The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Research report: Functional annotation of ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 3 (EIN3) in Arabidopsis thaliana

Target identity verification (critical)

The target protein is EIN3 (UniProt O24606), encoded by Arabidopsis thaliana locus At3g20770. Multiple sources explicitly map EIN3 to At3g20770 and describe it as a plant-specific, nuclear transcription factor and core member of the EIN3/EIL family central to ethylene signaling, matching the UniProt context and domains. (hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 6-7, stepanova2005arabidopsisethylenesignaling pages 1-2, chen2005ethylenesignaltransduction. pages 1-2)

Executive summary

EIN3 is the master transcription factor at the end of the canonical ethylene signal transduction pathway. Its primary biochemical “activity” is sequence-specific DNA binding (as a homodimer) and transcriptional regulation of ethylene-responsive genes. The dominant regulatory principle is post-translational: in air (no ethylene), EIN3 is rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin–26S proteasome system via SCF complexes containing the F-box proteins EBF1/EBF2; upon ethylene perception, EIN3 is stabilized and accumulates in the nucleus, enabling downstream transcriptional cascades (e.g., ERF1) and feedback control (e.g., induction of EBF2). (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 7-8, guo2003plantresponsesto pages 3-5, stepanova2005arabidopsisethylenesignaling pages 1-2)

1) Key concepts, definitions, and current mechanistic understanding

1.1 What EIN3 is

EIN3 (ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE 3) is a nuclear-localized transcription factor required for normal ethylene responses in Arabidopsis. In the canonical pathway, ethylene perception by ER-localized receptors and inactivation of the Raf-like kinase CTR1 relieves repression of EIN2, which then enables activation/accumulation of EIN3/EIL transcription factors that drive ethylene-responsive gene expression. (stepanova2005arabidopsisethylenesignaling pages 1-2, etheridge2006progressreportethylene pages 1-2, chen2005ethylenesignaltransduction. pages 1-2)

1.2 Where EIN3 acts (subcellular localization)

EIN3 functions in the nucleus. Primary evidence from the foundational mechanistic study shows ethylene/ACC promotes nuclear accumulation of a functional EIN3–GFP fusion detectable after ~1 h and persisting at least 4 h; proteasome inhibition (MG132) can also drive nuclear accumulation without ethylene, consistent with stability control being central. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 3-5)

1.3 Molecular function: DNA binding and transcriptional control

DNA binding and transcriptional regulation constitute EIN3’s core function.

Domain architecture and binding mode:
- Reviews and structural work map an EIN3 DNA-binding region (DBD) to aa 80–359 (review) with refined boundaries of aa 82–352 (optimal) and a core DBD aa 174–306 (crystallized; PDB reported in the primary paper). (hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 6-7, song2015biochemicalandstructural pages 1-2)
- EIN3 binds DNA as a homodimer, and high-affinity binding is favored by two inverted EIN3-binding sites. (hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 6-7)

Cis-element recognition:
- Genome-wide analysis shows enrichment of a consensus EIN3 motif (often referred to as TEIL motif) in EIN3 binding regions. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3)
- A recent synthetic-promoter study reports a canonical Arabidopsis EIN3/EIL binding site (EBS) as ATGTAT, and emphasizes promoter-configuration dependence of EIN3 binding/activation. (fernandez‐moreno2026ebsna pages 2-3)

1.4 Central regulatory principle: EIN3 stability is the output of upstream signaling

A defining concept for EIN3 is that ethylene signaling largely controls ethylene responses by controlling EIN3 protein abundance (stability/turnover), rather than by strongly changing EIN3 transcription.

SCF(EBF1/EBF2)-proteasome pathway:
- In the absence of ethylene, EIN3 is short-lived and is degraded through a ubiquitin/proteasome pathway mediated by the F-box proteins EBF1 and EBF2 (SCF complexes). (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 1-2, guo2003plantresponsesto pages 7-8)
- Quantitatively, EIN3 half-life in air is reported as < 30 min. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 7-8)
- Ethylene stabilizes EIN3 by inhibiting its proteolysis; proteasome inhibitors (MG132/MG115) rapidly increase EIN3 protein, supporting proteasome dependence. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 2-3, guo2003plantresponsesto pages 3-5)

Upstream dependencies (core pathway requirement):
Ethylene-induced EIN3 accumulation requires multiple upstream ethylene-pathway components, including ETR1, EIN4, CTR1, EIN2, EIN5, and EIN6, anchoring EIN3 unambiguously within the canonical receptor→CTR1→EIN2 axis. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 1-2, guo2003plantresponsesto pages 7-8)

Phenotypic consequences of altering EIN3 stability:
- Mutations in either ebf1 or ebf2 stabilize EIN3 and increase ethylene sensitivity; ebf1 ebf2 double mutants show constitutive ethylene phenotypes (ctr1-like), while overexpressing EBF1/EBF2 destabilizes EIN3 and causes ethylene insensitivity. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 7-8, guo2003plantresponsesto pages 5-7)

2) Recent developments and latest research (prioritizing 2023–2024)

2.1 2024: Post-transcriptional control of the EBF→EIN3 stability module via DNE1

A 2024 study identifies DNE1 (an endoribonuclease induced by ethylene) as a positive regulator of ethylene responses that acts by modulating the EBF1/2 mRNA layer. DNE1:
- Colocalizes with EIN2 at processing bodies (P-bodies) in response to ethylene.
- Recognizes and cleaves EBF1/2 3′UTRs, reducing EBF1/2 mRNA abundance and repressing their translation.
- Loss-of-function dne1 mutants show mild ethylene insensitivity and stress-related phenotypes (e.g., ER/oxidative stress sensitivity), connecting RNA processing to ethylene sensitivity through control of EBF1/2 and thus EIN3 stability. (yan2024endoribonucleasedne1promotes pages 1-2)

This expands the canonical view (protein degradation only) into a multi-layer model in which RNA processing and translational repression tune the EIN3-stability “rheostat” through EBF1/2. (yan2024endoribonucleasedne1promotes pages 1-2)

2.2 2023–2024: Crosstalk framing—EIN3 as a hub integrating ethylene with other hormone/stress pathways

Recent reviews emphasize EIN3/EIL1 as hubs connecting ethylene to other signaling networks (not limited to developmental “pleiotropy,” but through mechanistic modulation of the EIN3 stability/targeting system):
- A 2023 review highlights the ethylene–jasmonate network, positioning EIN3/EIL1 and JA regulators as key nodes and noting involvement of the canonical EIN2→EBF1/2→EIN3 logic in stress-associated transcriptional programs. (aragonraygoza2025diverserolesof pages 3-4)
- A 2024 developmental review reiterates context-dependent EIN3/EIL1 regulation and documents ethylene pathway mutant phenotypes that reflect hormonal interaction (e.g., altered ABA sensitivities across ethylene mutants), consistent with EIN3/EIL1 functioning as a transcriptional “range setter” depending on tissue and environment. (khan2024roleofethylene pages 1-2)

2.3 2024: Ethylene-independent functions of ethylene pathway components (including EIN2/EIN3) in specific contexts

A 2024 fruit-focused review synthesizes evidence that ethylene pathway components—specifically ACC, EIN2, and EIN3—can have ethylene-independent functions under particular conditions, and stresses that dosage dependence and tissue/stage specificity complicate inference from partial pathway mutants. While not Arabidopsis-centric, this is relevant for interpreting EIN3 phenotypes and designing functional studies. (huang2024ethyleneinfruits pages 1-2)

3) Current applications and real-world implementations

3.1 Ethylene pathway monitoring and synthetic biology: EIN3-binding-site reporters

A clear real-world implementation of EIN3 biology is the creation of synthetic transcriptional reporters based on EIN3 binding sites. A synthetic promoter called EBSn (EIN3 binding-site new) leverages arrays of EIN3-binding elements and is reported to:
- Outperform older EIN3-binding-site reporters in ethylene sensitivity.
- Monitor endogenous ethylene levels with more ubiquitous expression under exogenous ethylene.
- Function in both Arabidopsis and tomato, indicating cross-species utility for phenotyping and engineering ethylene-regulated traits. (fernandez‐moreno2026ebsna pages 2-3)

3.2 Translational relevance to horticulture and trait genetics

In fruit crops, ethylene signaling components are linked to breeding-relevant traits; for example, a 2024 review notes a GWAS identifying SlEIN4 (ethylene receptor) as a determinant of tomato fruit firmness, illustrating how ethylene signaling genetics (upstream of EIN3 outputs) is already leveraged in trait association and improvement contexts. (huang2024ethyleneinfruits pages 1-2)

4) Expert opinions and analysis from authoritative sources

4.1 Authoritative consensus: EIN3 stabilization is the key control point

Authoritative reviews from 2005–2006 articulate the central model that ethylene signaling culminates in EIN3/EIL transcription factors whose abundance is controlled by proteasomal degradation via EBF1/2, thereby making EIN3 stability a major “valve” controlling response strength. (stepanova2005arabidopsisethylenesignaling pages 1-2, etheridge2006progressreportethylene pages 1-2)

4.2 Systems-level view: EIN3 binds broadly, but only a subset of binding is regulatory

Genome-wide binding and transcriptome time courses support the view that EIN3 is a broad chromatin-binding factor whose binding is context dependent: only a minority of binding events correlate with transcriptional change, implying cofactor/chromatin constraints and promoter architecture govern which EIN3-bound sites are productive. This is consistent with newer synthetic-promoter interpretations that configuration/accessibility strongly influence EIN3 outputs. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3, fernandez‐moreno2026ebsna pages 2-3)

5) Statistics and data points from key studies

5.1 Kinetics and stability (protein-level)

• EIN3 half-life in air: <30 minutes. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 7-8)
• Nuclear accumulation of EIN3-GFP after ACC: detectable after ~1 hour, persisting at least 4 hours. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 3-5)
• EIN3 protein becomes detectable by ~1 hour of ethylene treatment and correlates with triple-response severity in the foundational study. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 2-3)

5.2 Genome-wide binding and transcriptional cascade statistics (Chang et al., 2013)

ChIP-seq and time-course transcriptomics define the direct and indirect transcriptional reach of EIN3:
- 1,460 EIN3 binding regions associated with 1,314 genes. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3)
- Only ~30% of EIN3 binding sites associated with transcriptional change under tested conditions. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3)
- Among ethylene-regulated EIN3 targets, 85% induced (activator-dominant behavior). (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3)
- ~14% of EIN3-regulated targets were transcription factors, consistent with cascade amplification. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3)
- Ethylene transcriptional response organized into 4 temporal waves under EIN3 control. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3)

5.3 Explicit feedback wiring

• The EBF2 promoter contains 3 EIN3 binding sites, and EBF2 mediates EIN3 proteolysis (negative feedback). (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 13-14, chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3)

Pathway schematic evidence

A recent review provides a schematic of the ethylene signaling pathway highlighting EIN2-CEND movement to nucleus and P-bodies, suppression of EBF1/2, and stabilization/accumulation of EIN3/EIL1.

(hao2025ethylenesignalingin media e307761f)

Consolidated evidence table

Table: This table summarizes the functional annotation of Arabidopsis EIN3 (At3g20770; UniProt O24606), including mechanism, regulation, localization, genome-scale data, and recent developments. It is useful as a compact evidence-backed reference for pathway-centered gene annotation.

References (URLs and publication dates)

The most central sources used here include:
- Guo H, Ecker JR. Plant Responses to Ethylene Gas Are Mediated by SCF^EBF1/EBF2-Dependent Proteolysis of EIN3 Transcription Factor. Cell. Dec 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00969-3 (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 1-2)
- Chen Y-F, Etheridge N, Schaller GE. Ethylene signal transduction. Annals of Botany. May 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci100 (chen2005ethylenesignaltransduction. pages 1-2)
- Stepanova AN, Alonso JM. Arabidopsis Ethylene Signaling Pathway. Science’s STKE. Mar 2005. https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2762005cm4 (stepanova2005arabidopsisethylenesignaling pages 1-2)
- Etheridge N, Hall BP, Schaller GE. Progress report: ethylene signaling and responses. Planta. Feb 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0163-2 (etheridge2006progressreportethylene pages 1-2)
- Chang KN et al. Temporal transcriptional response to ethylene gas drives growth hormone cross-regulation in Arabidopsis. eLife. Jun 2013. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00675 (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3)
- Song J et al. Biochemical and Structural Insights into the Mechanism of DNA Recognition by Arabidopsis ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3. PLOS ONE. Sep 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137439 (song2015biochemicalandstructural pages 1-2)
- Yan Y et al. Endoribonuclease DNE1 Promotes Ethylene Response by Modulating EBF1/2 mRNA Processing in Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci. Feb 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042138 (yan2024endoribonucleasedne1promotes pages 1-2)
- Huang W et al. Ethylene in fruits: beyond ripening control. Horticulture Research. Aug 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae229 (huang2024ethyleneinfruits pages 1-2)
- Khan S et al. Role of Ethylene in the Regulation of Plant Developmental Processes. Stresses. Jan 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4010003 (khan2024roleofethylene pages 1-2)

References

1. (hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 6-7): Dongdong Hao, Wenyang Li, and Hongwei Guo. Ethylene signaling in <i>arabidopsis</i>: a journey from historical discoveries to modern insights. Plant Hormones, 1:0-0, Jan 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.48130/ph-0025-0015, doi:10.48130/ph-0025-0015. This article has 9 citations.

2. (stepanova2005arabidopsisethylenesignaling pages 1-2): Anna N. Stepanova and Jose M. Alonso. Arabidopsis ethylene signaling pathway. Science's STKE, 2005:cm4-cm4, Mar 2005. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2762005cm4, doi:10.1126/stke.2762005cm4. This article has 73 citations.

3. (chen2005ethylenesignaltransduction. pages 1-2): YI-FENG CHEN, NAOMI ETHERIDGE, and G. ERIC SCHALLER. Ethylene signal transduction. Annals of botany, 95 6:901-15, May 2005. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci100, doi:10.1093/aob/mci100. This article has 579 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

4. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 7-8): Hongwei Guo and Joseph R Ecker. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by scfebf1/ebf2-dependent proteolysis of ein3 transcription factor. Cell, 115:667-677, Dec 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3, doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3. This article has 1147 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

5. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 3-5): Hongwei Guo and Joseph R Ecker. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by scfebf1/ebf2-dependent proteolysis of ein3 transcription factor. Cell, 115:667-677, Dec 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3, doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3. This article has 1147 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

6. (etheridge2006progressreportethylene pages 1-2): Naomi Etheridge, Brenda Parson Hall, and G Eric Schaller. Progress report: ethylene signaling and responses. Planta, 223:387-391, Feb 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0163-2, doi:10.1007/s00425-005-0163-2. This article has 56 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

7. (song2015biochemicalandstructural pages 1-2): Jinghui Song, Chenxu Zhu, Xing Zhang, Xing Wen, Lulu Liu, Jinying Peng, Hongwei Guo, and Chengqi Yi. Biochemical and structural insights into the mechanism of dna recognition by arabidopsis ethylene insensitive3. PLoS ONE, 10:e0137439, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137439, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137439. This article has 44 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

8. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3): Katherine Noelani Chang, Shan Zhong, Matthew T Weirauch, Gary Hon, Mattia Pelizzola, Hai Li, Shao-shan Carol Huang, Robert J Schmitz, Mark A Urich, Dwight Kuo, Joseph R Nery, Hong Qiao, Ally Yang, Abdullah Jamali, Huaming Chen, Trey Ideker, Bing Ren, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Timothy R Hughes, and Joseph R Ecker. Temporal transcriptional response to ethylene gas drives growth hormone cross-regulation in arabidopsis. eLife, Jun 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.00675, doi:10.7554/elife.00675. This article has 469 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

9. (fernandez‐moreno2026ebsna pages 2-3): Josefina‐Patricia Fernandez‐Moreno, Mario Fenech, Anna E. Yaschenko, Chengsong Zhao, Matthew Neubauer, Hannah N. Davis, Alex J. Marchi, Raine Concannon, Alexandra Keren‐Keiserman, Moshe Reuveni, Victor Levitsky, Dmitry Oshchepkov, Vladislav Dolgikh, Alexander Goldshmidt, José T. Ascencio‐Ibáñez, Elena Zemlyanskaya, Jose M. Alonso, and Anna N. Stepanova. ebsn , a robust synthetic reporter for monitoring ethylene responses in plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 24:698-716, Sep 2026. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.70302, doi:10.1111/pbi.70302. This article has 4 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

10. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 1-2): Hongwei Guo and Joseph R Ecker. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by scfebf1/ebf2-dependent proteolysis of ein3 transcription factor. Cell, 115:667-677, Dec 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3, doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3. This article has 1147 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

11. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 2-3): Hongwei Guo and Joseph R Ecker. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by scfebf1/ebf2-dependent proteolysis of ein3 transcription factor. Cell, 115:667-677, Dec 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3, doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3. This article has 1147 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

12. (guo2003plantresponsesto pages 5-7): Hongwei Guo and Joseph R Ecker. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by scfebf1/ebf2-dependent proteolysis of ein3 transcription factor. Cell, 115:667-677, Dec 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3, doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00969-3. This article has 1147 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

13. (yan2024endoribonucleasedne1promotes pages 1-2): Yan Yan, Hongwei Guo, and Wenyang Li. Endoribonuclease dne1 promotes ethylene response by modulating ebf1/2 mrna processing in arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25:2138, Feb 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042138, doi:10.3390/ijms25042138. This article has 4 citations.

14. (aragonraygoza2025diverserolesof pages 3-4): Alejandro Aragón-Raygoza and Josh Strable. Diverse roles of ethylene in maize growth and development, and its importance in shaping plant architecture. Journal of Experimental Botany, 76:1854-1865, Feb 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf062, doi:10.1093/jxb/eraf062. This article has 10 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

15. (khan2024roleofethylene pages 1-2): Sheen Khan, Ameena Fatima Alvi, and Nafees A. Khan. Role of ethylene in the regulation of plant developmental processes. Stresses, 4:28-53, Jan 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4010003, doi:10.3390/stresses4010003. This article has 55 citations.

16. (huang2024ethyleneinfruits pages 1-2): Wei Huang, Cong Tan, and Hongwei Guo. Ethylene in fruits: beyond ripening control. Horticulture Research, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae229, doi:10.1093/hr/uhae229. This article has 18 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

17. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 13-14): Katherine Noelani Chang, Shan Zhong, Matthew T Weirauch, Gary Hon, Mattia Pelizzola, Hai Li, Shao-shan Carol Huang, Robert J Schmitz, Mark A Urich, Dwight Kuo, Joseph R Nery, Hong Qiao, Ally Yang, Abdullah Jamali, Huaming Chen, Trey Ideker, Bing Ren, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Timothy R Hughes, and Joseph R Ecker. Temporal transcriptional response to ethylene gas drives growth hormone cross-regulation in arabidopsis. eLife, Jun 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.00675, doi:10.7554/elife.00675. This article has 469 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

18. (hao2025ethylenesignalingin media e307761f): Dongdong Hao, Wenyang Li, and Hongwei Guo. Ethylene signaling in <i>arabidopsis</i>: a journey from historical discoveries to modern insights. Plant Hormones, 1:0-0, Jan 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.48130/ph-0025-0015, doi:10.48130/ph-0025-0015. This article has 9 citations.

19. (song2015biochemicalandstructural pages 18-19): Jinghui Song, Chenxu Zhu, Xing Zhang, Xing Wen, Lulu Liu, Jinying Peng, Hongwei Guo, and Chengqi Yi. Biochemical and structural insights into the mechanism of dna recognition by arabidopsis ethylene insensitive3. PLoS ONE, 10:e0137439, Sep 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137439, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137439. This article has 44 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

20. (benavente2006molecularmechanismsof pages 4-6): Larissa M. Benavente and Jose M. Alonso. Molecular mechanisms of ethylene signaling in arabidopsis. Molecular bioSystems, 2 3-4:165-73, Mar 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1039/b513874d, doi:10.1039/b513874d. This article has 108 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

21. (hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 5-6): Dongdong Hao, Wenyang Li, and Hongwei Guo. Ethylene signaling in <i>arabidopsis</i>: a journey from historical discoveries to modern insights. Plant Hormones, 1:0-0, Jan 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.48130/ph-0025-0015, doi:10.48130/ph-0025-0015. This article has 9 citations.

22. (chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 12-13): Katherine Noelani Chang, Shan Zhong, Matthew T Weirauch, Gary Hon, Mattia Pelizzola, Hai Li, Shao-shan Carol Huang, Robert J Schmitz, Mark A Urich, Dwight Kuo, Joseph R Nery, Hong Qiao, Ally Yang, Abdullah Jamali, Huaming Chen, Trey Ideker, Bing Ren, Ziv Bar-Joseph, Timothy R Hughes, and Joseph R Ecker. Temporal transcriptional response to ethylene gas drives growth hormone cross-regulation in arabidopsis. eLife, Jun 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.00675, doi:10.7554/elife.00675. This article has 469 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

23. (hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 9-10): Dongdong Hao, Wenyang Li, and Hongwei Guo. Ethylene signaling in <i>arabidopsis</i>: a journey from historical discoveries to modern insights. Plant Hormones, 1:0-0, Jan 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.48130/ph-0025-0015, doi:10.48130/ph-0025-0015. This article has 9 citations.

24. (hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 8-9): Dongdong Hao, Wenyang Li, and Hongwei Guo. Ethylene signaling in <i>arabidopsis</i>: a journey from historical discoveries to modern insights. Plant Hormones, 1:0-0, Jan 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.48130/ph-0025-0015, doi:10.48130/ph-0025-0015. This article has 9 citations.

Citations

1. guo2003plantresponsesto pages 3-5
2. hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 6-7
3. chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 2-3
4. guo2003plantresponsesto pages 7-8
5. aragonraygoza2025diverserolesof pages 3-4
6. khan2024roleofethylene pages 1-2
7. huang2024ethyleneinfruits pages 1-2
8. guo2003plantresponsesto pages 2-3
9. guo2003plantresponsesto pages 1-2
10. stepanova2005arabidopsisethylenesignaling pages 1-2
11. etheridge2006progressreportethylene pages 1-2
12. song2015biochemicalandstructural pages 1-2
13. guo2003plantresponsesto pages 5-7
14. chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 13-14
15. song2015biochemicalandstructural pages 18-19
16. benavente2006molecularmechanismsof pages 4-6
17. hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 5-6
18. chang2013temporaltranscriptionalresponse pages 12-13
19. hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 9-10
20. hao2025ethylenesignalingin pages 8-9
21. https://doi.org/10.48130/ph-0025-0015;
22. https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2762005cm4;
23. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci100
24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0163-2;
25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137439
26. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00675;
27. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.70302
28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03
29. https://doi.org/10.1039/b513874d;
30. https://doi.org/10.48130/ph-0025-0015
31. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00675
32. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137439;
33. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003347107
34. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042138
35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042138;
36. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae229
37. https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2762005cm4
38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0163-2
39. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4010003
40. https://doi.org/10.48130/ph-0025-0015,
41. https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2762005cm4,
42. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci100,
43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03
44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0163-2,
45. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137439,
46. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.00675,
47. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.70302,
48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042138,
49. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf062,
50. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4010003,
51. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae229,
52. https://doi.org/10.1039/b513874d,