Final Report: Evaluation of Monoacylglycerol Lipase Activity (GO:0047372) for C. albicans LPL1 (Q5AMS2)

Gene: LPL1 (Candida albicans SC5314)
UniProt: Q5AMS2
Hypothesis: LPL1 has monoacylglycerol lipase activity (GO:0047372)
Evidence type: IBA (Inferred from Biological Ancestor) via GO_REF:0000033
Verdict: OVER-ANNOTATED

Executive Judgment

Verdict: Over-annotated

The hypothesis that Candida albicans LPL1 (Q5AMS2) possesses monoacylglycerol (MAG) lipase activity (GO:0047372) is over-annotated. The annotation was propagated by phylogenetic inference (IBA, GO_REF:0000033) but is based on a misattribution across distinct subfamilies within the PTHR12482 family. Six independent lines of evidence — subfamily classification, ortholog characterization, catalytic motif analysis, active-site residue comparison, AlphaFold structural modeling, and authoritative GO database inspection — converge on the same conclusion: the MAG lipase annotation belongs to the ROG1 subfamily (PTHR12482:SF62) and should not be propagated to the LPL1 subfamily (PTHR12482:SF24). The authoritative GO source (QuickGO/GOA) has already corrected this, listing phospholipase annotations (GO:0004622, GO:0120559) rather than GO:0047372 for Q5AMS2. The persistence of GO:0047372 in UniProt appears to reflect a stale or improperly synchronized annotation.

Most important caveats: - No direct experimental data exists for Ca LPL1 in any organism — all functional inferences are based on orthology to S. cerevisiae LPL1 - α/β-hydrolases can have overlapping substrate specificities; Sc LPL1 was not explicitly tested against MAG substrates - The absence of GO:0047372 from QuickGO reflects a curation decision, not a direct experimental disproof

Summary

This investigation evaluated whether the C. albicans gene product LPL1 (UniProt Q5AMS2) directly possesses monoacylglycerol lipase activity as annotated by GO:0047372 via Inferred from Biological Ancestor (IBA) evidence. Through three iterations of computational analysis, literature review, and database interrogation, we established that this annotation is incorrect — a case of over-annotation arising from phylogenetic inference that crossed subfamily boundaries.

The key insight is that the PTHR12482 family (DUF676-containing α/β-hydrolases) contains at least two functionally distinct subfamilies: SF24 (LPL1/phospholipase B subfamily) and SF62 (ROG1/MAG lipase subfamily). C. albicans LPL1 belongs to SF24, sharing 44.4% domain identity with S. cerevisiae LPL1 — an experimentally characterized phospholipase B that acts on glycerophospholipids at sn-2 and sn-1 positions (PMID: 25014274). The MAG lipase activity experimentally demonstrated for S. cerevisiae ROG1 (PMID: 25433290) belongs to the distinct SF62 subfamily. Active-site residue analysis reveals consistent differences at three key positions between the two subfamilies, supporting distinct substrate specificities. The PAINT curation system correctly restricted the MAG lipase annotation to the ROG1 branch (PTN000773838), and QuickGO reflects this correction, while UniProt appears to retain a stale propagation.

The correct molecular function annotations for Ca LPL1 are GO:0004622 (lysophospholipase activity / phosphatidylcholine 1-acylhydrolase activity) and GO:0120559 (phosphatidylethanolamine lysophospholipase A1 activity), both supported by PAINT inference from the experimentally characterized S. cerevisiae LPL1 ortholog within the same SF24 subfamily.

Key Findings

Finding 1: Ca LPL1 Belongs to the LPL1/Phospholipase B Subfamily (SF24), Not the ROG1/MAG Lipase Subfamily (SF62)

PANTHER classification unambiguously places C. albicans LPL1 (Q5AMS2) in subfamily PTHR12482:SF24 (LIPID DROPLET PHOSPHOLIPASE 1), together with S. cerevisiae LPL1 (Q08448). The protein experimentally shown to have MAG lipase activity — S. cerevisiae ROG1 (P53118) — resides in a separate subfamily, PTHR12482:SF62. Domain-level sequence identity confirms this classification: the DUF676 domain of Ca LPL1 shares 44.4% identity with Sc LPL1 versus only 25.6% with Sc ROG1. Furthermore, the InterPro signature IPR016445 (Rog1_fam/Lipase_Rog1) is present in ROG1 but absent from Ca LPL1, confirming they represent distinct functional lineages within the broader DUF676 family.

This subfamily distinction is the most critical piece of evidence. IBA annotations are valid only when propagated within the correct phylogenetic scope. The PAINT annotation for GO:0047372 was placed at node PTN000773838 within the SF62 branch — it was never intended to propagate to SF24 members.

Finding 2: The Closest Characterized Ortholog Is a Phospholipase B, Not a MAG Lipase

The closest experimentally characterized ortholog of Ca LPL1 is S. cerevisiae LPL1 (Q08448), which was purified and biochemically characterized by Selvaraju et al. (2014). The purified protein demonstrated phospholipase activity with broad substrate specificity, acting on all glycerophospholipids — PE, PA, PC, PS, and PG — primarily at the sn-2 position (phospholipase A2 activity) with secondary sn-1 activity on lysophospholipids (lysophospholipase activity) (PMID: 25014274). The study specifically noted that "LPL1/YOR059c contains lipase specific motif GXSXG and acetate labeling in the LPL1 overexpressed strains depicted a decrease in glycerophospholipids and an increase in free fatty acids."

Importantly, Sc LPL1 carries an IBA (not IDA) annotation for GO:0047372 in some databases, meaning even the S. cerevisiae ortholog lacks direct experimental evidence for MAG lipase activity. Its experimentally validated function is phospholipase B, consistent with its SGD IDA annotation for GO:0004622.

A separate study confirmed this identity: "Lpl1 is a phospholipase and a component of the lipid droplet. Lpl1 has dual functions: it is required for both efficient proteasome-mediated protein degradation and the dynamic regulation of lipid droplets" (PMID: 28100635).

Finding 3: Conserved Catalytic Motif Supports Phospholipase B Identity

Sequence analysis of the DUF676 domain reveals that Ca LPL1 possesses the GYSLG motif at positions 102–106, while Sc LPL1 has GYSQG at positions 88–92. Both share the GYS[L/Q]G variant of the canonical GXSXG lipase motif. In contrast, Sc ROG1 has a distinct GHSLG motif at position 267 — with histidine replacing tyrosine at the second position. This Tyr→His substitution at the GXSXG motif position 2 is a consistent marker distinguishing the two subfamilies and likely contributes to their different substrate preferences.

The catalytic triad (Ser-Asp-His) is conserved across all three proteins: Ca LPL1 (S104/D206/H504), Sc LPL1 (S90/D199/H414), and Sc ROG1 (S269/D372/H552). This confirms all three are functional serine hydrolases but does not discriminate substrate specificity — the triad is a universal feature of α/β-hydrolases.

Site-directed mutagenesis of the GXSXG motif in Sc LPL1 abolished its phospholipase activity (PMID: 25014274), confirming the catalytic serine is essential for function.

Finding 4: AlphaFold Structure Confirms High-Confidence DUF676 Fold

The AlphaFold model for Q5AMS2 shows an overall mean pLDDT of 83.2, with the DUF676 domain (residues 14–213) modeled at very high confidence (mean pLDDT = 95.1). The catalytic serine region (residues 99–109) achieves a mean pLDDT of 98.4, indicating the active site is modeled with near-experimental reliability. A transmembrane helix is predicted at residues 286–306 (pLDDT = 83.5), consistent with lipid droplet membrane anchoring. The C-terminal region (residues 350–556) has lower confidence (mean pLDDT = 70.5), suggesting intrinsic disorder or flexibility.

This structural confidence supports the reliability of active-site comparisons and confirms that Ca LPL1 adopts the expected α/β-hydrolase fold characteristic of DUF676 family members.

Finding 5: QuickGO Confirms GO:0047372 Is Absent — UniProt Discrepancy

Direct interrogation of the QuickGO API (the authoritative source for GO annotations maintained by the GO Consortium) returned zero annotations of GO:0047372 on Q5AMS2 (Ca LPL1) and zero on Q08448 (Sc LPL1). However, GO:0047372 is correctly present on P53118 (Sc ROG1) with both IBA and IDA evidence.

UniProt displays GO:0047372 [IBA:GO_Central] on Q5AMS2, creating a discrepancy with the authoritative GO source. This discrepancy likely reflects a synchronization lag — the PAINT curation has been corrected to restrict GO:0047372 to the ROG1 branch (PTN000773838 within SF62), but UniProt may not have fully propagated this update.

QuickGO instead lists the following molecular function IBA annotations for Q5AMS2: - GO:0004622 — lysophospholipase activity (phosphatidylcholine 1-acylhydrolase) - GO:0120559 — phosphatidylethanolamine lysophospholipase A1 activity

Both are derived from PTN000280739/SGD:S000005585 (Sc LPL1/YOR059C), the correct ortholog within the SF24 subfamily.

Finding 6: Active-Site Residues at Three Key Positions Distinguish LPL1 from ROG1

AlphaFold-based active-site comparison (within 8 Å of the catalytic serine) identified three positions where LPL1 orthologs consistently differ from ROG1:

All residues were modeled with pLDDT > 90 in the AlphaFold structures. The consistent pattern — Tyr/Phe/His in LPL1 vs His/Leu/Leu in ROG1 — supports the hypothesis that the two subfamilies have evolved distinct substrate-binding pockets. The bulkier, more polar residues in LPL1 are consistent with accommodation of phospholipid headgroups, while the smaller, more hydrophobic residues in ROG1 are consistent with simpler monoacylglycerol substrates.

Mechanistic Model / Interpretation

The DUF676 family (PTHR12482) represents a diverse group of α/β-hydrolases that share the catalytic Ser-Asp-His triad and the GXSXG lipase motif but have diverged into functionally distinct subfamilies:

PTHR12482 (DUF676 / α/β-hydrolase superfamily)
├── SF24: LPL1 subfamily (Phospholipase B)
│   ├── S. cerevisiae LPL1 (Q08448) — IDA: phospholipase B
│   │   • Acts on PE, PA, PC, PS, PG at sn-2 > sn-1
│   │   • Localized to lipid droplets
│   │   • GYSxG motif; Tyr at GXSXG pos.2
│   │
│   └── C. albicans LPL1 (Q5AMS2) — THIS GENE
│       • 44.4% DUF676 identity with Sc LPL1
│       • Same GYSLG motif; same active-site residues
│       • Correct GO MF: GO:0004622, GO:0120559
│
├── SF62: ROG1 subfamily (MAG lipase)
│   └── S. cerevisiae ROG1 (P53118) — IDA: MAG lipase
│       • Acts on monoacylglycerols
│       • GHSLG motif; His at GXSXG pos.2
│       • Correct GO MF: GO:0047372
│
└── Other subfamilies (YJU3/MGL, MGL2, etc.)
    └── S. cerevisiae YJU3 — IDA: MAG lipase (different family)
        • Primary MAG lipase (>90% activity)
        • Distinct from PTHR12482 entirely

The over-annotation arose because GO:0047372 (MAG lipase) was experimentally demonstrated for ROG1 (PMID: 25433290), a member of the same PTHR12482 family but a different subfamily (SF62). Phylogenetic annotation transfer (IBA) incorrectly propagated this term across the subfamily boundary to SF24 members including Ca LPL1. The PAINT curators have since corrected this by placing the GO:0047372 annotation at node PTN000773838, which is within the SF62 branch and does not propagate to SF24.

It is worth noting that the S. cerevisiae genome encodes at least three distinct MAG lipase activities: YJU3 (the primary MAG lipase, accounting for >90% of cellular MAG hydrolase activity; PMID: 20554061), MGL2/YMR210w (a secondary MAG lipase; PMID: 26991558), and ROG1 (PMID: 25433290). LPL1 is not among them — it functions as a lipid droplet-associated phospholipase B.

Separation of Direct Activity from Downstream Phenotypes

Direct gene-product activity (supported by ortholog data): - Phospholipase B / lysophospholipase: Hydrolysis of glycerophospholipids at sn-2 (primary) and sn-1 (secondary) ester bonds - Substrate: PC, PE, PA, PS, PG glycerophospholipids and their lyso-forms - Location: Lipid droplet membrane (via C-terminal transmembrane helix)

Downstream phenotypes (inferred from Sc LPL1, not direct Ca LPL1 activity): - Lipid droplet dynamics and remodeling - Proteasome-mediated protein degradation (dual function reported for Sc LPL1) - Free fatty acid release from glycerophospholipids

NOT supported as direct activity: - Monoacylglycerol hydrolysis (GO:0047372) — this activity belongs to ROG1 (SF62) and YJU3 (separate family) - Triacylglycerol lipase activity — distinct enzymes (Tgl3, Tgl4, Tgl5 in yeast) - Secreted lipase/virulence factor activity — Ca LPL1 is intracellular, distinct from the C. albicans LIP gene family (LIP1-10)

Evidence Matrix

GO Curation Implications

Recommended Curation Action (Lead — requires curator verification)

The core issue is that GO:0047372 was a phylogenetic transfer from the wrong subfamily. The PAINT system has already corrected this at the annotation source level. The curation action should ensure downstream consumers (including UniProt) reflect the corrected annotation. No new experimental evidence for Ca LPL1 is needed to justify removal — the subfamily misattribution is sufficient.

Term Hierarchy Consideration

GO:0047372 (monoacylglycerol lipase activity) is a child of GO:0016298 (lipase activity). The correct annotations GO:0004622 and GO:0120559 are children of GO:0004620 (phospholipase activity), which is also a child of GO:0016298. Both MAG lipase and phospholipase activities fall under the broader "lipase activity" umbrella, but they represent distinct substrate specificities that should not be conflated.

Conflicts and Alternatives

UniProt vs. QuickGO Discrepancy

The most notable conflict is the persistence of GO:0047372 in UniProt's display for Q5AMS2 despite its absence from QuickGO. This is likely a synchronization issue rather than a genuine curation disagreement. Curators should verify whether the UniProt annotation derives from an older PAINT release or an independent annotation source.

Could Ca LPL1 Have Dual Specificity?

Some α/β-hydrolases exhibit broad substrate specificity. While Sc LPL1 was tested primarily on glycerophospholipids (PMID: 25014274), it was not explicitly tested against MAG substrates in that study. However, the active-site residue differences between LPL1 and ROG1 subfamilies, combined with the availability of dedicated MAG lipases (YJU3, MGL2) in yeast, argue against significant MAG lipase activity for LPL1. The bulkier residues (Phe, His) in the LPL1 active site would sterically disfavor the simpler MAG substrate.

Paralog Confusion Risk

The DUF676 family contains multiple paralogs in yeast and Candida genomes. The risk of annotation transfer across subfamily boundaries is inherent to IBA evidence and underscores the importance of subfamily-level resolution in PAINT annotations. C. albicans has 4 proteins in the PTHR12482 family: one in SF24 (Q5AMS2/LPL1), two in SF62, and one in SF65.

No Direct Experimental Data for Ca LPL1

No publication reports direct biochemical characterization of the C. albicans LPL1 gene product. All functional inferences are based on orthology to Sc LPL1. While the 44.4% domain identity and conserved active-site residues strongly support functional equivalence within SF24, direct experimental validation in C. albicans has not been performed.

Substrate Class Mismatch

The central conflict is between two GO terms on Ca LPL1 that imply different substrate classes: - GO:0047372 (MAG lipase): substrates are monoacylglycerols (neutral lipids) - GO:0004622 (PC lysophospholipase A1): substrates are lysophospholipids (phospholipids)

These are sibling terms under GO:0016298 (lipase activity), not parent-child. The experimental evidence from the closest ortholog (Sc LPL1) supports the phospholipid substrate class, not the neutral lipid class.

Knowledge Gaps

Discriminating Tests

1. Direct substrate specificity assay (highest priority): Purify recombinant Ca LPL1 and test hydrolytic activity against a panel of MAG (C16:0, C18:1), DAG, TAG, and glycerophospholipid (PC, PE, PA, PS) substrates. Compare Km/Vmax to determine substrate preference. This single experiment would definitively resolve whether Ca LPL1 has any MAG lipase activity.

2. Competitive substrate assay: Incubate purified Ca LPL1 with equimolar MAG and glycerophospholipid substrates simultaneously and measure relative hydrolysis rates. This would reveal substrate preference in a biologically relevant context.

3. Gene deletion lipidomics: Generate C. albicans lpl1Δ mutant and perform lipidomic analysis. Accumulation of glycerophospholipids (not MAGs) would confirm phospholipase B function. Compare with rog1 ortholog deletion if identifiable in C. albicans.

4. Cross-subfamily complementation: Express Sc ROG1 in an lpl1Δ background and vice versa to test whether they can functionally substitute for each other. Non-complementation would confirm distinct in vivo functions.

5. Active-site mutagenesis: Mutate the three divergent active-site positions (Y103H, F134L, H138L) in Ca LPL1 to ROG1-like residues and test whether this shifts substrate preference toward MAGs. This would establish the structural basis for substrate discrimination between the subfamilies.

Curation Leads

Lead 1: Remove GO:0047372 from Q5AMS2 — VERY HIGH CONFIDENCE

Action: Remove or confirm absence of GO:0047372 (monoacylglycerol lipase activity) IBA annotation.

Rationale: The annotation is ABSENT from QuickGO (the authoritative GO annotation database, accessed 2026-07-05). The PAINT curation correctly restricts GO:0047372 to the ROG1 subfamily (SF62, node PTN000773838) and does NOT propagate it to the LPL1 subfamily (SF24). If the AI review YAML derived this annotation from UniProt rather than from QuickGO, the annotation should be flagged as a data-synchronization artifact.

Candidate references with exact verified snippets: - PMID: 25014274 (Selvaraju et al., 2014): "The purified Lpl1p showed phospholipase activity with broader substrate specificity, acting on all glycerophospholipids primarily at sn-2 position and later at sn-1 position." — Demonstrates Sc LPL1 (same subfamily) is a phospholipase B, not a MAG lipase. - PMID: 25433290 (Vishnu Varthini et al., 2015): "Here, we report that revertant of glycogen synthase kinase mutation-1 (Rog1p) possesses monoacylglycerol (MAG) lipase activity in S. cerevisiae." — The MAG lipase evidence applies to ROG1 (SF62), not LPL1 (SF24). - PMID: 28100635 (Weisshaar et al., 2017): "Lpl1 is a phospholipase and a component of the lipid droplet." — Independent confirmation of Sc LPL1 as phospholipase.

Lead 2: Retain GO:0004622 and GO:0120559 — HIGH CONFIDENCE

Action: Retain lysophospholipase activity annotations.

Rationale: Both annotations are present in QuickGO via PAINT node PTN000280739, sourced from SGD:S000005585 (Sc LPL1/YOR059C). They are consistent with the experimentally demonstrated phospholipase B activity of Sc LPL1. Note that GO:0120559 is present in QuickGO but NOT in UniProt, indicating UniProt may be missing a valid annotation.

Lead 3: Verify Annotation Source in AI Review YAML

Rationale: The seed hypothesis cites IBA / GO_REF:0000033 as the evidence for GO:0047372. However, current PAINT/QuickGO data does not include this annotation on Q5AMS2. The curator should determine whether the YAML was generated from UniProt (which shows a stale annotation) or from an older GO/GAF release. This distinction affects whether the action should be "remove" (if still present) or "confirm already absent" (if already corrected upstream).

Lead 4: Flag UniProt Synchronization Issue

Action: Report to UniProt-GOA that GO:0047372 on Q5AMS2 appears stale relative to current PAINT/QuickGO data.

Rationale: QuickGO shows no GO:0047372 annotation; UniProt displays it — indicates a synchronization gap between the authoritative GO source and UniProt's display.

Suggested Questions for Curator

1. Data source: Was the AI review YAML generated from UniProt cross-references or from QuickGO/GAF files? This determines whether GO:0047372 needs active removal or is already absent.
2. PAINT review: Has the PAINT curation for PTHR12482 been updated to correct the GO:0047372 propagation? QuickGO data suggests yes.
3. Missing annotation: Should GO:0120559 (PE lysophospholipase A1), present in QuickGO but absent from UniProt, be flagged for addition?
4. Sc LPL1 substrate testing: Has anyone tested Sc LPL1 with MAG substrates? The absence of evidence for MAG lipase activity is not proof of absence — but it strengthens the case for removing the annotation pending direct testing.

Evidence Base — Key Literature

Primary Evidence

Selvaraju et al. (2014) — PMID: 25014274 Identification of a phospholipase B encoded by the LPL1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The foundational characterization of Sc LPL1. Demonstrated that purified LPL1 acts as a phospholipase B with broad glycerophospholipid substrate specificity. Site-directed mutagenesis confirmed the GXSXG motif is essential for activity. This is the strongest evidence that Ca LPL1 (same subfamily, 44.4% domain identity) functions as a phospholipase B rather than a MAG lipase.

Saha et al. (2015) — PMID: 25433290 ROG1 encodes a monoacylglycerol lipase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Identified ROG1 as a MAG lipase — the source of the IDA evidence underlying the IBA propagation of GO:0047372. Critically, ROG1 is in a different PANTHER subfamily (SF62) from LPL1 (SF24).

Weisshaar et al. (2017) — PMID: 28100635 Phospholipase Lpl1 links lipid droplet function with quality control protein degradation. Confirmed Sc LPL1 as a lipid droplet-associated phospholipase with a dual role in LD dynamics and proteasomal degradation. Independently supports the phospholipase identity.

Heier et al. (2010) — PMID: 20554061 Identification of Yju3p as functional orthologue of mammalian monoglyceride lipase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Demonstrated that YJU3 (not LPL1 or ROG1) accounts for >90% of cellular MAG hydrolase activity in yeast, establishing YJU3 as the primary MAG lipase and further distancing LPL1 from this function.

Gajdoš et al. (2016) — PMID: 26991558 MGL2/YMR210w encodes a monoacylglycerol lipase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Identified MGL2 as a secondary MAG lipase, further demonstrating that MAG lipase activity in yeast is attributed to specific enzymes distinct from LPL1.

Structural Context

Steer et al. (2016) — PMID: 26869448 Crystal structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae monoglyceride lipase Yju3p. Provided structural insight into the true yeast MAG lipase (Yju3p), revealing distinct cap region architecture and substrate binding that differ from the DUF676 fold of LPL1.

C. albicans Lipase Context

Multiple reviews describe C. albicans secreted lipases (LIP1-10) as virulence factors (PMID: 23874127, PMID: 31216165, PMID: 34506621). These are distinct from the intracellular LPL1 gene product and should not be confused with it. The C. albicans LIP gene family encodes secreted triacylglycerol lipases involved in host tissue invasion, while LPL1 encodes an intracellular lipid droplet phospholipase.

Limitations

1. No direct experimental data for Ca LPL1: All functional inferences are based on orthology to Sc LPL1. While the evidence for orthology is strong (same PANTHER subfamily, 44.4% DUF676 domain identity, conserved active-site residues), direct biochemical validation has not been performed.

2. AlphaFold predictions vs. experimental structures: Active-site comparisons rely on AlphaFold-predicted structures. While confidence scores are very high (pLDDT > 90), subtle conformational differences that affect substrate binding may not be captured.

3. Negative evidence limitation: The absence of GO:0047372 from QuickGO confirms the annotation has been corrected at the source, but does not constitute positive evidence against MAG lipase activity — it reflects a curation decision, not an experimental result.

4. Substrate overlap uncertainty: Some α/β-hydrolases show promiscuous substrate specificity. Without directly testing Ca LPL1 against MAG substrates, we cannot fully exclude low-level MAG hydrolysis as a minor secondary activity.

5. Organism-specific context: C. albicans has a distinct lipid metabolism context compared to S. cerevisiae, particularly regarding virulence-associated lipase activity. Whether Ca LPL1 has acquired additional or modified functions in the pathogenic context is unknown.

Proposed Follow-up Experiments/Actions

1. Immediate curation action: Verify that GO:0047372 is removed from all annotation displays for Q5AMS2. Contact UniProt-GOA if the discrepancy persists after checking PAINT release synchronization.

2. Short-term experimental validation: Express and purify Ca LPL1 and test against a substrate panel including MAG (C16:0, C18:1), lysoPC, lysoPE, PC, PE, PA to determine substrate preference directly. This would provide IDA-level evidence for the correct GO MF term.

3. Genetic validation in C. albicans: Generate lpl1Δ deletion mutant and perform lipidomic profiling to identify accumulating substrates. If glycerophospholipids (not MAGs) accumulate, this confirms phospholipase B function in vivo.

4. Systematic subfamily annotation review: Review all PTHR12482 IBA annotations to check for other instances of cross-subfamily propagation that may introduce similar over-annotations.

5. Structure determination: Solve the crystal structure of Ca LPL1 or Sc LPL1 to enable definitive active-site comparison with the known MAG lipase structures (Yju3p, human MGL).

Report generated: 2026-07-05
Investigation: 3 iterations, 38 papers reviewed, 6 findings confirmed
Verdict: Over-annotated — GO:0047372 should not be assigned to Ca LPL1 (Q5AMS2)