Regeneration (Rgn, CG6014) is a Drosophila protein with an N-terminal signal peptide, a C-type lectin-like domain (residues 70-199) and a long, highly charged, predicted disordered C-terminal region; it has no transmembrane segment. The gene encodes two nearly identical products (808 and 800 residues) that differ by eight residues inside the lectin-like domain. rgn is not expressed in undamaged leg imaginal discs but is induced in blastema cells after disc fragmentation or ubiquitous Wingless expression, and reducing rgn dosage delays blastema formation and lowers regeneration-induced transdetermination. rgn is also required in adult intestinal progenitors for Notch signalling, intestinal stem-cell maintenance and epithelial repair. Its molecular activity, ligand and subcellular site of action are unknown; the lectin-like domain lacks the canonical calcium- and sugar-binding motifs, so carbohydrate binding is not established.
| GO Term | Evidence | Action | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0005802 trans-Golgi network | IBA GO_REF:0000033 | REMOVE | Summary: Trans-Golgi network residence is propagated from TGN38/TGOLN2, but Rgn lacks the membrane anchor and sorting signal that define that localization, and shows no detectable sequence conservation with the seeds. Reason: PANTHER:PTN000575073 is the single annotated node of PTHR23211 and its IBD for trans-Golgi network is seeded by vertebrate TGN38/TGOLN2 proteins, which are type I membrane proteins whose trans-Golgi residence and recycling depend on a single transmembrane segment and the cytoplasmic YQRL tyrosine sorting motif. Although M9PFV8 is classified in the same PANTHER subfamily (PTHR23211:SF0), it has no transmembrane segment and no C-terminal tyrosine motif (the UniProt record carries no transmembrane feature; our hydropathy scan found none after the signal peptide), and its domain architecture (signal peptide, C-type lectin-like domain, charged disordered tail) is unlike TGN38. Local alignment of Rgn to the TGOLN2 and TGN38 seeds is confined to the compositionally biased disordered region and is not distinguishable from composition-matched shuffled controls, whereas Rgn's lectin-like domain aligns clearly to PTHR22803 C-type lectins. The target therefore lacks the determinants of the propagated compartment, and no experiment places Rgn in the trans-Golgi network. Transit of a signal-peptide protein through the Golgi would not justify an is_active_in assertion. Propagation Review Root cause: PROPAGATION BAD Failure modes: COMPARTMENT OR COMPLEX MISMATCH WRONG ORTHOLOG OR PARALOG Sources checked: PANTHER:PTN000575073 SUPPORTS SOURCE BUT NOT TARGET The trans-Golgi network IBD is sound for the experimentally localized vertebrate TGN38/TGOLN2 seeds, which carry a transmembrane anchor and a YQRL sorting motif. Rgn shares the PTHR23211:SF0 assignment but neither determinant, and pairwise similarity to the seeds was not above shuffled controls, so the localization does not transfer. Supporting Evidence: file:DROME/rgn/rgn-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md Rgn lacks both the transmembrane anchor and the cytoplasmic YQRL sorting signal that underlie TGN38/TGOLN2 residence and recycling to the trans-Golgi network. file:DROME/rgn/rgn-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md Pairwise similarity between Rgn and the TGN38/TGOLN2 seeds is not distinguishable from composition-matched shuffles file:DROME/rgn/rgn-uniprot.txt FT SIGNAL 1..23 FT /evidence="ECO:0000256|SAM:SignalP" file:DROME/rgn/rgn-uniprot.txt FT DOMAIN 70..199 FT /note="C-type lectin" FT /evidence="ECO:0000259|PROSITE:PS50041" |
| GO:0030140 trans-Golgi network transport vesicle | IBA GO_REF:0000033 | REMOVE | Summary: TGN-derived transport-vesicle residence is propagated from the TGN38 recycling cycle, which requires a transmembrane cargo-receptor architecture that Rgn lacks. Reason: The same node (PANTHER:PTN000575073) propagates trans-Golgi network transport vesicle localization seeded by mouse TGN38 (MGI:105079). That localization reflects TGN38 cycling between the trans-Golgi network and the plasma membrane as an integral membrane protein, driven by its cytoplasmic tyrosine motif. Rgn has no transmembrane segment and no tyrosine sorting motif, its architecture is a signal peptide plus C-type lectin-like domain plus charged disordered tail, and no sequence conservation with the seeds was detected above shuffled controls. No experiment places Rgn in TGN-derived vesicles. Propagation Review Root cause: PROPAGATION BAD Failure modes: COMPARTMENT OR COMPLEX MISMATCH WRONG ORTHOLOG OR PARALOG Sources checked: PANTHER:PTN000575073 SUPPORTS SOURCE BUT NOT TARGET The TGN transport-vesicle IBD fits mouse TGN38, a recycling type I membrane protein. Rgn lacks the transmembrane and sorting determinants that this localization depends on. Supporting Evidence: file:DROME/rgn/rgn-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md Rgn lacks both the transmembrane anchor and the cytoplasmic YQRL sorting signal that underlie TGN38/TGOLN2 residence and recycling to the trans-Golgi network. file:DROME/rgn/rgn-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md Pairwise similarity between Rgn and the TGN38/TGOLN2 seeds is not distinguishable from composition-matched shuffles |
| GO:0030246 carbohydrate binding | IEA GO_REF:0000104 | MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED | Summary: The C-type lectin-like domain is real, but it lacks the canonical calcium/sugar-binding motifs and no ligand has been measured, so carbohydrate binding is a fold-level over-inference. Reason: The rule transfers carbohydrate binding from the presence of a C-type lectin-like domain. C-type lectin-like domains are a fold, and many bind proteins, lipids or nothing carbohydrate-like. In canonical Ca2+-dependent CTLDs, sugar binding uses the EPN (mannose-type) or QPD (galactose-type) motif and the WND motif at calcium site 2; the Rgn CTLD has none of these, and the UniProt PROSITE-ProRule annotation itself cautions that conserved residues are missing. No ligand assay exists for Rgn. The original description of Rgn raises Wingless glycoprotein binding only as a speculation. Supporting Evidence: file:DROME/rgn/rgn-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md CTLD (70-199): cysteines at 74, 91, 174, 190 and 198. EPN absent; QPD absent; WND absent. file:DROME/rgn/rgn-uniprot.txt CC -!- CAUTION: Lacks conserved residue(s) required for the propagation of CC feature annotation. {ECO:0000256|PROSITE-ProRule:PRU00040}. PMID:18485344 Such domains have been reported to bind a variety of ligands, principally carbohydrates, but also glycoproteins, lipids, receptors and inorganic surfaces |
| GO:0030246 carbohydrate binding | ISS PMID:16475980 Participation of a galactose-specific C-type lectin in Droso... | MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED | Summary: The ISS donor, galactose-specific lectin-galC1 (DL1), belongs to a different PANTHER family (PTHR22803) and retains sugar-binding motifs that Rgn lacks. Reason: The donor FBgn0016675 (lectin-galC1, UniProt Q9VIX1) is a small secreted galactose-specific C-type lectin classified in PTHR22803, whereas Rgn is classified in PTHR23211. The similarity between the two is limited to the C-type lectin-like domain (31.5% identity over ~110 residues). That relationship supports a shared fold, not a shared ligand, and Rgn lacks the QPD/EPN and WND motifs used for Ca2+-dependent sugar binding. PMID:16475980 characterises DL1, not Rgn. Same action as the IEA row for this term. Supporting Evidence: file:DROME/rgn/rgn-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md CTLD (70-199): cysteines at 74, 91, 174, 190 and 198. EPN absent; QPD absent; WND absent. file:DROME/rgn/rgn-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md The CTLD is detectably related to REG-family and other C-type lectins, but lacks the EPN/QPD and WND motifs used for Ca2+-dependent sugar binding in canonical CTLDs |
| GO:0042246 tissue regeneration | IEP PMID:18485344 Three genes control the timing, the site and the size of bla... | ACCEPT | Summary: rgn is induced specifically at the blastema during imaginal-disc regeneration, which matches the genetic requirement shown in the same study. Reason: In situ hybridisation shows rgn is off in undamaged prothoracic leg discs and is activated at the blastema after either fragmentation or ubiquitous wg expression. Taken alone, expression would be weak evidence of participation, but here it agrees with the IMP row from the same paper. Same action as the IMP row. Supporting Evidence: PMID:18485344 Thus, with both protocols, all three genes were specifically activated at sites of regeneration. |
| GO:0042246 tissue regeneration | IMP PMID:18485344 Three genes control the timing, the site and the size of bla... | ACCEPT | Summary: Reducing rgn dosage delays blastema formation in imaginal-disc regeneration, and rgn deficiency in gut progenitors impairs epithelial repair. Reason: Two independent P-element alleles in CG6014 (rgn1, rgn2) fail to complement. Heterozygous animals delay blastema formation by about one day under both wg-induced and fragmentation-induced regeneration, and they reduce regeneration-induced transdetermination. Precise excisions of rgn1 suppress its semi-lethality and revert the transdetermination phenotype. An independent 2026 study (abstract only) reports that rgn deficiency in intestinal progenitors disrupts Notch signalling, depletes intestinal stem cells and causes intestinal atrophy during epithelial repair. GO:0042246 is as specific as the evidence allows, because GO has no imaginal-disc regeneration term and the molecular mechanism is unknown. The process term is broad and may partly reflect a regulatory role (the authors speculate that Rgn attenuates Wg signalling), so regulation terms are not proposed. Supporting Evidence: PMID:18485344 We conclude that two gene copies of rgn are required for proper timing of blastema formation and to initiate blastema cell division and growth. PMID:41935796 we demonstrate that Rgn deficiency in progenitors disrupts Notch signaling |
Loading supporting contentβ¦
Download this section (compressed HTML)Q: Is the PTHR23211 (TGN38) classification of Rgn and its insect orthologs a genuine homology, or does it come from HMM matches to the shared charged, low-complexity region? Rgn has no transmembrane segment or YQRL motif, and its pairwise similarity to TGN38/TGOLN2 is not above shuffled controls.
Q: Where does Rgn act? Is it secreted into the extracellular space, retained in the secretory pathway, or associated with the cell surface?
Q: Does the Rgn C-type lectin-like domain bind Wingless or heparan sulfate, given that it lacks the canonical Ca2+/sugar-binding motifs?
Experiment: Tag endogenous rgn (CRISPR knock-in) with a functional-rescue test, then image it in regenerating discs and gut with and without permeabilisation to determine whether it is secreted and where it acts.
Hypothesis: Rgn is a secreted protein that acts extracellularly at the regeneration blastema.
Type: localization
Experiment: Express the purified Rgn CTLD and test binding to a glycan array, heparan sulfate and Wingless, with and without calcium.
Hypothesis: The non-canonical Rgn CTLD binds a glycoprotein or glycosaminoglycan ligand such as Wingless or heparan sulfate rather than simple sugars.
Type: binding assay
Loading supporting contentβ¦
Download this section (compressed HTML)Loading supporting contentβ¦
Download this section (compressed HTML)Loading supporting contentβ¦
Download this section (compressed HTML)Loading supporting contentβ¦
Download this section (compressed HTML)