WHY3

UniProt ID: Q66GR6
Organism: Arabidopsis thaliana
Review Status: DRAFT
πŸ“ Provide Detailed Feedback

Gene Description

WHIRLY3 (WHY3) is a nuclear-encoded member of the plant-specific Whirly family of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins. It carries an N-terminal chloroplast transit peptide and is located in chloroplasts, where it associates with plastid nucleoids; in organello import shows it can also enter mitochondria. Like its plastid paralog WHY1, it folds into the Whirly domain and assembles into tetramers that bind ssDNA without sequence specificity. WHY1 and WHY3 act redundantly to maintain plastid genome stability: plants lacking both accumulate plastid DNA rearrangements generated by recombination between short direct repeats (microhomology-mediated break-induced replication), especially after double-strand breaks are induced, leading to maternally inherited leaf variegation. WHY3 is also captured in RNA-interactome studies, and a nuclear pool has been reported to bind, with WHY1, an upstream element of the kinesin gene AtKP1 and repress its transcription.

Existing Annotations Review

GO Term Evidence Action Reason
GO:0003677 DNA binding
IDA
PMID:21911368
A conserved lysine residue of plant Whirly proteins is neces...
MODIFY
Summary: WHY3 binds DNA; in chloroplast extracts the WHY1/WHY3 pool is found in large DNA-containing complexes, and WHY3 alone (in why1 KO extracts) retains ssDNA-binding activity.
Reason: DNA binding is correct but general. The specific, well-supported activity is single-stranded DNA binding: EMSA of why1 single-KO leaf extracts, in which WHY3 is the only plastid Whirly, still shows ssDNA binding, and the Whirly fold and ssDNA-binding residues are conserved. GO:0003697 is_a GO:0003677 and the gene already carries it (IBA, IEA). Refine to single-stranded DNA binding.
Proposed replacements: single-stranded DNA binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21911368
part of the WHY1/3 population is found in large complexes that contain DNA
PMID:19666500
Only one Whirly is detected in the single KOs, and no Whirlies are detected in KO1/3 extracts.
PMID:19666500
whereas less intense signals are detected with KO1 and KO3, respectively
GO:0003677 DNA binding
IEA
GO_REF:0000120
MODIFY
Summary: Electronic DNA binding annotation from the Whirly ssDNA-binding domain signature.
Reason: The Whirly domain (IPR009044 ssDNA-binding transcriptional regulator) supports DNA binding, but the domain-level and experimental evidence specify single-stranded DNA binding, which the gene already carries. Refine to GO:0003697.
Proposed replacements: single-stranded DNA binding
Supporting Evidence:
file:ARATH/WHY3/WHY3-uniprot.txt
Pfam; PF08536; Whirly; 1.
PMID:19666500
whereas less intense signals are detected with KO1 and KO3, respectively
GO:0003677 DNA binding
ISS
PMID:15967440
DNA-binding proteins of the Whirly family in Arabidopsis tha...
MODIFY
Summary: ISS DNA binding transferred from potato p24/StWHY1 (AF233342), a characterised ssDNA-binding Whirly.
Reason: The transfer is sound (WHY3 has the Whirly fold and the conserved ssDNA-binding residues), but the source protein and WHY3 both bind single-stranded DNA; refine to single-stranded DNA binding.
Proposed replacements: single-stranded DNA binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:24192350
WHY1, WHY2 and WHY3 all exhibit the canonical Whirly fold.
PMID:20551348
Importantly, ssDNA binding residues are also conserved in Arabidopsis proteins, suggesting that the mechanism of ssDNA binding of St-WHY2 is similar to the ones of Arabidopsis WHY1, WHY2, and WHY3
PMID:19666500
whereas less intense signals are detected with KO1 and KO3, respectively
GO:0003697 single-stranded DNA binding
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: Phylogenetic inference of single-stranded DNA binding for the plant Whirly family node.
Reason: Single-stranded DNA binding is the core activity of the Whirly family and is supported directly for WHY3 by EMSA of why1 KO extracts. WHY3 sits inside the Whirly clade with an intact Whirly fold, so the inherited claim holds.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE CORE
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN008423852 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
Whirly family node; WHY3 retains the Whirly fold and ssDNA-binding residues.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19666500
whereas less intense signals are detected with KO1 and KO3, respectively
PMID:24192350
WHY1, WHY2 and WHY3 all exhibit the canonical Whirly fold.
PMID:20551348
Importantly, ssDNA binding residues are also conserved in Arabidopsis proteins, suggesting that the mechanism of ssDNA binding of St-WHY2 is similar to the ones of Arabidopsis WHY1, WHY2, and WHY3
GO:0003697 single-stranded DNA binding
IEA
GO_REF:0000002
ACCEPT
Summary: InterPro2GO single-stranded DNA binding from the Whirly domain (IPR013742).
Reason: Whirly domain membership is a reliable indicator of ssDNA binding, and this is confirmed experimentally for WHY3.
Supporting Evidence:
file:ARATH/WHY3/WHY3-uniprot.txt
Pfam; PF08536; Whirly; 1.
PMID:19666500
whereas less intense signals are detected with KO1 and KO3, respectively
GO:0003729 mRNA binding
HDA
PMID:27729395
In Planta Determination of the mRNA-Binding Proteome of Arab...
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: WHY3 was captured in the mRNA-binding proteome of etiolated seedlings (interactome capture).
Reason: RNA binding by WHY3 is supported by two independent in planta RNA-interactome capture studies, but the RNA targets and the biological role of RNA binding by WHY3 are unknown; the core activity is ssDNA binding. Retained as non-core. The paper is cached as abstract only; the abstract names WHIRLY among captured protein families.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:27729395
including WHIRLY, LIM, ALBA, DUF1296, and
GO:0003729 mRNA binding
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Phylogenetic inference of mRNA binding for the Whirly family.
Reason: RNA binding by WHY3 is supported by two independent in planta RNA-interactome capture studies, but the RNA targets and the biological role of RNA binding by WHY3 are unknown; the core activity is ssDNA binding. Retained as non-core. The family node is seeded by Arabidopsis Whirlies captured in RIC data, including WHY3 itself.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:32344669
ptRIC also assigned RNA-binding activity to all the members of the Alba- and the Whirly (WHY)-domain-containing protein families.
PMID:27729395
including WHIRLY, LIM, ALBA, DUF1296, and
GO:0003729 mRNA binding
IDA
PMID:32344669
Discovering the RNA-Binding Proteome of Plant Leaves with an...
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Leaf ptRIC assigned RNA-binding activity to all Whirly family members, including WHY3.
Reason: RNA binding by WHY3 is supported by two independent in planta RNA-interactome capture studies, but the RNA targets and the biological role of RNA binding by WHY3 are unknown; the core activity is ssDNA binding. Retained as non-core.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:32344669
ptRIC also assigned RNA-binding activity to all the members of the Alba- and the Whirly (WHY)-domain-containing protein families.
GO:0005634 nucleus
IDA NOT
PMID:15967440
DNA-binding proteins of the Whirly family in Arabidopsis tha...
UNDECIDED
Summary: NOT nucleus: GFP fusion of WHY3 in protoplasts and onion cells showed plastid, not nuclear, signal.
Reason: The negative result comes from a transient GFP-fusion assay (paper cached as abstract only) and is corroborated by later reporter work, but a nuclear pool is suggested by ChIP of WHY1/WHY3 at the AtKP1 upstream element and by a predicted NLS; UniProt lists nucleus by similarity. Absence of detectable GFP signal does not exclude a small or conditional nuclear pool, so the negation can neither be confirmed nor refuted with the available evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15967440
Transient expression of GFP fusion proteins in protoplasts and onion epidermal cells confirmed the localisation of these proteins in plastids or mitochondria, respectively.
PMID:32490348
WHIRLY3 was likewise found solely in chloroplasts after transient expression of a reporter construct
PMID:19669906
A ChIP assay showed that AtWHY1 and AtWHY3 bind to the upstream region of AtKP1 gene in vivo.
GO:0005739 mitochondrion
HDA
PMID:28887381
Global Analysis of Membrane-associated Protein Oligomerizati...
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: WHY3 was detected in a mitochondrial/membrane-associated proteome profiling dataset.
Reason: The mitochondrion location is independently supported by in organello import showing protease-protected accumulation of WHY3 in mitochondria, competed by a mitochondrial precursor. The assay cannot resolve the sub-compartment, and the documented functional role of WHY3 is in plastids, so the location is kept as non-core.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:32490348
Indeed, as proven here by in organello import as well as competition experiments, WHIRLY3 is dually targeted into both, mitochondria and chloroplasts
GO:0005739 mitochondrion
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Phylogenetic inference that Whirly proteins are active in mitochondria, seeded by the mitochondrial paralog WHY2.
Reason: Checked the source: the node is seeded by WHY2 (AT1G71260), the mitochondrial paralog, so the transfer to the plastid paralog WHY3 is a paralog extrapolation. Nevertheless WHY3 is imported into mitochondria in organello and has been proposed to compensate for WHY2 loss, so the organelle claim holds for WHY3; activity there is not demonstrated, so it is kept as non-core.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE NON CORE
Failure modes: WRONG ORTHOLOG OR PARALOG
Sources checked:
AGI_LocusCode:AT1G71260 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
WHY2 is mitochondrial; WHY3 is plastid-targeted but also imported into mitochondria in organello (PMID:32490348).
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:32490348
Indeed, as proven here by in organello import as well as competition experiments, WHIRLY3 is dually targeted into both, mitochondria and chloroplasts
GO:0006281 DNA repair
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
MODIFY
Summary: Phylogenetic inference of DNA repair for the Whirly family.
Reason: DNA repair is correct but general. The why1 why3 evidence comes from DSB-inducing treatments (ciprofloxacin, bleomycin), and the mechanism proposed is binding of resected ssDNA at DSBs to limit error-prone microhomology-mediated break-induced replication in favour of accurate repair. Refine to double-strand break repair (GO:0006302, is_a DNA repair). Note that the in vivo genetics are on the double mutant, so WHY3 acts redundantly with WHY1.
Propagation Review
Root cause: TERM SCOPING PROBLEM
Failure modes: GRANULARITY MISMATCH
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN008423852 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
Whirly DSB-repair role is shown for plastid WHY1/WHY3 and mitochondrial WHY2 in Arabidopsis.
Proposed replacements: double-strand break repair
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20551348
Importantly, rearrangements in the plastid genome of why2-1 mutant plants and in the mitochondria of why1 why3 mutant plants were at wild-type levels
PMID:21911368
Whirly proteins are believed to modulate the MMBIR pathway either by binding the resected DNA that forms during processing of DSBs, thus favoring error-free repair through homologous recombination
GO:0006281 DNA repair
IEA
GO_REF:0000117
MODIFY
Summary: ARBA machine-learning prediction of DNA repair.
Reason: DNA repair is correct but general. The why1 why3 evidence comes from DSB-inducing treatments (ciprofloxacin, bleomycin), and the mechanism proposed is binding of resected ssDNA at DSBs to limit error-prone microhomology-mediated break-induced replication in favour of accurate repair. Refine to double-strand break repair (GO:0006302, is_a DNA repair). Note that the in vivo genetics are on the double mutant, so WHY3 acts redundantly with WHY1.
Proposed replacements: double-strand break repair
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20551348
Importantly, rearrangements in the plastid genome of why2-1 mutant plants and in the mitochondria of why1 why3 mutant plants were at wild-type levels
PMID:21911368
Whirly proteins are believed to modulate the MMBIR pathway either by binding the resected DNA that forms during processing of DSBs, thus favoring error-free repair through homologous recombination
GO:0006281 DNA repair
IMP
PMID:21911368
A conserved lysine residue of plant Whirly proteins is neces...
MODIFY
Summary: why1 why3 double mutants are hypersensitive to ciprofloxacin (DSB inducer) and complementation requires the conserved KGKAAL lysine.
Reason: DNA repair is correct but general. The why1 why3 evidence comes from DSB-inducing treatments (ciprofloxacin, bleomycin), and the mechanism proposed is binding of resected ssDNA at DSBs to limit error-prone microhomology-mediated break-induced replication in favour of accurate repair. Refine to double-strand break repair (GO:0006302, is_a DNA repair). Note that the in vivo genetics are on the double mutant, so WHY3 acts redundantly with WHY1.
Proposed replacements: double-strand break repair
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21911368
the absence of Whirly proteins in the plastids of these plants makes them sensitive to low doses of ciprofloxacin
PMID:21911368
Whirly proteins are believed to modulate the MMBIR pathway either by binding the resected DNA that forms during processing of DSBs, thus favoring error-free repair through homologous recombination
GO:0006281 DNA repair
NAS
PMID:20551348
Crystal structures of DNA-Whirly complexes and their role in...
MODIFY
Summary: Author statement that Whirlies function in organelle genome repair, from the DNA-Whirly crystal structure paper.
Reason: DNA repair is correct but general. The why1 why3 evidence comes from DSB-inducing treatments (ciprofloxacin, bleomycin), and the mechanism proposed is binding of resected ssDNA at DSBs to limit error-prone microhomology-mediated break-induced replication in favour of accurate repair. Refine to double-strand break repair (GO:0006302, is_a DNA repair). Note that the in vivo genetics are on the double mutant, so WHY3 acts redundantly with WHY1.
Proposed replacements: double-strand break repair
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20551348
Importantly, rearrangements in the plastid genome of why2-1 mutant plants and in the mitochondria of why1 why3 mutant plants were at wild-type levels
PMID:21911368
Whirly proteins are believed to modulate the MMBIR pathway either by binding the resected DNA that forms during processing of DSBs, thus favoring error-free repair through homologous recombination
GO:0006355 regulation of DNA-templated transcription
IEA
GO_REF:0000002
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: InterPro2GO regulation of transcription from the Whirly "ssDNA-binding transcriptional regulator" domain.
Reason: Whirly proteins were first described as nuclear transcriptional regulators (potato p24/WHY1). For WHY3 the only support is a single report that WHY1 and WHY3 are components of KBF1, which binds an upstream element of AtKP1 (ChIP) and represses it on overexpression. The role is plausible for WHY3 but peripheral to its established organellar genome-maintenance function.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19669906
A ChIP assay showed that AtWHY1 and AtWHY3 bind to the upstream region of AtKP1 gene in vivo.
PMID:19669906
KBF1 is a single and double-stranded DNA-binding factor.
GO:0006952 defense response
IEA
GO_REF:0000002
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED
Summary: InterPro2GO defense response from the Whirly domain.
Reason: Defense-gene regulation by Whirlies is established for Arabidopsis WHY1 and potato WHY1 (nuclear pool), not for WHY3. No defense phenotype or defense-gene binding has been shown for WHY3; the annotation is a family-level extrapolation of a function not demonstrated for this paralog.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15708347
the Arabidopsis Whirly protein AtWhy1 contributes to both basal and specific defense responses
GO:0006952 defense response
TAS
PMID:15708347
Whirly transcription factors: defense gene regulation and be...
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED
Summary: Traceable author statement from a Whirly review that Whirly transcription factors regulate defense genes.
Reason: Defense-gene regulation by Whirlies is established for Arabidopsis WHY1 and potato WHY1 (nuclear pool), not for WHY3. No defense phenotype or defense-gene binding has been shown for WHY3; the annotation is a family-level extrapolation of a function not demonstrated for this paralog. The cited review attributes defense roles to AtWhy1 and potato Whirly orthologs.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15708347
the Arabidopsis Whirly protein AtWhy1 contributes to both basal and specific defense responses
GO:0009507 chloroplast
HDA
PMID:18431481
Sorting signals, N-terminal modifications and abundance of t...
ACCEPT
Summary: WHY3 identified in large-scale MS proteome of purified chloroplasts.
Reason: Chloroplast location is supported by a predicted chloroplast transit peptide, in vitro import and GFP fusion, and multiple chloroplast proteomes; it is where WHY3 maintains plastid genome stability.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21911368
WHY1 and WHY3 are directed to the chloroplasts whereas WHY2 is directed to the mitochondria
PMID:15967440
Transient expression of GFP fusion proteins in protoplasts and onion epidermal cells confirmed the localisation of these proteins in plastids or mitochondria, respectively.
GO:0009507 chloroplast
IDA
PMID:15967440
DNA-binding proteins of the Whirly family in Arabidopsis tha...
ACCEPT
Summary: In vitro import and GFP fusion show WHY3 is targeted to plastids.
Reason: Chloroplast location is supported by a predicted chloroplast transit peptide, in vitro import and GFP fusion, and multiple chloroplast proteomes; it is where WHY3 maintains plastid genome stability.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15967440
Transient expression of GFP fusion proteins in protoplasts and onion epidermal cells confirmed the localisation of these proteins in plastids or mitochondria, respectively.
file:ARATH/WHY3/WHY3-uniprot.txt
SUBCELLULAR LOCATION: Plastid, chloroplast {ECO:0000269|PubMed:15967440}.
GO:0009507 chloroplast
IEA
GO_REF:0000044
ACCEPT
Summary: Electronic mapping from UniProt subcellular location (Plastid, chloroplast).
Reason: Chloroplast location is supported by a predicted chloroplast transit peptide, in vitro import and GFP fusion, and multiple chloroplast proteomes; it is where WHY3 maintains plastid genome stability. The UniProt location is experimentally grounded (PubMed:15967440).
Supporting Evidence:
file:ARATH/WHY3/WHY3-uniprot.txt
SUBCELLULAR LOCATION: Plastid, chloroplast {ECO:0000269|PubMed:15967440}.
PMID:15967440
Transient expression of GFP fusion proteins in protoplasts and onion epidermal cells confirmed the localisation of these proteins in plastids or mitochondria, respectively.
GO:0009507 chloroplast
ISM
GO_REF:0000122
ACCEPT
Summary: AtSubP prediction of chloroplast localization.
Reason: Chloroplast location is supported by a predicted chloroplast transit peptide, in vitro import and GFP fusion, and multiple chloroplast proteomes; it is where WHY3 maintains plastid genome stability. Prediction agrees with the experimental data.
Supporting Evidence:
file:ARATH/WHY3/WHY3-uniprot.txt
TRANSIT 1..75 /note="Chloroplast"
PMID:15967440
Transient expression of GFP fusion proteins in protoplasts and onion epidermal cells confirmed the localisation of these proteins in plastids or mitochondria, respectively.
GO:0009570 chloroplast stroma
HDA
PMID:20061580
AT_CHLORO, a comprehensive chloroplast proteome database wit...
ACCEPT
Summary: WHY3 identified in the stromal fraction of the AT_CHLORO chloroplast proteome.
Reason: Stromal location is consistent with a soluble nucleoid-associated ssDNA-binding protein; chloroplast nucleoids are part of the stroma. Direct proteomic evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21911368
part of the WHY1/3 population is found in large complexes that contain DNA
GO:0009863 salicylic acid mediated signaling pathway
IDA
PMID:19669906
Recruitment of AtWHY1 and AtWHY3 by a distal element upstrea...
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED
Summary: Annotation based on the finding that SA treatment raises WHY1 and WHY3 transcripts, together with WHY-dependent repression of AtKP1.
Reason: The cached abstract supports only induction of WHY3 transcripts by salicylic acid, which is expression evidence (response to SA) rather than participation in the SA signal transduction pathway; no SA-signalling phenotype or step performed by WHY3 is described. The full text was not available, so the row is not removed, but the term appears to overstate the evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19669906
salicylic acid treatment resulted in an increase of AtWHY1 and AtWHY3 transcripts
GO:0042644 chloroplast nucleoid
HDA
PMID:16326926
pTAC2, -6, and -12 are components of the transcriptionally a...
ACCEPT
Summary: WHY3 identified among proteins of isolated transcriptionally active plastid chromosomes (pTAC / nucleoid fraction).
Reason: The chloroplast nucleoid is where WHY3 binds plastid DNA; WHY1/WHY3 are found in DNA-containing complexes in chloroplast extracts. Direct proteomic evidence (paper cached as abstract only; deferring to the curator for the WHY3 identification).
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21911368
part of the WHY1/3 population is found in large complexes that contain DNA
GO:1990391 DNA repair complex
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Phylogenetic inference that Whirlies are part of a DNA repair complex.
Reason: GO:1990391 is defined as a protein complex involved in DNA repair. WHY3 forms Whirly tetramers (and, by analogy with WHY1/WHY2, higher-order 24-mers on long ssDNA) that act in organellar DSB repair, so the claim is defensible, but the complex is a homo-oligomeric ssDNA-binding assembly rather than a defined multi-subunit repair machine, and the term adds little beyond the MF and BP. Kept as non-core.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:24192350
reveals that these structurally similar proteins assemble into tetramers
PMID:21911368
Whirly proteins are believed to modulate the MMBIR pathway either by binding the resected DNA that forms during processing of DSBs, thus favoring error-free repair through homologous recombination
GO:1990391 DNA repair complex
IEA
GO_REF:0000117
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: ARBA prediction of DNA repair complex.
Reason: GO:1990391 is defined as a protein complex involved in DNA repair. WHY3 forms Whirly tetramers (and, by analogy with WHY1/WHY2, higher-order 24-mers on long ssDNA) that act in organellar DSB repair, so the claim is defensible, but the complex is a homo-oligomeric ssDNA-binding assembly rather than a defined multi-subunit repair machine, and the term adds little beyond the MF and BP. Kept as non-core.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:24192350
reveals that these structurally similar proteins assemble into tetramers
GO:1990391 DNA repair complex
IPI
PMID:24192350
A family portrait: structural comparison of the Whirly prote...
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Crystal structure shows WHY3 assembles into a C4 Whirly tetramer like WHY1 and WHY2.
Reason: GO:1990391 is defined as a protein complex involved in DNA repair. WHY3 forms Whirly tetramers (and, by analogy with WHY1/WHY2, higher-order 24-mers on long ssDNA) that act in organellar DSB repair, so the claim is defensible, but the complex is a homo-oligomeric ssDNA-binding assembly rather than a defined multi-subunit repair machine, and the term adds little beyond the MF and BP. Kept as non-core.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:24192350
reveals that these structurally similar proteins assemble into tetramers
PMID:24192350
WHY1, WHY2 and WHY3 all exhibit the canonical Whirly fold.

Core Functions

Plastid single-stranded DNA-binding Whirly tetramer that, redundantly with WHY1, binds plastid DNA at nucleoids and protects the plastid genome against microhomology-mediated illegitimate recombination during double-strand break repair, favouring accurate repair.

Molecular Function:
single-stranded DNA binding
Directly Involved In:
Cellular Locations:
Supporting Evidence:
  • PMID:19666500
    whereas less intense signals are detected with KO1 and KO3, respectively
  • PMID:19666500
    We suggest that AtWhy1 and AtWhy3 function as antirecombination proteins, contributing to safeguard plastid genome integrity.
  • PMID:20551348
    Importantly, rearrangements in the plastid genome of why2-1 mutant plants and in the mitochondria of why1 why3 mutant plants were at wild-type levels
  • PMID:21911368
    Whirly proteins are believed to modulate the MMBIR pathway either by binding the resected DNA that forms during processing of DSBs, thus favoring error-free repair through homologous recombination
  • PMID:21911368
    part of the WHY1/3 population is found in large complexes that contain DNA

References

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

Suggested Questions for Experts

Q: Should WHY1/WHY3 carry negative regulation of DNA recombination (GO:0045910), given that they are proposed to act as antirecombination factors by coating ssDNA, or is the double-strand break repair term sufficient?

Q: Does WHY3 have a physiologically meaningful nuclear pool, and does it act in the nucleus independently of WHY1 (e.g. at the AtKP1 element)?

Q: Does WHY3 compensate for WHY2 in mitochondria in vivo, given its in organello import into mitochondria?

Suggested Experiments

Experiment: Complement why1 why3 with WHY3 alone (wild type and a KGKAAL second-lysine mutant) to test whether WHY3 by itself restores ciprofloxacin resistance and plastid genome stability, independent of WHY1.

Experiment: Use endogenous-promoter WHY3-tagged lines with chloroplast, mitochondrial and nuclear fractionation (with cross-contamination markers) to quantify the WHY3 pool in each compartment.

Deep Research

Manual

(WHY3-deep-research-manual.md)

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

πŸ“š Additional Documentation

Notes

(WHY3-notes.md)

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

πŸ“„ View Raw YAML

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)