ADPRHL1 (ARH2) is a catalytically inactive member of the ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase family, expressed almost exclusively in striated muscle and most strongly in the heart. It retains the all-alpha ADP-ribosylhydrolase fold of its active paralogues ADPRH (ARH1, an ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase) and ADPRS (ARH3, a serine/poly(ADP-ribose) hydrolase), but has lost the aspartate pair that coordinates the catalytic magnesium ions and the serines that grip the adenosine-ribose of the substrate, and recombinant ARH2 shows no hydrolase activity in the assays that detect ARH1 and ARH3 activity. Its function instead depends on the vestigial substrate cleft: the two adjacent serines that bind adenosine-ribose in ADPRH are replaced in ADPRHL1 by a di-arginine motif (Arg271-Arg272), and deleting one to four residues from that loop abolishes ventricular myofibril assembly in Xenopus without touching any catalytic residue. Loss of ADPRHL1 blocks striated myofibril assembly and outgrowth of the cardiac ventricle in frog embryos, and knockout in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes disorganises sarcomeres, reduces beta-1 integrin, paxillin and phosphorylated FAK, and impairs focal adhesion formation, calcium transients and electrical conduction through excessive activation of the ROCK-myosin II pathway. Epitope-tagged protein localises to stripes flanking the Z-disc, consistent with the sarcomeric and myofibrillar localisation recorded for the protein. No ligand, substrate or binding partner has been identified, so the molecular activity underlying these roles remains undefined.
| GO Term | Evidence | Action | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GO:0000287
magnesium ion binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000002 |
REMOVE |
Summary: This is the ancestral catalytic magnesium site transferred onto a protein in which that site has been dismantled. The row comes from interpro2go, which maps IPR012108 "ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase" to GO:0000287, GO:0003875 and GO:0051725; ADPRHL1 matches IPR012108 because the entry's single member signature, PIRSF016939, does not separate the active ARH1 proteins from the inactive ARH2 ones. Of the 1282 proteins in IPR012108, 11 are reviewed Swiss-Prot entries, and 7 of those 11 are the entries Swiss-Prot itself names "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2" and annotates with a CAUTION that they lack the metal-binding residues. So a majority of the entry's own curated members are curated as catalytically dead, and the entry still supplies the metal-binding term. UniProt states the loss directly on this accession, and a residue census confirms it against a matched control: of ADPRH's six UniProt-annotated Mg(2+) ligands, ADPRHL1 keeps the coordinating oxygen at only three and loses it at three. Written as ADPRH position to ADPRHL1 residue, the survivors are Ser54 to Ser56, Asp55 to Asp57 and Asp302 to Glu304, and the losses are Asp56 to Asn58, Asp304 to Ala306 and Ser305 to Ala307. The decisive one is Asp56 to Asn58, because aspartate-to-asparagine at a vicinal catalytic aspartate is the very substitution used to abolish this family's activity experimentally - PMID:17075046 kills ARH3's reaction by replacing Asp77 and Asp78 with asparagine. The comparison is controlled rather than asserted: Dictyostelium ADPRH, a genuine ARH1 at 48.4% identity to human ADPRH - the same distance as ADPRHL1's 42.6-47.7% - retains 13 of 20 ligand sites and all six Mg(2+) donors, while every ADPRHL1 orthologue retains 6-7 sites and 2-3 donors. Retention is therefore not tracking sequence distance. One counter-consideration is recorded rather than suppressed: PMID:27217161's model notes that Asp100 of ADPRHL1 could provide an alternative coordination site for metals. That is a hedged modelling suggestion, presented in the source as an obstacle to substrate docking rather than as a functional site, and never tested - it does not support the annotation, whose provenance is specifically the ancestral catalytic site.
Reason: Removed on the term's own provenance rather than by importing the hydrolase result. Magnesium binding as such has never been assayed on ARH2, and three of ADPRH's six Mg(2+) donor positions do survive, so the honest statement is not that ADPRHL1 binds no metal. All positions in this paragraph are given in ADPRH numbering, with the ADPRHL1 residue after the arrow: retained are Ser54 to Ser56, Asp55 to Asp57 and Asp302 to Glu304; lost are Asp56 to Asn58, Asp304 to Ala306 and Ser305 to Ala307. That reconciles with PMID:27217161, which reports three of the four critical aspartates lost with only Asp55 conserved - its verbatim sentence is quoted in this row's supported_by below, and nothing in this paragraph is a quotation. It uses a different denominator and a stricter criterion: its four are Asp55, Asp56, Asp302 and Asp304, and it scores Asp302 to Glu304 as lost because the residue is no longer an aspartate, whereas the donor test used here scores it retained because a glutamate still contributes a carboxylate oxygen. Both statements describe the same alignment. What is refuted is the only thing that put this term here: the row exists solely as interpro2go's mapping of IPR012108, that mapping describes the catalytic Mg(2+) centre of the active ARH1 members, and that centre is demonstrably dismantled - UniProt's own CAUTION records the metal-binding residues as absent, and the losses include the vicinal Asp56, the position whose aspartate-to-asparagine substitution abolishes the paralogue's activity. There is no independent support for the term anywhere in the clade: all seven reviewed ARH2 orthologues hold it by the same single IEA route. With its sole basis refuted and no measurement on either side, REMOVE rather than MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED - though the latter would also have been defensible, and the caveat in the summary about ADPRHL1 Asp100, the one position in this row's reasoning cited in ADPRHL1 rather than ADPRH numbering, is why.
Propagation Review
Root cause:
PROPAGATION BAD
Failure modes:
PSEUDO OR SUBACTIVITY LOSS
WRONG ORTHOLOG OR PARALOG
Sources checked:
InterPro:IPR012108
· ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase (InterPro family, member signature PIRSF016939)
SUPPORTS SOURCE BUT NOT TARGET
The signature is sound for the ARH1 members that justify it and unsound for the ARH2 members that outnumber them: 7 of the entry's 11 reviewed members are "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2" entries carrying a lack-of-catalytic-residues CAUTION. The three other InterPro signatures ADPRHL1 matches - IPR050792, IPR005502 and IPR036705 - map to nothing in interpro2go, which is the internal control showing this is one over-reaching entry rather than a careless pipeline.
Supporting Evidence:
file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
lacks the metal-binding and substrate-binding residues
PMID:27217161
Three of the four critical aspartates of ADPRH have been lost in mammalian ADPRHL1 (hADPRH D56, D302, D304 lost, only D55 is conserved), suggesting that ADPRHL1 cation binding may be compromised.
PMID:36497109
ARH2 (so far) does not exhibit any enzymatic activities [70], consistent with differences in primary sequences from critical residues found in ARH1 (e.g., 54-SDDT-57, 302-DSDS-305)
file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md
Retention therefore is not tracking sequence distance here.
|
|
GO:0003875
ADP-ribosylarginine-[protein] hydrolase activity
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000120 |
REMOVE |
Summary: The activity this term names has been measured on ARH2 and was not found. Ono et al. assayed recombinant ARH2 alongside ARH1 and ARH3 and report it inactive; the Moss laboratory's family review states the negative across the whole assay panel and, specifically for the reaction this term describes, that ARH2 does not appear to be responsible for hydrolysis of the ADP-ribose-acceptor linkage. UniProt records the same on this entry. Two independent automatic routes deliver the term anyway and neither examines a residue. The first is interpro2go via IPR012108. The second is the ARBA rule cited in this row's own WITH/FROM: ARBA00088955 has a single condition set, FunFam id 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002 AND taxon Mammalia, and this entry's cross-reference reads "FunFam; 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002; ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase isoform X1". That FunFam contains both the active ARH1 proteins and the inactive ARH2 ones (ARH3 sits in FF:000001), so the rule is keyed on a structural family whose name asserts an activity that half its members have lost. The rule's taxon clause makes a testable prediction and GOA confirms it: the five mammalian ARH2 orthologues receive GO:0003875 via GO_REF:0000120 while Xenopus and zebrafish receive it via GO_REF:0000002 instead. Across all seven reviewed ARH2 orthologues, GO:0003875, GO:0000287 and GO:0051725 are held 21 times and every single one is IEA - no experimental, ISS or IBA support exists anywhere in the clade. PAINT, by contrast, gets this right: the GO:0003875 IBA reaches 20 gene products from node PTN009030515 and all 20 are ADPRH orthologues, with no ARH2 among them. The specificity question was also asked in the other direction and answered no: no ARH2 orthologue carries any ARH3-type term (GO:0140290, GO:0004649, GO:0140292 all return zero), and the residue census scores ADPRHL1 at 6-7 of ARH3's 17 sites against 14-17 for the ARH3 clade itself. ADPRHL1 is not a misfiled serine hydrolase; it is not a hydrolase.
Reason: A catalytic activity that was directly assayed on this protein and not detected, arriving from two fold-based pipelines neither of which inspects the catalytic residues. The field's own caveat - that the negative was obtained with model substrates - is why no replacement hydrolase term is proposed rather than why the term is kept: GO cannot express "might hydrolyse something unidentified", and inventing a general hydrolase term to hold that hedge would be an over-annotation of the opposite sign.
Propagation Review
Root cause:
PROPAGATION BAD
Failure modes:
PSEUDO OR SUBACTIVITY LOSS
WRONG ORTHOLOG OR PARALOG
Sources checked:
ARBA:ARBA00088955
· ARBA rule, FunFam 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002 AND taxon Mammalia gives GO:0003875
SOURCE BAD
The rule's whole condition set is a CATH FunFam membership plus a taxon. The FunFam is named "ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase isoform X1" and contains ADPRH and ADPRHL1 alike, so the rule grants a catalytic molecular function on the strength of a family name. Its Mammalia clause is visible in GOA as the split between GO_REF:0000120 for the five mammalian ARH2 orthologues and GO_REF:0000002 for the frog and zebrafish ones.
InterPro:IPR012108
· ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase (InterPro family, member signature PIRSF016939)
SUPPORTS SOURCE BUT NOT TARGET
Same entry as on the GO:0000287 and GO:0051725 rows; 7 of its 11 reviewed members are Swiss-Prot "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2" entries.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:17075046
The rate of O-acetyl-ADP-ribose hydrolysis by recombinant ARH3 was 250-fold that observed with ARH1; ARH2 and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase were inactive.
PMID:36497109
ARH2 does not appear to be responsible for hydrolysis of ADP-ribose-acceptor linkage.
PMID:32726316
The sequence changes suggest binding of ADP-ribosylated protein substrates and cation-mediated catalysis are both abolished in Adprhl1 and biochemical assays have confirmed the lack of any comparable enzymatic activity
file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
showing no activity against O-acetyl-ADP-ribose
|
|
GO:0030017
sarcomere
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000044 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: The automatic mapping of UniProt SubCell SL-0313 (Sarcomere) to GO:0030017. Its input is this entry's SUBCELLULAR LOCATION line, "Cytoplasm, myofibril, sarcomere", which carries ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q6AZR2 - so this row and the ISS row below are the same underlying observation arriving by two routes rather than two independent findings, and they are given the same verdict. The observation itself is the Xenopus work: an N-terminally epitope-tagged Adprhl1 localises to stripes flanking the Z-disc. Two caveats are recorded rather than glossed. It is over-expressed tagged protein, and the same study reports that its peptide antibody was not sensitive enough to detect endogenous Adprhl1 in situ, so the endogenous distribution has not been imaged in any species. And no human localisation experiment exists at all. Kept because the inference is nonetheless well founded - a 74.6%-identical 1:1 ortholog, a heart- and skeletal-muscle-restricted expression pattern, and human knockout cardiomyocytes in which sarcomere arrangement is disturbed - and because a location term that is very likely true should not be deleted on the strength of an assay caveat.
Reason: A true but indirectly evidenced compartment call. Same datum as the ISS row, reached through UniProt's SubCell vocabulary rather than through the curator's ortholog transfer.
Supporting Evidence:
file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
SUBCELLULAR LOCATION: Cytoplasm, myofibril, sarcomere
PMID:27217161
Recombinant Adprhl1 can localize to stripes adjacent to the Z-disc
|
|
GO:0051725
protein de-ADP-ribosylation
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000002 |
REMOVE |
Summary: The biological process that the absent hydrolase activity would carry out, transferred from the same IPR012108 signature and falling with it. The direction of this term was checked explicitly rather than assumed, because this family is exactly where reaction direction goes wrong: GO:0051725 is the removal of ADP-ribose, which is the correct direction for an ARH-family protein, so this is not the error of annotating a protein as performing the modification it removes. It fails for a different reason - ADPRHL1 has never been shown to remove ADP-ribose from anything, and was assayed for exactly that and found inactive. Nothing else in the literature supports the process either. The closest is PMID:35816343, in which a germline p.Asp78Val allele expressed in prostate cells activates PARP1 and raises poly(ADP-ribose) levels while wild-type ADPRHL1 suppresses proliferation; that is consistent with wild-type ADPRHL1 restraining cellular ADP-ribosylation somehow, but it is ectopic expression of a single variant in cancer cell lines with no demonstration that ADPRHL1 acts on ADP-ribose itself, and it cannot support a de-ADP-ribosylation annotation. Note that Asp78 is not one of the ligand positions in the residue census, so the variant does not bear on the catalytic question either.
Reason: A process term that exists solely as the downstream consequence of a catalytic activity this protein does not have. Removed on the same evidence as the GO:0003875 row, and from the same signature.
Propagation Review
Root cause:
PROPAGATION BAD
Failure modes:
PSEUDO OR SUBACTIVITY LOSS
WRONG ORTHOLOG OR PARALOG
Sources checked:
InterPro:IPR012108
· ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase (InterPro family, member signature PIRSF016939)
SUPPORTS SOURCE BUT NOT TARGET
The third of the three terms interpro2go attaches to this entry. It reaches all seven reviewed ARH2 orthologues, in every case as the only evidence any of them has for the process.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36497109
ARH2 does not appear to be responsible for hydrolysis of ADP-ribose-acceptor linkage.
PMID:17075046
The rate of O-acetyl-ADP-ribose hydrolysis by recombinant ARH3 was 250-fold that observed with ARH1; ARH2 and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase were inactive.
file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
lacks the metal-binding and substrate-binding residues
|
|
GO:0003242
cardiac chamber ballooning
|
ISS
GO_REF:0000024 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: A sound ortholog transfer. The WITH/FROM entity is correct for an ISS row - the sequence-similar protein, not a partner - and it resolves to ARHL1_XENLA, a reviewed Swiss-Prot entry for Xenopus laevis adprhl1, 354 aa, a 1:1 ortholog at 74.6% aligned identity (published as 75%). Its own annotation is IMP from PMID:27217161, where morpholino knockdown of all Adprhl1 variants prevents outgrowth of the ventricle while leaving cardiomyocyte number, electrical conduction and myofibrillar gene expression intact. A fully paginated reference-projection test on that PMID returns 3 annotations over 1 entity, so this is one curator reading one paper about one gene, not a bulk import and not a complex-level phenotype spread across a set. The mammalian evidence is thinner but not contradictory: mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3-4 are normal, but that allele still produces the smaller ADPRHL1 species and so is not a null. ADPRHL1 is heart- and skeletal-muscle-enriched in human tissue and expressed in left ventricle myocardium, and human variants in the locus associate with ventricular conduction phenotypes, so nothing about the human gene argues against the transfer.
Reason: Legitimate ISS from a reviewed 1:1 ortholog at 75% identity whose underlying evidence is a specific, single-gene loss-of-function experiment in the same organ.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:27217161
Morpholino oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of all Adprhl1 variants inhibits striated myofibril assembly and prevents outgrowth of the ventricle.
PMID:36497109
ARH2 is a cytoplasmic protein expressed primarily in heart and skeletal muscle and may be involved in cardiac myofibril assembly and cardiac chamber outgrowth
|
|
GO:0030017
sarcomere
|
ISS
GO_REF:0000024 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: The curator's ortholog transfer of the Xenopus localisation, and the origin of the SubCell IEA row above. Q6AZR2 holds GO:0030017 by IMP from PMID:27217161 - IMP rather than IDA because the localisation was obtained from transgenically over-expressed, N-terminally tagged protein. The same caveats therefore apply here as to the IEA row: it is tagged over-expressed protein, the endogenous protein has never been imaged in situ in any species, and there is no human localisation experiment. It is accepted because the ortholog relationship is close and unambiguous, because the compartment is consistent with everything else known about the protein - muscle-restricted expression, a knockout that disorganises sarcomeres in human cardiomyocytes, and a reported association of mouse ARH2 with a synemin, desmin and triadin-containing assembly - and because the two GO:0030017 rows describe one observation and must take one action.
Reason: Correctly executed ISS from a reviewed 1:1 ortholog. The assay caveat is recorded as a knowledge gap rather than used to delete a compartment call that is very likely true.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:27217161
Recombinant Adprhl1 can localize to stripes adjacent to the Z-disc
PMID:27217161
immunocytochemistry of hearts using the same antibody was not sufficiently sensitive to detect endogenous Adprhl1 protein in situ
|
|
GO:0055003
cardiac myofibril assembly
|
ISS
GO_REF:0000024 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: The best-supported annotation on this gene, and the only one with independent human evidence behind it. The ISS is faithful to its donor: Q6AZR2 holds GO:0055003 by IMP from PMID:27217161, where knockdown blocks striated myofibril assembly and over-expression produces disarrayed, branching myofibrils with sarcomere division at the actin-Z-disc boundary. It is independently corroborated in human cells that GOA has not yet seen: CRISPR knockout of ADPRHL1 in H9 embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes leaves cardiac differentiation and myofibrillar gene expression intact but disturbs sarcomere arrangement. Accepted as it stands, with two additive recommendations recorded separately rather than by modifying this row - a more specific ventricular term that exists in GO but has been curated only onto TrEMBL copies of the Xenopus gene, and the human IMP evidence that should sit alongside this ISS. Why the human sarcomere result is left as a curation recommendation rather than proposed as its own row, when the same paper's focal adhesion result is proposed: the focal adhesion finding is the paper's central, quantified result, measured on four independent markers and closed by a pharmacological rescue, and it has no annotation in GOA at all. The sarcomere finding is a qualitative supplementary-figure observation with no quantification, and the process it would support is already annotated here and refined by the GO:0055005 row below - so a third overlapping myofibril term drawn from the weaker of the paper's two observations would add granularity the observation does not carry. GO:0045214 sarcomere organization was considered on that basis and declined.
Reason: A faithful ortholog transfer of a specific loss-of-function phenotype, now also supported by a human knockout. Left unmodified because the row correctly reflects the term its cited donor holds; the refinement is proposed additively below.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:27217161
Morpholino oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of all Adprhl1 variants inhibits striated myofibril assembly and prevents outgrowth of the ventricle.
PMID:37880701
the arrangement of sarcomeres was less regular
|
|
GO:0055005
ventricular cardiac myofibril assembly
|
ISS
GO_REF:0000024 |
NEW |
Summary: Proposed addition, and it exists only because a reference-projection test on the 2020 CRISPR paper turned up a split donor. All three of ADPRHL1's ISS rows transfer from UniProtKB:Q6AZR2, the Swiss-Prot entry for Xenopus laevis adprhl1, which carries the 2016 morpholino paper's three IMP annotations. But Xenbase curated the 2020 CRISPR paper onto two TrEMBL accessions for the same frog gene, A0A8J0UG54 and A0A8J0UIM8 (adprhl1.L), which the UniProt ISS pipeline never consulted. Those entries hold GO:0055005 ventricular cardiac myofibril assembly, GO:0030041 actin filament polymerization and GO:0036342 post-anal tail morphogenesis by IMP, and none of the three has ever propagated to any mammal. GO:0055005 is an is_a descendant of the GO:0055003 that ADPRHL1 already holds, and the evidence for it is specific: CRISPR deletion of one to four residues from the Arg271-Arg272 loop at the centre of the vestigial ADP-ribosylhydrolase cleft causes loss of ventricular myofibril assembly, which is also the cleanest demonstration anywhere that ADPRHL1's function is cleft-dependent and catalysis-independent. Human relevance is direct - ADPRHL1 is expressed in left ventricle myocardium and its knockout disorganises sarcomeres in human cardiomyocytes. GO:0030041 was considered and declined for human: the Xenopus IMP is a morphological inference from myofibril phenotypes rather than a polymerization assay, and the human mechanism places any actin effect downstream of ROCK-myosin II. GO:0036342 is Xenopus-specific and not transferable.
Reason: A more specific term than the existing GO:0055003 row, curated for the orthologous gene from a later paper, which failed to propagate because the two Xenopus papers were curated onto different accessions of the same gene. Added rather than substituted for GO:0055003, because that row correctly reflects the donor it cites.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:32726316
Mutant alleles encode discrete loss of 1, 3 or 4 amino acids from a di-arginine (Arg271-Arg272) containing peptide loop at the centre of the ancestral ADP-ribosylhydrolase site.
PMID:32726316
Thus despite lacking catalytic activity, it is the modified (adenosine-ribose) substrate binding cleft of Adprhl1 that fulfils an essential role during heart formation.
PMID:37880701
the arrangement of sarcomeres was less regular
|
|
GO:0051894
positive regulation of focal adhesion assembly
|
IMP
PMID:37880701 The pseudoenzyme ADPRHL1 affects cardiac function by regulat... |
NEW |
Summary: Proposed addition from the only functional experiment ever performed on the human protein, which contributes nothing to GOA at present - a fully paginated reference-projection test on PMID:37880701 returns zero annotations over zero entities. CRISPR knockout of ADPRHL1 in human H9 embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes reduces beta-1 integrin, phosphorylated FAK, paxillin and talin, and impairs focal adhesion formation; the cells detach from the culture surface, and calcium transients and microelectrode-array conduction are perturbed. Inhibiting ROCK or myosin II restores focal adhesions and rescues the electrical and calcium phenotypes, placing the defect downstream of excessive ROCK-myosin II activity. The direction matters and is stated by the experiment: knockout decreases focal adhesion formation, so wild-type ADPRHL1 promotes it. The regulation term rather than the bare GO:0048041 is chosen deliberately - ADPRHL1 is not a structural component of focal adhesions and the paper's mechanism is regulatory and indirect, running through the ROCK-myosin II pathway. Evidence code is IMP: this is a genetic knockout scored by phenotype, not a direct assay of ADPRHL1 acting on a focal adhesion. No term is proposed for the calcium and conduction phenotypes, which the same experiments show are downstream of the adhesion defect and are rescued by relieving it. One caveat recorded rather than argued away: the paper's own model makes the focal adhesion defect downstream of de-repressed ROCK-myosin II, so a curator might reasonably prefer a Rho-kinase-pathway term over the focal adhesion one. This row stays on the phenotype that was actually measured, on four markers, and rescued - the pathway step is inferred from RNA-seq and inhibitor sensitivity, and no assay places ADPRHL1 on ROCK itself.
Reason: Direct human loss-of-function evidence for a regulatory role in focal adhesion assembly, in the correct direction, currently absent from GOA entirely.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:37880701
suggesting that ADPRHL1 deficiency disrupts the FAs in these cells
PMID:37880701
the expression of Paxillin, a structural protein in FAs, in KO-CM was markedly reduced
PMID:37880701
Our results demonstrated that ADPRHL1-deficient cardiomyocytes exhibited abnormal adhesion, calcium transients and electrophysiological activity.
|
Q: To InterPro and GO Central: IPR012108 "ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase" maps to GO:0000287, GO:0003875 and GO:0051725, but a majority of its own reviewed members are pseudoenzymes. Of the entry's 1282 proteins, 11 are Swiss-Prot; 4 are named "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH1" and 7 are named "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2", each carrying a CAUTION that it lacks the metal-binding and substrate-binding residues. The result is 21 IEA annotations across seven ARH2 orthologues with no experimental, ISS or IBA support anywhere behind them. Either the entry should be split so that PIRSF016939's ARH1 and ARH2 branches are separate signatures, or the three GO mappings should be withdrawn from it. Note the contrast that shows this is one entry and not a systemic problem: the other three signatures ADPRHL1 matches - IPR050792, IPR005502 and IPR036705 - map to nothing at all, and PAINT independently reaches the correct answer, giving GO:0003875 to 20 ADPRH orthologues from node PTN009030515 and to no ARH2 protein.
Suggested experts: InterPro curators, GO Central
Q: To UniProt (ARBA): rule ARBA00088955 assigns GO:0003875 on a single condition set, FunFam id 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002 AND taxon Mammalia. That FunFam is named "ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase isoform X1" and contains ADPRH and ADPRHL1 alike - P54922, Q8NDY3, Q8BGK2, Q5XIB3, Q3ZBM1, Q5RCJ0, Q6AZR2 and Q5XJB9 all match it, while ARH3 sits in FF:000001. The rule therefore grants a catalytic molecular function to five mammalian pseudoenzymes on the strength of a structural family's name, in entries whose own CAUTION line says the catalytic residues are absent. A negative taxon or a negative condition excluding the ARH2 orthologues would fix it.
Suggested experts: UniProt ARBA developers
Q: To UniProt (nomenclature): Q8NDY3's RecName is "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2", and the same name is used for all seven ARH2 orthologues. Transferase is the wrong reaction direction. The entry's own SIMILARITY line assigns it to the ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase family, its AltName is "[Protein ADP-ribosylarginine] hydrolase-like protein 1", and no ARH-family protein has been proposed to add ADP-ribose. Suggest "Inactive ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH2", consistent with ADPRH_HUMAN "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH1" and ADPRS_HUMAN "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH3". This name is what GOA prints in the GENE NAME column of every ADPRHL1 annotation.
Suggested experts: UniProt nomenclature curators
Q: To GOA and Xenbase: the ISS pipeline and Xenbase are curating the same Xenopus laevis gene onto different accessions, and one whole paper is invisible as a result. All three of human ADPRHL1's ISS rows transfer from UniProtKB:Q6AZR2 (ARHL1_XENLA, Swiss-Prot), which carries the 2016 morpholino paper. Xenbase curated the 2020 CRISPR paper (PMID:32726316) onto A0A8J0UG54 and A0A8J0UIM8, TrEMBL entries for adprhl1.L, giving GO:0055005, GO:0030041 and GO:0036342 by IMP - none of which has reached any mammalian orthologue. Merging or cross-linking those accessions would let the later evidence propagate.
Suggested experts: GOA curators, Xenbase curators
Q: To GOA: PMID:37880701 is the only functional experiment ever performed on human ADPRHL1 - a CRISPR knockout in H9 embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes - and it contributes zero annotations. Beyond the focal adhesion term proposed here, it supports human IMP evidence for GO:0055003, which the gene currently holds only by ISS from frog.
Suggested experts: GOA curators
Q: To the ADPRH reviewers (paint/ADPRH, PR 2332): the two reviews were run independently and agree on every residue and mapped position across the five shared positions and five shared accessions. They differ on the class label at seven of those calls, because that review scores substitutions with hand-defined conservative groups while this one used BLOSUM62. The difference is entirely at aspartate-to-asparagine and serine-to-alanine, which BLOSUM62 scores positively. This review resolves the clash in favour of the ADPRH review by adding a third, mechanism-anchored test - whether the coordinating carboxylate or hydroxyl oxygen survives - which calls both substitutions lost. The anchor is that aspartate-to-asparagine at a vicinal catalytic aspartate is exactly the substitution PMID:17075046 uses to abolish ARH3 activity. Recorded here rather than silently absorbed.
Suggested experts: ai-gene-review PAINT campaign reviewers
Experiment: Identify what the Arg271-Arg272 cleft binds. Express wild-type ADPRHL1 and the loop-deletion alleles characterised in PMID:32726316 as tagged baits in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and compare interactomes; a partner lost specifically by the loop deletions is a candidate for the molecular function that this review could not annotate.
Experiment: Re-test hydrolase activity against physiological substrates. The published negatives used O-acetyl-ADP-ribose and other model substrates; the family review flags that as a possible explanation for the null result. Assay recombinant ADPRHL1 against ADP-ribosylated proteins purified from cardiac muscle, and against phospho-ribosylated derivatives, which the 2020 paper raises as a candidate remaining ligand.
Experiment: Image endogenous ADPRHL1. Knock a fluorescent tag into the native ADPRHL1 locus in human iPSCs, differentiate to cardiomyocytes, and image against the knockout line as the specificity control. This would give the first localisation of the protein at native abundance in any species and the first in human, and would test whether the Z-disc-flanking distribution seen with over-expressed tagged Xenopus protein is genuine.
Experiment: Make a true mammalian null. The existing mouse allele deletes exons 3-4 and still produces the smaller ADPRHL1 species. A full knockout, verified by loss of both protein species on western blot, would test whether the Xenopus chamber-outgrowth requirement holds in a mammal and would validate or refute the three ISS rows in this review.
Experiment: Determine which ADPRHL1 protein species matters. The 40 kDa and 23 kDa forms differ in abundance across development and the mouse exon 3-4 allele separates them genetically. Define the 23 kDa species by mass spectrometry and test the two forms separately for rescue of the knockout phenotype in human cardiomyocytes.
What is not known — curated, literature-grounded statements of the open unknowns (the inverse of core functions).
Gap: ADPRHL1 has no known molecular function. No ligand, no substrate, no verified protein partner and no measured biochemical activity of any kind has been reported. The genetics say the vestigial substrate cleft is what matters, but what that cleft binds is undetermined - the 2020 study lists it as an open question, asking whether Adprhl1 retains binding for a partially degraded ADP-ribose derivative such as phospho-ribose, or whether the cleft is itself a target for ADP-ribosylation.
OPEN BIOLOGY MF_DARK
What is known: Established: the protein exists and is detected by mass spectrometry (UniProt PE 1); it folds on the all-alpha ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase scaffold; it is inactive against O-acetyl-ADP-ribose and against the ADP-ribose-acceptor linkages that ARH1 and ARH3 cleave; three of six magnesium-coordinating positions and both adenosine-ribose serines are lost; and one to four residue deletions in the Arg271-Arg272 loop abolish ventricular myofibril assembly. Not established: any binding activity, any partner, and whether the loop acts as a binding surface, a protein-protein interface or something else. IntAct returns zero interactions for Q8NDY3, against 17 for ADPRH and 35 for ADPRS by the same query, so this is a real absence and not a failed lookup.
Significance: Every molecular function currently in GOA for this gene is removed by this review, so after it the gene has no MF annotation at all. That is the honest state: ADPRHL1 is an essential cardiac protein with a completely undefined activity, and the family review itself cautions that the in vitro negatives may reflect the use of model substrates rather than genuine inertness.
What would resolve it: Identify what the Arg271-Arg272 cleft binds - for example by photo-crosslinking or pull-down from cardiomyocyte extracts using wild-type versus loop-deleted ADPRHL1 as bait - and re-test hydrolase activity against physiological ADP-ribosylated cardiac substrates rather than the small-molecule model substrates used so far.
Provenance (the field's own admissions):
Gap: The subcellular localisation of endogenous ADPRHL1 has never been imaged, in any species. Every localisation statement in the record - UniProt's SUBCELLULAR LOCATION line, the SubCell IEA row and the ISS row - descends from a single Xenopus experiment using transgenically over-expressed, N-terminally epitope-tagged protein.
OPEN BIOLOGYCURATION CC_DARK
What is known: Established: over-expressed tagged Xenopus Adprhl1 localises to stripes flanking the Z-disc and a diffuse stripe at the H-zone; human ADPRHL1 is heart-, skeletal-muscle- and tongue-enriched and expressed in left ventricle myocardium; and human ADPRHL1 knockout disorganises sarcomeres. Not established: where the endogenous protein is, at native abundance, in any species - the antibody raised against the protein was not sensitive enough to detect it in situ - and nothing at all about the human protein's location.
Significance: Two of the seven GOA rows are this one observation, and it is the only positive evidence for the cellular component. If the tagged construct mislocalises, both rows are wrong together and there is no independent check anywhere in the record.
What would resolve it: Endogenous immunofluorescence or a knock-in fluorescent tag at the native locus in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes, with the ADPRHL1 knockout line as the specificity control.
Provenance (the field's own admissions):
Gap: Whether a mammal actually requires ADPRHL1 for heart development is untested. The only published mammalian allele deletes exons 3-4, and those animals are normal - but the allele still produces the smaller ADPRHL1 protein species, so it is not a null and cannot answer the question.
NARROWING BIOLOGY BP_DARK
What is known: Established: loss of all Adprhl1 variants in Xenopus prevents ventricle outgrowth; loss in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes impairs adhesion, calcium handling and conduction; and mice lacking exons 3-4 are viable and normal while retaining the small protein species, which localises the essential activity to the C-terminal portion. Not established: the phenotype of a true mammalian null. As of the 2022 family review no Arh2-deficient mouse had been reported; a knockout has since been described only in a preprint with no PubMed identifier, which this review does not rely on.
Significance: Three of the seven GOA rows are ISS transfers of Xenopus developmental phenotypes into human. They are sound as ortholog inferences, but no mammalian loss-of-function result yet tests them, and the one mammalian allele that exists is hypomorphic by construction.
What would resolve it: A conditional or full mouse Adprhl1 null in which loss of both the 40 kDa and the smaller protein species is confirmed by western blot, phenotyped for chamber morphogenesis and myofibril organisation.
Provenance (the field's own admissions):
ADPRHL1 is a catalytically inactive member of the ADP-ribosylhydrolase family whose principal characterized role is in cardiac myofibrillogenesis and ventricular chamber outgrowth PMID:27217161. Although it lacks the active-site residues required for ADP-ribosylhydrolase catalysis, its function depends not on catalysis but on a modified substrate-binding cleft centered on a di-arginine (Arg271-Arg272) loop; disruption of this loop abolishes ventricular myofibril assembly, and cardiac activity is concentrated in the C-terminal portion of the protein [PMID:27217161, PMID:32726316]. Consistent with a direct structural role, recombinant ADPRHL1 localizes to stripes adjacent to the Z-disc and modulates actin filament and Z-disc dynamics, with both loss and overexpression disrupting sarcomere organization PMID:27217161. In human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, ADPRHL1 maintains focal adhesion formation, calcium transients, and electrophysiological activity by suppressing the ROCK-myosin II pathway, and pharmacological ROCK or myosin II inhibition rescues these defects PMID:37880701. Beyond the heart, wild-type ADPRHL1 restrains cell proliferation, while a recurrent germline loss-of-function variant (p.D78V) activates PARP1 and enhances DNA damage response and prostate cancer cell survival in a manner reversible by olaparib PMID:35816343. Its promoter is subject to epigenetic repression through an HDAC4/MEF2/SUV39H1 axis in cardiomyocytes PMID:34492228.
Recorded for reference. The AIGR evaluation found this grounding is coarse (collapses to general parents) and can contradict the narrative — do not import these GO ids directly; re-ground from the narrative + PMIDs.
| Year | Confidence | Finding | PMIDs | Journal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | High | Adprhl1 is essential for striated myofibril assembly and ventricular chamber outgrowth in Xenopus laevis; morpholino knockdown inhibits myofibrillogenesis while overexpression causes disarrayed, branching myofibrils with sarcomere division at the actin-Z-disc boundary, and recombinant Adprhl1 localizes to stripes adjacent to the Z-disc, indicating a direct role in modifying Z-disc and actin dynamics. | PMID:27217161 | Developmental biology |
| 2016 | Medium | Structural modelling indicates Adprhl1 is a pseudoenzyme lacking key catalytic residues required for ADP-ribosylhydrolase activity, classifying it as catalytically inactive despite belonging to the ADP-ribosylhydrolase protein family. | PMID:27217161 | Developmental biology |
| 2020 | High | CRISPR/Cas9 knockout targeting a di-arginine (Arg271-Arg272) peptide loop at the centre of the ancestral ADP-ribosylhydrolase binding cleft in exon 6 causes loss of ventricular myofibril assembly, demonstrating that the modified substrate-binding cleft—not catalytic activity—is required for Adprhl1 cardiac function; mice lacking exons 3-4 are normal but retain the smaller ADPRHL1 species, indicating cardiac activity is concentrated in the C-terminal protein portion. | PMID:32726316 | PloS one |
| 2023 | High | ADPRHL1 knockout in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes causes abnormal cell adhesion, disrupted focal adhesion formation, and perturbations in calcium transients and electrophysiological activity via excessive upregulation of the ROCK-myosin II pathway; pharmacological inhibition of ROCK or myosin II restores focal adhesions and improves electrical conduction and calcium activity. | PMID:37880701 | Stem cell research & therapy |
| 2022 | Medium | A recurrent ADPRHL1 germline loss-of-function mutation (c.A233T; p.D78V) activates PARP1, leading to increased H2O2- or cisplatin-induced DNA damage response and enhanced prostate cancer cell survival; wild-type ADPRHL1 expressed in prostate cancer cells suppresses cell proliferation and oncogenesis, and PARP1 inhibition with olaparib suppresses cell survival induced by mutant ADPRHL1. | PMID:35816343 | Molecular cancer research : MCR |
| 2021 | Medium | HDAC4 represses transcription from the Adprhl1 promoter through a mechanism requiring the methyltransferase SUV39H1; MEF2 binding sites are overrepresented in Adprhl1 promoter regions that gain activating histone marks (H3K9ac, H3K4me3) upon HDAC4 deletion, identifying the Adprhl1 promoter as a target of HDAC4/MEF2/SUV39H1-mediated epigenetic repression in cardiomyocytes. | PMID:34492228 | Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology |
| 2025 | Low | ARH2 (ADPRHL1) promotes M2 macrophage polarization and suppresses immune responses in lung adenocarcinoma by regulating the FPR2/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway; siRNA-mediated knockdown of ARH2 delivered via a nanoparticle system activates anti-tumor immune responses. | PMID:40801020 | Bioactive materials |
Human ADPRHL1 / ARH2, UniProt Q8NDY3 (ARHL1_HUMAN, reviewed, 354 aa, PE 1: evidence at
protein level). Accession verified independently against projects/paint/human-no-IBA-simple.csv
(line human,Q8NDY3,ADPRHL1) and against the UniProt REST record.
| source | count |
|---|---|
ADPRHL1-goa.tsv data lines |
7 |
| distinct data lines | 7 |
fetch-gene stub - term: entries |
7 |
They reconcile exactly. No stub collapse on this gene — a non-confirmation of the
ADAMTSL5 stub-collapse defect. (The stub key is (GO id, evidence, reference, negated,
qualifier); the two GO:0030017 rows survive as separate entries because their evidence codes
and references differ.)
Three genes this campaign were on human-no-IBA-simple.csv while carrying IBA rows, so this
was queried rather than assumed. QuickGO returns 7 annotations for UniProtKB:Q8NDY3, none
of them IBA, with numberOfHits == len(results) asserted. UniProt agrees:
[file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt "PAN-GO; Q8NDY3; 0 GO annotations based on evolutionary models."].
Positive control (a zero and a rejected query look identical): the same call pattern on
UniProtKB:P54922 (ADPRH) returns 15 annotations of which 2 are IBA. The endpoint works,
IBAs are visible for this family, and ADPRHL1 genuinely has none.
That absence is not an oversight. GO:0003875 is propagated by IBA to 20 gene products from
a single node, PANTHER:PTN009030515, seeded by MGI:MGI:1098234 (mouse Adprh),
RGD:2052 (rat Adprh) and UniProtKB:P54922 (human ADPRH) — and every one of the 20 is an
ADPRH orthologue. Not one ADPRHL1 orthologue is among them. PAINT models this family's
catalytic loss correctly and deliberately gave the ARH2 clade nothing. That is the negative
control that makes the rest of this review an argument rather than an opinion: a curation body
can get this right, and one did.
All 20 recipients were resolved individually rather than read off the symbol column, and
the Swiss-Prot/TrEMBL split is stated because an unreviewed entry's name is an automatic
label and must not be cited as evidence of what a protein does:
| status | n | detail |
|---|---|---|
| reviewed (Swiss-Prot) | 4 | P54922 human, P54923 mouse, Q02589 rat, Q32KR8 bovine — all ADPRH |
unreviewed (TrEMBL) with gene name ADPRH/adprh |
11 | macaque, opossum, platypus, dog, chicken, pig, gorilla, chimp, X. tropicalis, X. laevis adprh.L and adprh.S |
| unreviewed, no gene name | 5 | sea urchin, horse, anole, spotted gar, amphioxus LOC118404985 |
Every one of the 20 is named "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH1" and none is an ARH2. The
gene-name column carries the claim for 15 of 20; for the remaining 5 it rests on the PANTHER
node placement plus the automatic name, which is weaker — and saying so is the point.
It holds, on four independent lines, one of which is a direct measurement.
[PMID:17075046](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17075046 "ARH2 and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase were inactive.") — Ono et al.
assayed recombinant ARH2 against O-acetyl-ADP-ribose alongside ARH1 and ARH3 and found no
activity. The Moss-lab family review restates the position across the whole assay panel:
[PMID:36497109](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36497109 "Enzyme properties: ARH2 (so far) does not exhibit any enzymatic activities [70], consistent with differences in primary sequences from critical residues found in ARH1 (e.g., 54-SDDT-57, 302-DSDS-305)")
and, on the specific reaction the GO term names,
[PMID:36497109](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36497109 "ARH2 does not appear to be responsible for hydrolysis of ADP-ribose-acceptor linkage.").
The Xenopus group reach the same conclusion citing the same biochemistry:
[PMID:32726316](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32726316 "The sequence changes suggest binding of ADP-ribosylated protein substrates and cation-mediated catalysis are both abolished in Adprhl1 and biochemical assays have confirmed the lack of any comparable enzymatic activity").
This is the difference between this gene and the ADGRA2 case. ADGRA2's coupling was
unmeasured; ADPRHL1's hydrolase activity was measured and not found. Per the campaign's
own calibration that is the condition under which REMOVE is earned rather than
MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED.
And the field's own caveat is recorded rather than suppressed:
[PMID:36497109](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36497109 "However, the lack of ARH2 catalytic activity may be the result of the use of model substrates.")
That caveat is why nothing in this review claims ADPRHL1 is inert; it claims the arginine
hydrolase reaction is refuted. Those are different statements, and only the second is
annotatable.
[file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt "lacks the metal-binding and substrate-binding residues"]
(CAUTION) and
[file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt "showing no activity against O-acetyl-ADP-ribose"]
(FUNCTION). The feature table carries zero BINDING and zero ACT_SITE features.
For comparison ADPRH (P54922) has 14 such features spanning 20 distinct residue
positions, and ADPRS/ARH3 (Q9NX46) 14 spanning 17 — the census works in positions,
because binding_sites() expands ranged features.
genes/human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-bioinformatics/catalytic_site_census.py (committed, self-testing,
regenerates RESULTS.md byte-identically) maps all 20 of ADPRH's UniProt-annotated ligand
positions through a global alignment onto 17 family members.
| clade | n | % id to ADPRH | identical of 20 | disruptive+gap | Mg(2+) donor kept of 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARH1 / ADPRH (active; positive control) | 5 | 48.4–100 | 13–20 | 0–3 | 6 |
| ARH2 / ADPRHL1 (subject) | 7 | 42.6–47.7 | 6–7 | 7–8 | 2–3 |
| ARH3 / ADPRS (active; discriminating control) | 4 | 26.6–28.1 | 7–8 | 7–9 | 6 |
| DraG (active, arginine; low-identity control) | 1 | 27.5 | 9 | 8 | 6 |
The identity-matched control is the load-bearing part. Dictyostelium ADPRH is a genuine
ARH1 at 48.4% identity — the same distance from human ADPRH as ADPRHL1's 42.6–47.7% — and
keeps 13 of 20 sites with 3 disruptive. Every ADPRHL1 orthologue keeps 6–7 with 7–8 disruptive.
So retention is not tracking sequence distance. Two low-identity active enzymes make the same
point from the other side: DraG at 27.5% keeps 9, more than ADPRHL1 keeps at nearly twice the
identity.
Two external checks that the alignment method is sane, both reproducing published figures:
measured 46.6% vs [PMID:32726316](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32726316 "the 357 amino acid ADPRH and 354 aa ADPRHL1 share 46% sequence identity"),
and measured 74.6% vs [PMID:32726316](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32726316 "Xenopus Adprhl1 being 75% identical to human ADPRHL1").
Site by site, the Mg²⁺ centre is dismantled: D56→N58, D304→A306, S305→A307 lose the
coordinating oxygen; S54→S56, D55→D57 and D302→E304 keep it. The one that decides it is
D56→N58, because aspartate-to-asparagine at a vicinal catalytic aspartate is exactly the
substitution the field uses to kill this family's activity — PMID:17075046 abolishes ARH3's
reaction by replacing D77/D78 with asparagine. BLOSUM62 scores D→N at +1 and calls it
conservative; the mechanism does not. This is why the script reports a third, mechanism-anchored
donor_group column and rests on that rather than on a generic substitution matrix.
This reproduces the paper's own residue list independently:
[PMID:27217161](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27217161 "Three of the four critical aspartates of ADPRH have been lost in mammalian ADPRHL1 (hADPRH D56, D302, D304 lost, only D55 is conserved), suggesting that ADPRHL1 cation binding may be compromised.")
paint/ADPRH (PR #2332) published a five-position census over the same family. Its calls for
the five accessions the two analyses share were reproduced before anything else was
reported.
paint/ADPRH uses hand-definedBLOSUM62 > 0. Every difference is a BLOSUM62-positivedonor_group column agrees withA lost active site is not a lost function, and ADPRHL1's function is real, essential and
independent of catalysis:
[PMID:27217161](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27217161 "Recombinant Adprhl1 can localize to stripes adjacent to the Z-disc"), and[PMID:32726316](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32726316 "Mutant alleles encode discrete loss of 1, 3 or 4 amino acids from a di-arginine (Arg271-Arg272) containing peptide loop at the centre of the ancestral ADP-ribosylhydrolase site.")[PMID:32726316](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32726316 "The critical Adprhl1 deletion covers the exact structural position where in the active enzyme Adprh, two adjacent serines that support adenosine-ribose substrate binding are located.").So the correct reading is "catalysis refuted, function retained and relocated to the vestigial
cleft", not "pseudoenzyme, therefore nothing".
[PMID:27217161](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27217161 "Of particular note is the aspartate, D100, that could provide an alternative coordination site for metals but whose presence interferes with the phosphate groups of forcibly docked ADP.")
D100 is a modelling suggestion, hedged with "could", presented in the source as an obstacle to
substrate docking rather than as a functional metal site, and never tested. It does not rescue
GO:0000287, whose provenance is the ancestral catalytic Mg²⁺ site — but it is why the
GO:0000287 verdict is argued from the annotation's derivation rather than from an
unqualified claim that ADPRHL1 binds no metal.
Downloading interpro2go and looking up each of the four signatures ADPRHL1 matches:
| signature | type | interpro2go mapping |
|---|---|---|
| IPR012108 ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase | family (backed by PIRSF016939 alone) | GO:0000287, GO:0003875, GO:0051725 |
| IPR050792 ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase | family | none |
| IPR005502 Ribosyl_crysJ1 | domain | none |
| IPR036705 Ribosyl_crysJ1 superfamily | homologous superfamily | none |
So this is not "InterPro2GO is careless". Three of four signatures map to nothing; InterPro2GO
exercises restraint on the fold- and family-level entries. One specific entry carries a
mapping stronger than its own membership warrants.
And the membership is measurable. IPR012108 has 1282 proteins, of which 11 are reviewed
(Swiss-Prot) — 0.9%. Of those 11:
| Swiss-Prot name | n |
|---|---|
| "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH1" | 4 |
| "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2" | 7 |
A majority of the InterPro entry's own reviewed members are entries Swiss-Prot itself names
"Inactive" and annotates with a CAUTION that they lack the catalytic residues — and the entry
still maps to the activity. Note also what the entry gets right: ADPRS/ARH3 is excluded from
IPR012108 altogether, so InterPro does separate ARH3 from ARH1. It just does not separate ARH2.
GO_REF:0000120's WITH/FROM cites ARBA:ARBA00088955. Fetching the rule
(https://rest.uniprot.org/arba/ARBA00088955) gives, verbatim, a single condition set:
FunFam id = 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002 AND taxon = Mammalia -> GO:0003875
And ADPRHL1's own cross-reference reads
DR FunFam; 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002; ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase isoform X1; 1.
The FunFam does not separate the active ARH1 from the dead ARH2 — P54922, Q8NDY3, Q8BGK2,
Q5XIB3, Q3ZBM1, Q5RCJ0, Q6AZR2 and Q5XJB9 all match FF:000002, while ARH3 sits in a different
FunFam (FF:000001). The FunFam's name asserts the activity; nothing in the rule examines a
residue. This is the campaign's "a domain's NAME is not an activity" trap in its purest form.
The rule's taxon clause makes a falsifiable prediction, and GOA confirms it. If
ARBA00088955 is restricted to Mammalia, the five mammalian ARH2 entries should get GO:0003875
via GO_REF:0000120 and the two non-mammals via GO_REF:0000002 instead. Queried:
| accession | species | GO:0003875 | GO:0000287 | GO:0051725 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q8NDY3 | human | IEA(GO_REF:0000120) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) |
| Q8BGK2 | mouse | IEA(GO_REF:0000120) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) |
| Q5XIB3 | rat | IEA(GO_REF:0000120) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) |
| Q3ZBM1 | bovine | IEA(GO_REF:0000120) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) |
| Q5RCJ0 | orangutan | IEA(GO_REF:0000120) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) |
| Q6AZR2 | X. laevis | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) |
| Q5XJB9 | zebrafish | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) | IEA(GO_REF:0000002) |
Exactly as predicted. 21 annotations across 7 species, every one IEA, not one with any
experimental, IBA or ISS support anywhere in the family.
Positive controls that the endpoint and the terms are alive: human ADPRH carries GO:0003875
by IBA + IDA + IEA + IMP, and human ADPRS carries GO:0140290 by IBA + IDA + IEA.
Negative with control: no ARH2 orthologue carries any ARH3-type term (GO:0140290,
GO:0004649, GO:0140292 all return zero for all seven). So the mis-assignment is
specifically to the arginine specificity — there is no reading on which ADPRHL1 is a
mis-filed serine/PAR hydrolase instead. My Part-2 census agrees: ADPRHL1 keeps only 6–7 of
ARH3's 17 sites while the ARH3 clade keeps 14–17. It fails against both active references.
All three ISS rows cite UniProtKB:Q6AZR2 = ARHL1_XENLA, reviewed Swiss-Prot, 354 aa,
Xenopus laevis adprhl1 — a true 1:1 ortholog at 74.6% identity, not a paralog. The transfer
is sound. WITH/FROM entity type is correct for ISS (the sequence-similar entity, not a partner).
Fully-paginated reference-projection test on the underlying paper:
PMID:27217161 → 3 annotations over 1 entity (Q6AZR2: GO:0003242, GO:0055003,
GO:0030017, all IMP). One curator reading one paper about one gene — not a bulk import, and
no phenotype spreading across a set. The benign shape, reported because the check was run.
But the same test on the 2020 CRISPR paper found a real defect.
PMID:32726316 → 10 annotations over 2 entities, and the two entities are
A0A8J0UG54 and A0A8J0UIM8 — TrEMBL accessions for adprhl1.L, the same Xenopus laevis
gene, curated by Xenbase, not the Swiss-Prot entry Q6AZR2 that UniProt's ISS pipeline
transfers from. Terms curated there and nowhere else in the family:
GO:0055005 ventricular cardiac myofibril assembly (IMP) — a child of the GO:0055003GO:0030041 actin filament polymerization (IMP)GO:0036342 post-anal tail morphogenesis (IMP) — Xenopus-specific, not transferableSo the human record inherits the 2016 paper and is blind to the 2020 one, because the two
papers were curated onto different accessions of the same frog gene. That is a fixable
curation defect and it is the reason GO:0055005 is proposed here as a NEW row rather than
found in GOA.
GO:0030041 was considered and declined for human: the Xenopus IMP is a morphological
inference from myofibril phenotypes rather than a polymerization assay, and the human
mechanism places any actin effect downstream of ROCK–myosin II. Recording the declined lead
rather than taking it.
PMID:37880701 — a CRISPR knockout of ADPRHL1 in human H9 embryonic stem cells differentiated
to cardiomyocytes — contributes zero annotations to GOA (reference-projection test:
0 annotations, 0 entities). It is the only functional experiment ever performed on the human
protein. Its results:
[PMID:37880701](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37880701 "Our results indicate that the expression of β1-integrin was significantly decreased in KO-CM, suggesting that ADPRHL1 deficiency disrupts the FAs in these cells")[PMID:37880701](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37880701 "the expression of Paxillin, a structural protein in FAs, in KO-CM was markedly reduced")[PMID:37880701](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37880701 "ADPRHL1 deficiency disrupted the formation of focal adhesions in cardiomyocytes by excessively upregulating the ROCK")–myosin II pathway[PMID:37880701](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37880701 "the arrangement of sarcomeres was less regular") in knockout cardiomyocytes[PMID:37880701](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37880701 "Our results demonstrated that ADPRHL1-deficient cardiomyocytes exhibited abnormal adhesion, calcium transients and electrophysiological activity.")Direction: knockout decreases focal adhesion formation, so wild-type ADPRHL1 promotes it —
hence GO:0051894 positive regulation of focal adhesion assembly, not the bare
GO:0048041, since ADPRHL1 is not a structural FA component and the paper's mechanism is
regulatory.
GO:0051725 isfindInteractions/Q8NDY3 returns 0 interactions. Positive control:GO:0005515 row for this gene. (UniProt's DR BioGRID; 125253; 2. records two BioGRIDPublicationType and CommentsCorrections/RefType wereupdate-to/relation additionally clean for all 10 DOIs, all HTTP 200 (so the checkPMID:36497109, PMID:16278211) plusnumberOfHits == len(results). The assertionGO:0003875 query reports 1728 hits and would havegates_passed: True, 6 citations, all numeric PMIDs (no PMID:bio_* preprint ids).
All six verified to concern ADPRHL1/ARH2 specifically — checked because on the sibling gene
ADPRH the provider returned two citations that resolve to papers about entirely different
proteins. Here they are clean, and the narrative is broadly accurate.
Its recall is the problem, as usual. Absent from the affinage record, and decisive here:
| missed | why it mattered |
|---|---|
PMID:17075046 |
the only direct measurement that ARH2 is inactive — and it is titled for ARH3 |
PMID:36497109 |
the family review that states the negative across the whole assay panel and supplies the "model substrates" caveat |
PMID:16278211 |
Oka et al. 2006, the reference both Xenopus papers cite for ARH2's lack of activity |
The first is the campaign's "a paper titled for a PARALOG can hold your gene's answer" pattern
exactly: no ADPRHL1-keyed search returns a paper called "The 39-kDa poly(ADP-ribose)
glycohydrolase ARH3 hydrolyzes O-acetyl-ADP-ribose". It was found by searching the family.
Q8NDY3's RecName is "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2" (ECO:0000305), and the same
name is on all seven ARH2 orthologues. "Transferase" is the wrong direction. The entry's own
SIMILARITY line places it in the ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase family, its own AltName is
"[Protein ADP-ribosylarginine] hydrolase-like protein 1", and no ARH-family member has ever been
proposed to add ADP-ribose. Naming a dead hydrolase after the opposite reaction is the same
"who modifies whom" confusion the campaign flags for annotations, occurring in a protein name —
and it is the name GOA prints in the GENE NAME column of every one of these rows. Suggested
correction: "Inactive ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH2", matching ADPRH_HUMAN's
"ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH1" and ADPRS_HUMAN's "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH3".
PMID:35816343 (prostate cancer): a recurrent germline p.D78V allele in African-American[PMID:35816343](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35816343 "expression of the wild-type ADPRHL1 in prostate cancer cells suppressed cell proliferation and oncogenesis")[PMID:35816343](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35816343 "the ADPRHL1 mutant activates PARP1"). This is ectopic expression inPMID:40801020 (lung adenocarcinoma):[PMID:40801020](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40801020 "ARH2 promotes M2 macrophage polarization and suppresses immune responses by regulating the FPR2/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway").PMID:34492228 (HDAC4/MEF2/SUV39H1 repression of the Adprhl1 promoter): this is aboutfull_text_available: false), so nothing is asserted about its full text. Not annotatedArh2-knockout mouse exists only as a bioRxiv preprint (10.1101/2023.02.07.527494,Thus far, an Arh2-deficient mouse model has not been reported. and the mouse[PMID:32726316](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32726316 "Mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3-4 are normal but production of the smaller ADPRHL1 species is unaffected")PMID:12070318 is UniProt's reference [1] for the isoform-1 mRNA only. It is a survey of| # | term | evidence | route | action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GO:0000287 magnesium ion binding | IEA | InterPro2GO / IPR012108 | REMOVE |
| 2 | GO:0003875 ADP-ribosylarginine-[protein] hydrolase activity | IEA | ARBA00088955 + IPR012108 | REMOVE |
| 3 | GO:0030017 sarcomere | IEA | SubCell SL-0313 | ACCEPT |
| 4 | GO:0051725 protein de-ADP-ribosylation | IEA | InterPro2GO / IPR012108 | REMOVE |
| 5 | GO:0003242 cardiac chamber ballooning | ISS | Q6AZR2 | ACCEPT |
| 6 | GO:0030017 sarcomere | ISS | Q6AZR2 | ACCEPT |
| 7 | GO:0055003 cardiac myofibril assembly | ISS | Q6AZR2 | ACCEPT |
| 8 | GO:0055005 ventricular cardiac myofibril assembly | ISS | Xenbase-curated X. laevis adprhl1 | NEW |
| 9 | GO:0051894 positive regulation of focal adhesion assembly | IMP | human hESC-CM knockout | NEW |
The two GO:0030017 rows take the same action, as the repo's "same term, same action" rule
requires; they are two routes to one underlying observation (UniProt's SUBCELLULAR LOCATION:
Cytoplasm, myofibril, sarcomere line is itself ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q6AZR2, so the SubCell
IEA and the ISS row are the same datum arriving twice).
No molecular function term is proposed. ADPRHL1's MF is genuinely unknown: no ligand, no
substrate, no verified partner, zero IntAct interactions. Proposing GO:0098772 or
GO:0008092 (affinage's own grounding) would be inventing an annotation to express a hunch.
That gap is recorded in knowledge_gaps instead.
/private/tmp/wt-ADPRHL1, branch paint/ADPRHL1, cut from origin/main at89e6622d4.git --version is 2.37.0, so git merge-tree --write-tree is unavailable; conflict probinggit merge origin/main --no-edit + git diff --diff-filter=U."56D" in m substring test also matched the other orthologues' rows. Anchored on"reviewed" in entryType and"reference_id:" in line traps.Generated by catalytic_site_census.py. Re-running reproduces this file byte-for-byte
(python catalytic_site_census.py && git diff --exit-code RESULTS.md).
origin/paint/ADPRH:genes/human/ADPRH/ADPRH-bioinformatics/results.json; P54922, Q6AZR2, Q8BGK2, Q8NDY3, Q9NX46 at positions [54, 55, 56, 302, 305]):BLOSUM62 > 0. Both are defensible and they are not the samedonor_group) and rests its| comparison | published | measured (aligned-column identity) | source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADPRH_vs_ADPRHL1_human | 46% | 46.6% | PMID:32726316 |
| ADPRHL1_human_vs_Xenopus | 75% | 74.6% | PMID:32726316 |
Identity here is identities / aligned columns (gaps excluded), which runs a little
higher than an alignment-length denominator. It is applied identically to every row.
Reference sites (all from UniProt's own feature table, nothing hand-assigned):
| position | residue | ligand |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | S | Mg(2+) |
| 55 | D | Mg(2+) |
| 56 | D | Mg(2+) |
| 85 | K | substrate |
| 101 | G | substrate |
| 102 | A | substrate |
| 103 | S | substrate |
| 124 | S | substrate |
| 130 | G | substrate |
| 163 | H | substrate |
| 164 | H | substrate |
| 165 | H | substrate |
| 263 | Y | substrate |
| 264 | S | substrate |
| 265 | G | substrate |
| 269 | S | substrate |
| 270 | S | substrate |
| 302 | D | Mg(2+) |
| 304 | D | Mg(2+) |
| 305 | S | Mg(2+) |
| clade | n | % id to ADPRH | identical of 20 | disruptive+gap of 20 | Mg(2+) donor kept of 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARH1 / ADPRH (active, arginine; POSITIVE CONTROL) | 5 | 48.4-100.0 | 13-20 | 0-3 | 6 |
| ARH2 / ADPRHL1 (SUBJECT clade) | 7 | 42.6-47.7 | 6-7 | 7-8 | 2-3 |
| ARH3 / ADPRS (active, serine+PAR+OAADPr; DISCRIMINATING CONTROL) | 4 | 26.6-28.1 | 7-8 | 7-9 | 6 |
| bacterial DraG (active, arginine; LOW-IDENTITY POSITIVE CONTROL) | 1 | 27.5 | 9 | 8 | 6 |
The identity-matched control is what makes this an argument rather than an
observation. Dictyostelium ADPRH is a genuine ARH1 at 48.4% identity -- the
same distance from human ADPRH as ADPRHL1's 42.6-47.7% -- and it retains 13 of the
20 sites with 3 disruptive. Every ADPRHL1 orthologue, at that same distance, retains
6-7 with 7-8 disruptive. Retention therefore is not tracking sequence distance here.
Two low-identity active enzymes point the same way: DraG at 27.5% keeps 9, and the
ARH3 orthologues at ~28% keep 7-8 -- i.e. ADPRHL1, at nearly twice the identity,
retains no more of ADPRH's site set than proteins half as similar do.
Per-protein detail:
| accession | entry | organism | SwissProt | % id | identical | conservative | disruptive | gap | own annotated sites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P54922 | ADPRH_HUMAN | Homo sapiens | yes | 100.0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| P54923 | ADPRH_MOUSE | Mus musculus | yes | 82.4 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Q02589 | ADPRH_RAT | Rattus norvegicus | yes | 82.9 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Q32KR8 | ADPRH_BOVIN | Bos taurus | yes | 88.5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Q54H71 | ADPRH_DICDI | Dictyostelium discoideum | yes | 48.4 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Q8NDY3 | ARHL1_HUMAN | Homo sapiens | yes | 46.6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Q8BGK2 | ARHL1_MOUSE | Mus musculus | yes | 46.1 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Q5XIB3 | ARHL1_RAT | Rattus norvegicus | yes | 45.6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Q3ZBM1 | ARHL1_BOVIN | Bos taurus | yes | 42.6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Q5RCJ0 | ARHL1_PONAB | Pongo abelii | yes | 46.3 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Q6AZR2 | ARHL1_XENLA | Xenopus laevis | yes | 47.7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Q5XJB9 | ARHL1_DANRE | Danio rerio | yes | 44.4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Q9NX46 | ADPRS_HUMAN | Homo sapiens | yes | 27.8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 17 |
| Q8CG72 | ADPRS_MOUSE | Mus musculus | yes | 27.9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 17 |
| Q28FQ6 | ADPRS_XENTR | Xenopus tropicalis | yes | 28.1 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| Q66HT8 | ADPRS_DANRE | Danio rerio | yes | 26.6 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 16 |
| P14300 | DRAG_RHORU | Rhodospirillum rubrum | yes | 27.5 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| ADPRH pos | ADPRH aa | ligand | ADPRHL1 pos | ADPRHL1 aa | BLOSUM62 call | donor group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54 | S | Mg(2+) | 56 | S | identical | retained |
| 55 | D | Mg(2+) | 57 | D | identical | retained |
| 56 | D | Mg(2+) | 58 | N | conservative | lost |
| 85 | K | substrate | 85 | R | conservative | n/a |
| 101 | G | substrate | 101 | P | disruptive | n/a |
| 102 | A | substrate | 102 | A | identical | n/a |
| 103 | S | substrate | 103 | T | conservative | retained |
| 124 | S | substrate | 125 | E | disruptive | lost |
| 130 | G | substrate | 131 | G | identical | n/a |
| 163 | H | substrate | 164 | H | identical | n/a |
| 164 | H | substrate | 165 | N | conservative | n/a |
| 165 | H | substrate | 166 | H | identical | n/a |
| 263 | Y | substrate | 265 | S | disruptive | n/a |
| 264 | S | substrate | 266 | E | disruptive | lost |
| 265 | G | substrate | 267 | G | identical | n/a |
| 269 | S | substrate | 271 | R | disruptive | lost |
| 270 | S | substrate | 272 | R | disruptive | lost |
| 302 | D | Mg(2+) | 304 | E | conservative | retained |
| 304 | D | Mg(2+) | 306 | A | disruptive | lost |
| 305 | S | Mg(2+) | 307 | A | conservative | lost |
Three things to read off this table.
Asked separately because ARH1 and ARH3 have different specificities: an
annotation that is right for one is wrong for the other. If ADPRHL1 were a
serine/PAR/OAADPr hydrolase rather than an arginine one, it would score here.
| clade | n | % id to ARH3 | identical of 17 | disruptive+gap of 17 | Mg(2+) donor kept of 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARH1 / ADPRH (active, arginine; POSITIVE CONTROL) | 5 | 20.4-27.8 | 7-9 | 5-8 | 6-7 |
| ARH2 / ADPRHL1 (SUBJECT clade) | 7 | 20.7-26.9 | 6-7 | 7-9 | 1-3 |
| ARH3 / ADPRS (active, serine+PAR+OAADPr; DISCRIMINATING CONTROL) | 4 | 54.8-100.0 | 14-17 | 0 | 7 |
| bacterial DraG (active, arginine; LOW-IDENTITY POSITIVE CONTROL) | 1 | 28.5 | 11 | 5 | 6 |
The ARH3 clade recovers 14-17 of its own 17 sites, so the reference set is not
intrinsically hard to hit. ADPRHL1 scores 6-7 -- it fails against both active
references. There is therefore no reading of these data on which ADPRHL1 is a
mis-assigned ARH3-type (serine / PAR / O-acetyl-ADP-ribose) hydrolase rather than a
mis-assigned ARH1-type (arginine) one; the correct conclusion is neither.
id: Q8NDY3
gene_symbol: ADPRHL1
product_type: PROTEIN
status: COMPLETE
taxon:
id: NCBITaxon:9606
label: Homo sapiens
description: >-
ADPRHL1 (ARH2) is a catalytically inactive member of the ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase
family, expressed almost exclusively in striated muscle and most strongly in the
heart. It retains the all-alpha ADP-ribosylhydrolase fold of its active paralogues
ADPRH (ARH1, an ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase) and ADPRS (ARH3, a serine/poly(ADP-ribose)
hydrolase), but has lost the aspartate pair that coordinates the catalytic magnesium
ions and the serines that grip the adenosine-ribose of the substrate, and recombinant
ARH2 shows no hydrolase activity in the assays that detect ARH1 and ARH3 activity.
Its function instead depends on the vestigial substrate cleft: the two adjacent serines
that bind adenosine-ribose in ADPRH are replaced in ADPRHL1 by a di-arginine motif
(Arg271-Arg272), and deleting one to four residues from that loop abolishes ventricular
myofibril assembly in Xenopus without touching any catalytic residue. Loss of ADPRHL1
blocks striated myofibril assembly and outgrowth of the cardiac ventricle in frog
embryos, and knockout in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes disorganises
sarcomeres, reduces beta-1 integrin, paxillin and phosphorylated FAK, and impairs
focal adhesion formation, calcium transients and electrical conduction through
excessive activation of the ROCK-myosin II pathway. Epitope-tagged protein localises
to stripes flanking the Z-disc, consistent with the sarcomeric and myofibrillar
localisation recorded for the protein. No ligand, substrate or binding partner has
been identified, so the molecular activity underlying these roles remains undefined.
alternative_products:
- name: '1'
id: Q8NDY3-1
- name: '2'
id: Q8NDY3-2
sequence_note: VSP_023036
existing_annotations:
- term:
id: GO:0000287
label: magnesium ion binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000002
qualifier: enables
supporting_entities:
- InterPro:IPR012108
review:
summary: >-
This is the ancestral catalytic magnesium site transferred onto a protein in which
that site has been dismantled. The row comes from interpro2go, which maps
IPR012108 "ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase" to GO:0000287, GO:0003875 and GO:0051725;
ADPRHL1 matches IPR012108 because the entry's single member signature, PIRSF016939,
does not separate the active ARH1 proteins from the inactive ARH2 ones. Of the
1282 proteins in IPR012108, 11 are reviewed Swiss-Prot entries, and 7 of those 11
are the entries Swiss-Prot itself names "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2" and
annotates with a CAUTION that they lack the metal-binding residues. So a majority
of the entry's own curated members are curated as catalytically dead, and the entry
still supplies the metal-binding term. UniProt states the loss directly on this
accession, and a residue census confirms it against a matched control: of ADPRH's
six UniProt-annotated Mg(2+) ligands, ADPRHL1 keeps the coordinating oxygen at only
three and loses it at three. Written as ADPRH position to ADPRHL1 residue, the
survivors are Ser54 to Ser56, Asp55 to Asp57 and Asp302 to Glu304, and the losses
are Asp56 to Asn58, Asp304 to Ala306 and Ser305 to Ala307. The decisive one is Asp56 to
Asn58, because aspartate-to-asparagine at a vicinal catalytic aspartate is the very
substitution used to abolish this family's activity experimentally - PMID:17075046
kills ARH3's reaction by replacing Asp77 and Asp78 with asparagine. The comparison
is controlled rather than asserted: Dictyostelium ADPRH, a genuine ARH1 at 48.4%
identity to human ADPRH - the same distance as ADPRHL1's 42.6-47.7% - retains 13 of
20 ligand sites and all six Mg(2+) donors, while every ADPRHL1 orthologue retains
6-7 sites and 2-3 donors. Retention is therefore not tracking sequence distance.
One counter-consideration is recorded rather than suppressed: PMID:27217161's model
notes that Asp100 of ADPRHL1 could provide an alternative coordination site for
metals. That is a hedged modelling suggestion, presented in the source as an
obstacle to substrate docking rather than as a functional site, and never tested -
it does not support the annotation, whose provenance is specifically the ancestral
catalytic site.
action: REMOVE
reason: >-
Removed on the term's own provenance rather than by importing the hydrolase result.
Magnesium binding as such has never been assayed on ARH2, and three of ADPRH's six
Mg(2+) donor positions do survive, so the honest statement is not that ADPRHL1 binds
no metal. All positions in this paragraph are given in ADPRH numbering, with the
ADPRHL1 residue after the arrow: retained are Ser54 to Ser56, Asp55 to Asp57 and
Asp302 to Glu304; lost are Asp56 to Asn58, Asp304 to Ala306 and Ser305 to Ala307.
That reconciles with PMID:27217161, which reports three of the four critical
aspartates lost with only Asp55 conserved - its verbatim sentence is quoted in this
row's supported_by below, and nothing in this paragraph is a quotation. It uses a
different denominator and a stricter criterion: its four are Asp55, Asp56, Asp302 and
Asp304, and it scores Asp302 to Glu304 as lost because the residue is no longer an
aspartate, whereas the donor test used here scores it retained because a glutamate
still contributes a carboxylate oxygen. Both statements describe the same alignment. What is refuted is the only
thing that put this term here: the row exists solely as interpro2go's mapping of
IPR012108, that mapping describes the catalytic Mg(2+) centre of the active ARH1
members, and that centre is demonstrably dismantled - UniProt's own CAUTION records
the metal-binding residues as absent, and the losses include the vicinal Asp56, the
position whose aspartate-to-asparagine substitution abolishes the paralogue's
activity. There is no independent support for the term anywhere in the clade: all
seven reviewed ARH2 orthologues hold it by the same single IEA route. With its sole
basis refuted and no measurement on either side, REMOVE rather than
MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED - though the latter would also have been defensible, and the
caveat in the summary about ADPRHL1 Asp100, the one position in this row's reasoning
cited in ADPRHL1 rather than ADPRH numbering, is why.
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
supporting_text: lacks the metal-binding and substrate-binding residues
- reference_id: PMID:27217161
supporting_text: >-
Three of the four critical aspartates of ADPRH have been lost in mammalian
ADPRHL1 (hADPRH D56, D302, D304 lost, only D55 is conserved), suggesting that
ADPRHL1 cation binding may be compromised.
- reference_id: PMID:36497109
supporting_text: >-
ARH2 (so far) does not exhibit any enzymatic activities [70], consistent with
differences in primary sequences from critical residues found in ARH1 (e.g.,
54-SDDT-57, 302-DSDS-305)
- reference_id: file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md
supporting_text: Retention therefore is not tracking sequence distance here.
propagation_review:
root_cause: PROPAGATION_BAD
failure_modes:
- PSEUDO_OR_SUBACTIVITY_LOSS
- WRONG_ORTHOLOG_OR_PARALOG
source_entities:
- source_id: InterPro:IPR012108
source_label: ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase (InterPro family, member signature PIRSF016939)
source_status: SUPPORTS_SOURCE_BUT_NOT_TARGET
comment: >-
The signature is sound for the ARH1 members that justify it and unsound for the
ARH2 members that outnumber them: 7 of the entry's 11 reviewed members are
"Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2" entries carrying a
lack-of-catalytic-residues CAUTION. The three other InterPro signatures ADPRHL1
matches - IPR050792, IPR005502 and IPR036705 - map to nothing in interpro2go,
which is the internal control showing this is one over-reaching entry rather
than a careless pipeline.
- term:
id: GO:0003875
label: ADP-ribosylarginine-[protein] hydrolase activity
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000120
qualifier: enables
supporting_entities:
- ARBA:ARBA00088955
- InterPro:IPR012108
review:
summary: >-
The activity this term names has been measured on ARH2 and was not found. Ono et al.
assayed recombinant ARH2 alongside ARH1 and ARH3 and report it inactive; the Moss
laboratory's family review states the negative across the whole assay panel and,
specifically for the reaction this term describes, that ARH2 does not appear to be
responsible for hydrolysis of the ADP-ribose-acceptor linkage. UniProt records the
same on this entry. Two independent automatic routes deliver the term anyway and
neither examines a residue. The first is interpro2go via IPR012108. The second is
the ARBA rule cited in this row's own WITH/FROM: ARBA00088955 has a single condition
set, FunFam id 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002 AND taxon Mammalia, and this entry's
cross-reference reads "FunFam; 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002; ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase
isoform X1". That FunFam contains both the active ARH1 proteins and the inactive ARH2
ones (ARH3 sits in FF:000001), so the rule is keyed on a structural family whose name
asserts an activity that half its members have lost. The rule's taxon clause makes a
testable prediction and GOA confirms it: the five mammalian ARH2 orthologues receive
GO:0003875 via GO_REF:0000120 while Xenopus and zebrafish receive it via GO_REF:0000002
instead. Across all seven reviewed ARH2 orthologues, GO:0003875, GO:0000287 and
GO:0051725 are held 21 times and every single one is IEA - no experimental, ISS or
IBA support exists anywhere in the clade. PAINT, by contrast, gets this right: the
GO:0003875 IBA reaches 20 gene products from node PTN009030515 and all 20 are ADPRH
orthologues, with no ARH2 among them. The specificity question was also asked in the
other direction and answered no: no ARH2 orthologue carries any ARH3-type term
(GO:0140290, GO:0004649, GO:0140292 all return zero), and the residue census scores
ADPRHL1 at 6-7 of ARH3's 17 sites against 14-17 for the ARH3 clade itself. ADPRHL1 is
not a misfiled serine hydrolase; it is not a hydrolase.
action: REMOVE
reason: >-
A catalytic activity that was directly assayed on this protein and not detected,
arriving from two fold-based pipelines neither of which inspects the catalytic
residues. The field's own caveat - that the negative was obtained with model
substrates - is why no replacement hydrolase term is proposed rather than why the
term is kept: GO cannot express "might hydrolyse something unidentified", and
inventing a general hydrolase term to hold that hedge would be an over-annotation
of the opposite sign.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:17075046
supporting_text: >-
The rate of O-acetyl-ADP-ribose hydrolysis by recombinant ARH3 was 250-fold that
observed with ARH1; ARH2 and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase were inactive.
- reference_id: PMID:36497109
supporting_text: >-
ARH2 does not appear to be responsible for hydrolysis of ADP-ribose-acceptor
linkage.
- reference_id: PMID:32726316
supporting_text: >-
The sequence changes suggest binding of ADP-ribosylated protein substrates and
cation-mediated catalysis are both abolished in Adprhl1 and biochemical assays
have confirmed the lack of any comparable enzymatic activity
- reference_id: file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
supporting_text: showing no activity against O-acetyl-ADP-ribose
propagation_review:
root_cause: PROPAGATION_BAD
failure_modes:
- PSEUDO_OR_SUBACTIVITY_LOSS
- WRONG_ORTHOLOG_OR_PARALOG
source_entities:
- source_id: ARBA:ARBA00088955
source_label: ARBA rule, FunFam 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002 AND taxon Mammalia gives GO:0003875
source_status: SOURCE_BAD
comment: >-
The rule's whole condition set is a CATH FunFam membership plus a taxon. The
FunFam is named "ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase isoform X1" and contains ADPRH and
ADPRHL1 alike, so the rule grants a catalytic molecular function on the strength
of a family name. Its Mammalia clause is visible in GOA as the split between
GO_REF:0000120 for the five mammalian ARH2 orthologues and GO_REF:0000002 for the
frog and zebrafish ones.
- source_id: InterPro:IPR012108
source_label: ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase (InterPro family, member signature PIRSF016939)
source_status: SUPPORTS_SOURCE_BUT_NOT_TARGET
comment: >-
Same entry as on the GO:0000287 and GO:0051725 rows; 7 of its 11 reviewed members
are Swiss-Prot "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2" entries.
- term:
id: GO:0030017
label: sarcomere
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000044
qualifier: located_in
supporting_entities:
- UniProtKB-SubCell:SL-0313
review:
summary: >-
The automatic mapping of UniProt SubCell SL-0313 (Sarcomere) to GO:0030017. Its input
is this entry's SUBCELLULAR LOCATION line, "Cytoplasm, myofibril, sarcomere", which
carries ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q6AZR2 - so this row and the ISS row below are the same
underlying observation arriving by two routes rather than two independent findings,
and they are given the same verdict. The observation itself is the Xenopus work: an
N-terminally epitope-tagged Adprhl1 localises to stripes flanking the Z-disc. Two
caveats are recorded rather than glossed. It is over-expressed tagged protein, and
the same study reports that its peptide antibody was not sensitive enough to detect
endogenous Adprhl1 in situ, so the endogenous distribution has not been imaged in any
species. And no human localisation experiment exists at all. Kept because the
inference is nonetheless well founded - a 74.6%-identical 1:1 ortholog, a heart- and
skeletal-muscle-restricted expression pattern, and human knockout cardiomyocytes in
which sarcomere arrangement is disturbed - and because a location term that is very
likely true should not be deleted on the strength of an assay caveat.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
A true but indirectly evidenced compartment call. Same datum as the ISS row, reached
through UniProt's SubCell vocabulary rather than through the curator's ortholog
transfer.
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
supporting_text: 'SUBCELLULAR LOCATION: Cytoplasm, myofibril, sarcomere'
- reference_id: PMID:27217161
supporting_text: Recombinant Adprhl1 can localize to stripes adjacent to the Z-disc
- term:
id: GO:0051725
label: protein de-ADP-ribosylation
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000002
qualifier: involved_in
supporting_entities:
- InterPro:IPR012108
review:
summary: >-
The biological process that the absent hydrolase activity would carry out, transferred
from the same IPR012108 signature and falling with it. The direction of this term was
checked explicitly rather than assumed, because this family is exactly where reaction
direction goes wrong: GO:0051725 is the removal of ADP-ribose, which is the correct
direction for an ARH-family protein, so this is not the error of annotating a protein
as performing the modification it removes. It fails for a different reason - ADPRHL1
has never been shown to remove ADP-ribose from anything, and was assayed for exactly
that and found inactive. Nothing else in the literature supports the process either.
The closest is PMID:35816343, in which a germline p.Asp78Val allele expressed in
prostate cells activates PARP1 and raises poly(ADP-ribose) levels while wild-type
ADPRHL1 suppresses proliferation; that is consistent with wild-type ADPRHL1 restraining
cellular ADP-ribosylation somehow, but it is ectopic expression of a single variant
in cancer cell lines with no demonstration that ADPRHL1 acts on ADP-ribose itself,
and it cannot support a de-ADP-ribosylation annotation. Note that Asp78 is not one of
the ligand positions in the residue census, so the variant does not bear on the
catalytic question either.
action: REMOVE
reason: >-
A process term that exists solely as the downstream consequence of a catalytic
activity this protein does not have. Removed on the same evidence as the GO:0003875
row, and from the same signature.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:36497109
supporting_text: >-
ARH2 does not appear to be responsible for hydrolysis of ADP-ribose-acceptor
linkage.
- reference_id: PMID:17075046
supporting_text: >-
The rate of O-acetyl-ADP-ribose hydrolysis by recombinant ARH3 was 250-fold that
observed with ARH1; ARH2 and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase were inactive.
- reference_id: file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
supporting_text: lacks the metal-binding and substrate-binding residues
propagation_review:
root_cause: PROPAGATION_BAD
failure_modes:
- PSEUDO_OR_SUBACTIVITY_LOSS
- WRONG_ORTHOLOG_OR_PARALOG
source_entities:
- source_id: InterPro:IPR012108
source_label: ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase (InterPro family, member signature PIRSF016939)
source_status: SUPPORTS_SOURCE_BUT_NOT_TARGET
comment: >-
The third of the three terms interpro2go attaches to this entry. It reaches all
seven reviewed ARH2 orthologues, in every case as the only evidence any of them
has for the process.
- term:
id: GO:0003242
label: cardiac chamber ballooning
evidence_type: ISS
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000024
qualifier: involved_in
supporting_entities:
- UniProtKB:Q6AZR2
review:
summary: >-
A sound ortholog transfer. The WITH/FROM entity is correct for an ISS row - the
sequence-similar protein, not a partner - and it resolves to ARHL1_XENLA, a reviewed
Swiss-Prot entry for Xenopus laevis adprhl1, 354 aa, a 1:1 ortholog at 74.6% aligned
identity (published as 75%). Its own annotation is IMP from PMID:27217161, where
morpholino knockdown of all Adprhl1 variants prevents outgrowth of the ventricle while
leaving cardiomyocyte number, electrical conduction and myofibrillar gene expression
intact. A fully paginated reference-projection test on that PMID returns 3 annotations
over 1 entity, so this is one curator reading one paper about one gene, not a bulk
import and not a complex-level phenotype spread across a set. The mammalian evidence
is thinner but not contradictory: mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3-4 are normal, but that
allele still produces the smaller ADPRHL1 species and so is not a null. ADPRHL1 is
heart- and skeletal-muscle-enriched in human tissue and expressed in left ventricle
myocardium, and human variants in the locus associate with ventricular conduction
phenotypes, so nothing about the human gene argues against the transfer.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Legitimate ISS from a reviewed 1:1 ortholog at 75% identity whose underlying evidence
is a specific, single-gene loss-of-function experiment in the same organ.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:27217161
supporting_text: >-
Morpholino oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of all Adprhl1 variants inhibits
striated myofibril assembly and prevents outgrowth of the ventricle.
- reference_id: PMID:36497109
supporting_text: >-
ARH2 is a cytoplasmic protein expressed primarily in heart and skeletal muscle and
may be involved in cardiac myofibril assembly and cardiac chamber outgrowth
- term:
id: GO:0030017
label: sarcomere
evidence_type: ISS
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000024
qualifier: located_in
supporting_entities:
- UniProtKB:Q6AZR2
review:
summary: >-
The curator's ortholog transfer of the Xenopus localisation, and the origin of the
SubCell IEA row above. Q6AZR2 holds GO:0030017 by IMP from PMID:27217161 - IMP rather
than IDA because the localisation was obtained from transgenically over-expressed,
N-terminally tagged protein. The same caveats therefore apply here as to the IEA row:
it is tagged over-expressed protein, the endogenous protein has never been imaged in
situ in any species, and there is no human localisation experiment. It is accepted
because the ortholog relationship is close and unambiguous, because the compartment is
consistent with everything else known about the protein - muscle-restricted
expression, a knockout that disorganises sarcomeres in human cardiomyocytes, and a
reported association of mouse ARH2 with a synemin, desmin and triadin-containing
assembly - and because the two GO:0030017 rows describe one observation and must take
one action.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Correctly executed ISS from a reviewed 1:1 ortholog. The assay caveat is recorded as a
knowledge gap rather than used to delete a compartment call that is very likely true.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:27217161
supporting_text: Recombinant Adprhl1 can localize to stripes adjacent to the Z-disc
- reference_id: PMID:27217161
supporting_text: >-
immunocytochemistry of hearts using the same antibody was not sufficiently sensitive
to detect endogenous Adprhl1 protein in situ
- term:
id: GO:0055003
label: cardiac myofibril assembly
evidence_type: ISS
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000024
qualifier: involved_in
supporting_entities:
- UniProtKB:Q6AZR2
review:
summary: >-
The best-supported annotation on this gene, and the only one with independent human
evidence behind it. The ISS is faithful to its donor: Q6AZR2 holds GO:0055003 by IMP
from PMID:27217161, where knockdown blocks striated myofibril assembly and
over-expression produces disarrayed, branching myofibrils with sarcomere division at
the actin-Z-disc boundary. It is independently corroborated in human cells that GOA has
not yet seen: CRISPR knockout of ADPRHL1 in H9 embryonic stem cell-derived
cardiomyocytes leaves cardiac differentiation and myofibrillar gene expression intact
but disturbs sarcomere arrangement. Accepted as it stands, with two additive
recommendations recorded separately rather than by modifying this row - a more specific
ventricular term that exists in GO but has been curated only onto TrEMBL copies of the
Xenopus gene, and the human IMP evidence that should sit alongside this ISS. Why the
human sarcomere result is left as a curation recommendation rather than proposed as its
own row, when the same paper's focal adhesion result is proposed: the focal adhesion
finding is the paper's central, quantified result, measured on four independent markers
and closed by a pharmacological rescue, and it has no annotation in GOA at all. The
sarcomere finding is a qualitative supplementary-figure observation with no
quantification, and the process it would support is already annotated here and refined
by the GO:0055005 row below - so a third overlapping myofibril term drawn from the
weaker of the paper's two observations would add granularity the observation does not
carry. GO:0045214 sarcomere organization was considered on that basis and declined.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
A faithful ortholog transfer of a specific loss-of-function phenotype, now also
supported by a human knockout. Left unmodified because the row correctly reflects the
term its cited donor holds; the refinement is proposed additively below.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:27217161
supporting_text: >-
Morpholino oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of all Adprhl1 variants inhibits
striated myofibril assembly and prevents outgrowth of the ventricle.
- reference_id: PMID:37880701
supporting_text: the arrangement of sarcomeres was less regular
- term:
id: GO:0055005
label: ventricular cardiac myofibril assembly
evidence_type: ISS
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000024
qualifier: involved_in
supporting_entities:
- UniProtKB:A0A8J0UG54
- UniProtKB:A0A8J0UIM8
review:
summary: >-
Proposed addition, and it exists only because a reference-projection test on the 2020
CRISPR paper turned up a split donor. All three of ADPRHL1's ISS rows transfer from
UniProtKB:Q6AZR2, the Swiss-Prot entry for Xenopus laevis adprhl1, which carries the
2016 morpholino paper's three IMP annotations. But Xenbase curated the 2020 CRISPR
paper onto two TrEMBL accessions for the same frog gene, A0A8J0UG54 and A0A8J0UIM8
(adprhl1.L), which the UniProt ISS pipeline never consulted. Those entries hold
GO:0055005 ventricular cardiac myofibril assembly, GO:0030041 actin filament
polymerization and GO:0036342 post-anal tail morphogenesis by IMP, and none of the
three has ever propagated to any mammal. GO:0055005 is an is_a descendant of the
GO:0055003 that ADPRHL1 already holds, and the evidence for it is specific: CRISPR
deletion of one to four residues from the Arg271-Arg272 loop at the centre of the
vestigial ADP-ribosylhydrolase cleft causes loss of ventricular myofibril assembly,
which is also the cleanest demonstration anywhere that ADPRHL1's function is
cleft-dependent and catalysis-independent. Human relevance is direct - ADPRHL1 is
expressed in left ventricle myocardium and its knockout disorganises sarcomeres in
human cardiomyocytes. GO:0030041 was considered and declined for human: the Xenopus
IMP is a morphological inference from myofibril phenotypes rather than a
polymerization assay, and the human mechanism places any actin effect downstream of
ROCK-myosin II. GO:0036342 is Xenopus-specific and not transferable.
action: NEW
reason: >-
A more specific term than the existing GO:0055003 row, curated for the orthologous
gene from a later paper, which failed to propagate because the two Xenopus papers were
curated onto different accessions of the same gene. Added rather than substituted for
GO:0055003, because that row correctly reflects the donor it cites.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:32726316
supporting_text: >-
Mutant alleles encode discrete loss of 1, 3 or 4 amino acids from a di-arginine
(Arg271-Arg272) containing peptide loop at the centre of the ancestral
ADP-ribosylhydrolase site.
- reference_id: PMID:32726316
supporting_text: >-
Thus despite lacking catalytic activity, it is the modified (adenosine-ribose)
substrate binding cleft of Adprhl1 that fulfils an essential role during heart
formation.
- reference_id: PMID:37880701
supporting_text: the arrangement of sarcomeres was less regular
- term:
id: GO:0051894
label: positive regulation of focal adhesion assembly
evidence_type: IMP
original_reference_id: PMID:37880701
qualifier: involved_in
review:
summary: >-
Proposed addition from the only functional experiment ever performed on the human
protein, which contributes nothing to GOA at present - a fully paginated
reference-projection test on PMID:37880701 returns zero annotations over zero
entities. CRISPR knockout of ADPRHL1 in human H9 embryonic stem cell-derived
cardiomyocytes reduces beta-1 integrin, phosphorylated FAK, paxillin and talin, and
impairs focal adhesion formation; the cells detach from the culture surface, and
calcium transients and microelectrode-array conduction are perturbed. Inhibiting ROCK
or myosin II restores focal adhesions and rescues the electrical and calcium
phenotypes, placing the defect downstream of excessive ROCK-myosin II activity. The
direction matters and is stated by the experiment: knockout decreases focal adhesion
formation, so wild-type ADPRHL1 promotes it. The regulation term rather than the bare
GO:0048041 is chosen deliberately - ADPRHL1 is not a structural component of focal
adhesions and the paper's mechanism is regulatory and indirect, running through the
ROCK-myosin II pathway. Evidence code is IMP: this is a genetic knockout scored by
phenotype, not a direct assay of ADPRHL1 acting on a focal adhesion. No term is
proposed for the calcium and conduction phenotypes, which the same experiments show
are downstream of the adhesion defect and are rescued by relieving it. One caveat
recorded rather than argued away: the paper's own model makes the focal adhesion defect
downstream of de-repressed ROCK-myosin II, so a curator might reasonably prefer a
Rho-kinase-pathway term over the focal adhesion one. This row stays on the phenotype
that was actually measured, on four markers, and rescued - the pathway step is inferred
from RNA-seq and inhibitor sensitivity, and no assay places ADPRHL1 on ROCK itself.
action: NEW
reason: >-
Direct human loss-of-function evidence for a regulatory role in focal adhesion
assembly, in the correct direction, currently absent from GOA entirely.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:37880701
supporting_text: suggesting that ADPRHL1 deficiency disrupts the FAs in these cells
- reference_id: PMID:37880701
supporting_text: >-
the expression of Paxillin, a structural protein in FAs, in KO-CM was markedly
reduced
- reference_id: PMID:37880701
supporting_text: >-
Our results demonstrated that ADPRHL1-deficient cardiomyocytes exhibited abnormal
adhesion, calcium transients and electrophysiological activity.
core_functions:
- description: >-
Cleft-dependent, catalysis-independent scaffolding activity required for striated
myofibril assembly in the growing cardiac ventricle. ADPRHL1 is a pseudoenzyme whose
ancestral ADP-ribosylhydrolase site has been converted into a di-arginine-containing
surface (Arg271-Arg272 in place of ADPRH's adenosine-ribose-binding Ser269 and Ser270);
small in-frame deletions in that loop abolish ventricular myofibril assembly while
leaving cardiomyocyte specification, myofibrillar gene expression and electrical
conduction intact. Epitope-tagged protein sits in stripes flanking the Z-disc. The
ligand or partner engaged by the modified cleft is unknown, so no molecular function
term is asserted.
directly_involved_in:
- id: GO:0055005
label: ventricular cardiac myofibril assembly
- id: GO:0003242
label: cardiac chamber ballooning
locations:
- id: GO:0030017
label: sarcomere
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:32726316
supporting_text: >-
Thus despite lacking catalytic activity, it is the modified (adenosine-ribose)
substrate binding cleft of Adprhl1 that fulfils an essential role during heart
formation.
- reference_id: PMID:27217161
supporting_text: >-
Morpholino oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of all Adprhl1 variants inhibits
striated myofibril assembly and prevents outgrowth of the ventricle.
- description: >-
Restraint of the ROCK-myosin II pathway in cardiomyocytes, permitting focal adhesion
assembly. Loss of ADPRHL1 in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes
over-activates ROCK-myosin II, reduces beta-1 integrin, phosphorylated FAK, paxillin
and talin, and impairs focal adhesion formation, cell attachment, calcium handling and
electrical conduction; pharmacological inhibition of ROCK or of myosin II restores
them. Whether ADPRHL1 acts on the pathway directly is not established. No location is
given for this function deliberately: focal adhesions and costameres are not the
sarcomere, and the only compartment ever reported for the protein is the sarcomere, so
carrying it over here would assert a place this activity has not been shown to occupy.
directly_involved_in:
- id: GO:0051894
label: positive regulation of focal adhesion assembly
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:37880701
supporting_text: >-
Our results demonstrated that ADPRHL1-deficient cardiomyocytes exhibited abnormal
adhesion, calcium transients and electrophysiological activity.
- reference_id: PMID:37880701
supporting_text: >-
the expression of Paxillin, a structural protein in FAs, in KO-CM was markedly
reduced
knowledge_gaps:
- gap_statement: >-
ADPRHL1 has no known molecular function. No ligand, no substrate, no verified protein
partner and no measured biochemical activity of any kind has been reported. The
genetics say the vestigial substrate cleft is what matters, but what that cleft binds
is undetermined - the 2020 study lists it as an open question, asking whether Adprhl1
retains binding for a partially degraded ADP-ribose derivative such as phospho-ribose,
or whether the cleft is itself a target for ADP-ribosylation.
boundary: >-
Established: the protein exists and is detected by mass spectrometry (UniProt PE 1); it
folds on the all-alpha ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase scaffold; it is inactive against
O-acetyl-ADP-ribose and against the ADP-ribose-acceptor linkages that ARH1 and ARH3
cleave; three of six magnesium-coordinating positions and both adenosine-ribose serines
are lost; and one to four residue deletions in the Arg271-Arg272 loop abolish
ventricular myofibril assembly. Not established: any binding activity, any partner, and
whether the loop acts as a binding surface, a protein-protein interface or something
else. IntAct returns zero interactions for Q8NDY3, against 17 for ADPRH and 35 for
ADPRS by the same query, so this is a real absence and not a failed lookup.
gap_kind:
- BIOLOGY
dark_aspect: MF_DARK
status: OPEN
significance: >-
Every molecular function currently in GOA for this gene is removed by this review, so
after it the gene has no MF annotation at all. That is the honest state: ADPRHL1 is an
essential cardiac protein with a completely undefined activity, and the family review
itself cautions that the in vitro negatives may reflect the use of model substrates
rather than genuine inertness.
resolution: >-
Identify what the Arg271-Arg272 cleft binds - for example by photo-crosslinking or
pull-down from cardiomyocyte extracts using wild-type versus loop-deleted ADPRHL1 as
bait - and re-test hydrolase activity against physiological ADP-ribosylated cardiac
substrates rather than the small-molecule model substrates used so far.
provenance:
- reference_id: PMID:36497109
supporting_text: >-
However, the lack of ARH2 catalytic activity may be the result of the use of model
substrates.
- reference_id: PMID:36497109
supporting_text: Function of ARH2 would be an interesting area of future study.
- gap_statement: >-
The subcellular localisation of endogenous ADPRHL1 has never been imaged, in any
species. Every localisation statement in the record - UniProt's SUBCELLULAR LOCATION
line, the SubCell IEA row and the ISS row - descends from a single Xenopus experiment
using transgenically over-expressed, N-terminally epitope-tagged protein.
boundary: >-
Established: over-expressed tagged Xenopus Adprhl1 localises to stripes flanking the
Z-disc and a diffuse stripe at the H-zone; human ADPRHL1 is heart-, skeletal-muscle- and
tongue-enriched and expressed in left ventricle myocardium; and human ADPRHL1 knockout
disorganises sarcomeres. Not established: where the endogenous protein is, at native
abundance, in any species - the antibody raised against the protein was not sensitive
enough to detect it in situ - and nothing at all about the human protein's location.
gap_kind:
- BIOLOGY
- CURATION
dark_aspect: CC_DARK
status: OPEN
significance: >-
Two of the seven GOA rows are this one observation, and it is the only positive evidence
for the cellular component. If the tagged construct mislocalises, both rows are wrong
together and there is no independent check anywhere in the record.
resolution: >-
Endogenous immunofluorescence or a knock-in fluorescent tag at the native locus in human
iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes, with the ADPRHL1 knockout line as the specificity control.
provenance:
- reference_id: PMID:27217161
supporting_text: >-
immunocytochemistry of hearts using the same antibody was not sufficiently sensitive
to detect endogenous Adprhl1 protein in situ
- gap_statement: >-
Whether a mammal actually requires ADPRHL1 for heart development is untested. The only
published mammalian allele deletes exons 3-4, and those animals are normal - but the
allele still produces the smaller ADPRHL1 protein species, so it is not a null and
cannot answer the question.
boundary: >-
Established: loss of all Adprhl1 variants in Xenopus prevents ventricle outgrowth; loss
in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes impairs adhesion, calcium handling
and conduction; and mice lacking exons 3-4 are viable and normal while retaining the
small protein species, which localises the essential activity to the C-terminal portion.
Not established: the phenotype of a true mammalian null. As of the 2022 family review no
Arh2-deficient mouse had been reported; a knockout has since been described only in a
preprint with no PubMed identifier, which this review does not rely on.
gap_kind:
- BIOLOGY
dark_aspect: BP_DARK
status: NARROWING
significance: >-
Three of the seven GOA rows are ISS transfers of Xenopus developmental phenotypes into
human. They are sound as ortholog inferences, but no mammalian loss-of-function result
yet tests them, and the one mammalian allele that exists is hypomorphic by construction.
resolution: >-
A conditional or full mouse Adprhl1 null in which loss of both the 40 kDa and the
smaller protein species is confirmed by western blot, phenotyped for chamber
morphogenesis and myofibril organisation.
provenance:
- reference_id: PMID:32726316
supporting_text: >-
Mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3-4 are normal but production of the smaller ADPRHL1
species is unaffected
- reference_id: PMID:32726316
supporting_text: What is the precise composition of the smaller 23 kDa Adprhl1 protein?
suggested_questions:
- question: >-
To InterPro and GO Central: IPR012108 "ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase" maps to GO:0000287,
GO:0003875 and GO:0051725, but a majority of its own reviewed members are pseudoenzymes.
Of the entry's 1282 proteins, 11 are Swiss-Prot; 4 are named "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH1"
and 7 are named "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2", each carrying a CAUTION that it
lacks the metal-binding and substrate-binding residues. The result is 21 IEA annotations
across seven ARH2 orthologues with no experimental, ISS or IBA support anywhere behind
them. Either the entry should be split so that PIRSF016939's ARH1 and ARH2 branches are
separate signatures, or the three GO mappings should be withdrawn from it. Note the
contrast that shows this is one entry and not a systemic problem: the other three
signatures ADPRHL1 matches - IPR050792, IPR005502 and IPR036705 - map to nothing at all,
and PAINT independently reaches the correct answer, giving GO:0003875 to 20 ADPRH
orthologues from node PTN009030515 and to no ARH2 protein.
experts:
- InterPro curators
- GO Central
- question: >-
To UniProt (ARBA): rule ARBA00088955 assigns GO:0003875 on a single condition set, FunFam
id 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002 AND taxon Mammalia. That FunFam is named "ADP-ribosylarginine
hydrolase isoform X1" and contains ADPRH and ADPRHL1 alike - P54922, Q8NDY3, Q8BGK2,
Q5XIB3, Q3ZBM1, Q5RCJ0, Q6AZR2 and Q5XJB9 all match it, while ARH3 sits in FF:000001. The
rule therefore grants a catalytic molecular function to five mammalian pseudoenzymes on
the strength of a structural family's name, in entries whose own CAUTION line says the
catalytic residues are absent. A negative taxon or a negative condition excluding the ARH2
orthologues would fix it.
experts:
- UniProt ARBA developers
- question: >-
To UniProt (nomenclature): Q8NDY3's RecName is "Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2", and
the same name is used for all seven ARH2 orthologues. Transferase is the wrong reaction
direction. The entry's own SIMILARITY line assigns it to the ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase
family, its AltName is "[Protein ADP-ribosylarginine] hydrolase-like protein 1", and no
ARH-family protein has been proposed to add ADP-ribose. Suggest "Inactive
ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH2", consistent with ADPRH_HUMAN "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH1" and
ADPRS_HUMAN "ADP-ribosylhydrolase ARH3". This name is what GOA prints in the GENE NAME
column of every ADPRHL1 annotation.
experts:
- UniProt nomenclature curators
- question: >-
To GOA and Xenbase: the ISS pipeline and Xenbase are curating the same Xenopus laevis gene
onto different accessions, and one whole paper is invisible as a result. All three of
human ADPRHL1's ISS rows transfer from UniProtKB:Q6AZR2 (ARHL1_XENLA, Swiss-Prot), which
carries the 2016 morpholino paper. Xenbase curated the 2020 CRISPR paper (PMID:32726316)
onto A0A8J0UG54 and A0A8J0UIM8, TrEMBL entries for adprhl1.L, giving GO:0055005,
GO:0030041 and GO:0036342 by IMP - none of which has reached any mammalian orthologue.
Merging or cross-linking those accessions would let the later evidence propagate.
experts:
- GOA curators
- Xenbase curators
- question: >-
To GOA: PMID:37880701 is the only functional experiment ever performed on human ADPRHL1 -
a CRISPR knockout in H9 embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes - and it contributes
zero annotations. Beyond the focal adhesion term proposed here, it supports human IMP
evidence for GO:0055003, which the gene currently holds only by ISS from frog.
experts:
- GOA curators
- question: >-
To the ADPRH reviewers (paint/ADPRH, PR 2332): the two reviews were run independently and
agree on every residue and mapped position across the five shared positions and five
shared accessions. They differ on the class label at seven of those calls, because that
review scores substitutions with hand-defined conservative groups while this one used
BLOSUM62. The difference is entirely at aspartate-to-asparagine and serine-to-alanine,
which BLOSUM62 scores positively. This review resolves the clash in favour of the ADPRH
review by adding a third, mechanism-anchored test - whether the coordinating carboxylate
or hydroxyl oxygen survives - which calls both substitutions lost. The anchor is that
aspartate-to-asparagine at a vicinal catalytic aspartate is exactly the substitution
PMID:17075046 uses to abolish ARH3 activity. Recorded here rather than silently absorbed.
experts:
- ai-gene-review PAINT campaign reviewers
suggested_experiments:
- description: >-
Identify what the Arg271-Arg272 cleft binds. Express wild-type ADPRHL1 and the
loop-deletion alleles characterised in PMID:32726316 as tagged baits in human iPSC-derived
cardiomyocytes and compare interactomes; a partner lost specifically by the loop deletions
is a candidate for the molecular function that this review could not annotate.
- description: >-
Re-test hydrolase activity against physiological substrates. The published negatives used
O-acetyl-ADP-ribose and other model substrates; the family review flags that as a possible
explanation for the null result. Assay recombinant ADPRHL1 against ADP-ribosylated proteins
purified from cardiac muscle, and against phospho-ribosylated derivatives, which the 2020
paper raises as a candidate remaining ligand.
- description: >-
Image endogenous ADPRHL1. Knock a fluorescent tag into the native ADPRHL1 locus in human
iPSCs, differentiate to cardiomyocytes, and image against the knockout line as the
specificity control. This would give the first localisation of the protein at native
abundance in any species and the first in human, and would test whether the Z-disc-flanking
distribution seen with over-expressed tagged Xenopus protein is genuine.
- description: >-
Make a true mammalian null. The existing mouse allele deletes exons 3-4 and still produces
the smaller ADPRHL1 species. A full knockout, verified by loss of both protein species on
western blot, would test whether the Xenopus chamber-outgrowth requirement holds in a
mammal and would validate or refute the three ISS rows in this review.
- description: >-
Determine which ADPRHL1 protein species matters. The 40 kDa and 23 kDa forms differ in
abundance across development and the mouse exon 3-4 allele separates them genetically.
Define the 23 kDa species by mass spectrometry and test the two forms separately for rescue
of the knockout phenotype in human cardiomyocytes.
references:
- id: GO_REF:0000002
title: Gene Ontology annotation through association of InterPro records with GO
terms
findings:
- statement: >-
The route behind the GO:0000287 and GO:0051725 rows, and behind GO:0003875 in the
non-mammalian ARH2 orthologues. Its input is IPR012108, whose interpro2go entry maps
to exactly those three terms and whose reviewed membership is 4 ARH1 proteins and 7
Swiss-Prot-declared inactive ARH2 proteins.
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
The pipeline is correctly applied - the interpro2go file does map IPR012108 to these
three terms, confirmed by downloading it and looking up all four signatures ADPRHL1
matches. The defect is in the input signature, not the mapping machinery, and the
other three signatures mapping to nothing is the control that shows so.
- id: GO_REF:0000024
title: Manual transfer of experimentally-verified manual GO annotation data to orthologs
by curator judgment of sequence similarity
findings:
- statement: >-
The route behind the three ISS rows, all citing UniProtKB:Q6AZR2 (ARHL1_XENLA), a
reviewed 1:1 ortholog at 74.6% aligned identity. Correct WITH/FROM entity type for
ISS. The limitation is not in the transfer but in the donor set: the same Xenopus gene
also has Xenbase-curated annotations on TrEMBL accessions that this route never sees.
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Q6AZR2 resolved via the UniProt REST API - reviewed Swiss-Prot, Xenopus laevis
adprhl1, 354 aa, holding GO:0003242, GO:0055003 and GO:0030017 by IMP from
PMID:27217161. Not a paralog and not a partial clone.
- id: GO_REF:0000044
title: Gene Ontology annotation based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Subcellular Location
vocabulary mapping, accompanied by conservative changes to GO terms applied by
UniProt
findings:
- statement: >-
The route behind the second GO:0030017 row. Its input is SubCell SL-0313, which comes
from this entry's SUBCELLULAR LOCATION line, itself ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q6AZR2 - so
this row and the ISS GO:0030017 row are one observation reaching GOA twice.
reference_review:
relevance: MEDIUM
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Correctly applied. Worth noting only that it is not independent of the ISS row, which
is why the two rows are given the same action.
- id: GO_REF:0000120
title: Combined Automated Annotation using Multiple IEA Methods
findings:
- statement: >-
The route behind the GO:0003875 row in the five mammalian ARH2 orthologues. Its
WITH/FROM names ARBA:ARBA00088955, whose full condition set - fetched from the UniProt
ARBA endpoint - is FunFam id 1.10.4080.10:FF:000002 AND taxon Mammalia. The Mammalia
clause is directly visible in GOA as the GO_REF:0000120 versus GO_REF:0000002 split
between the mammalian and non-mammalian orthologues.
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Correctly applied by the pipeline; the rule itself is the problem. Verified by fetching
the rule and checking that its FunFam condition matches ADPRHL1's own DR FunFam line,
and by confirming that the predicted mammalian and non-mammalian reference split is
exactly what GOA shows across the seven reviewed ARH2 orthologues.
- id: PMID:27217161
title: The cardiac-restricted protein ADP-ribosylhydrolase-like 1 is essential for
heart chamber outgrowth and acts on muscle actin filament assembly.
findings:
- statement: >-
The experimental root of all three ISS rows. Morpholino knockdown of all Adprhl1
variants in Xenopus laevis blocks striated myofibril assembly and prevents ventricle
outgrowth, without affecting cardiomyocyte number, calcium signal propagation or
myofibrillar gene expression.
supporting_text: >-
Morpholino oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown of all Adprhl1 variants inhibits
striated myofibril assembly and prevents outgrowth of the ventricle.
- statement: >-
Structural modelling on the ADPRH crystal structure 3HFW identifies the specific
losses in the ADPRHL1 active site, listing them in ADPRH numbering.
supporting_text: >-
Three of the four critical aspartates of ADPRH have been lost in mammalian ADPRHL1
(hADPRH D56, D302, D304 lost, only D55 is conserved), suggesting that ADPRHL1 cation
binding may be compromised.
- statement: >-
The same modelling records a hedged possibility that a different aspartate could
coordinate metal, which is why the GO:0000287 verdict is argued from the annotation's
derivation rather than from a flat claim that ADPRHL1 binds no metal.
supporting_text: >-
Of particular note is the aspartate, D100, that could provide an alternative
coordination site for metals but whose presence interferes with the phosphate groups
of forcibly docked ADP.
- statement: >-
The source of the sarcomere localisation, obtained with over-expressed N-terminally
tagged protein.
supporting_text: Recombinant Adprhl1 can localize to stripes adjacent to the Z-disc
- statement: >-
The caveat on that localisation, from the same study - the endogenous protein could
not be detected in situ, so no endogenous localisation exists in any species.
supporting_text: >-
immunocytochemistry of hearts using the same antibody was not sufficiently sensitive
to detect endogenous Adprhl1 protein in situ
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Verified against the cached full text. Fully paginated reference-projection test
returns 3 annotations over 1 entity (Q6AZR2), so this is one curator reading one paper
about one gene rather than a bulk import. No retraction, erratum or Crossref update-to.
- id: PMID:32726316
title: Defective heart chamber growth and myofibrillogenesis after knockout of adprhl1
gene function by targeted disruption of the ancestral catalytic active site.
findings:
- statement: >-
The genetic demonstration that ADPRHL1's function is cleft-dependent and
catalysis-independent: CRISPR-induced in-frame deletions of one to four residues from
the di-arginine loop at the centre of the vestigial ADP-ribosylhydrolase site abolish
ventricular myofibril assembly.
supporting_text: >-
Mutant alleles encode discrete loss of 1, 3 or 4 amino acids from a di-arginine
(Arg271-Arg272) containing peptide loop at the centre of the ancestral
ADP-ribosylhydrolase site.
- statement: The authors' own summary of what that means for a pseudoenzyme.
supporting_text: >-
Thus despite lacking catalytic activity, it is the modified (adenosine-ribose)
substrate binding cleft of Adprhl1 that fulfils an essential role during heart
formation.
- statement: >-
The structural claim that this review's alignment independently reproduces from
UniProt features alone - ADPRH's substrate-binding Ser269 and Ser270 map onto
ADPRHL1's Arg271 and Arg272.
supporting_text: >-
The critical Adprhl1 deletion covers the exact structural position where in the active
enzyme Adprh, two adjacent serines that support adenosine-ribose substrate binding are
located.
- statement: >-
The secondary attribution for the biochemical negative, which this review anchors
independently to PMID:17075046 and PMID:36497109.
supporting_text: >-
The sequence changes suggest binding of ADP-ribosylated protein substrates and
cation-mediated catalysis are both abolished in Adprhl1 and biochemical assays have
confirmed the lack of any comparable enzymatic activity
- statement: >-
The only published mammalian allele, and the reason it does not test the requirement -
it is not a null.
supporting_text: >-
Mice lacking Adprhl1 exons 3-4 are normal but production of the smaller ADPRHL1
species is unaffected
- statement: >-
The published identity figures used as external checks that this review's alignment
method is sane; measured 46.6% and 74.6% against 46% and 75%.
supporting_text: the 357 amino acid ADPRH and 354 aa ADPRHL1 share 46% sequence identity
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Verified against the cached full text. Its reference-projection test is what exposed
the split-donor problem: 10 annotations over 2 entities, and both entities are TrEMBL
accessions for Xenopus adprhl1.L curated by Xenbase, not the Swiss-Prot entry the ISS
rows transfer from. Crossref reports a has-preprint relation and no update-to; no
retraction or erratum.
- id: PMID:37880701
title: The pseudoenzyme ADPRHL1 affects cardiac function by regulating the ROCK pathway.
findings:
- statement: >-
The only functional experiment ever performed on the human protein. CRISPR knockout in
H9 embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes; the cells still differentiate and still
express cardiac genes, but adhere abnormally and show perturbed calcium handling and
electrophysiology.
supporting_text: >-
Our results demonstrated that ADPRHL1-deficient cardiomyocytes exhibited abnormal
adhesion, calcium transients and electrophysiological activity.
- statement: >-
The mechanism and its direction - knockout reduces focal adhesion formation via
excessive ROCK-myosin II activity, so wild-type ADPRHL1 promotes focal adhesion
assembly.
supporting_text: >-
ADPRHL1 deficiency disrupted the formation of focal adhesions in cardiomyocytes by
excessively upregulating the ROCK
- statement: The focal adhesion component measurements underlying that conclusion.
supporting_text: suggesting that ADPRHL1 deficiency disrupts the FAs in these cells
- statement: A second, independent focal adhesion marker measured in the same cells.
supporting_text: >-
the expression of Paxillin, a structural protein in FAs, in KO-CM was markedly reduced
- statement: >-
Independent human support for the cardiac myofibril assembly annotation that GOA
currently holds only by ISS from frog.
supporting_text: the arrangement of sarcomeres was less regular
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Verified against the cached full text. A fully paginated reference-projection test
returns zero annotations over zero entities - this paper is entirely absent from GOA,
which is the largest coverage gap on this gene. No retraction, erratum or Crossref
update-to.
- id: PMID:17075046
title: The 39-kDa poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase ARH3 hydrolyzes O-acetyl-ADP-ribose,
a product of the Sir2 family of acetyl-histone deacetylases.
findings:
- statement: >-
The direct in vitro measurement that recombinant ARH2 has no activity, made alongside
ARH1 and ARH3 in the same assay. This is the single most decision-relevant fact for
this gene's molecular function rows, and it is in a paper titled for a paralogue.
supporting_text: >-
The rate of O-acetyl-ADP-ribose hydrolysis by recombinant ARH3 was 250-fold that
observed with ARH1; ARH2 and poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase were inactive.
- statement: >-
The mutagenesis that anchors this review's claim that aspartate-to-asparagine at a
vicinal catalytic aspartate is inactivating rather than conservative - the same
substitution ADPRHL1 carries at the position corresponding to ADPRH Asp56.
supporting_text: >-
hydrolysis of O-acetyl-ADP-ribose was abolished by replacement of the vicinal
aspartates at positions 77 and 78 of ARH3 with asparagine
full_text_unavailable: true
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Cached abstract-only, so nothing is asserted here beyond what the abstract states, and
both quoted claims are in the abstract. Found by searching the family rather than the
gene symbol - no ADPRHL1-keyed query returns a paper titled for ARH3 - and it is absent
from the affinage record. UniProt cites this PMID as the experimental evidence for the
mouse ARH2 entry's inactivity. No retraction, erratum or Crossref update-to.
- id: PMID:36497109
title: ARH Family of ADP-Ribose-Acceptor Hydrolases.
findings:
- statement: >-
The family review's statement of ARH2's enzymatic status, with the specific sequence
motifs whose loss explains it. The ARH1 motifs quoted, 54-SDDT-57 and 302-DSDS-305,
correspond exactly to the UniProt-annotated magnesium ligands used as the reference set
in this review's residue census.
supporting_text: >-
ARH2 (so far) does not exhibit any enzymatic activities [70], consistent with
differences in primary sequences from critical residues found in ARH1 (e.g.,
54-SDDT-57, 302-DSDS-305)
- statement: >-
The statement bearing specifically on the reaction that GO:0003875 and GO:0051725
name.
supporting_text: >-
ARH2 does not appear to be responsible for hydrolysis of ADP-ribose-acceptor linkage.
- statement: >-
The authors' own caveat, recorded because it is the reason no replacement hydrolase
term is proposed and the reason this review does not claim ADPRHL1 is biochemically
inert.
supporting_text: >-
However, the lack of ARH2 catalytic activity may be the result of the use of model
substrates.
- statement: >-
The expression pattern and the biological role attributed to ARH2 by the family's own
reviewers.
supporting_text: >-
ARH2 is a cytoplasmic protein expressed primarily in heart and skeletal muscle and may
be involved in cardiac myofibril assembly and cardiac chamber outgrowth
publication_type: REVIEW
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
A review, used for the family-level statement of enzymatic status and for its explicit
caveat, not as a primary source for any measurement; the underlying measurement is
cited separately as PMID:17075046. From the laboratory that characterised all three ARH
proteins. Absent from the affinage record. No retraction, erratum or Crossref update-to.
- id: PMID:35816343
title: A Recurrent ADPRHL1 Germline Mutation Activates PARP1 and Confers Prostate
Cancer Risk in African American Families.
findings:
- statement: >-
A recurrent germline p.Asp78Val allele segregating in African-American prostate cancer
families; the mutant activates PARP1 and increases the DNA damage response, an effect
reversed by olaparib.
supporting_text: the ADPRHL1 mutant activates PARP1
- statement: >-
Ectopic wild-type ADPRHL1 restrains proliferation in prostate cancer cells. Suggestive
of a link to cellular ADP-ribosylation but not evidence that ADPRHL1 itself acts on
ADP-ribose, so no annotation is proposed from it.
supporting_text: >-
expression of the wild-type ADPRHL1 in prostate cancer cells suppressed cell
proliferation and oncogenesis
reference_review:
relevance: MEDIUM
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Correctly cited and internally sound, but deliberately not used for any annotation: it
is ectopic expression in cancer cell lines, one variant in one ancestry group, and it
demonstrates no biochemical activity of ADPRHL1. Asp78 is not among the ligand
positions in the residue census, so it does not bear on the catalytic question either.
Crossref shows is-supplemented-by and has-preprint relations and no update-to.
- id: PMID:40801020
title: Inhibition of ARH2 by pH/ROS-responsive nanosystem for improved lung adenocarcinoma
immunochemotherapy.
findings:
- statement: >-
siRNA knockdown of ARH2 delivered by nanoparticle in lung adenocarcinoma models; ARH2
is reported to promote M2 macrophage polarisation via FPR2, PI3K and AKT. A different
tissue and the opposite direction from the prostate work, and rated low confidence by
the provider that surfaced it.
supporting_text: >-
ARH2 promotes M2 macrophage polarization and suppresses immune responses by regulating
the FPR2/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway
reference_review:
relevance: LOW
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Correctly cited and genuinely about ARH2, but not used for any annotation. It is a
drug-delivery study whose gene-function claims rest on siRNA in tumour models, and its
direction contradicts the tumour-suppressor reading of PMID:35816343 in a different
tissue. Recorded so the next reviewer knows it was read and set aside.
- id: PMID:34492228
title: Histone deacetylase 4 deletion broadly affects cardiac epigenetic repression
and regulates transcriptional susceptibility via H3K9 methylation.
findings:
- statement: >-
Identifies the Adprhl1 promoter as a target of HDAC4, MEF2 and SUV39H1 repression in
cardiomyocytes. This concerns regulation of the gene, not a function of the protein,
and yields no annotation.
full_text_unavailable: true
reference_review:
relevance: LOW
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Cached abstract-only, so nothing is asserted about its full text and no quote is taken
from it. Included for completeness because affinage cites it; a gene whose promoter is
a repression target is not thereby annotated with a function.
- id: PMID:16278211
title: Identification and characterization of a mammalian 39-kDa poly(ADP-ribose)
glycohydrolase.
findings:
- statement: >-
The reference both Xenopus papers cite for ARH2's lack of comparable enzymatic
activity. Cached abstract-only, and the abstract does not itself mention ARH2, so no
claim in this review rests on it - the biochemical negative is anchored to
PMID:17075046 and PMID:36497109 instead.
full_text_unavailable: true
reference_review:
relevance: MEDIUM
correctness: UNVERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Listed because it is the citation the primary literature uses for ARH2's inactivity,
but marked unverified rather than verified: only the abstract is cached, the abstract
is about ARH3, and this review declines to assert what a paper's unavailable full text
contains. Nothing here depends on it.
- id: PMID:12070318
title: The family of toxin-related ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferases in humans and the
mouse.
findings:
- statement: >-
UniProt's reference 1 for the ADPRHL1 isoform-1 mRNA. It surveys the
ecto-ADP-ribosyltransferase (ARTC) family, which is a different family from the ARH
hydrolases, and is the most likely origin of the word transferase in Q8NDY3's
recommended name.
full_text_unavailable: true
reference_review:
relevance: LOW
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Correctly cited by UniProt for a sequence submission only. Noted here solely in support
of the nomenclature correction request; no functional claim about ARH2 is drawn from
it, and its full text is not available.
- id: file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-deep-research-affinage.md
title: Affinage mechanistic annotation for ADPRHL1 (human)
findings:
- statement: >-
The provider record used as a starting lead, recorded for provider evaluation rather
than cited as evidence. Its narrative is broadly accurate and all six of its citations
were individually verified to concern ADPRHL1 or ARH2 - which is not a given, since on
the sibling gene ADPRH the same provider returned citations resolving to papers about
entirely different proteins.
- statement: >-
Its recall, however, missed every source that decides this review's molecular function
verdicts: PMID:17075046 (the only direct measurement that ARH2 is inactive, titled for
ARH3), PMID:36497109 (the family review that states the negative across the assay
panel and supplies the model-substrate caveat) and PMID:16278211 (the reference the
primary literature cites for ARH2's inactivity). All three were found by searching the
family rather than the gene symbol.
reference_review:
relevance: MEDIUM
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
gates_passed True, six citations, all numeric PMIDs with no bioRxiv identifiers in a
PMID-shaped field, and each verified against PubMed to be about ADPRHL1/ARH2. No
retraction or erratum among them. Used only as a lead: no sentence from it is quoted
as supporting_text anywhere in this review, per the campaign rule that provider prose
must not carry a mechanistic claim. The repo validator's warning that no annotation
references this file is therefore expected and is left standing rather than silenced
by inventing a citation.
- id: file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-uniprot.txt
title: UniProtKB entry Q8NDY3 (ARHL1_HUMAN), Inactive ADP-ribosyltransferase ARH2
findings:
- statement: >-
The curated record states the catalytic loss twice - once in FUNCTION and once in
CAUTION - and its feature table contains zero BINDING and zero ACT_SITE features.
ADPRH (P54922) has 14 such features spanning 20 distinct residue positions and
ADPRS (Q9NX46) 14 spanning 17; ADPRHL1 has none at all.
supporting_text: lacks the metal-binding and substrate-binding residues
- statement: >-
The FUNCTION line's statement of the measured negative, attributed by similarity to
the rat and mouse entries.
supporting_text: showing no activity against O-acetyl-ADP-ribose
- statement: >-
The input to the SubCell IEA row, itself ECO:0000250|UniProtKB:Q6AZR2 and therefore
not independent of the ISS row.
supporting_text: 'SUBCELLULAR LOCATION: Cytoplasm, myofibril, sarcomere'
- statement: >-
Corroborates the QuickGO finding that this gene has no IBA annotation, which is a
deliberate PAINT judgement rather than a coverage gap.
supporting_text: 0 GO annotations based on evolutionary models.
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
All four quotes hand-verified with grep -F against the file in this worktree, each on a
single physical line so that no UniProt CC continuation is crossed. The repo's
reference validator does not check file: quotes, so this was done by hand.
- id: file:human/ADPRHL1/ADPRHL1-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md
title: 'ADPRHL1 (ARH2, Q8NDY3): catalytic-site census against its active paralogues'
findings:
- statement: >-
The identity-matched control that turns the residue observation into an argument.
Dictyostelium ADPRH, a genuine ARH1 at 48.4% identity - the same distance as ADPRHL1's
42.6-47.7% - keeps 13 of 20 ligand sites and all six magnesium donors, while every
ADPRHL1 orthologue keeps 6-7 sites and 2-3 donors.
supporting_text: Retention therefore is not tracking sequence distance here.
- statement: >-
The low-identity active controls pointing the same way from the other side, and the
reason the result cannot be explained by sequence divergence alone.
supporting_text: 'Two low-identity active enzymes point the same way: DraG at 27.5% keeps 9, and the'
- statement: >-
The independent reproduction of the sibling ADPRH review's panel, split into the
objective channel (residue and mapped position) and the metric channel (class label).
supporting_text: identical on all 25 calls
reference_review:
relevance: HIGH
correctness: VERIFIED
review_notes: >-
Generated by the committed script catalytic_site_census.py, which fetches every
sequence and feature live from UniProt, caches them, self-tests, break-tests its own
reproduction gate, and regenerates this file byte-identically. Its two external checks
reproduce published identity figures (46.6% versus 46%, 74.6% versus 75%). All quotes
taken from it were hand-verified with grep -F because the repo validator skips file
references.