studies in Caillaud et al. (2009). BUB3.1 associates with spindle microtubules during metaphase arrest.
Reason: Well-supported by experimental evidence showing BUB3.1 accumulation on spindle MT-like structures in MG132-treated cells.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
Progressively, much of the BUBR1, BUB3.1, MAD2:GFP-derived fluorescence took on a fibrillar appearance, probably as a result of association with the acentrosomal metaphase spindle apparatus
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:21687678
Conserved CDC20 cell cycle functions are carried out by two ...
MODIFY
Summary: IPI annotation based on Y2H interaction with CDC20-1 and CDC20-2 in Kevei et al. (2011). While the interaction is documented, "protein binding" is too generic.
Reason: Same issue as the other "protein binding" annotation - too generic. The interaction with CDC20 is functionally meaningful in the context of MCC formation and APC/C regulation. A more specific term or complex annotation would be more informative.
Proposed replacements: mitotic checkpoint complex
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21687678
Binding of AtCDC20.1 and AtCDC20.2 was detected to MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 and a weaker one to BUB3.1
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:20706207
Targeted interactomics reveals a complex core cell cycle mac...
MODIFY
Summary: IPI annotation from Van Leene et al. (2010) targeted interactomics study. This high-throughput TAP-MS study identified BUB3.1 interactions in the context of cell cycle machinery.
Reason: Generic "protein binding" annotation from a high-throughput study. While valid, this provides minimal functional insight. The specific interactions identified would be more informative.
Proposed replacements: mitotic checkpoint complex
GO:0000776 kinetochore
IDA
PMID:19710914
Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserve...
ACCEPT
Summary: IDA annotation for kinetochore localization from Caillaud et al. (2009). This is direct experimental evidence showing BUB3.1-GFP at kinetochores following SAC activation.
Reason: Strong experimental evidence. BUB3.1-GFP localizes to kinetochores in both propyzamide-treated cells (prometaphase arrest) and MG132-treated cells (metaphase arrest).
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
Similar localisation was observed for the BUB3.1 and BUBR1 fusion proteins (n = 20; Fig. 3). Thus, the plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 partners identified in this study are all in place at the unattached kinetochores
GO:0007094 mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint signaling
IDA
PMID:19710914
Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserve...
ACCEPT
Summary: IDA annotation for mitotic SAC signaling based on Caillaud et al. (2009). BUB3.1 is part of the SAC machinery, interacting with MAD2 and BUBR1, and localizing appropriately during checkpoint activation.
Reason: Core function of BUB3.1 with strong experimental support. The study demonstrates physical interactions between SAC components, appropriate localization dynamics, and cell cycle-regulated expression.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
We conclude that plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 proteins may have the SAC protein functions conserved from yeast to humans
GO:0009524 phragmoplast
IDA
PMID:19710914
Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserve...
ACCEPT
Summary: IDA annotation for phragmoplast localization from Caillaud et al. (2009). Time-lapse imaging showed BUB3.1 at the phragmoplast midline during cytokinesis.
Reason: Plant-specific core function with strong experimental evidence. This is one of the key findings of the Caillaud et al. study - BUB3.1 has a dual role in SAC and cytokinesis.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19710914
BUB3.1 displayed an unexpected distribution during cytokinesis in late anaphase to telophase in plant cells. It first appeared in the centre of the forming cell plate, and was subsequently redistributed to the growing margins of the cell plate as the cell plate grew outwards
GO:0080008 Cul4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complex
ISS
PMID:18223036
Characterization of Arabidopsis and rice DWD proteins and th...
UNDECIDED
Summary: ISS annotation suggesting BUB3.1 is part of a CUL4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, based on Lee et al. (2008). This paper identified DWD (DDB1-binding WD40) proteins as potential substrate receptors for CUL4-based E3 ligases. BUB3.1 contains WD40 repeats and may have a DWD motif.
Reason: The Lee et al. (2008) paper is about DWD proteins as CUL4 substrate receptors. While BUB3.1 contains WD40 repeats, its primary known functions are in SAC and cytokinesis, not as a CUL4 substrate receptor. This annotation may be based on domain architecture rather than functional evidence. Need to verify whether BUB3.1 was specifically identified as a CUL4 complex component or if this is inference from domain structure. The connection between BUB3 and CUL4 is not clearly established in the core BUB3.1 literature.

Core Functions

BUB3.1 functions as a component of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), interacting with MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 to ensure proper chromosome segregation. It localizes to unattached kinetochores and spindle microtubules during SAC activation. This is a conserved function from yeast to plants.

Supporting Evidence:
  • PMID:19710914
    Coexpression of BUBR1:Cub:URA3 with either Nub:BUB3.1 and Nub:MAD2 conferred resistance to 5-FOA, indicating that BUBR1 interacted with both BUB3.1 and MAD2
  • PMID:19710914
    the plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 partners identified in this study are all in place at the unattached kinetochores and may therefore fulfil the evolutionarily conserved functions of SAC proteins, delaying anaphase until all the chromosomes are attached to both poles of the spindle

BUB3.1 has a plant-specific function in phragmoplast-mediated cytokinesis. It localizes to the phragmoplast midline during cell plate formation and interacts with MAP65-3 to promote microtubule reorganization. This dual function distinguishes plant BUB3 proteins from their animal/yeast counterparts.

Directly Involved In:
Cellular Locations:
Supporting Evidence:
  • PMID:19710914
    Unexpectedly, BUB3.1 was also found in the phragmoplast midline during the final step of cell division in plants
  • DOI:10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z
    BUB3.1 and BUB3.2 interact with MAP65-3 to promote phragmoplast microtubule reorganization

References

Annotation inferences using phylogenetic trees
  • BUB3.1 functions are phylogenetically conserved across eukaryotes
Gene Ontology annotation based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot keyword mapping
  • Keywords mapped to GO terms, some may be over-generalized
Gene Ontology annotation based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Subcellular Location vocabulary mapping, accompanied by conservative changes to GO terms applied by UniProt
  • Subcellular locations consistently mapped
Combined Automated Annotation using Multiple IEA Methods
AtSubP analysis
  • Computational prediction of nuclear localization confirmed experimentally
Characterization of Arabidopsis and rice DWD proteins and their roles as substrate receptors for CUL4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases.
  • Identified DWD proteins in Arabidopsis that may serve as CUL4 substrate receptors
  • WD40-containing proteins with DWD motif can interact with DDB1
The Arabidopsis checkpoint protein Bub3.1 is essential for gametophyte development.
  • BUB3.1 is essential for male and female gametophyte development
  • Homozygous knockouts are lethal
Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserved and unsuspected roles in plant cell division.
  • BUB3.1 interacts physically with BUBR1 and MAD2
  • BUB3.1 localizes to unattached kinetochores upon SAC activation
  • BUB3.1 displays cell cycle-regulated expression with G2/M peak
  • BUB3.1 unexpectedly localizes to phragmoplast midline during cytokinesis
  • BUB3.1 associates with both kinetochores and spindle microtubules during metaphase arrest
Targeted interactomics reveals a complex core cell cycle machinery in Arabidopsis thaliana.
  • High-throughput TAP-MS identified BUB3.1 interactions in cell cycle network
  • BUB3.1 connected to mitotic checkpoint protein network
Conserved CDC20 cell cycle functions are carried out by two of the five isoforms in Arabidopsis thaliana.
  • BUB3.1 interacts with CDC20-1 and CDC20-2
  • AtCDC20.1 and AtCDC20.2 are components of MCC with BUB3.1
DOI:10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z
Role of the BUB3 protein in phragmoplast microtubule reorganization during cytokinesis
  • BUB3.1 and BUB3.2 interact with MAP65-3
  • BUB3.1/BUB3.2 promote phragmoplast microtubule reorganization
  • bub3.1 bub3.2 double mutants show cytokinesis defects
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2316583121
A coadapted KNL1 and spindle assembly checkpoint axis orchestrates precise mitosis in Arabidopsis
  • BUB3.3 (not BUB3.1) is recruited to kinetochores by KNL1
  • Paralog specialization in Arabidopsis BUB3 family
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2322677121
The Arabidopsis BUB1/MAD3 family protein BMF3 requires BUB3.3 to recruit CDC20 to kinetochores
  • BUB3.3 mediates CDC20 recruitment to kinetochores via BMF3
  • Functional distinction between BUB3 paralogs in plants

Suggested Questions for Experts

Q: Does BUB3.1 have any meiosis-specific function, or do gametophyte defects result from post-meiotic mitotic errors?

Q: What is the functional relationship between BUB3.1/BUB3.2 (cytokinesis-specialized) and BUB3.3 (kinetochore-specialized)?

Q: Is the CUL4-RING E3 ligase complex annotation biologically meaningful or just domain-based inference?

Suggested Experiments

Experiment: Compare BUB3.1 localization and function during meiosis I/II vs mitosis to determine if there is meiosis-specific activity

Hypothesis: BUB3.1 gametophyte defects result from post-meiotic mitotic errors rather than meiotic dysfunction

Experiment: Generate bub3.1 bub3.3 double mutants to understand functional overlap between paralogs

Hypothesis: BUB3.1 and BUB3.3 have distinct but complementary functions in cell division

Experiment: Test whether BUB3.1 directly binds DDB1 to validate CUL4 complex membership

Hypothesis: BUB3.1 is not a bona fide CUL4 substrate receptor despite containing WD40 repeats

📚 Additional Documentation

Deep Research Falcon

(BUB3.1-deep-research-falcon.md)

provider: falcon
model: Edison Scientific Literature
cached: false
start_time: '2026-01-31T12:36:05.979281'
end_time: '2026-01-31T12:41:20.151652'
duration_seconds: 314.17
template_file: templates/gene_research_go_focused.md
template_variables:
organism: ARATH
gene_id: BUB3.1
gene_symbol: BUB3.1
uniprot_accession: Q9LJN8
protein_description: 'RecName: Full=Mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3.1; AltName:
Full=Protein BUDDING UNINHIBITED BY BENZYMIDAZOL 3.1;'
gene_info: Name=BUB3.1; OrderedLocusNames=At3g19590; ORFNames=MMB12.5;
organism_full: Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress).
protein_family: Belongs to the WD repeat BUB3 family. .
protein_domains: WD40/YVTN_repeat-like_dom_sf. (IPR015943); WD40_PAC1. (IPR020472);
WD40_repeat_dom_sf. (IPR036322); WD40_rpt. (IPR001680); WD40 (PF00400)
provider_config:
timeout: 600
max_retries: 3
parameters:
allowed_domains: []
temperature: 0.1
citation_count: 16


Question

Gene Research for Functional Annotation

⚠️ CRITICAL: Gene/Protein Identification Context

BEFORE YOU BEGIN RESEARCH: You MUST verify you are researching the CORRECT gene/protein. Gene symbols can be ambiguous, especially for less well-characterized genes from non-model organisms.

Target Gene/Protein Identity (from UniProt):

  • UniProt Accession: Q9LJN8
  • Protein Description: RecName: Full=Mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3.1; AltName: Full=Protein BUDDING UNINHIBITED BY BENZYMIDAZOL 3.1;
  • Gene Information: Name=BUB3.1; OrderedLocusNames=At3g19590; ORFNames=MMB12.5;
  • Organism (full): Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress).
  • Protein Family: Belongs to the WD repeat BUB3 family. .
  • Key Domains: WD40/YVTN_repeat-like_dom_sf. (IPR015943); WD40_PAC1. (IPR020472); WD40_repeat_dom_sf. (IPR036322); WD40_rpt. (IPR001680); WD40 (PF00400)

MANDATORY VERIFICATION STEPS:

  1. Check if the gene symbol "BUB3.1" matches the protein description above
  2. Verify the organism is correct: Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress).
  3. Check if protein family/domains align with what you find in literature
  4. If you find literature for a DIFFERENT gene with the same or similar symbol, STOP

If Gene Symbol is Ambiguous or You Cannot Find Relevant Literature:

DO NOT PROCEED WITH RESEARCH ON A DIFFERENT GENE. Instead:
- State clearly: "The gene symbol 'BUB3.1' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein"
- Explain what you found (e.g., "Found extensive literature on a different gene with the same symbol in a different organism")
- Describe the protein based ONLY on the UniProt information provided above
- Suggest that the protein function can be inferred from domain/family information

Research Target:

Please provide a comprehensive research report on the gene BUB3.1 (gene ID: BUB3.1, UniProt: Q9LJN8) in ARATH.

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Output

Question: You are an expert researcher providing comprehensive, well-cited information.

Provide detailed information focusing on:
1. Key concepts and definitions with current understanding
2. Recent developments and latest research (prioritize 2023-2024 sources)
3. Current applications and real-world implementations
4. Expert opinions and analysis from authoritative sources
5. Relevant statistics and data from recent studies

Format as a comprehensive research report with proper citations. Include URLs and publication dates where available.
Always prioritize recent, authoritative sources and provide specific citations for all major claims.

Gene Research for Functional Annotation

⚠️ CRITICAL: Gene/Protein Identification Context

BEFORE YOU BEGIN RESEARCH: You MUST verify you are researching the CORRECT gene/protein. Gene symbols can be ambiguous, especially for less well-characterized genes from non-model organisms.

Target Gene/Protein Identity (from UniProt):

  • UniProt Accession: Q9LJN8
  • Protein Description: RecName: Full=Mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3.1; AltName: Full=Protein BUDDING UNINHIBITED BY BENZYMIDAZOL 3.1;
  • Gene Information: Name=BUB3.1; OrderedLocusNames=At3g19590; ORFNames=MMB12.5;
  • Organism (full): Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress).
  • Protein Family: Belongs to the WD repeat BUB3 family. .
  • Key Domains: WD40/YVTN_repeat-like_dom_sf. (IPR015943); WD40_PAC1. (IPR020472); WD40_repeat_dom_sf. (IPR036322); WD40_rpt. (IPR001680); WD40 (PF00400)

MANDATORY VERIFICATION STEPS:

  1. Check if the gene symbol "BUB3.1" matches the protein description above
  2. Verify the organism is correct: Arabidopsis thaliana (Mouse-ear cress).
  3. Check if protein family/domains align with what you find in literature
  4. If you find literature for a DIFFERENT gene with the same or similar symbol, STOP

If Gene Symbol is Ambiguous or You Cannot Find Relevant Literature:

DO NOT PROCEED WITH RESEARCH ON A DIFFERENT GENE. Instead:
- State clearly: "The gene symbol 'BUB3.1' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein"
- Explain what you found (e.g., "Found extensive literature on a different gene with the same symbol in a different organism")
- Describe the protein based ONLY on the UniProt information provided above
- Suggest that the protein function can be inferred from domain/family information

Research Target:

Please provide a comprehensive research report on the gene BUB3.1 (gene ID: BUB3.1, UniProt: Q9LJN8) in ARATH.

The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Plan
Objective 1: Verify target identity, organism, family/domains, and paralogs for Arabidopsis thaliana BUB3.1 (UniProt Q9LJN8; At3g19590). Status: completed. Evidence from Arabidopsis studies identifies two close BUB3 paralogs (BUB3.1/At3g19590 and BUB3.2/At1g49910) and a divergent BUB3.3; BUB3.1 is a ~38 kDa WD40-repeat BUB3 family protein with 52% identity to human BUB3, consistent with the UniProt description and WD40 family annotation (PLoS ONE 2009; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757, Aug 2009) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 147-148).
Objective 2: Gather recent and foundational literature with emphasis on 2023–2024 sources. Status: completed. High-quality recent work in 2024 PNAS articles detail a KNL1–SAC axis and BMF3–BUB3.3–CDC20 recruitment, and a 2024 Nature Plants article links BUB3.3 to a kinesin-7 motor; foundational Arabidopsis BUB3.1 studies from 2009–2018 provide functional and localization evidence (https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121, Jan 2024; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121, Mar 2024; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01824-7, Oct 2024; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757, Aug 2009; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z, Jul 2018) (deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 3-5, tang2024akinetochoreassociatedkinesin7 pages 1-8, caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2).
Objective 3: Compile detailed evidence on function, pathways, localization, and plant-specific roles. Status: completed. Evidence assembled below (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2, zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2).
Objective 4: Extract statistics/quantitative data and applications/implications. Status: completed. Quantitative n values for localization/interaction assays and identity percentages are included; developmental and cytokinesis implications summarized (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 11-11).
Objective 5: Synthesize expert analysis from authoritative sources. Status: completed. Integrates PNAS and Nature Plants advances with foundational Arabidopsis work to delineate paralog-specific roles (deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 3-5, tang2024akinetochoreassociatedkinesin7 pages 1-8).
Objective 6: Create a summary artifact table. Status: completed; see embedded artifact (artifact-00).
Objective 7: Write and submit the comprehensive, cited research report. Status: completed.

Comprehensive research report: Arabidopsis thaliana BUB3.1 (At3g19590; UniProt Q9LJN8)

1) Key concepts and definitions
BUB3.1 is an Arabidopsis thaliana WD40-repeat protein of the conserved BUB3 family, encoded at locus At3g19590, and one of multiple BUB3 paralogs in Arabidopsis (BUB3.1, BUB3.2, BUB3.3). Sequence and domain analyses show BUB3.1 is ~38 kDa with multiple WD40 repeats; it shares ~52% identity with human BUB3 and ~22% with budding yeast BUB3, consistent with a conserved scaffold role in the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) (PLoS ONE, 2009; URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757, Aug 2009) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 147-148). In plants, BUB3 paralogs have diversified: BUB3.1 and BUB3.2 are highly similar (≈88% identity), while BUB3.3 is more divergent and exhibits specialized kinetochore functions (Nature Plants, 2018; URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z, Jul 2018; PNAS, 2024; URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121, Jan 2024) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2, deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 2-3, deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2).

Functionally, BUB3 proteins are core SAC components that contribute to assembly of a checkpoint effector complex to inhibit APC/C activator CDC20 until all chromosomes are properly attached to spindle microtubules. In Arabidopsis, BUB3.1 interacts with MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3-like proteins, consistent with a role in mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC)-like signaling (PLoS ONE, 2009; URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757, Aug 2009) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 148-150, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 147-148).

2) Primary molecular function, interactions, and plant‑specific roles
- Checkpoint scaffold and MCC context: BUB3.1 displays cell cycle–regulated expression peaking at G2/M and physically interacts with MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 family proteins, supporting participation in SAC signaling that restrains anaphase onset (PLoS ONE, 2009; URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757; thesis/compendium 2013) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 148-150, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 147-148, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 174-182).
- Plant‑specific cytokinesis function: Unlike the canonical animal paradigm that emphasizes kinetochore-restricted BUB3 functions, Arabidopsis BUB3.1 and its close paralog BUB3.2 additionally interact with the microtubule-bundling protein MAP65-3 and promote phragmoplast microtubule reorganization during cytokinesis. BUB3.1/2 localize to the spindle midzone and phragmoplast midline and facilitate MAP65-3 association with microtubules, directly linking checkpoint components to cytokinetic machinery (Nature Plants, 2018; URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z, Jul 2018) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2, paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2, paganelli2015threebub1and pages 9-10).
- Interaction repertoire: BUB3.1 interacts with MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 family proteins by Y2H/BiFC and co-localizes at centromeric foci; tandem affinity purifications and biochemical data identify MAP65-3 as a BUB3.1 partner, with specificity over other MAP65 isoforms (e.g., not MAP65-1), reinforcing a targeted role in midzone/cell plate formation (New Phytologist, 2015; URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073, Sep 2015) (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2, paganelli2015threebub1and pages 9-10).

3) Subcellular localization dynamics
- Interphase: BUB3.1-GFP is nuclear with additional cytoplasmic signal (PLoS ONE, 2009; URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 147-148).
- Proto-/prometaphase under SAC activation: Upon microtubule destabilization (e.g., propyzamide), BUB3.1 accumulates at unattached kinetochores, similar to MAD2 and BUBR1, consistent with checkpoint activation (PLoS ONE, 2009; URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 148-150).
- Anaphase to cytokinesis: BUB3.1 enriches in the spindle midzone during anaphase and strongly at the phragmoplast midline during cytokinesis, before reappearing in daughter nuclei, matching a role in phragmoplast regulation (Nature Plants, 2018; URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2).

4) Genetic/phenotypic evidence
- BUB3.1 loss and development: Arabidopsis BUB3.1 disruption has been associated with embryo/gametophyte lethality in certain lines, indicating essential roles in reproduction; family-level evidence supports BUB3 roles in development and fertility (PNAS, 2024; URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121, Mar 2024) (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 11-11).
- Cytokinesis function revealed by paralog double mutants: bub3;1 bub3;2 double mutants exhibit uncoordinated phragmoplast expansion, failed cell plate assembly, and hypersensitivity to caffeine, consistent with defective cytokinesis. At the organismal level, seedlings can appear grossly normal, but cellular defects are clear (Nature Plants, 2018; URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2).
- SAC-related phenotypes in family: MAD3/BUBR1-related mutants (interacting with BUB3.1) show metaphase misalignment, lagging chromosomes, and micronuclei; combined SAC component mutations exacerbate mitotic defects (New Phytologist, 2015; URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073) (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2, paganelli2015threebub1and pages 9-10).

5) Plant-specific features vs animals/yeast
Plants repurpose BUB3 paralogs for additional midzone/phragmoplast roles. BUB3.1/2 cooperate with MAP65-3 to reorganize midzone microtubules, a function not described in the same form in animals/yeast, where BUB3 primarily scaffolds kinetochore recruitment via GLEBS interactions on Bub1/BubR1. In Arabidopsis, only BUB3.3 is a persistent kinetochore-localized SAC factor, while BUB3.1/2 primarily support cytokinesis, illustrating paralog specialization in plants (Nature Plants, 2018; URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z; PNAS, 2024; URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2, deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 2-3, deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2).

6) Recent developments and latest research (2023–2024)
Although these advances focus on BUB3.3 rather than BUB3.1, they define the present understanding of the BUB3 family axis at plant kinetochores and clarify paralog-specific roles relative to BUB3.1:
- KNL1–SAC axis in Arabidopsis: KNL1 independently recruits BUB3.3 and BMF3 to kinetochores; loss of KNL1 disrupts kinetochore localization of SAC components and prevents SAC activation, establishing KNL1 as a core plant kinetochore scaffold for SAC proteins (PNAS, 2024; URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121, Jan 2024) (deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2, deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 2-3).
- BMF3–BUB3.3–CDC20 recruitment: BMF3 requires BUB3.3 to recruit CDC20 to unattached kinetochores; BMF3 carries internal repeats necessary for BUB3.3 binding, and bub3.3 and bmf3 mutants lose kinetochore CDC20 signals, indicating a specialized paralog pathway for MCC-like assembly in plants (PNAS, 2024; URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121, Mar 2024) (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 9-10, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 7-7, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 3-5).
- Kinesin-7 cooperation with BUB3.3: A kinetochore-associated kinesin-7 motor (KAK1; CENP-E–like) cooperates with BUB3.3 to promote chromosome congression. KNL1C-BUB3.3 and KAK1-KNL1C fusion experiments rescue respective mutant phenotypes, supporting functional connections among KNL1, BUB3.3, and kinesin-7 (Nature Plants, 2024; URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01824-7, Oct 2024) (tang2024akinetochoreassociatedkinesin7 pages 1-8). These data underscore that the kinetochore-centric BUB3 activity in Arabidopsis is predominantly mediated by BUB3.3, whereas BUB3.1 serves plant-specific cytokinetic functions.

7) Quantitative data and key statistics
- Sequence identity: BUB3.1 shares ~52% identity with human BUB3 and ~22% with budding yeast BUB3; BUB3.1 and BUB3.2 share ~88% identity, consistent with paralogous conservation (PLoS ONE, 2009; URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 147-148).
- Localization/interaction assays: Multiple BiFC and localization experiments report sample sizes typically n = 20–40 cells per assay; kinetochore association is observed under spindle poison (e.g., propyzamide) or proteasome inhibition (MG132) conditions (PLoS ONE, 2009; URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4, paganelli2013…formationdes pages 148-150).
- Genetic phenotypes: bub3;1 bub3;2 double mutants show clear cellular cytokinesis defects and stress hypersensitivity (caffeine) despite relatively mild gross morphology (Nature Plants, 2018; URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2). Family-level SAC mutants (MAD3-related) exhibit increased chromosome misalignment, lagging chromosomes, and micronuclei, quantitatively increasing mitotic error frequency (New Phytologist, 2015; URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073) (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2, paganelli2015threebub1and pages 9-10).

8) Current applications and implications
- Development and fertility: Disruption of BUB3 family members can lead to gametophyte/embryo lethality; for BUB3.1, essential roles in reproduction have been reported in specific genetic backgrounds, highlighting potential constraints on cell division fidelity during plant reproduction (PNAS, 2024; URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121) (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 11-11).
- Cytokinesis engineering and stress responses: The BUB3.1/2–MAP65-3 axis provides a plant-specific handle on phragmoplast organization; defects yield sensitivity to agents like caffeine and cytokinesis failure, implicating BUB3.1 in robustness of cell plate formation and thus tissue patterning during growth (Nature Plants, 2018; URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2).
- Mechanistic framework for crop systems: The 2024 KNL1–SAC studies outline a plant lineage–specific recruitment architecture for kinetochore checkpoints, which may inform targeted manipulation of mitotic fidelity in plant breeding and development. Although these data focus on BUB3.3, they clarify the broader BUB3 family organization in plants and help contextualize BUB3.1’s cytokinesis role (PNAS, 2024; URLs above) (deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2, deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 2-3).

Expert synthesis and analysis
Collectively, Arabidopsis BUB3.1 conforms to a conserved SAC scaffold with WD40 repeats, but plant evolution diversified BUB3 paralogs: BUB3.3 now anchors core kinetochore SAC functions (recruiting CDC20 via BMF3 and cooperating with KNL1 and KAK1 kinesin-7), whereas BUB3.1 (and BUB3.2) have assumed prominent phragmoplast/midzone roles by partnering with MAP65-3 to execute cytokinesis. This division of labor explains earlier observations of BUB3.1 localization to unattached kinetochores under checkpoint activation, while its dominant developmental impact manifests through cytokinesis. The 2024 advances provide a mechanistic scaffold for kinetochore recruitment in plants and, by demarcating paralog-specific roles, prevent conflation of BUB3.1 cytokinesis functions with BUB3.3 checkpoint recruitment roles (PNAS 2024; Nature Plants 2018, 2024) (deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 3-5, tang2024akinetochoreassociatedkinesin7 pages 1-8, zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2).

Embedded summary table of evidence
| Category | Key finding (1–2 sentences) | Evidence type | Organism / isoform specificity | Quantitative details | Primary source(s) (URL, year) |
|---|---|---:|---|---:|---|
| Identity / domains / paralogs | BUB3.1 is a WD40-repeat protein (~38 kDa) belonging to the BUB3 family; Arabidopsis has multiple BUB3 paralogs including highly similar BUB3.2 and a more divergent BUB3.3. | Sequence analysis, expression profiling | Arabidopsis thaliana (BUB3.1 At3g19590 vs BUB3.2 At1g49910; BUB3.3 divergent) | BUB3.1 ~38 kDa; BUB3.1 vs BUB3.2 ~88% identity; BUB3.1 vs human BUB3 ~52% identity (n / assays reported) | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757 (2009) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4), (paganelli2013…formationdes pages 147-148) |
| Primary molecular function | Functions as a WD40 scaffold in the spindle assembly checkpoint (forms part of MCC to inhibit CDC20/APC/C), with cell-cycle regulated expression peaking at G2/M. | Localization (GFP), BiFC, cell synchronization, pharmacological SAC activation | BUB3.1 (primary evidence for SAC role) | G2/M expression peak reported; localization/BiFC assays typically n = 20–40 cells in studies | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757 (2009) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4), (paganelli2013…formationdes pages 148-150) |
| Interaction partners | Direct/robust interactions reported with MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 family proteins and a plant-specific interaction with MAP65-3 (links SAC to microtubule bundling). | Y2H / split-ubiquitin, BiFC, TAP-MS, co‑IP | BUB3.1 ↔ MAD2, BUBR1/MAD3; BUB3.1 ↔ MAP65-3 (plant-specific) | Interaction assays with BiFC/Y2H reported (n ≈ 20–40); TAP‑MS identified MAP65-3 in complexes | https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073 (2015) (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2, paganelli2015threebub1and pages 9-10), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z (2018) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2) |
| Subcellular localization dynamics | BUB3.1 is nuclear in interphase, localizes to unattached kinetochores on SAC activation, becomes enriched in the spindle midzone during anaphase and concentrates at the phragmoplast midline during cytokinesis. | Live-cell imaging (GFP fusions), drug treatments (propyzamide), immunolocalization | Observed for BUB3.1 (also reported for BUB3.2 in many assays) | Localization assays reported with sample counts (e.g., n = 20–40); dynamic relocalization across mitotic phases documented | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757 (2009) (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z (2018) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2), (paganelli2013…formationdes pages 148-150) |
| Mutant / phenotypic evidence | Loss or combined loss of BUB3 paralogs impairs cytokinesis and chromosome segregation: bub3;1 bub3;2 double mutants display uncoordinated phragmoplast expansion, cytokinesis failure and caffeine hypersensitivity; single BUB3.1 disruption reported to affect female gametophyte/embryogenesis in some lines. | Genetic knockouts / double mutants, phenotypic characterization, cytology | Phenotypes reported for bub3;1 bub3;2 double mutants; some BUB3.1 T‑DNA lines show gametophytic/embryo defects | Cellular phenotypes: failed cell plate assembly, misaligned chromosomes, cytokinesis defects; stress sensitivity (caffeine) described | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z (2018) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2), https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073 (2015) (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2) |
| Plant‑specific roles beyond SAC | BUB3.1/2 promote phragmoplast microtubule reorganization by interacting with MAP65-3, implicating BUB3 paralogs in cytokinesis regulation distinct from canonical kinetochore-only roles in animals/yeast. | Biochemistry (interaction assays), cellular imaging, genetics | Demonstrated for BUB3.1 and BUB3.2 (plant paralogs) | Functional assays show MAP65-3 recruitment/activity promoted by BUB3.1/2; double mutant cytokinesis phenotypes documented | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z (2018) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2) |
| 2023–2024 family‑level advances | Recent 2024 work shows a noncanonical BUB3 paralog (BUB3.3) mediates recruitment of CDC20 via BMF3 at kinetochores and highlights coadaptation of KNL1–SAC connections in Arabidopsis; these advances emphasize paralog-specific specialization within the plant BUB3 family (BUB3.3 findings distinct from BUB3.1 roles). | Genetic, biochemical, cryo/cell biological analyses (recent PNAS and PNAS-series studies) | Findings primarily implicate BUB3.3 (not BUB3.1) for CDC20 recruitment; KNL1–SAC coadaptation discussed at family level in Arabidopsis | PNAS 2024 (Deng et al.) demonstrates BMF3 requires BUB3.3 to recruit CDC20 (see DOI); reviews/PNAS work on KNL1 coadaptation in 2024 discuss plant‑specific recruitment mechanisms | https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121 (2024) (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 11-11), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121 (2024) (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 9-10) |

Table: Concise, evidence‑linked summary of Arabidopsis thaliana BUB3.1 (At3g19590; UniProt Q9LJN8) covering identity, functions, partners, localization, mutant phenotypes, plant‑specific roles, and recent 2023–2024 family advances; sources cited for each entry for quick verification.

Verification of gene/protein identity and avoidance of ambiguity
- The literature cited explicitly uses Arabidopsis At3g19590 for BUB3.1 and distinguishes BUB3.2 (At1g49910) and BUB3.3, aligning with the UniProt entry Q9LJN8 and the Arabidopsis organism context. Domain and family annotations (WD40 repeats; BUB3 family) match UniProt-provided domain architecture. No conflicting gene symbol usage from other organisms is invoked in the evidence (Nature Plants 2018; PLoS ONE 2009) (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2, caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4).

References with URLs and dates (selection within the evidence set)
- Caillaud MC et al. Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein Dynamics Reveal Conserved and Unsuspected Roles in Plant Cell Division. PLoS ONE. Aug 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757 (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4).
- Paganelli L et al. Three BUB1 and BUBR1/MAD3-related spindle assembly checkpoint proteins are required for accurate mitosis in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist. Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073 (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2, paganelli2015threebub1and pages 9-10).
- Zhang H et al. Role of the BUB3 protein in phragmoplast microtubule reorganization during cytokinesis. Nature Plants. Jul 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2).
- Deng X et al. A coadapted KNL1 and spindle assembly checkpoint axis orchestrates precise mitosis in Arabidopsis. PNAS. Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121 (deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2, deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 2-3).
- Deng X et al. The Arabidopsis BUB1/MAD3 family protein BMF3 requires BUB3.3 to recruit CDC20 to kinetochores in SAC signaling. PNAS. Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121 (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 9-10, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 7-9, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 11-11, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 7-7, deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 3-5).
- Tang X et al. A kinetochore-associated kinesin-7 motor cooperates with BUB3.3 to regulate mitotic chromosome congression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Plants. Oct 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01824-7 (tang2024akinetochoreassociatedkinesin7 pages 1-8).

References

  1. (caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4): Marie-Cécile Caillaud, Laetitia Paganelli, Philippe Lecomte, Laurent Deslandes, Michaël Quentin, Yann Pecrix, Manuel Le Bris, Nicolas Marfaing, Pierre Abad, and Bruno Favery. Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserved and unsuspected roles in plant cell division. PLoS ONE, 4:e6757, Aug 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006757. This article has 89 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

  2. (paganelli2013…formationdes pages 147-148): L Paganelli. … formation des cellules géantes induites par le nématode à galles meloidogyne incognita: caractérisation du complexe de surveillance de la mitose chez arabidopsis. Unknown journal, 2013.

  3. (deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 1-2): Xingguang Deng, Ying He, Xiaoya Tang, Xianghong Liu, Yuh-Ru Julie Lee, Bo Liu, and Honghui Lin. A coadapted knl1 and spindle assembly checkpoint axis orchestrates precise mitosis in arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2316583121. This article has 10 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  4. (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 3-5): Xingguang Deng, Felicia Lei Peng, Xiaoya Tang, Yuh-Ru Julie Lee, Hong-Hui Lin, and Bo Liu. The arabidopsis bub1/mad3 family protein bmf3 requires bub3.3 to recruit cdc20 to kinetochores in spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2322677121. This article has 10 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  5. (tang2024akinetochoreassociatedkinesin7 pages 1-8): Xiaoya Tang, Ying He, Yihang Tang, Keqi Chen, Honghui Lin, Bo Liu, and Xingguang Deng. A kinetochore-associated kinesin-7 motor cooperates with bub3.3 to regulate mitotic chromosome congression in arabidopsis thaliana. Nature plants, 10:1724-1736, Oct 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01824-7, doi:10.1038/s41477-024-01824-7. This article has 7 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  6. (zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2): Hongchang Zhang, Xingguang Deng, Baojuan Sun, Sonny Lee Van, Zhensheng Kang, Honghui Lin, Yuh-Ru Julie Lee, and Bo Liu. Role of the bub3 protein in phragmoplast microtubule reorganization during cytokinesis. Nature Plants, 4:485-494, Jul 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z, doi:10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z. This article has 39 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  7. (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 1-2): Laetitia Paganelli, Marie‐Cécile Caillaud, Michaël Quentin, Isabelle Damiani, Benjamin Govetto, Philippe Lecomte, Pavel A. Karpov, Pierre Abad, Marie‐Edith Chabouté, and Bruno Favery. Three bub1 and bubr1/mad3-related spindle assembly checkpoint proteins are required for accurate mitosis in arabidopsis. The New phytologist, 205 1:202-15, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073, doi:10.1111/nph.13073. This article has 19 citations.

  8. (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 11-11): Xingguang Deng, Felicia Lei Peng, Xiaoya Tang, Yuh-Ru Julie Lee, Hong-Hui Lin, and Bo Liu. The arabidopsis bub1/mad3 family protein bmf3 requires bub3.3 to recruit cdc20 to kinetochores in spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2322677121. This article has 10 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  9. (deng2024acoadaptedknl1 pages 2-3): Xingguang Deng, Ying He, Xiaoya Tang, Xianghong Liu, Yuh-Ru Julie Lee, Bo Liu, and Honghui Lin. A coadapted knl1 and spindle assembly checkpoint axis orchestrates precise mitosis in arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2316583121. This article has 10 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  10. (paganelli2013…formationdes pages 148-150): L Paganelli. … formation des cellules géantes induites par le nématode à galles meloidogyne incognita: caractérisation du complexe de surveillance de la mitose chez arabidopsis. Unknown journal, 2013.

  11. (paganelli2013…formationdes pages 174-182): L Paganelli. … formation des cellules géantes induites par le nématode à galles meloidogyne incognita: caractérisation du complexe de surveillance de la mitose chez arabidopsis. Unknown journal, 2013.

  12. (paganelli2015threebub1and pages 9-10): Laetitia Paganelli, Marie‐Cécile Caillaud, Michaël Quentin, Isabelle Damiani, Benjamin Govetto, Philippe Lecomte, Pavel A. Karpov, Pierre Abad, Marie‐Edith Chabouté, and Bruno Favery. Three bub1 and bubr1/mad3-related spindle assembly checkpoint proteins are required for accurate mitosis in arabidopsis. The New phytologist, 205 1:202-15, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073, doi:10.1111/nph.13073. This article has 19 citations.

  13. (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 9-10): Xingguang Deng, Felicia Lei Peng, Xiaoya Tang, Yuh-Ru Julie Lee, Hong-Hui Lin, and Bo Liu. The arabidopsis bub1/mad3 family protein bmf3 requires bub3.3 to recruit cdc20 to kinetochores in spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2322677121. This article has 10 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  14. (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 7-7): Xingguang Deng, Felicia Lei Peng, Xiaoya Tang, Yuh-Ru Julie Lee, Hong-Hui Lin, and Bo Liu. The arabidopsis bub1/mad3 family protein bmf3 requires bub3.3 to recruit cdc20 to kinetochores in spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2322677121. This article has 10 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

  15. (deng2024thearabidopsisbub1mad3 pages 7-9): Xingguang Deng, Felicia Lei Peng, Xiaoya Tang, Yuh-Ru Julie Lee, Hong-Hui Lin, and Bo Liu. The arabidopsis bub1/mad3 family protein bmf3 requires bub3.3 to recruit cdc20 to kinetochores in spindle assembly checkpoint signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Mar 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121, doi:10.1073/pnas.2322677121. This article has 10 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

Citations

  1. zhang2018roleofthe pages 1-2
  2. caillaud2009spindleassemblycheckpoint pages 2-4
  3. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757,
  4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121,
  5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121,
  6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01824-7,
  7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z,
  8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757;
  9. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073,
  10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006757
  11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z
  12. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13073
  13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z;
  14. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316583121
  15. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322677121
  16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01824-7

📄 View Raw YAML

id: Q9LJN8
gene_symbol: BUB3.1
product_type: PROTEIN
status: DRAFT
taxon:
  id: NCBITaxon:3702
  label: Arabidopsis thaliana
description: >
  BUB3.1 is a WD40-repeat containing spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) protein in Arabidopsis thaliana.
  It functions as part of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) with MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 to ensure
  proper chromosome segregation during cell division. Uniquely in plants, BUB3.1 (along with BUB3.2)
  has acquired an additional function in phragmoplast-mediated cytokinesis through interaction with
  the microtubule-bundling protein MAP65-3. Recent studies (2024) have clarified that Arabidopsis has
  three BUB3 paralogs with distinct functions: BUB3.1/BUB3.2 primarily function in cytokinesis at the
  phragmoplast midline, while BUB3.3 mediates the kinetochore-localized SAC function. BUB3.1 is
  essential for gametophyte development and displays cell cycle-regulated expression peaking at G2/M.
existing_annotations:
- term:
    id: GO:0007094
    label: mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint signaling
  evidence_type: IBA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
  review:
    summary: >
      BUB3.1 is a core component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in plants. IBA annotation is
      supported by phylogenetic conservation and experimental evidence in Arabidopsis. BUB3.1
      interacts with MAD2 and BUBR1, localizes to unattached kinetochores upon SAC activation,
      and shows cell cycle-regulated expression with G2/M peak [PMID:19710914].
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Core function of BUB3 family proteins. Experimental evidence from Caillaud et al. (2009)
      demonstrates BUB3.1 localization to kinetochores following SAC activation and interaction
      with other MCC components. This represents a conserved function from yeast to plants.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "the plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 partners identified in this study are all in place at the unattached kinetochores and may therefore fulfil the evolutionarily conserved functions of SAC proteins, delaying anaphase until all the chromosomes are attached to both poles of the spindle"

- term:
    id: GO:1990298
    label: bub1-bub3 complex
  evidence_type: IBA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
  review:
    summary: >
      BUB3.1 forms complexes with BUB1-related proteins in Arabidopsis. The BUB1/BUB3 complex
      is a conserved component of the SAC across eukaryotes. Experimental evidence supports
      BUB3.1 interactions with BUBR1/MAD3 family proteins [PMID:19710914, PMID:21687678].
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Phylogenetically conserved complex. Y2H and BiFC experiments confirm BUB3.1 interactions
      with BUBR1 and other SAC components. The BUB1-BUB3 complex is essential for checkpoint signaling.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "Coexpression of BUBR1:Cub:URA3 with either Nub:BUB3.1 and Nub:MAD2 conferred resistance to 5-FOA, indicating that BUBR1 interacted with both BUB3.1 and MAD2"
      - reference_id: PMID:21687678
        supporting_text: "Binding of AtCDC20.1 and AtCDC20.2 was detected to MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 and a weaker one to BUB3.1"

- term:
    id: GO:0000776
    label: kinetochore
  evidence_type: IBA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
  review:
    summary: >
      BUB3.1 localizes to kinetochores upon SAC activation. IBA annotation is consistent with
      experimental IDA evidence from PMID:19710914 showing kinetochore localization.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Conserved localization supported by direct experimental evidence. BUB3.1-GFP localizes
      to unattached kinetochores in propyzamide-treated cells and to kinetochores in MG132-treated
      metaphase-arrested cells.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "At a prometaphase-like stage, following treatment with the microtubule-destabilizing herbicide propyzamid, which prevents the formation of microtubule-kinetochore attachments, the MAD2 fusion protein was found to cluster strongly in bright spots on condensing chromosomes corresponding to unattached kinetochores (n = 20; Fig. 3). Similar localisation was observed for the BUB3.1 and BUBR1 fusion proteins (n = 20; Fig. 3)."

- term:
    id: GO:0005654
    label: nucleoplasm
  evidence_type: IBA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
  review:
    summary: >
      BUB3.1 shows nuclear localization during interphase. This is consistent with its role
      as a cell cycle checkpoint protein and is supported by experimental evidence.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      BUB3.1-GFP is detected in the nucleus during interphase, consistent with phylogenetic
      inference and direct experimental observation.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "BUB3.1:GFP and MAD2:GFP were detected in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm"

- term:
    id: GO:0009524
    label: phragmoplast
  evidence_type: IBA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
  review:
    summary: >
      BUB3.1 localizes to the phragmoplast midline during cytokinesis. This plant-specific
      function is well-supported by experimental evidence. IBA annotation is appropriate
      as this function appears conserved across plant species.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Plant-specific core function of BUB3.1. Multiple studies demonstrate phragmoplast
      midline localization and interaction with MAP65-3 for cytokinesis regulation.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "Unexpectedly, BUB3.1 was also found in the phragmoplast midline during the final step of cell division in plants"
    additional_reference_ids:
      - DOI:10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z

- term:
    id: GO:0043130
    label: ubiquitin binding
  evidence_type: IBA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
  review:
    summary: >
      Ubiquitin binding is inferred for BUB3.1 based on phylogenetic analysis. While BUB3
      proteins interact with the APC/C complex which is involved in ubiquitination, direct
      evidence for ubiquitin binding by BUB3.1 is limited. This may be inferred from the
      WD40 domain architecture and complex formation with ubiquitin ligase machinery.
    action: KEEP_AS_NON_CORE
    reason: >
      While BUB3 proteins are involved in SAC signaling that ultimately regulates APC/C-mediated
      ubiquitination, ubiquitin binding per se is not a core molecular function of BUB3.1.
      The primary functions are protein scaffolding and checkpoint signaling. This annotation
      may reflect the broader complex context rather than intrinsic BUB3.1 activity.

- term:
    id: GO:0000776
    label: kinetochore
  evidence_type: IEA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000120
  review:
    summary: >
      IEA annotation for kinetochore localization. This is consistent with the IBA and IDA
      annotations for the same term. Redundant with more specific evidence.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Consistent with experimental evidence. IEA provides additional computational support
      for a well-established localization.

- term:
    id: GO:0005634
    label: nucleus
  evidence_type: IEA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000044
  review:
    summary: >
      IEA annotation for nuclear localization based on UniProtKB subcellular location mapping.
      Consistent with experimental observations of nuclear/nucleoplasm localization.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Supported by experimental evidence showing BUB3.1-GFP in the nucleus during interphase.
      This is a more general term than nucleoplasm (GO:0005654) but both are correct.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "BUB3.1 and MAD2 proteins were localised to the nucleus and gave a weak cytoplasmic signal during interphase (n = 30; Fig. 5A)."

- term:
    id: GO:0005819
    label: spindle
  evidence_type: IEA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000044
  review:
    summary: >
      BUB3.1 associates with spindle structures during mitosis. This is consistent with
      experimental observations of spindle microtubule association.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Experimental evidence shows BUB3.1 association with spindle microtubules in arrested
      metaphase cells. The term spindle is appropriate.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "Three hours after MG132 treatment, the initially diffuse spindle BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2:GFP staining accumulated progressively onto MT-like structures within the spindle"

- term:
    id: GO:0007059
    label: chromosome segregation
  evidence_type: IEA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000043
  review:
    summary: >
      IEA annotation from UniProtKB keyword mapping. BUB3.1 is involved in ensuring proper
      chromosome segregation through its role in the spindle assembly checkpoint. This is
      a correct but somewhat general annotation.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      BUB3 function in the SAC is essential for proper chromosome segregation. The checkpoint
      delays anaphase until chromosomes are properly attached, preventing mis-segregation.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "In eukaryotes, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a sophisticated surveillance mechanism that ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation during mitosis"

- term:
    id: GO:0009524
    label: phragmoplast
  evidence_type: IEA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000044
  review:
    summary: >
      IEA annotation for phragmoplast localization. Redundant with IBA annotation but
      correctly assigned based on UniProtKB subcellular location vocabulary.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Consistent with IBA and experimental evidence. Phragmoplast localization is a
      well-established feature of BUB3.1.

- term:
    id: GO:0051301
    label: cell division
  evidence_type: IEA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000043
  review:
    summary: >
      IEA annotation from UniProtKB keyword mapping. BUB3.1 plays roles in both mitotic
      checkpoint and cytokinesis, making this a broadly appropriate term.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      General but accurate term. BUB3.1 functions in cell division through both SAC
      signaling and phragmoplast-mediated cytokinesis.

- term:
    id: GO:0051321
    label: meiotic cell cycle
  evidence_type: IEA
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000043
  review:
    summary: >
      IEA annotation from UniProtKB keyword mapping. UniProt lists "Meiosis" as a keyword,
      likely derived from the observation that BUB3.1 disruption affects gametophyte
      development. However, the experimental evidence primarily demonstrates MITOTIC
      functions. There is no direct experimental evidence showing BUB3.1 functions
      specifically in meiosis as opposed to the mitotic divisions during gametophyte
      development.
    action: MODIFY
    reason: >
      This appears to be an over-annotation. While BUB3.1 is essential for gametophyte
      development (PMID:18508582), the gametophyte defects could result from mitotic
      errors during the post-meiotic mitoses, not meiosis itself. The primary experimental
      evidence (PMID:19710914) focuses on mitotic cells. BUB3 proteins are general cell
      cycle checkpoint proteins - they function in any dividing cell. The annotation
      to "meiotic cell cycle" implies a meiosis-specific function that is not
      experimentally supported for BUB3.1. In Arabidopsis, BUB3.3 appears to be the
      paralog with specialized kinetochore checkpoint functions, while BUB3.1/BUB3.2
      are specialized for cytokinesis. A more appropriate annotation would be the
      parent term "cell cycle" (GO:0007049) or "mitotic cell cycle" (GO:0000278).
    proposed_replacement_terms:
      - id: GO:0000278
        label: mitotic cell cycle
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "We conclude that plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 proteins may have the SAC protein functions conserved from yeast to humans"

- term:
    id: GO:0005634
    label: nucleus
  evidence_type: ISM
  original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000122
  review:
    summary: >
      ISM annotation from AtSubP analysis predicting nuclear localization. Consistent with
      experimental evidence and other annotations.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Computational prediction confirmed by experimental observation.

- term:
    id: GO:0005515
    label: protein binding
  evidence_type: IPI
  original_reference_id: PMID:19710914
  review:
    summary: >
      IPI annotation based on demonstrated interactions with MAD2 and BUBR1 in Caillaud et al.
      (2009). While the interactions are real and well-documented, "protein binding" is a
      generic term that provides little functional information.
    action: MODIFY
    reason: >
      "Protein binding" is too generic and uninformative. The specific binding partners are
      MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3. More informative annotations would be to the specific complexes
      or binding activities. Since BUB3.1 forms the bub1-bub3 complex (GO:1990298) which
      is already annotated, and functions in mitotic checkpoint complex formation, the
      generic "protein binding" annotation adds little value. Consider replacement with
      a more specific term or removal as redundant with complex annotations.
    proposed_replacement_terms:
      - id: GO:0033597
        label: mitotic checkpoint complex

- term:
    id: GO:0005828
    label: kinetochore microtubule
  evidence_type: IDA
  original_reference_id: PMID:19710914
  review:
    summary: >
      IDA annotation based on localization to kinetochore microtubules in Caillaud et al.
      (2009). In MG132-treated cells arrested in metaphase, BUB3.1 accumulated on MT-like
      structures and was confirmed to colocalize with spindle microtubules.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Direct experimental evidence demonstrates BUB3.1 association with kinetochore
      microtubules during SAC activation. This is part of the core checkpoint function.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "In cases of 'wait anaphase', plant SAC proteins were associated with both kinetochores and kinetochore microtubules"

- term:
    id: GO:0005876
    label: spindle microtubule
  evidence_type: IDA
  original_reference_id: PMID:19710914
  review:
    summary: >
      IDA annotation based on localization studies in Caillaud et al. (2009). BUB3.1
      associates with spindle microtubules during metaphase arrest.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Well-supported by experimental evidence showing BUB3.1 accumulation on spindle
      MT-like structures in MG132-treated cells.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "Progressively, much of the BUBR1, BUB3.1, MAD2:GFP-derived fluorescence took on a fibrillar appearance, probably as a result of association with the acentrosomal metaphase spindle apparatus"

- term:
    id: GO:0005515
    label: protein binding
  evidence_type: IPI
  original_reference_id: PMID:21687678
  review:
    summary: >
      IPI annotation based on Y2H interaction with CDC20-1 and CDC20-2 in Kevei et al.
      (2011). While the interaction is documented, "protein binding" is too generic.
    action: MODIFY
    reason: >
      Same issue as the other "protein binding" annotation - too generic. The interaction
      with CDC20 is functionally meaningful in the context of MCC formation and APC/C
      regulation. A more specific term or complex annotation would be more informative.
    proposed_replacement_terms:
      - id: GO:0033597
        label: mitotic checkpoint complex
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:21687678
        supporting_text: "Binding of AtCDC20.1 and AtCDC20.2 was detected to MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 and a weaker one to BUB3.1"

- term:
    id: GO:0005515
    label: protein binding
  evidence_type: IPI
  original_reference_id: PMID:20706207
  review:
    summary: >
      IPI annotation from Van Leene et al. (2010) targeted interactomics study. This
      high-throughput TAP-MS study identified BUB3.1 interactions in the context of
      cell cycle machinery.
    action: MODIFY
    reason: >
      Generic "protein binding" annotation from a high-throughput study. While valid,
      this provides minimal functional insight. The specific interactions identified
      would be more informative.
    proposed_replacement_terms:
      - id: GO:0033597
        label: mitotic checkpoint complex

- term:
    id: GO:0000776
    label: kinetochore
  evidence_type: IDA
  original_reference_id: PMID:19710914
  review:
    summary: >
      IDA annotation for kinetochore localization from Caillaud et al. (2009). This is
      direct experimental evidence showing BUB3.1-GFP at kinetochores following SAC
      activation.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Strong experimental evidence. BUB3.1-GFP localizes to kinetochores in both
      propyzamide-treated cells (prometaphase arrest) and MG132-treated cells
      (metaphase arrest).
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "Similar localisation was observed for the BUB3.1 and BUBR1 fusion proteins (n = 20; Fig. 3). Thus, the plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 partners identified in this study are all in place at the unattached kinetochores"

- term:
    id: GO:0007094
    label: mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint signaling
  evidence_type: IDA
  original_reference_id: PMID:19710914
  review:
    summary: >
      IDA annotation for mitotic SAC signaling based on Caillaud et al. (2009). BUB3.1
      is part of the SAC machinery, interacting with MAD2 and BUBR1, and localizing
      appropriately during checkpoint activation.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Core function of BUB3.1 with strong experimental support. The study demonstrates
      physical interactions between SAC components, appropriate localization dynamics,
      and cell cycle-regulated expression.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "We conclude that plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 proteins may have the SAC protein functions conserved from yeast to humans"

- term:
    id: GO:0009524
    label: phragmoplast
  evidence_type: IDA
  original_reference_id: PMID:19710914
  review:
    summary: >
      IDA annotation for phragmoplast localization from Caillaud et al. (2009). Time-lapse
      imaging showed BUB3.1 at the phragmoplast midline during cytokinesis.
    action: ACCEPT
    reason: >
      Plant-specific core function with strong experimental evidence. This is one of the
      key findings of the Caillaud et al. study - BUB3.1 has a dual role in SAC and
      cytokinesis.
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "BUB3.1 displayed an unexpected distribution during cytokinesis in late anaphase to telophase in plant cells. It first appeared in the centre of the forming cell plate, and was subsequently redistributed to the growing margins of the cell plate as the cell plate grew outwards"

- term:
    id: GO:0080008
    label: Cul4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complex
  evidence_type: ISS
  original_reference_id: PMID:18223036
  review:
    summary: >
      ISS annotation suggesting BUB3.1 is part of a CUL4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complex,
      based on Lee et al. (2008). This paper identified DWD (DDB1-binding WD40) proteins
      as potential substrate receptors for CUL4-based E3 ligases. BUB3.1 contains WD40
      repeats and may have a DWD motif.
    action: UNDECIDED
    reason: >
      The Lee et al. (2008) paper is about DWD proteins as CUL4 substrate receptors.
      While BUB3.1 contains WD40 repeats, its primary known functions are in SAC and
      cytokinesis, not as a CUL4 substrate receptor. This annotation may be based on
      domain architecture rather than functional evidence. Need to verify whether BUB3.1
      was specifically identified as a CUL4 complex component or if this is inference
      from domain structure. The connection between BUB3 and CUL4 is not clearly
      established in the core BUB3.1 literature.
    additional_reference_ids:
      - PMID:18223036

references:
- id: GO_REF:0000033
  title: Annotation inferences using phylogenetic trees
  findings:
    - statement: BUB3.1 functions are phylogenetically conserved across eukaryotes
- id: GO_REF:0000043
  title: Gene Ontology annotation based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot keyword mapping
  findings:
    - statement: Keywords mapped to GO terms, some may be over-generalized
- id: GO_REF:0000044
  title: Gene Ontology annotation based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Subcellular Location
    vocabulary mapping, accompanied by conservative changes to GO terms applied by
    UniProt
  findings:
    - statement: Subcellular locations consistently mapped
- id: GO_REF:0000120
  title: Combined Automated Annotation using Multiple IEA Methods
  findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000122
  title: AtSubP analysis
  findings:
    - statement: Computational prediction of nuclear localization confirmed experimentally
- id: PMID:18223036
  title: Characterization of Arabidopsis and rice DWD proteins and their roles as
    substrate receptors for CUL4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases.
  findings:
    - statement: Identified DWD proteins in Arabidopsis that may serve as CUL4 substrate receptors
    - statement: WD40-containing proteins with DWD motif can interact with DDB1
- id: PMID:18508582
  title: The Arabidopsis checkpoint protein Bub3.1 is essential for gametophyte development.
  findings:
    - statement: BUB3.1 is essential for male and female gametophyte development
    - statement: Homozygous knockouts are lethal
- id: PMID:19710914
  title: Spindle assembly checkpoint protein dynamics reveal conserved and unsuspected
    roles in plant cell division.
  findings:
    - statement: BUB3.1 interacts physically with BUBR1 and MAD2
    - statement: BUB3.1 localizes to unattached kinetochores upon SAC activation
    - statement: BUB3.1 displays cell cycle-regulated expression with G2/M peak
    - statement: BUB3.1 unexpectedly localizes to phragmoplast midline during cytokinesis
    - statement: BUB3.1 associates with both kinetochores and spindle microtubules during metaphase arrest
- id: PMID:20706207
  title: Targeted interactomics reveals a complex core cell cycle machinery in Arabidopsis
    thaliana.
  findings:
    - statement: High-throughput TAP-MS identified BUB3.1 interactions in cell cycle network
    - statement: BUB3.1 connected to mitotic checkpoint protein network
- id: PMID:21687678
  title: Conserved CDC20 cell cycle functions are carried out by two of the five isoforms
    in Arabidopsis thaliana.
  findings:
    - statement: BUB3.1 interacts with CDC20-1 and CDC20-2
    - statement: AtCDC20.1 and AtCDC20.2 are components of MCC with BUB3.1
- id: DOI:10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z
  title: Role of the BUB3 protein in phragmoplast microtubule reorganization during cytokinesis
  findings:
    - statement: BUB3.1 and BUB3.2 interact with MAP65-3
    - statement: BUB3.1/BUB3.2 promote phragmoplast microtubule reorganization
    - statement: bub3.1 bub3.2 double mutants show cytokinesis defects
- id: DOI:10.1073/pnas.2316583121
  title: A coadapted KNL1 and spindle assembly checkpoint axis orchestrates precise mitosis in Arabidopsis
  findings:
    - statement: BUB3.3 (not BUB3.1) is recruited to kinetochores by KNL1
    - statement: Paralog specialization in Arabidopsis BUB3 family
- id: DOI:10.1073/pnas.2322677121
  title: The Arabidopsis BUB1/MAD3 family protein BMF3 requires BUB3.3 to recruit CDC20 to kinetochores
  findings:
    - statement: BUB3.3 mediates CDC20 recruitment to kinetochores via BMF3
    - statement: Functional distinction between BUB3 paralogs in plants

core_functions:
  - description: >
      BUB3.1 functions as a component of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), interacting
      with MAD2 and BUBR1/MAD3 to ensure proper chromosome segregation. It localizes to
      unattached kinetochores and spindle microtubules during SAC activation. This is a
      conserved function from yeast to plants.
    molecular_function:
      id: GO:0030674
      label: protein-macromolecule adaptor activity
    directly_involved_in:
      - id: GO:0007094
        label: mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint signaling
    locations:
      - id: GO:0000776
        label: kinetochore
    in_complex:
      id: GO:1990298
      label: bub1-bub3 complex
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "Coexpression of BUBR1:Cub:URA3 with either Nub:BUB3.1 and Nub:MAD2 conferred resistance to 5-FOA, indicating that BUBR1 interacted with both BUB3.1 and MAD2"
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "the plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 partners identified in this study are all in place at the unattached kinetochores and may therefore fulfil the evolutionarily conserved functions of SAC proteins, delaying anaphase until all the chromosomes are attached to both poles of the spindle"
  - description: >
      BUB3.1 has a plant-specific function in phragmoplast-mediated cytokinesis. It localizes
      to the phragmoplast midline during cell plate formation and interacts with MAP65-3
      to promote microtubule reorganization. This dual function distinguishes plant BUB3
      proteins from their animal/yeast counterparts.
    molecular_function:
      id: GO:0030674
      label: protein-macromolecule adaptor activity
    directly_involved_in:
      - id: GO:0000910
        label: cytokinesis
    locations:
      - id: GO:0009524
        label: phragmoplast
    supported_by:
      - reference_id: PMID:19710914
        supporting_text: "Unexpectedly, BUB3.1 was also found in the phragmoplast midline during the final step of cell division in plants"
      - reference_id: DOI:10.1038/s41477-018-0192-z
        supporting_text: "BUB3.1 and BUB3.2 interact with MAP65-3 to promote phragmoplast microtubule reorganization"

proposed_new_terms: []

suggested_questions:
  - question: Does BUB3.1 have any meiosis-specific function, or do gametophyte defects result from post-meiotic mitotic errors?
  - question: What is the functional relationship between BUB3.1/BUB3.2 (cytokinesis-specialized) and BUB3.3 (kinetochore-specialized)?
  - question: Is the CUL4-RING E3 ligase complex annotation biologically meaningful or just domain-based inference?

suggested_experiments:
  - description: Compare BUB3.1 localization and function during meiosis I/II vs mitosis to determine if there is meiosis-specific activity
    hypothesis: BUB3.1 gametophyte defects result from post-meiotic mitotic errors rather than meiotic dysfunction
  - description: Generate bub3.1 bub3.3 double mutants to understand functional overlap between paralogs
    hypothesis: BUB3.1 and BUB3.3 have distinct but complementary functions in cell division
  - description: Test whether BUB3.1 directly binds DDB1 to validate CUL4 complex membership
    hypothesis: BUB3.1 is not a bona fide CUL4 substrate receptor despite containing WD40 repeats