| Source (authors, year, venue) | URL/DOI | Organism/gene mentioned | What was reported (function/pathway/localization/phenotype) | Evidence type | Notes/limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yu et al., 2016, *Development* | https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.134247 | *Drosophila melanogaster*; CG6051 | CG6051 was listed among four genes encoding spliceosome-complex proteins and was identified in an RNAi screen as required for germline stem cell self-renewal and early germ-cell differentiation; knockdown was associated with a detectable phenotype in the screen. No explicit subcellular localization or biochemical function for CG6051 was provided in the retrieved excerpt. (pqac-00000001, pqac-00000003) | Functional genetics; RNAi screen | Important ambiguity: the figure image/labels appear to show **CG6015** rather than **CG6051**, suggesting a possible clerical discrepancy in the publication; this limits confidence that the phenotype is unambiguously assigned to Q9VB70. (pqac-00000004) |
| Sundaram, 2013, *WormBook* review | https://doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.80.2 | *Caenorhabditis elegans*; LST-2 | Reviews LST-2 as a lateral signaling target encoding a zinc finger/FYVE domain-containing protein; genetically, *lst-2* alone had no obvious phenotype but enhanced vulval signaling defects with *gap-1*, linking it to RTK/Ras pathway modulation. Because FYVE domains typically bind PtdIns(3)P and target endosomal membranes, this supports an inferred endosomal/signaling role for Drosophila CG6051 as an lst-2-family homolog. (pqac-00000000) | Review summarizing genetics and domain-based inference | Indirect evidence only: this is **not** a Drosophila study and does not test CG6051/Q9VB70 directly. Functional transfer from nematode LST-2 to fly CG6051 remains inferential. (pqac-00000000) |
| Yu et al., 2016, Figure 3 image context | https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.134247 | *Drosophila melanogaster*; CG6051/CG6015 | Figure context places the queried gene in a spliceosome-related network, with node/star annotations indicating a screen hit whose knockdown produced germline phenotypes. (pqac-00000004) | Figure-based support from screen paper | Useful as visual corroboration of screen inclusion, but the CG6051 vs CG6015 label mismatch is a major limitation for gene-identity verification. (pqac-00000004) |
| Bahia, 2021, dissertation/unknown venue | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo? | Honeybee lst-2-like homolog, not Drosophila CG6051 | A lst-2-like homolog appeared in a gene list with numeric metrics, but no phenotype, localization, or mechanistic conclusion relevant to Drosophila CG6051 was provided in the excerpt. (pqac-00000002) | Transcriptomic/listing evidence | Not directly relevant to Q9VB70; included mainly to show that lst-2-type annotations occur in other insects and should not be conflated with *Drosophila melanogaster* CG6051. (pqac-00000002) |


*Table: This table summarizes the limited retrieved evidence specifically relevant to Drosophila melanogaster CG6051/Q9VB70 and separates direct fly evidence from indirect inference based on the C. elegans LST-2 family. It also highlights an important CG6051-versus-CG6015 ambiguity in one screen figure.*