SwrD (formerly YlzI) is a small (~71 aa) swarming-specific enhancer of flagellar motor power in Bacillus subtilis. Located in the fla-che operon adjacent to fliL, SwrD increases power delivery (torque) per flagellum by acting at the level of MotAB stator activity, without affecting stator abundance or flagellar number. Deletion of swrD abolishes swarming motility and reduces swimming speed (~2-fold) and single-flagellum torque (~6-fold). These phenotypes are rescued by MotAB overexpression, demonstrating that SwrD functions to enhance motor power output. SwrD homologs often co-occur with motAB across diverse bacteria, suggesting a conserved role in stator-dependent torque enhancement for surface motility.
| GO Term | Evidence | Action | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GO:0071978
bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility
|
IBA
GO_REF:0000033 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This phylogenetic annotation (IBA) is well-supported by experimental evidence from PMID:29061663. SwrD is specifically required for swarming motility; deletion abolishes swarming on solid surfaces while cells retain swimming ability (albeit reduced).
Reason: The IBA annotation aligns with direct experimental evidence. Hall et al. (2018) demonstrated that swrD mutants completely fail to swarm on 0.7% agar, while complementation restores swarming. The phylogenetic inference is consistent with the protein's conserved function across Firmicutes and other bacterial lineages where SwrD homologs co-occur with motAB.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:29061663
Here we report a new gene, swrD, located within the 32 gene fla-che operon dedicated to flagellar biosynthesis and chemotaxis, which when mutated abolished swarming motility.
PMID:29061663
SwrD was not required for surfactant production, flagellar gene expression, or an increase in flagellar number. Instead, SwrD was required to increase flagellar power.
file:BACSU/swrD/swrD-deep-research-falcon.md
See deep research file for comprehensive analysis
|
|
GO:0071978
bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility
|
IMP
PMID:29061663 SwrD (YlzI) Promotes Swarming in Bacillus subtilis by Increa... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This is the primary experimental paper characterizing SwrD function. Hall et al. (2018) demonstrated through deletion and complementation experiments that SwrD is essential for swarming motility by increasing power to flagellar motors via MotAB stator activity.
Reason: PMID:29061663 provides definitive experimental evidence for SwrD's role in swarming. The study shows: (1) swrD deletion abolishes swarming on 0.7% agar, (2) complementation restores swarming, (3) the phenotype is not due to reduced flagellar number or surfactant production, and (4) MotAB overexpression rescues swrD-related phenotypes. This directly demonstrates that SwrD is involved in bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:29061663
Here we report a new gene, swrD, located within the 32 gene fla-che operon dedicated to flagellar biosynthesis and chemotaxis, which when mutated abolished swarming motility.
PMID:29061663
We conclude that swarming motility requires flagellar power in excess of that which is needed to swim.
PMID:29061663
SwrD likely increases power in other organisms, like the Firmicutes, Clostridia, Spirochaetes, and the Deltaproteobacteria.
|
|
GO:0071978
bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility
|
IMP
PMID:25313396 FlgM is secreted by the flagellar export apparatus in Bacill... |
REMOVE |
Summary: This annotation is INCORRECT. PMID:25313396 (Calvo and Kearns, 2015) is about FlgM secretion by the flagellar export apparatus in Bacillus subtilis. The paper does NOT mention swrD or ylzI anywhere. This appears to be an erroneous annotation.
Reason: PMID:25313396 is titled "FlgM is secreted by the flagellar export apparatus in Bacillus subtilis" and focuses entirely on the anti-sigma factor FlgM and its secretion mechanism. The paper investigates flagellar structural genes required for FlgM secretion (FliF, FliG, FliO, FliP, FliQ, FliR, FlhA, FlhB, FliK) but makes no mention of swrD or its synonym ylzI. This annotation should be removed as it attributes experimental evidence from a paper that does not study or mention SwrD.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:25313396
FlgM is secreted by the flagellar export apparatus in Bacillus subtilis.
|
|
GO:0071977
bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swimming motility
|
IMP
PMID:29061663 SwrD (YlzI) Promotes Swarming in Bacillus subtilis by Increa... |
NEW |
Summary: SwrD affects swimming motility as well as swarming. Hall et al. (2018) demonstrated that swrD deletion reduces swimming speed approximately 2-fold (from ~30 um/s to ~15 um/s). This annotation captures the effect on swimming that is distinct from swarming.
Reason: While swrD mutants can still swim (unlike swarming which is abolished), their swimming is significantly impaired. The ~2-fold reduction in swimming speed and ~6-fold reduction in torque demonstrates that SwrD positively affects flagellum-dependent swimming motility. This annotation would complement the swarming annotation by capturing the broader motility phenotype. Evidence is IMP based on mutant phenotype analysis.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:29061663
Mutation of swrD reduced swimming speed and torque of tethered flagella, and all swrD-related phenotypes were restored when the stator subunits MotA and MotB were overexpressed either by spontaneous suppressor mutations or by artificial induction.
PMID:29061663
cells mutated for swrD swim with reduced speed
|
|
GO:1902021
regulation of bacterial-type flagellum-dependent cell motility
|
IMP
PMID:29061663 SwrD (YlzI) Promotes Swarming in Bacillus subtilis by Increa... |
NEW |
Summary: SwrD functions as a positive regulator of flagellar motor power, modulating motility by enhancing stator activity. This regulatory function is distinct from direct involvement in motility per se.
Reason: SwrD regulates the power output of the flagellar motor by acting at the level of MotAB stator activity, without affecting stator protein levels or flagellar number. This is a regulatory function that modulates the rate/extent of cell motility. The fact that MotAB overexpression rescues swrD phenotypes demonstrates that SwrD acts as a positive regulator of motor function. This GO term captures the regulatory aspect of SwrD function that the direct motility terms do not fully represent.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:29061663
SwrD was not required for surfactant production, flagellar gene expression, or an increase in flagellar number. Instead, SwrD was required to increase flagellar power.
PMID:29061663
all swrD-related phenotypes were restored when the stator subunits MotA and MotB were overexpressed
|
|
GO:0003674
molecular_function
|
NAS | NEW |
Summary: Added to align core_functions with existing annotations.
Reason: Core function term not present in existing_annotations.
|
Q: What is the molecular mechanism by which SwrD enhances MotAB stator activity?
Q: Does SwrD directly interact with MotAB stator proteins or other motor components?
Q: What is the subcellular localization of SwrD (cytoplasmic, membrane-associated, or motor-localized)?
Q: Is SwrD function regulated during the transition from swimming to swarming?
Experiment: Protein-protein interaction studies (co-IP, bacterial two-hybrid) to identify SwrD binding partners
Hypothesis: SwrD may directly interact with MotAB stator complex or other motor components
Experiment: Fluorescent tagging of SwrD to determine subcellular localization
Hypothesis: SwrD may localize to the flagellar motor or membrane
Experiment: Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy of MotA-GFP in swrD mutant vs wild-type to assess stator dynamics
Hypothesis: SwrD may reduce stator dynamism by facilitating stator retention at the motor
Experiment: Cryo-EM of motor complexes with and without SwrD to identify structural changes
Hypothesis: SwrD may induce conformational changes in the stator-rotor interface
provider: falcon
model: Edison Scientific Literature
cached: false
start_time: '2025-12-17T18:45:48.598784'
end_time: '2025-12-17T18:53:12.709801'
duration_seconds: 444.11
template_file: templates/gene_research_go_focused.md
template_variables:
organism: BACSU
gene_id: swrD
gene_symbol: swrD
uniprot_accession: C0H412
protein_description: 'RecName: Full=Swarming motility protein SwrD {ECO:0000305};'
gene_info: Name=swrD {ECO:0000303|PubMed:29061663}; Synonyms=ylzI; OrderedLocusNames=BSU16299;
organism_full: Bacillus subtilis (strain 168).
protein_family: Not specified in UniProt
protein_domains: SwrD-like. (IPR009384); FlbD (PF06289)
provider_config:
timeout: 600
max_retries: 3
parameters:
allowed_domains: []
temperature: 0.1
citation_count: 14
BEFORE YOU BEGIN RESEARCH: You MUST verify you are researching the CORRECT gene/protein. Gene symbols can be ambiguous, especially for less well-characterized genes from non-model organisms.
DO NOT PROCEED WITH RESEARCH ON A DIFFERENT GENE. Instead:
- State clearly: "The gene symbol 'swrD' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein"
- Explain what you found (e.g., "Found extensive literature on a different gene with the same symbol in a different organism")
- Describe the protein based ONLY on the UniProt information provided above
- Suggest that the protein function can be inferred from domain/family information
Please provide a comprehensive research report on the gene swrD (gene ID: swrD, UniProt: C0H412) in BACSU.
The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
Question: You are an expert researcher providing comprehensive, well-cited information.
Provide detailed information focusing on:
1. Key concepts and definitions with current understanding
2. Recent developments and latest research (prioritize 2023-2024 sources)
3. Current applications and real-world implementations
4. Expert opinions and analysis from authoritative sources
5. Relevant statistics and data from recent studies
Format as a comprehensive research report with proper citations. Include URLs and publication dates where available.
Always prioritize recent, authoritative sources and provide specific citations for all major claims.
BEFORE YOU BEGIN RESEARCH: You MUST verify you are researching the CORRECT gene/protein. Gene symbols can be ambiguous, especially for less well-characterized genes from non-model organisms.
DO NOT PROCEED WITH RESEARCH ON A DIFFERENT GENE. Instead:
- State clearly: "The gene symbol 'swrD' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein"
- Explain what you found (e.g., "Found extensive literature on a different gene with the same symbol in a different organism")
- Describe the protein based ONLY on the UniProt information provided above
- Suggest that the protein function can be inferred from domain/family information
Please provide a comprehensive research report on the gene swrD (gene ID: swrD, UniProt: C0H412) in BACSU.
The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
Research plan and verification summary
- Identity verification: The Bacillus subtilis (strain 168) gene ylzI within the fla/che operon is renamed swrD; it encodes a ~71-aa protein required for swarming. The gene lies just upstream of fliL with a short overlap, consistent with BSU16299. These points are demonstrated in primary literature, confirming the target identity and organism for SwrD in B. subtilis 168 (Jan 2018, Journal of Bacteriology; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 9-11).
Comprehensive research report: Bacillus subtilis swrD (ylzI/BSU16299)
1) Key concepts and definitions
- Gene and product: swrD (formerly ylzI) encodes a small protein (~71 aa) in the B. subtilis fla/che operon. Its loss abolishes swarming while leaving swimming partially intact. Complementation with swrD restores swarming, demonstrating that the phenotype is due to swrD itself rather than polar effects (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 9-11).
- Functional role: SwrD increases power delivery (torque) per flagellum by acting at the level of MotAB stator activity. It does not increase flagellar numbers and does not reduce MotA abundance, indicating a functional modulation of stator activity rather than expression or assembly (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 17-19, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 1-3, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5).
- Pathway context: Swarming in B. subtilis requires increased flagellar density and higher motor power on surfaces. SwrD belongs to the class of regulators that enhance motor power rather than those that increase flagellar number (e.g., SwrA/SwrB). Its genetic positioning overlaps with fliL, and swrD homologs often occur adjacent to motAB across diverse bacteria, supporting a conserved linkage to stator function (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 34-37, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 30-32, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5).
2) Recent developments and latest research (priority to 2023β2024)
- 2022 TnSeq gene compendium for swarming: A swarming selection-based TnSeq in B. subtilis recovered known swarming genes and identified additional candidates. In this framework, SwrD is cited as a factor that increases the power to individual motors, representing a torque/power-centric class of swarming determinants. This locates SwrD within contemporary gene-set views of swarming regulation (Jun 2022; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00089-22) (sanchez2022identificationofgenes pages 9-11).
- 2022 review of swarming methodology and features: A minireview on swarming techniques and behaviors references the prevalence of proteins influencing surface motility in Gram-positive bacteria, providing updated experimental context for assaying swarming phenotypes and torque-related adaptation under surface load (Feb 2022; Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01853-21) (poudel2019integratedproteomicsand pages 10-11).
- Mechanistic advances from FliL/stomatin-like systems: Although not SwrD itself, Vibrio FliL has been structurally characterized as a stomatin-like ring around the stator, providing a comparative model for torque enhancement at high load on surfaces. These 2019 data are still the leading structural insights for stator-associated torque regulators and continue to inform current models (Apr 2019; mBio; https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19) (takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10).
3) Current applications and real-world implementations
- Engineering surface motility and torque tuning: Because swrD deletion decreases per-flagellum torque and abolishes swarming yet can be rescued by overexpressing MotAB stators, SwrD and stator stoichiometry are targets for engineering bacterial motility under high-load conditions (e.g., synthetic biology designs for surface transport). The finding that extra stators can compensate for loss of SwrD suggests practical strategies to tune motor output in strains that must traverse viscous or high-friction environments (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 34-37, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5).
- Comparative and translational insights: Genomic co-occurrence of swrD with motAB and adjacency to fliL invites comparative analysis across Firmicutes and other taxa (e.g., spirochaetes) to understand torque adaptation in host or environmental settings where swarming contributes to colonization or spread. Structural knowledge from FliL informs hypotheses for interface points between torque modulators and stators, which could be leveraged in microbe-microbe competition or bioprocessing on surfaces (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17; Apr 2019; mBio; https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5, takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10).
4) Expert opinions and analysis from authoritative sources
- Primary experimental conclusion: Hall et al. concluded that SwrD is required to increase flagellar power for swarming and that it operates at the level of MotAB activity. They proposed that SwrD may reduce stator dynamism by facilitating stator retention at the motor, but were unable to directly visualize stator dynamics due to nonfunctional fluorescent fusionsβthus mechanistic details remain hypothetical (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 17-19).
- Relationship to FliL: In B. subtilis, fliL disruption produces a milder swarming defect and is not rescued by MotAB overexpression, suggesting SwrD and FliL act by distinct mechanisms despite genomic proximity. Across bacteria, FliLβs stomatin-like ring around the stator supports a general paradigm of torque enhancement via stator-associated scaffolds, providing a conceptual foil to SwrDβs mechanism (Apr 2019; mBio; https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19; Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 17-19).
- Contemporary integration (2022): The 2022 TnSeq study frames swarming requirements in a genome-scale context and cites SwrDβs power-enhancing role as part of the swarming toolkit, aligning with expert perspectives that swarming requires both increased flagellar density and enhanced torque at the motor (Jun 2022; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00089-22) (sanchez2022identificationofgenes pages 9-11).
5) Relevant statistics and quantitative data
- Swimming speed: Loss of swrD reduces average swimming speed about two-fold, from ~30 ΞΌm/s (WT) to ~15 ΞΌm/s (swrD), measured across ~100 cells (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 37-37).
- Torque reduction: Single-flagellum torque is reduced ~6-fold in the swrD mutant relative to WT, as measured in ~40 tethered cells (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 37-37).
- Rescue by MotAB: Overexpression of motA/motB (amyE::Physpank-motAB induced with 1 mM IPTG) restores swimming speed, torque, and swarming to near wild-type levels, correlating with elevated MotA levels by Western blot; MotA levels are not reduced in the swrD mutant itself, indicating SwrD acts on stator activity rather than abundance (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 34-37, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17).
- Swarming phenotype: swrD mutants fail to swarm on 0.7% agar; complementation and MotAB overexpression rescue swarming. Assays were designed to isolate swarming (e.g., preventing alternative spreading) and compared WT, swrD, and motAB-overexpression strains (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 30-32).
- Broader context: Reviews and surveys in 2022 reaffirm swarming as a high-load motility mode requiring specialized adaptations in motor function and population behavior, consistent with SwrDβs power-boosting role in B. subtilis (Feb 2022; AEM; https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01853-21) (poudel2019integratedproteomicsand pages 10-11).
Mechanistic and localization notes
- Localization: Experimental localization of SwrD (e.g., membrane association or specific motor binding) remains undetermined; functional inferences point to action at the stator level without evidence for changes in MotA abundance (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 17-19, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17).
- Distinction from FliL: FliL is stomatin-like and structurally forms a ring that interacts with stator subunits to enhance torque, particularly under high-load conditions such as swarming; in B. subtilis, the genetic and rescue phenotypes suggest SwrD operates via a different mechanism despite being adjacent to fliL (Apr 2019; mBio; https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19; Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17) (takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 17-19).
Structured summary of SwrD key facts
| Category | Detail | Quantitative / Notes | Key Sources (year and URL) |
|---|---|---:|---|
| Identifiers | UniProt C0H412; gene swrD (ylzI); locus BSU16299; organism Bacillus subtilis (strain 168) | Protein β71 aa | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17) |
| Domain / family | Annotated SwrD-like; genomic proximity to FliL (PF06289) reported; no demonstrated SPFH/stomatin fold for SwrD | Small protein; no resolved structural domain showing stomatin/SPFH | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5); Takekawa et al., 2019 (FliL structure) β https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19 (takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10) |
| Genomic context | Encoded in the fla/che operon; 3' end overlaps 5' of downstream fliL; commonly co-occurs adjacent to motAB in diverse bacteria | Possible translational coupling; conserved neighborhood with motAB | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5) |
| Molecular function | Promotes per-flagellum power by modulating MotAB stator activity (acts on stator activity not abundance) | MotA levels unchanged in swrD mutant; function inferred from genetic/rescue data | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17) |
| Cellular localization | Undetermined experimentally; protein is small (~71 aa) and encoded near membrane-associated flagellar genes | No direct localization (cytoplasmic vs membrane) demonstrated in available studies | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 9-11) |
| Phenotype of deletion | swrD deletion abolishes swarming but cells retain ability to swim | Severe swarming defect on 0.7% agar; mucoid colony phenotype (PgsB-dependent) | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 9-11) |
| Quantitative motor phenotypes | β2Γ reduced swim speed (~30 β ~15 ΞΌm/s); β6Γ reduced single-flagellum torque; phenotypes rescued by MotAB overexpression | Swim-speed measured on ~100 cells; torque measured on ~40 tethered cells; rescue via amyE::Physpank-motAB (1 mM IPTG) | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 34-37) |
| Swarming assays & rescue | swrD mutants fail to expand on 0.7% agar; overexpression of motA/motB (amyE::Physpank-motAB, 1 mM IPTG) restores swimming and swarming | Rescue demonstrates extra stators can compensate for loss of SwrD activity | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 30-32, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 34-37) |
| Relation to FliL / stomatin-like proteins | FliL (stomatin-like) forms a ring around stators to enhance torque in some bacteria; B. subtilis fliL mutant shows milder swarming defect and is not rescued by MotAB overexpression β suggesting distinct mechanisms | FliL structural ring model (8 nm inner diameter) implicates direct stator interaction; SwrD likely acts differently despite genomic proximity | Takekawa et al., 2019 β https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19 (takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10); Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 17-19) |
| Recent developments (2022β2024) | TnSeq swarming gene compendium recovered known swr genes and cites SwrD's role in increasing flagellar power; reviews summarize experimental techniques and regulators of swarming/torque | TnSeq supports SwrD as a torque/power-related regulator among swarming-required genes | Sanchez et al., 2022 (TnSeq) β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00089-22 (sanchez2022identificationofgenes pages 9-11); Partridge, 2022 (survey review) β https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01853-21 (poudel2019integratedproteomicsand pages 10-11) |
| Applications / implications | Target for engineering surface motility (modulating stator-rotor output); comparative studies across Firmicutes/Proteobacteria to understand torque adaptation on surfaces | Potential use in synthetic biology to tune motor output under high-load conditions; comparative phylogenetic context suggests broader relevance | Hall et al., 2018 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17 (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17); Takekawa et al., 2019 β https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19 (takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10); Sanchez et al., 2022 β https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00089-22 (sanchez2022identificationofgenes pages 9-11) |
Table: Compact summary table of experimentally supported properties of Bacillus subtilis SwrD (ylzI/BSU16299), including identifiers, function, phenotypes, quantitative motor data, genomic context, comparisons to FliL, and recent (2022) gene-set evidence; each row cites the primary sources used (context IDs).
Conclusions and open questions
- SwrD in B. subtilis 168 is a small, swarming-specific enhancer of motor power that acts at the level of stator activity without altering stator abundance. Deletion abolishes swarming and reduces torque and swimming speed; increasing stator levels suffices to rescue these defects. Genetic adjacency to fliL and frequent co-occurrence with motAB across bacteria suggest a conserved functional unit centered on stator modulation. Unlike the stomatin-like FliL, SwrDβs mechanism and localization remain unresolved, and no structural domain has been assigned from the available evidence here. Recent 2022 studies integrate SwrD into broader swarming gene frameworks, while structural work on FliL continues to inform hypotheses about stator-associated torque enhancement on surfaces (Jan 2018; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17; Jun 2022; J. Bacteriol.; https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00089-22; Apr 2019; mBio; https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19; Feb 2022; AEM; https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01853-21) (hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 34-37, hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5, sanchez2022identificationofgenes pages 9-11, takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10, poudel2019integratedproteomicsand pages 10-11).
References
(hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 3-5): Ashley N. Hall, Sundharraman Subramanian, Reid T. Oshiro, Alexandra K. Canzoneri, and Daniel B. Kearns. Swrd (ylzi) promotes swarming in bacillus subtilis by increasing power to flagellar motors. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17, doi:10.1128/jb.00529-17. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 9-11): Ashley N. Hall, Sundharraman Subramanian, Reid T. Oshiro, Alexandra K. Canzoneri, and Daniel B. Kearns. Swrd (ylzi) promotes swarming in bacillus subtilis by increasing power to flagellar motors. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17, doi:10.1128/jb.00529-17. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 17-19): Ashley N. Hall, Sundharraman Subramanian, Reid T. Oshiro, Alexandra K. Canzoneri, and Daniel B. Kearns. Swrd (ylzi) promotes swarming in bacillus subtilis by increasing power to flagellar motors. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17, doi:10.1128/jb.00529-17. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 1-3): Ashley N. Hall, Sundharraman Subramanian, Reid T. Oshiro, Alexandra K. Canzoneri, and Daniel B. Kearns. Swrd (ylzi) promotes swarming in bacillus subtilis by increasing power to flagellar motors. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17, doi:10.1128/jb.00529-17. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 15-17): Ashley N. Hall, Sundharraman Subramanian, Reid T. Oshiro, Alexandra K. Canzoneri, and Daniel B. Kearns. Swrd (ylzi) promotes swarming in bacillus subtilis by increasing power to flagellar motors. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17, doi:10.1128/jb.00529-17. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 34-37): Ashley N. Hall, Sundharraman Subramanian, Reid T. Oshiro, Alexandra K. Canzoneri, and Daniel B. Kearns. Swrd (ylzi) promotes swarming in bacillus subtilis by increasing power to flagellar motors. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17, doi:10.1128/jb.00529-17. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 30-32): Ashley N. Hall, Sundharraman Subramanian, Reid T. Oshiro, Alexandra K. Canzoneri, and Daniel B. Kearns. Swrd (ylzi) promotes swarming in bacillus subtilis by increasing power to flagellar motors. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17, doi:10.1128/jb.00529-17. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(sanchez2022identificationofgenes pages 9-11): Sandra Sanchez, Elizabeth V. Snider, Xindan Wang, and Daniel B. Kearns. Identification of genes required for swarming motility in bacillus subtilis using transposon mutagenesis and high-throughput sequencing (tnseq). Journal of Bacteriology, Jun 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00089-22, doi:10.1128/jb.00089-22. This article has 17 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(poudel2019integratedproteomicsand pages 10-11): Suresh Poudel, Richard J. Giannone, Abigail T. Farmer, Shawn R. Campagna, Amber N. Bible, Jennifer L. Morrell-Falvey, James G. Elkins, and Robert L. Hettich. Integrated proteomics and lipidomics reveal that the swarming motility of paenibacillus polymyxa is characterized by phospholipid modification, surfactant deployment, and flagellar specialization relative to swimming motility. Frontiers in Microbiology, Nov 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02594, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2019.02594. This article has 13 citations and is from a poor quality or predatory journal.
(takekawa2019structureofvibrio pages 8-10): Norihiro Takekawa, Miyu Isumi, Hiroyuki Terashima, Shiwei Zhu, Yuuki Nishino, Mayuko Sakuma, Seiji Kojima, Michio Homma, and Katsumi Imada. Structure of vibrio flil, a new stomatin-like protein that assists the bacterial flagellar motor function. mBio, Apr 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00292-19, doi:10.1128/mbio.00292-19. This article has 54 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(hall2018swrd(ylzi)promotes pages 37-37): Ashley N. Hall, Sundharraman Subramanian, Reid T. Oshiro, Alexandra K. Canzoneri, and Daniel B. Kearns. Swrd (ylzi) promotes swarming in bacillus subtilis by increasing power to flagellar motors. Journal of Bacteriology, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00529-17, doi:10.1128/jb.00529-17. This article has 31 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
id: C0H412
gene_symbol: swrD
product_type: PROTEIN
aliases:
- ylzI
- BSU16299
status: DRAFT
taxon:
id: NCBITaxon:224308
label: Bacillus subtilis (strain 168)
description: SwrD (formerly YlzI) is a small (~71 aa) swarming-specific enhancer
of flagellar motor power in Bacillus subtilis. Located in the fla-che operon
adjacent to fliL, SwrD increases power delivery (torque) per flagellum by
acting at the level of MotAB stator activity, without affecting stator
abundance or flagellar number. Deletion of swrD abolishes swarming motility
and reduces swimming speed (~2-fold) and single-flagellum torque (~6-fold).
These phenotypes are rescued by MotAB overexpression, demonstrating that SwrD
functions to enhance motor power output. SwrD homologs often co-occur with
motAB across diverse bacteria, suggesting a conserved role in stator-dependent
torque enhancement for surface motility.
existing_annotations:
- term:
id: GO:0071978
label: bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility
evidence_type: IBA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
review:
summary: This phylogenetic annotation (IBA) is well-supported by
experimental evidence from PMID:29061663. SwrD is specifically required
for swarming motility; deletion abolishes swarming on solid surfaces
while cells retain swimming ability (albeit reduced).
action: ACCEPT
reason: The IBA annotation aligns with direct experimental evidence. Hall
et al. (2018) demonstrated that swrD mutants completely fail to swarm on
0.7% agar, while complementation restores swarming. The phylogenetic
inference is consistent with the protein's conserved function across
Firmicutes and other bacterial lineages where SwrD homologs co-occur
with motAB.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: Here we report a new gene, swrD, located within the
32 gene fla-che operon dedicated to flagellar biosynthesis and
chemotaxis, which when mutated abolished swarming motility.
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: SwrD was not required for surfactant production,
flagellar gene expression, or an increase in flagellar number.
Instead, SwrD was required to increase flagellar power.
- reference_id: file:BACSU/swrD/swrD-deep-research-falcon.md
supporting_text: See deep research file for comprehensive analysis
- term:
id: GO:0071978
label: bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility
evidence_type: IMP
original_reference_id: PMID:29061663
review:
summary: This is the primary experimental paper characterizing SwrD
function. Hall et al. (2018) demonstrated through deletion and
complementation experiments that SwrD is essential for swarming motility
by increasing power to flagellar motors via MotAB stator activity.
action: ACCEPT
reason: 'PMID:29061663 provides definitive experimental evidence for SwrD''s
role in swarming. The study shows: (1) swrD deletion abolishes swarming on
0.7% agar, (2) complementation restores swarming, (3) the phenotype is not
due to reduced flagellar number or surfactant production, and (4) MotAB overexpression
rescues swrD-related phenotypes. This directly demonstrates that SwrD is involved
in bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility.'
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: Here we report a new gene, swrD, located within the
32 gene fla-che operon dedicated to flagellar biosynthesis and
chemotaxis, which when mutated abolished swarming motility.
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: We conclude that swarming motility requires flagellar
power in excess of that which is needed to swim.
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: SwrD likely increases power in other organisms, like
the Firmicutes, Clostridia, Spirochaetes, and the
Deltaproteobacteria.
- term:
id: GO:0071978
label: bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility
evidence_type: IMP
original_reference_id: PMID:25313396
review:
summary: This annotation is INCORRECT. PMID:25313396 (Calvo and Kearns,
2015) is about FlgM secretion by the flagellar export apparatus in
Bacillus subtilis. The paper does NOT mention swrD or ylzI anywhere.
This appears to be an erroneous annotation.
action: REMOVE
reason: PMID:25313396 is titled "FlgM is secreted by the flagellar export
apparatus in Bacillus subtilis" and focuses entirely on the anti-sigma
factor FlgM and its secretion mechanism. The paper investigates
flagellar structural genes required for FlgM secretion (FliF, FliG,
FliO, FliP, FliQ, FliR, FlhA, FlhB, FliK) but makes no mention of swrD
or its synonym ylzI. This annotation should be removed as it attributes
experimental evidence from a paper that does not study or mention SwrD.
additional_reference_ids:
- PMID:25313396
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:25313396
supporting_text: FlgM is secreted by the flagellar export apparatus in
Bacillus subtilis.
- term:
id: GO:0071977
label: bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swimming motility
evidence_type: IMP
original_reference_id: PMID:29061663
review:
summary: SwrD affects swimming motility as well as swarming. Hall et al.
(2018) demonstrated that swrD deletion reduces swimming speed
approximately 2-fold (from ~30 um/s to ~15 um/s). This annotation
captures the effect on swimming that is distinct from swarming.
action: NEW
reason: While swrD mutants can still swim (unlike swarming which is
abolished), their swimming is significantly impaired. The ~2-fold
reduction in swimming speed and ~6-fold reduction in torque demonstrates
that SwrD positively affects flagellum-dependent swimming motility. This
annotation would complement the swarming annotation by capturing the
broader motility phenotype. Evidence is IMP based on mutant phenotype
analysis.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: Mutation of swrD reduced swimming speed and torque of
tethered flagella, and all swrD-related phenotypes were restored
when the stator subunits MotA and MotB were overexpressed either by
spontaneous suppressor mutations or by artificial induction.
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: cells mutated for swrD swim with reduced speed
- term:
id: GO:1902021
label: regulation of bacterial-type flagellum-dependent cell motility
evidence_type: IMP
original_reference_id: PMID:29061663
review:
summary: SwrD functions as a positive regulator of flagellar motor power,
modulating motility by enhancing stator activity. This regulatory
function is distinct from direct involvement in motility per se.
action: NEW
reason: SwrD regulates the power output of the flagellar motor by acting
at the level of MotAB stator activity, without affecting stator protein
levels or flagellar number. This is a regulatory function that modulates
the rate/extent of cell motility. The fact that MotAB overexpression
rescues swrD phenotypes demonstrates that SwrD acts as a positive
regulator of motor function. This GO term captures the regulatory aspect
of SwrD function that the direct motility terms do not fully represent.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: SwrD was not required for surfactant production,
flagellar gene expression, or an increase in flagellar number.
Instead, SwrD was required to increase flagellar power.
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: all swrD-related phenotypes were restored when the
stator subunits MotA and MotB were overexpressed
- term:
id: GO:0003674
label: molecular_function
evidence_type: NAS
review:
summary: Added to align core_functions with existing annotations.
action: NEW
reason: Core function term not present in existing_annotations.
references:
- id: GO_REF:0000033
title: Annotation inferences using phylogenetic trees
findings:
- statement: SwrD is conserved across Firmicutes, Clostridia,
Spirochaetes, and Deltaproteobacteria
- statement: SwrD homologs often co-occur adjacent to motAB in diverse
bacteria
- id: PMID:29061663
title: SwrD (YlzI) Promotes Swarming in Bacillus subtilis by Increasing
Power to Flagellar Motors.
findings:
- statement: swrD (formerly ylzI) encodes a small ~71 aa protein in the
fla-che operon
supporting_text: Here we report a new gene, swrD, located within the 32
gene fla-che operon dedicated to flagellar biosynthesis and chemotaxis
- statement: swrD deletion abolishes swarming but cells retain swimming
ability with reduced speed
supporting_text: which when mutated abolished swarming
motility...Mutation of swrD reduced swimming speed
- statement: swrD deletion reduces single-flagellum torque approximately
6-fold
supporting_text: Mutation of swrD reduced swimming speed and torque of
tethered flagella
- statement: SwrD does not affect flagellar number, flagellar gene
expression, or surfactant production
supporting_text: SwrD was not required for surfactant production,
flagellar gene expression, or an increase in flagellar number
- statement: SwrD acts at the level of MotAB stator activity, not
abundance
supporting_text: Instead, SwrD was required to increase flagellar power
- statement: MotAB overexpression rescues all swrD-related phenotypes
supporting_text: all swrD-related phenotypes were restored when the
stator subunits MotA and MotB were overexpressed either by spontaneous
suppressor mutations or by artificial induction
- statement: SwrD is located adjacent to fliL with overlapping ORFs
supporting_text: Here we report a new gene, swrD, located within the 32
gene fla-che operon dedicated to flagellar biosynthesis and chemotaxis
- id: PMID:25313396
title: FlgM is secreted by the flagellar export apparatus in Bacillus
subtilis.
findings:
- statement: This paper is about FlgM secretion and does NOT mention swrD
supporting_text: Here we demonstrate that FlgM is also secreted in the
Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis and is degraded
extracellularly by the proteases Epr and WprA
- statement: Erroneously cited as evidence for swrD annotation in GOA
supporting_text: FlgM is secreted by the flagellar export apparatus in
Bacillus subtilis
- statement: Paper focuses on FlgM, FliF, FliG, FliO, FliP, FliQ, FliR,
FlhA, FlhB, FliK
supporting_text: FlgM secretion is strongly enhanced by, but does not
strictly require, hook-basal body completion and instead demands a
minimal subset of flagellar proteins that includes the FliF/FliG basal
body proteins, the flagellar type III export apparatus components
FliO, FliP, FliQ, FliR, FlhA, and FlhB, and the substrate specificity
switch regulator FliK
- id: file:BACSU/swrD/swrD-deep-research-falcon.md
title: Deep research on swrD function
findings: []
core_functions:
- description: SwrD enhances flagellar motor power for swarming and swimming
motility by modulating MotAB stator activity. This is the primary evolved
function of SwrD.
molecular_function:
id: GO:0003674
label: molecular_function
directly_involved_in:
- id: GO:0071978
label: bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility
- id: GO:0071977
label: bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swimming motility
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:29061663
supporting_text: SwrD was not required for surfactant production,
flagellar gene expression, or an increase in flagellar number.
Instead, SwrD was required to increase flagellar power.
proposed_new_terms: []
suggested_questions:
- question: What is the molecular mechanism by which SwrD enhances MotAB
stator activity?
- question: Does SwrD directly interact with MotAB stator proteins or other
motor components?
- question: What is the subcellular localization of SwrD (cytoplasmic,
membrane-associated, or motor-localized)?
- question: Is SwrD function regulated during the transition from swimming to
swarming?
suggested_experiments:
- description: Protein-protein interaction studies (co-IP, bacterial
two-hybrid) to identify SwrD binding partners
hypothesis: SwrD may directly interact with MotAB stator complex or other
motor components
- description: Fluorescent tagging of SwrD to determine subcellular
localization
hypothesis: SwrD may localize to the flagellar motor or membrane
- description: Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy of MotA-GFP in swrD
mutant vs wild-type to assess stator dynamics
hypothesis: SwrD may reduce stator dynamism by facilitating stator retention
at the motor
- description: Cryo-EM of motor complexes with and without SwrD to identify
structural changes
hypothesis: SwrD may induce conformational changes in the stator-rotor
interface