The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.

You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.

We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.

We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.

We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.

Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.

Comprehensive Research Report: Functional Annotation of Gene A0A8B6BFL6 in Mytilus galloprovincialis

Executive Summary

The protein A0A8B6BFL6 (ORF name: MGAL_10B073878) from Mytilus galloprovincialis (Mediterranean mussel) is annotated as a reverse transcriptase domain-containing protein. While no direct experimental studies were identified for this specific accession, comprehensive analysis based on domain architecture, comparative genomics, and recent bivalve transposable element research indicates this protein most likely functions as a retrotransposon-associated reverse transcriptase involved in mobile genetic element propagation. This annotation is strongly supported by the extensive literature on transposable element diversity in bivalve genomes and the mechanistic characterization of reverse transcriptase domains.

Table: This table summarizes the most defensible functional annotation for the Mytilus galloprovincialis protein A0A8B6BFL6. It distinguishes direct identity information from broader mechanistic and evolutionary inferences drawn from reverse-transcriptase and bivalve transposable-element literature.

1. Protein Identity and Genomic Context

1.1 Gene/Protein Verification

The target protein A0A8B6BFL6 is confirmed to be from Mytilus galloprovincialis, a marine bivalve mollusk of significant ecological and economic importance (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2). The protein contains characteristic reverse transcriptase (RT) domains including RVT_1 (PF00078), RT_dom (IPR000477), and related superfamily signatures including Hepadnavirus_pol/RT (IPR052055) and Rev_trsase/Diguanyl_cyclase (IPR043128). These domain annotations are consistent with proteins encoded by non-LTR retrotransposons rather than canonical host metabolic enzymes.

1.2 Genomic Landscape of M. galloprovincialis

The Mediterranean mussel possesses a complex, repeat-rich genome characterized by high heterozygosity (average 1.73%), widespread structural variation, and extensive hemizygosity affecting 36.78% of the reference genome assembly (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2, gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 2-5). The genome assembly is 1.28 Gb with 43% repeat content, substantially larger than coding sequences would predict (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2). This genomic architecture creates a favorable environment for transposable element activity and persistence. The species exhibits massive gene presence-absence variation involving approximately 20,000 dispensable genes, a phenomenon potentially linked to structural variants and mobile element dynamics (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2, gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 2-5).

2. Reverse Transcriptase: Molecular Function and Mechanism

2.1 Primary Enzymatic Activity

Reverse transcriptases are RNA-dependent DNA polymerases that catalyze the synthesis of complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template (arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3). This represents a reversal of the central dogma's typical information flow and is characteristic of retrotransposons, retroviruses, and a few specialized cellular enzymes like telomerase (arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3). For A0A8B6BFL6, the most likely function is RNA-to-DNA synthesis as part of a retrotransposon replication cycle rather than a host metabolic pathway.

2.2 Catalytic Mechanism and Substrate Specificity

Reverse transcriptases employ a conserved catalytic core featuring a D..DD active site motif that forms the catalytic triad essential for phosphodiester bond formation (arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3). The RT domain adopts a characteristic polymerase architecture with palm, fingers, and thumb subdomains (arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3). The thumb domain exhibits intrinsic flexibility crucial for accommodating the RNA-DNA hybrid product that forms during reverse transcription (arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3).

Substrate specificity: The enzyme requires an RNA template and deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) as substrates, producing single-stranded DNA complementary to the RNA template (arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2). In the context of retrotransposons, the physiological substrate is typically the element's own RNA transcript, which is reverse-transcribed within a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4).

2.3 Target-Primed Reverse Transcription (TPRT)

Non-LTR retrotransposons typically utilize a specialized mechanism called target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) for genomic integration (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4). In this process: (1) the retrotransposon-encoded endonuclease cleaves genomic DNA at a consensus sequence (often 5'-TTTT/AA-3'); (2) the exposed 3'-OH group at the nick serves as a primer for reverse transcription; (3) the RT synthesizes cDNA directly at the integration site using the retrotransposon RNA as template; (4) subsequent DNA repair and replication complete the insertion (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4). This coupling of reverse transcription with integration distinguishes non-LTR elements from other mobile elements.

3. Biological Role: Retrotransposon Life Cycle

3.1 Transposable Element Context in Eukaryotes

Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile DNA sequences capable of replicating independently within genomes through diverse "invasion strategies" (wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3). They constitute a major fraction of eukaryotic genomes and represent a primary source of genetic variation and evolutionary novelty (wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3). Retrotransposons, which mobilize via an RNA intermediate, are divided into LTR (long terminal repeat) elements and non-LTR elements, with the latter group including Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (LINEs) (wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3).

3.2 LINEs as Autonomous Retrotransposons

LINEs are autonomous retroelements encoding the protein machinery necessary for their own retrotransposition (wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2). A full-length LINE element typically contains a bidirectional promoter, two open reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2), and a polyadenylation signal (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2). ORF1 encodes an RNA-binding protein with chaperone activity that stabilizes the RNA, while ORF2 encodes a multifunctional protein containing endonuclease, reverse transcriptase, and additional domains required for retrotransposition (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4).

3.3 Retrotransposition Mechanism

The retrotransposon life cycle involves multiple cellular compartments (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4, gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2):

1. Transcription (nucleus): The retrotransposon is transcribed by host RNA polymerase II, producing an mRNA that serves as both the template for translation and the substrate for reverse transcription (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4, gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2).

2. Translation and RNP assembly (cytoplasm): The mRNA is exported to the cytoplasm where ORF1 and ORF2 proteins are synthesized. Multiple ORF1 trimers and one or more ORF2 molecules associate with the mRNA in cis to form the retrotransposon ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4, gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2). This cis-preference ensures the encoding element benefits from the proteins it produces.

3. Nuclear re-entry: The RNP complex must access the nucleus to complete retrotransposition. This can occur during mitosis when the nuclear envelope breaks down, or through interaction with nuclear transport machinery (e.g., karyopherins KPNA2 and KPNB1) that facilitate import through nuclear pore complexes (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4).

4. Integration (nucleus): Within the nucleus, the endonuclease cleaves genomic DNA, and the reverse transcriptase synthesizes cDNA using the retrotransposon RNA as template, with the genomic DNA nick serving as a primer (TPRT mechanism) (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4). Host DNA repair and replication factors (including PARP1, PARP2, RPA complex, PCNA) are recruited to complete the integration and synthesize the second DNA strand (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4).

Recent evidence indicates that reverse transcription can also occur in the cytoplasm independently of genomic integration, producing extrachromosomal cDNA molecules that may have distinct biological effects (fukuda2021cytoplasmicsynthesisof pages 1-2, gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2).

3.4 Evolutionary Model: "Stealth Drivers"

LINE diversity in many organisms, including bivalves, appears to follow a "stealth drivers" model of evolution (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4). In this model, multiple diversified LINE families maintain low levels of activity that allow them to persist undetected by host defenses over very long evolutionary timescales—tens to hundreds of millions of years. These elements can coexist and occasionally undergo lineage-specific amplification bursts under permissive conditions (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4). This contrasts with the "master gene" model where successive waves of amplification from individual active copies create distinct temporal families.

4. Retrotransposons in Mytilus galloprovincialis and Bivalves

4.1 Exceptional Transposable Element Diversity in Bivalves

Recent comprehensive surveys of bivalve genomes have revealed that this clade hosts exceptional transposable element diversity compared to other molluscan groups (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 1-2, martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4). Analysis of 27 bivalve genomes identified class I elements as highly dominant, with LINE elements representing the most common retroposon group despite being less abundant in copy number than some other element types (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4). LINEs cover between 1.30% and 24.78% of bivalve genomes, with a mean coverage of approximately 5.38% (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4).

4.2 LINE Superfamily Diversity

A phylogenetic analysis of 86,488 reverse transcriptase-containing LINEs across bivalve genomes identified representatives from 12 distinct clades distributed across all known LINE superfamilies (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4, martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 6-8). These include elements from the RTE, Jockey, L1, CR1, and I superfamilies. Bivalve genomes host members from at least 11 of the 14 identified LINE clades, including CR1, CR1-Zenon, L2, L2-2, RTE-X, RTE-BovB, Proto2, Tx1, Nimb, Ingi, and Hero (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 6-8). This diversity can be traced back to the bivalve most recent common ancestor approximately 500 million years ago, with subsequent lineage-specific expansions, contractions, and losses in different bivalve orders (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4, martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 6-8).

4.3 Context in M. galloprovincialis Genome

Within M. galloprovincialis specifically, the genome exhibits high repeat content with transposable elements contributing substantially to genomic complexity (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2, martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 1-2). The species belongs to the order Mytilida, which shows characteristic patterns of LINE family representation including presence of CR1, RTE, Jockey, and L1 superfamily members (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4, martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 6-8). Some bivalve species, particularly within certain orders, show notable expansions or contractions of specific LINE clades; for instance, Pectinida show extreme reduction of certain RTE clades, while Arcida show loss of L2-2 clade members (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 6-8).

The unusual genomic features of M. galloprovincialis—including massive gene presence-absence variation, extensive structural variation, and hemizygosity—may be linked to ongoing transposable element activity (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2, gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 2-5). Dispensable genes in this species tend to be associated with hemizygous genomic regions affected by structural variants, which account for nearly 580 Mb of DNA sequence not included in the reference genome assembly (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2). This suggests a dynamic interplay between mobile elements, structural variation, and gene content plasticity that may contribute to the species' remarkable invasiveness and resilience to environmental stress (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2, gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 2-5).

4.4 SINE-LINE Partnerships

Bivalves also harbor diverse Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements (SINEs), which are non-autonomous retrotransposons that hijack LINE-encoded reverse transcriptases for their own mobilization (martelossi2024widespreadhcdtrnaderived pages 1-2). Studies have identified highly conserved domain (HCD) SINEs in bivalves that can partner with at least four different LINE clades through a "mosaic evolution" mechanism, where SINE modules can be exchanged through recombination (martelossi2024widespreadhcdtrnaderived pages 1-2). These SINEs tend to accumulate preferentially within or near genes, consistent with a survival bias model for less harmful, short non-coding transposons in euchromatic regions (martelossi2024widespreadhcdtrnaderived pages 1-2).

5. Cellular Localization and Compartmentalization

5.1 Nucleo-Cytoplasmic Distribution

While no direct localization data exist for A0A8B6BFL6, inference from well-characterized LINE systems indicates that retrotransposon reverse transcriptases function across multiple cellular compartments (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4, fukuda2021cytoplasmicsynthesisof pages 1-2, gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2):

Cytoplasmic activities:
- Translation of retrotransposon mRNA occurs on cytoplasmic ribosomes
- Assembly of the RNP complex involves coating of the RNA with ORF1 protein and association with ORF2 protein (containing the RT domain) in the cytoplasm (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4)
- Recent evidence demonstrates that reverse transcription can occur in the cytoplasm independently of retrotransposition, producing cytoplasmic cDNA that may trigger innate immune responses (fukuda2021cytoplasmicsynthesisof pages 1-2, gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2)
- RNP complexes can accumulate in cytoplasmic stress granules or similar structures (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4)

Nuclear activities:
- Transcription of the retrotransposon element occurs in the nucleus via host RNA polymerase II (gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2)
- The RNP complex must re-enter the nucleus for integration, typically during mitosis or through active nuclear import (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4)
- Target-primed reverse transcription occurs at genomic DNA sites within the nucleus, where the RT synthesizes cDNA directly at the integration site (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4)
- Integration and completion of the insertion require nuclear DNA repair and replication machinery (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4)

The compartmentalization of reverse transcriptase activity reflects the complex life cycle of retrotransposons, with distinct steps optimized for different cellular locations (gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2).

5.2 Timing and Cell Cycle Dependence

In most dividing cells, retrotransposon integration is coupled to the cell cycle, with nuclear entry occurring during mitosis and integration taking place during S phase when DNA replication machinery is active (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4). However, evidence from neuronal cultures suggests retrotransposition can also occur in non-dividing cells through alternative mechanisms (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4). The cell cycle dependence reflects the requirement for access to genomic DNA and the reliance on host replication and repair factors for completing the integration process.

6. Broader Biological Significance

6.1 Role in Genome Evolution and Plasticity

Transposable elements, including retrotransposons, serve as major drivers of genome evolution by providing raw material for genetic diversity and innovation (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 1-2, wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3). In M. galloprovincialis, the extensive transposable element complement may contribute to the species' ability to adapt rapidly to diverse environmental conditions and colonize new ecological niches, consistent with its status as a highly successful invasive species (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2). The maintenance of diverse, long-lived LINE families following a "stealth drivers" model ensures a persistent source of genomic variation over evolutionary time (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4).

6.2 Impact on Gene Regulation and Expression

Retrotransposon-derived sequences can be co-opted for gene regulatory functions, with transposable element sequences serving as sources of cis-regulatory elements such as promoters and enhancers (wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3). In some organisms, specific retrotransposon families have been domesticated to perform essential cellular functions, demonstrating the potential for positive contributions of these elements to host biology despite their generally "selfish" character (arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3, wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3).

6.3 Genomic Instability and DNA Damage

Uncontrolled retrotransposon activity can be profoundly deleterious, causing insertional mutagenesis through disruption of genes, generation of DNA double-strand breaks, and triggering of inflammatory responses when retrotransposon nucleic acids are recognized by innate immune sensors (gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2). Cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to suppress retrotransposon activity, including epigenetic silencing, small RNA-mediated repression (such as piRNA pathways), and protein factors that sequester or degrade retrotransposon components (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2, gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2).

7. Limitations and Future Directions

7.1 Absence of Direct Experimental Evidence

A critical limitation of this functional annotation is the complete absence of direct experimental studies on A0A8B6BFL6. All functional inferences are based on domain architecture analysis and comparative genomics rather than gene-specific biochemical, cellular, or genetic experiments. Future work should include:

1. Expression profiling to determine tissue-specific and developmental patterns of A0A8B6BFL6 transcription
2. Biochemical characterization of purified protein to confirm reverse transcriptase activity and substrate specificity
3. Cellular localization studies using fluorescent protein fusions or immunocytochemistry
4. Functional assays to test for retrotransposition competence, either of A0A8B6BFL6 alone or in the context of a complete retrotransposon element
5. Genomic analysis to identify full-length retrotransposon copies potentially encoding this reverse transcriptase

7.2 Specific Retrotransposon Family Assignment

While the evidence strongly supports classification of A0A8B6BFL6 as a retrotransposon-associated reverse transcriptase, the specific LINE superfamily, clade, or family to which it belongs remains uncertain. Phylogenetic placement would require analysis of the complete ORF2 protein sequence (including RT, endonuclease, and other domains) in the context of the comprehensive bivalve LINE classification framework established by Martelossi et al. (2023) (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4, martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 6-8).

8. Conclusions

Based on comprehensive analysis of domain architecture, comparative genomics, and extensive recent literature on bivalve transposable elements and reverse transcriptase function, the protein A0A8B6BFL6 from Mytilus galloprovincialis is best annotated as a putative retrotransposon-associated reverse transcriptase.

Primary molecular function: RNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity, catalyzing the synthesis of complementary DNA from an RNA template as part of retrotransposon replication.

Substrate specificity: RNA template (likely the encoding retrotransposon's own transcript) plus deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates, producing single-stranded DNA.

Biological role: Component of the retrotransposon life cycle, enabling mobile element propagation through a "copy-and-paste" mechanism involving reverse transcription and genomic integration via target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT).

Cellular localization: Inferred to function across both cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments, with translation and RNP assembly in the cytoplasm, followed by nuclear entry and reverse transcription/integration at genomic DNA sites in the nucleus.

Evolutionary and genomic context: Part of the exceptionally diverse LINE complement in bivalve genomes, representing one component of the dynamic transposable element landscape that contributes to genomic plasticity, structural variation, and evolutionary innovation in M. galloprovincialis.

This annotation should be considered a high-confidence inference based on domain structure and comparative analysis rather than direct experimental proof for this specific gene product. The extensive literature on bivalve transposable elements from 2020-2024 provides strong support for this functional assignment within the broader genomic and evolutionary context of Mediterranean mussel biology.

References

1. (arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3): Irina R. Arkhipova and Irina A. Yushenova. To be mobile or not: the variety of reverse transcriptases and their recruitment by host genomes. Biochemistry (Moscow), 88:1754-1762, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1134/s000629792311007x, doi:10.1134/s000629792311007x. This article has 8 citations.

2. (wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3): Jonathan N. Wells and Cédric Feschotte. A field guide to eukaryotic transposable elements. Annual Review of Genetics, 54:539-561, Nov 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-040620-022145, doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-040620-022145. This article has 793 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

3. (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2): Marco Gerdol, Rebeca Moreira, Fernando Cruz, Jessica Gómez-Garrido, Anna Vlasova, Umberto Rosani, Paola Venier, Miguel A. Naranjo-Ortiz, Maria Murgarella, Samuele Greco, Pablo Balseiro, André Corvelo, Leonor Frias, Marta Gut, Toni Gabaldón, Alberto Pallavicini, Carlos Canchaya, Beatriz Novoa, Tyler S. Alioto, David Posada, and Antonio Figueras. Massive gene presence-absence variation shapes an open pan-genome in the mediterranean mussel. Genome Biology, Nov 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02180-3, doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02180-3. This article has 216 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

4. (gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 2-5): Marco Gerdol, Rebeca Moreira, Fernando Cruz, Jessica Gómez-Garrido, Anna Vlasova, Umberto Rosani, Paola Venier, Miguel A. Naranjo-Ortiz, Maria Murgarella, Samuele Greco, Pablo Balseiro, André Corvelo, Leonor Frias, Marta Gut, Toni Gabaldón, Alberto Pallavicini, Carlos Canchaya, Beatriz Novoa, Tyler S. Alioto, David Posada, and Antonio Figueras. Massive gene presence-absence variation shapes an open pan-genome in the mediterranean mussel. Genome Biology, Nov 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02180-3, doi:10.1186/s13059-020-02180-3. This article has 216 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

5. (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 1-2): Jacopo Martelossi, Filippo Nicolini, Simone Subacchi, Daniela Pasquale, Fabrizio Ghiselli, and Andrea Luchetti. Multiple and diversified transposon lineages contribute to early and recent bivalve genome evolution. BMC Biology, Jun 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01632-z, doi:10.1186/s12915-023-01632-z. This article has 28 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

6. (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4): Jacopo Martelossi, Filippo Nicolini, Simone Subacchi, Daniela Pasquale, Fabrizio Ghiselli, and Andrea Luchetti. Multiple and diversified transposon lineages contribute to early and recent bivalve genome evolution. BMC Biology, Jun 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01632-z, doi:10.1186/s12915-023-01632-z. This article has 28 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

7. (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2): Maria Sergeevna Protasova, Tatiana Vladimirovna Andreeva, and Evgeny Ivanovich Rogaev. Factors regulating the activity of line1 retrotransposons. Genes, 12:1562, Sep 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101562, doi:10.3390/genes12101562. This article has 58 citations.

8. (protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4): Maria Sergeevna Protasova, Tatiana Vladimirovna Andreeva, and Evgeny Ivanovich Rogaev. Factors regulating the activity of line1 retrotransposons. Genes, 12:1562, Sep 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101562, doi:10.3390/genes12101562. This article has 58 citations.

9. (gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2): Vera Gorbunova, Andrei Seluanov, Paolo Mita, Wilson McKerrow, David Fenyö, Jef D. Boeke, Sara B. Linker, Fred H. Gage, Jill A. Kreiling, Anna P. Petrashen, Trenton A. Woodham, Jackson R. Taylor, Stephen L. Helfand, and John M. Sedivy. The role of retrotransposable elements in ageing and age-associated diseases. Aug 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03542-y, doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03542-y. This article has 482 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

10. (fukuda2021cytoplasmicsynthesisof pages 1-2): Shinichi Fukuda, Akhil Varshney, Benjamin J. Fowler, Shao-bin Wang, Siddharth Narendran, Kameshwari Ambati, Tetsuhiro Yasuma, Joseph Magagnoli, Hannah Leung, Shuichiro Hirahara, Yosuke Nagasaka, Reo Yasuma, Ivana Apicella, Felipe Pereira, Ryan D. Makin, Eamonn Magner, Xinan Liu, Jian Sun, Mo Wang, Kirstie Baker, Kenneth M. Marion, Xiwen Huang, Elmira Baghdasaryan, Meenakshi Ambati, Vidya L. Ambati, Akshat Pandey, Lekha Pandya, Tammy Cummings, Daipayan Banerjee, Peirong Huang, Praveen Yerramothu, Genrich V. Tolstonog, Ulrike Held, Jennifer A. Erwin, Apua C. M. Paquola, Joseph R. Herdy, Yuichiro Ogura, Hiroko Terasaki, Tetsuro Oshika, Shaban Darwish, Ramendra K. Singh, Saghar Mozaffari, Deepak Bhattarai, Kyung Bo Kim, James W. Hardin, Charles L. Bennett, David R. Hinton, Timothy E. Hanson, Christian Röver, Keykavous Parang, Nagaraj Kerur, Jinze Liu, Brian C. Werner, S. Scott Sutton, Srinivas R. Sadda, Gerald G. Schumann, Bradley D. Gelfand, Fred H. Gage, and Jayakrishna Ambati. Cytoplasmic synthesis of endogenous alu complementary dna via reverse transcription and implications in age-related macular degeneration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Feb 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022751118, doi:10.1073/pnas.2022751118. This article has 72 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.

11. (martelossi2024widespreadhcdtrnaderived pages 1-2): Jacopo Martelossi, Mariangela Iannello, Fabrizio Ghiselli, and Andrea Luchetti. Widespread hcd-trna derived sines in bivalves rely on multiple line partners and accumulate in genic regions. Mobile DNA, Oct 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-024-00332-x, doi:10.1186/s13100-024-00332-x. This article has 4 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.

12. (martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 6-8): Jacopo Martelossi, Filippo Nicolini, Simone Subacchi, Daniela Pasquale, Fabrizio Ghiselli, and Andrea Luchetti. Multiple and diversified transposon lineages contribute to early and recent bivalve genome evolution. BMC Biology, Jun 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01632-z, doi:10.1186/s12915-023-01632-z. This article has 28 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.

Artifacts

• Edison artifact artifact-00

Citations

1. arkhipova2023tobemobile pages 1-3
2. gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 1-2
3. wells2020afieldguide pages 1-3
4. protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 1-2
5. protasova2021factorsregulatingthe pages 2-4
6. martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 2-4
7. martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 6-8
8. martelossi2024widespreadhcdtrnaderived pages 1-2
9. gorbunova2021theroleof pages 1-2
10. gerdol2020massivegenepresenceabsence pages 2-5
11. martelossi2023multipleanddiversified pages 1-2
12. fukuda2021cytoplasmicsynthesisof pages 1-2
13. https://doi.org/10.1134/s000629792311007x,
14. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-040620-022145,
15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-020-02180-3,
16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-023-01632-z,
17. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12101562,
18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03542-y,
19. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022751118,
20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-024-00332-x,