AIP (AH receptor-interacting protein, also known as XAP2/ARA9) is a ~37 kDa, 330-amino acid FKBP-type immunophilin homolog that functions as a co-chaperone/scaffold in the HSP90-AHR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) cytosolic complex and as a cytosolic factor mediating mitochondrial preprotein import via interaction with the import receptor TOMM20. It contains an N-terminal FKBP-type PPIase-like domain that is catalytically inactive (lacking PPIase enzymatic activity and FK506/rapamycin binding) and C-terminal TPR repeats (three TPR motifs plus a terminal alpha-7 helix) that mediate interactions with HSP90 and TOMM20. Cryo-EM structural analysis of the human agonist-bound AHR cytosolic complex (DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w) reveals AIP/XAP2 acting as a structural brace associated with the HSP90 dimer and the AHR client, with the HSP90 C-terminal MEEVD motif docked into the TPR domain of AIP. AIP exhibits chaperone-like (holdase) activity, suppressing thermal aggregation of substrate proteins. Beyond the AHR complex, AIP also interacts with phosphodiesterases PDE4A5 and PDE2A3, linking it to localized cAMP regulation and modulation of AHR nuclear translocation. Proteomic studies show AIP co-localizes with HSPA9 in the mitochondrial chaperone network, consistent with broader chaperone-network functions beyond the AHR complex (DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.24183). Germline loss-of-function AIP variants predispose to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) with incomplete penetrance (~12-30%), behaving as a tumor suppressor with a two-hit model (loss of heterozygosity in tumors). AIP mutations account for ~29% of childhood-onset GH-secreting pituitary tumors presenting as gigantism and ~9% of macroprolactinomas presenting before age 20 (DOI:10.1038/s41574-023-00948-8).
| GO Term | Evidence | Action | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GO:0045893
positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000108 |
KEEP AS NON CORE |
Summary: This IEA annotation was inferred by logical inference from AIP having transcription coactivator activity (GO:0003713). AIP/XAP2 was shown by Meyer et al. (PMID:9447995) to enhance AhR-driven transcription from a dioxin-responsive element by about twofold. This is an indirect consequence of AIP stabilizing the AHR-HSP90 complex in the cytosol, not a direct transcriptional activation function. The annotation is logically consistent with the coactivator annotation but represents a secondary downstream effect rather than a core function of AIP.
Reason: AIP does enhance AhR-driven transcription, but this is an indirect effect of its co-chaperone function in stabilizing the AHR-HSP90 complex, not a direct transcriptional regulatory activity. The annotation is technically correct as an inference from the coactivator annotation, but represents a downstream biological consequence rather than core function.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:9447995
XAP2 enhanced the ability of endogenous murine and human AhR complexes to activate a dioxin-responsive element-luciferase reporter twofold, following transient expression of XAP2 in Hepa 1c1c7 and HeLa cells.
|
|
GO:0003755
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000002 |
REMOVE |
Summary: This IEA annotation was automatically assigned based on InterPro domain IPR001179 (FKBP-type PPIase domain). While AIP does contain an FKBP-type PPIase-like domain, multiple studies have shown this domain is catalytically inactive. Laenger et al. (PMID:19375531) explicitly demonstrated that the PPIase-like region of XAP2 is enzymatically inactive. The domain has diverged from catalytically active FKBP family members and lacks key residues for PPIase catalysis.
Reason: AIP contains an FKBP-type PPIase-like domain that is catalytically inactive (PMID:19375531). The InterPro domain match is structurally correct but the functional annotation of PPIase activity is incorrect for this protein. This is a well-documented case of a domain homolog that has lost enzymatic activity.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19375531
The PPIase-like region turned out to be enzymatically inactive. Thus, PPIase activity is not essential for the action of XAP2 on GR, similarly to FKBP51 and FKBP52.
|
|
GO:0005737
cytoplasm
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000044 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IEA annotation is based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Subcellular Location mapping. AIP is well-established as a cytoplasmic protein. Kuzhandaivelu et al. (PMID:8972861) showed by immunofluorescence that XAP2 is a cytoplasmic protein. UniProt CC line states Subcellular location as Cytoplasm. This is consistent with AIP functioning as a cytosolic co-chaperone in the AHR-HSP90 complex and as a cytosolic factor in mitochondrial preprotein import.
Reason: AIP is well-established as a cytoplasmic protein across multiple studies. This is consistent with its function as a cytosolic co-chaperone.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:8972861
Antiserum raised against XAP2 recognizes a cytoplasmic protein with an apparent molecular mass of 36 kDa.
|
|
GO:0051082
unfolded protein binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000117 |
MODIFY |
Summary: This IEA annotation of GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) was assigned by ARBA machine learning models. GO:0051082 is being obsoleted (go-ontology issue 30962). While AIP does have experimentally demonstrated chaperone-like activity that prevents thermal aggregation of substrate proteins (PMID:14557246), the appropriate replacement term is GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone), which better captures the holdase/chaperone function rather than implying simple binding to unfolded proteins. The IEA annotation here is redundant with the IDA annotation from the same gene also annotated to GO:0051082 based on PMID:14557246.
Reason: GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. The experimental data from PMID:14557246 demonstrates genuine chaperone-like (holdase) activity for AIP, including suppression of thermal aggregation of rhodanese and citrate synthase in vitro. The replacement term GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) accurately captures this function. Additionally, this IEA annotation is redundant with the experimentally supported IDA annotation from PMID:14557246 on the same gene.
Proposed replacements:
protein folding chaperone
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:14557246
An aggregation suppression assay indicated that AIP has a chaperone-like activity to prevent substrate proteins from aggregation.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:17329248 Phosphodiesterase 2A forms a complex with the co-chaperone X... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP (XAP2) and PDE2A (UniProtKB:O00408). De Oliveira et al. (PMID:17329248) identified XAP2 as a major PDE2A-interacting protein via yeast two-hybrid screening and mapped the binding site to the GAF-B domain of PDE2A. This is a functionally significant interaction as PDE2A binding to XAP2 inhibits TCDD- and cAMP-induced nuclear translocation of AhR in hepatocytes. The interaction is relevant to AIP function in cAMP signaling regulation. However, protein binding is uninformative; the more specific annotation GO:0036004 (GAF domain binding) already captures this interaction.
Reason: The interaction between AIP and PDE2A is well-documented by yeast two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation (PMID:17329248). While protein binding is a generic term, the IPI evidence with specific interactor is standard practice and the more specific GAF domain binding annotation is also present. Duplicates with different evidence lines are acceptable.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:17329248
In a yeast two-hybrid screening we identified XAP2, a crucial component of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) complex, as a major PDE2A-interacting protein. We mapped the XAP2 binding site to the GAF-B domain of PDE2A.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:19375531 XAP2 inhibits glucocorticoid receptor activity in mammalian ... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP (XAP2) and HSP90AB1 (UniProtKB:P08238). Laenger et al. (PMID:19375531) showed that XAP2 interacts with Hsp90 through its TPR motif and that this interaction is required for XAP2 to inhibit glucocorticoid receptor activity. The AIP-HSP90 interaction is one of the most well-characterized interactions for this protein, mediated by the TPR domain binding to the MEEVD motif at the C-terminus of HSP90. This is a core interaction of AIP.
Reason: The AIP-HSP90 interaction is a core functional interaction, extensively validated. This IPI evidence from PMID:19375531 provides additional confirmation that the TPR domain mediates the HSP90 binding. Multiple independent studies confirm this interaction.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19375531
The effect of XAP2 on GR requires its interaction with Hsp90 through the TPR motif.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:20029029 Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking b... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and EGFR (UniProtKB:P00533) from a study on HDAC6 regulation of EGFR trafficking (PMID:20029029). AIP was not the focus of this study. The interaction between AIP and EGFR is likely detected in a high-throughput context and may represent an indirect interaction mediated through the HSP90 chaperone machinery, since EGFR is a known HSP90 client. Without more specific evidence for a direct, functional AIP-EGFR interaction, this should be considered with caution.
Reason: The interaction was detected by physical interaction evidence (IPI) and is plausible given that AIP is part of the HSP90 co-chaperone system and EGFR is an HSP90 client. While likely indirect, the IPI evidence is valid as recorded.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:21170051 Mixed Hsp90-cochaperone complexes are important for the prog... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and HSP90AB1 (UniProtKB:P08238) from a study on mixed Hsp90-cochaperone complexes (PMID:21170051). This study demonstrates that AIP forms part of mixed HSP90 co-chaperone complexes important for the chaperone reaction cycle. This is consistent with AIP being a bona fide HSP90 co-chaperone via its TPR domain.
Reason: This confirms the well-established AIP-HSP90 co-chaperone interaction in the context of functional chaperone cycle complexes.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:21903422 Mapping a dynamic innate immunity protein interaction networ... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and IRF7 (UniProtKB:Q92985) from a study mapping innate immunity protein interaction networks (PMID:21903422). AIP was detected interacting with IRF7 in a high-throughput innate immunity interaction mapping study. AIP is not known to have a role in interferon signaling. This interaction may be indirect (mediated through HSP90 which is known to interact with various signaling proteins) or may represent a non-physiological interaction from the high-throughput screen.
Reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence in a systematic study. While the biological relevance to AIP function is unclear, the physical evidence is valid as recorded. It may reflect AIP participating in HSP90-mediated regulation of signaling proteins.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:22113938 A bead-based approach for large-scale identification of in v... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and CSNK2A1/CK2alpha (UniProtKB:P68400) from a large-scale kinase substrate identification study (PMID:22113938). The interaction is from a high-throughput bead-based screen. CK2 is a ubiquitous kinase and the interaction may or may not be physiologically significant for AIP function. AIP has a phosphoserine at position 43 (ECO:0007744|PubMed:23186163), which could be a CK2 substrate site.
Reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence and is plausible given that AIP is known to be phosphorylated. The evidence stands as a valid physical interaction record.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:25036637 A quantitative chaperone interaction network reveals the arc... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and HSP90AB1 (UniProtKB:P08238) from a quantitative chaperone interaction network study (PMID:25036637). This study systematically mapped the chaperone-cochaperone interaction network and places AIP firmly within the HSP90 co-chaperone system. This is one of the core interactions of AIP.
Reason: This further validates the well-established AIP-HSP90 co-chaperone interaction in a comprehensive chaperone interactome study.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:28514442 Architecture of the human interactome defines protein commun... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and PRAMEF10 (UniProtKB:O60809) from a large-scale interactome mapping study (PMID:28514442). PRAMEF10 is a PRAME family member. This is from a high-throughput study and the biological significance of AIP interacting with PRAMEF10 is unclear. PRAMEF10 is poorly characterized.
Reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence in a systematic interactome study. The biological relevance is uncertain, but the physical interaction evidence is valid as recorded.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:28634279 In-frame seven amino-acid duplication in AIP arose over the ... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and HSP90AB1 (UniProtKB:P08238) from Salvatori et al. (PMID:28634279), which studied the c.805_825dup AIP mutation. The study demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation that wild-type AIP interacts with HSP90, and that the p.F269_H275dup mutation in TPR3 disrupts this interaction. This provides important functional validation that the AIP-HSP90 interaction is mediated through the TPR domain and is disrupted by disease-causing mutations.
Reason: This co-immunoprecipitation study confirms the AIP-HSP90 interaction and demonstrates its functional importance, as disease-causing AIP mutations disrupt the HSP90 binding. This is directly relevant to the tumor suppressor function of AIP.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:28634279
The results of a co-immunoprecipitation experiment with mutant AIP and HSP90 were consistent with lack of interaction between the two proteins (Fig
PMID:28634279
The mutation results in the duplication of seven amino-acids in third TPR domain of AIP, leading to the disruption of protein-protein interactions and markedly reduced protein stability.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:31980649 Extensive rewiring of the EGFR network in colorectal cancer ... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and EGFR (UniProtKB:P00533) from a study on EGFR network rewiring in KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer cells (PMID:31980649). AIP was not the focus of this study. The interaction with EGFR is likely indirect, mediated through the HSP90 chaperone machinery.
Reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence. While likely reflecting indirect interaction through the HSP90 system, the physical evidence is valid as recorded.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:33961781 Dual proteome-scale networks reveal cell-specific remodeling... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records interactions between AIP and PRAMEF10 (UniProtKB:O60809) and/or SYCN (UniProtKB:Q0VAF6) from a dual proteome-scale network study (PMID:33961781). These are from a high-throughput interactome study. The biological significance of these interactions for AIP function is unclear.
Reason: The interactions were detected by IPI evidence in a systematic proteome-scale interactome study. While biological relevance to AIP function is uncertain, the physical evidence is valid as recorded.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:35271311 OpenCell: Endogenous tagging for the cartography of human ce... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and CSNK2A1/CK2alpha (UniProtKB:P68400) from the OpenCell study (PMID:35271311), a large-scale endogenous tagging and imaging study. This is a second independent confirmation of the AIP-CK2alpha interaction after PMID:22113938.
Reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence in an independent large-scale study, providing a second line of evidence for the AIP-CK2alpha interaction.
|
|
GO:0003712
transcription coregulator activity
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000107 |
KEEP AS NON CORE |
Summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl Compara. AIP/XAP2 was shown to enhance AhR-mediated transcription (PMID:9447995), which is the basis for the mouse ortholog annotation. The term GO:0003712 (transcription coregulator activity) is broader than the TAS annotation GO:0003713 (transcription coactivator activity) also present for this gene. AIP enhances AhR transcription indirectly by stabilizing the cytosolic AHR-HSP90 complex, not by acting as a direct transcriptional coregulator in the nucleus. This is a secondary consequence of its co-chaperone function.
Reason: AIP does enhance AhR-dependent transcription, but this is an indirect effect of its co-chaperone role in stabilizing the AHR complex. The broader IEA term is acceptable as a non-core annotation consistent with the TAS coactivator annotation.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:9447995
XAP2 enhanced the ability of endogenous murine and human AhR complexes to activate a dioxin-responsive element-luciferase reporter twofold, following transient expression of XAP2 in Hepa 1c1c7 and HeLa cells.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000107 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl Compara. AIP is established as a cytosolic protein by multiple lines of evidence including IDA annotations based on immunofluorescence (GO_REF:0000052) and direct experimental evidence (PMID:17329248). This IEA is consistent with and redundant with the experimental evidence.
Reason: Cytosolic localization of AIP is well-established by multiple experimental methods. This IEA is consistent with experimental evidence.
|
|
GO:0016020
membrane
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000107 |
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED |
Summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl Compara. AIP is primarily a cytosolic protein. The membrane annotation may reflect AIP association with the outer mitochondrial membrane via its interaction with TOMM20 (PMID:14557246), or its reported colocalization with the plasma membrane via PDE2A interaction (PMID:17329248). AIP itself is not a membrane protein and does not have a transmembrane domain. The term GO:0016020 (membrane) is very broad and not very informative.
Reason: AIP is not an integral membrane protein. While it may associate with membranes through protein-protein interactions (TOMM20 at the mitochondrial outer membrane, or PDE2A at the plasma membrane), the broad term "membrane" is uninformative and potentially misleading for a primarily cytosolic co-chaperone protein. More specific localization terms (cytosol, plasma membrane colocalization) are already captured by other annotations.
|
|
GO:0017162
aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000107 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl Compara. AIP/XAP2 was originally identified as a component of the AhR core complex (PMID:9447995). Meyer et al. showed that XAP2 coprecipitates with FLAG-tagged AhR and is present in the unliganded AhR 9S complex. AIP binding to AhR is well-established as a core function of this protein and is the basis for its name.
Reason: AIP binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor is one of its best-characterized functions. This was demonstrated by coprecipitation and is the basis for the protein name. The IEA transfer from mouse ortholog is appropriate.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:9447995
Here we report the purification of an approximately 38-kDa protein (p38) from COS-1 cell cytosol that is a member of this complex by coprecipitation with a FLAG-tagged AhR.
|
|
GO:0034751
aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000107 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl Compara. AIP/XAP2 is an established subunit of the unliganded AhR core complex (PMID:9447995). Meyer et al. demonstrated that XAP2 is part of the heterotetrameric 9S AhR complex consisting of AhR, two HSP90 molecules, and XAP2. Reactome entries (R-HSA-8936849, R-HSA-8937169) also model AIP as part of the AHR:2xHSP90:AIP:PTGES3 complex. This is a core localization for AIP.
Reason: AIP is a bona fide subunit of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. This is one of the defining characteristics of this protein and is supported by multiple independent studies and Reactome pathway models.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:9447995
Prior to ligand activation, the unactivated aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) exists in a heterotetrameric 9S core complex consisting of the AhR ligand-binding subunit, a dimer of hsp90, and an unknown subunit.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
IDA
GO_REF:0000052 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IDA annotation is based on curation of immunofluorescence data (HPA). Cytosolic localization of AIP is well-established and consistent with its function as a cytosolic co-chaperone. Multiple studies confirm AIP is primarily cytosolic (PMID:8972861, PMID:14557246, PMID:17329248).
Reason: Immunofluorescence-based evidence for cytosolic localization of AIP is consistent with extensive other evidence for cytosolic localization.
|
|
GO:0003755
peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity
|
IDA
PMID:14557246 AIP is a mitochondrial import mediator that binds to both im... |
REMOVE |
Summary: This IDA annotation citing PMID:14557246 (Yano et al. 2003) claims PPIase activity for AIP. However, Yano et al. 2003 does NOT demonstrate PPIase enzymatic activity for AIP. The paper focuses on AIP as a mitochondrial import mediator with chaperone-like holdase activity. AIP belongs to the FKBP PPIase family structurally but its PPIase domain is catalytically inactive. Laenger et al. (PMID:19375531) explicitly showed the PPIase-like region is enzymatically inactive. This IDA annotation appears to be an error in the original curation, conflating structural homology to PPIases with actual catalytic activity.
Reason: AIP does not have PPIase catalytic activity. PMID:14557246 does not demonstrate PPIase activity; it describes chaperone-like holdase activity and mitochondrial import function. PMID:19375531 explicitly demonstrated that the PPIase-like region of AIP is enzymatically inactive. The IDA annotation based on PMID:14557246 for PPIase activity is an error.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19375531
The PPIase-like region turned out to be enzymatically inactive.
PMID:14557246
AIP belongs to a family of peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases (PPIases) that are ubiquitous in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Galat and Metcalfe, 1995).
|
|
GO:0051604
protein maturation
|
IDA
PMID:14557246 AIP is a mitochondrial import mediator that binds to both im... |
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED |
Summary: This IDA annotation to GO:0051604 (protein maturation) cites Yano et al. (PMID:14557246). The paper demonstrates that AIP functions as a cytosolic factor mediating mitochondrial preprotein import. AIP maintains preproteins in an import-competent conformation and facilitates their import into mitochondria via interaction with TOMM20. Overexpression of AIP enhanced mature OTC production (processing of pOTC to mature OTC by mitochondrial import and cleavage), and depletion reduced it. While the end result is maturation of mitochondrial preproteins (signal peptide cleavage), AIP does not directly participate in the proteolytic processing. A more accurate annotation would be GO:0070585 (protein localization to mitochondrion), which is already annotated.
Reason: AIP facilitates mitochondrial import but does not directly participate in protein maturation (proteolytic processing). The observed effect on pOTC maturation is an indirect consequence of enhanced mitochondrial import. The more appropriate annotation GO:0070585 (protein localization to mitochondrion) is already present for this gene and this reference. GO:0051604 is too broad and somewhat misleading for what AIP actually does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:14557246
AIP can enhance the mitochondrial import of pOTC.
PMID:14557246
All these results suggest strongly that AIP stabilizes pOTC in the cytosol and facilitates its import into mitochondria.
|
|
GO:0005654
nucleoplasm
|
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-8937169 |
KEEP AS NON CORE |
Summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8937169 (AHR:TCDD:2xHSP90AB1:AIP:PTGES3 translocates from cytosol to nucleoplasm). In the Reactome model, the entire AHR complex including AIP translocates to the nucleus upon ligand binding. AIP is primarily cytosolic and its presence in the nucleoplasm is transient as part of the ligand-bound AHR complex before the complex dissociates. This is a non-core localization.
Reason: AIP transiently enters the nucleoplasm as part of the ligand-activated AHR-HSP90 complex, but this is not its primary localization. The Reactome pathway model is accurate for the transient translocation event.
|
|
GO:0005654
nucleoplasm
|
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-8937191 |
KEEP AS NON CORE |
Summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8937191 (AHR:TCDD:2xHSP90AB1:AIP:PTGES3 dissociates). This represents the dissociation of the AHR complex in the nucleoplasm after translocation. AIP is released from the complex in the nucleus. This is consistent with the transient nuclear localization of AIP during AHR signaling.
Reason: This represents transient nuclear localization of AIP during AHR signaling, consistent with the Reactome pathway model. Not the primary localization.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-8936849 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8936849 (AHR:2xHSP90:AIP:PTGES3 binds TCDD). AIP is part of the cytosolic AHR complex that binds the TCDD ligand. Cytosolic localization of AIP is well-established.
Reason: Cytosolic localization of AIP as part of the AHR complex is well-supported by multiple lines of evidence.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-8937169 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8937169 (AHR:TCDD:2xHSP90AB1:AIP:PTGES3 translocates from cytosol to nucleoplasm). AIP starts in the cytosol as part of the AHR complex. Cytosol is the primary localization.
Reason: Cytosolic localization is the primary and well-established localization for AIP.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-8950201 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8950201 (Expression of Aryl Hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein). AIP is expressed and localized in the cytosol. This is consistent with all other evidence.
Reason: Cytosolic localization of AIP is the primary and well-established localization, supported by all available evidence.
|
|
GO:0036004
GAF domain binding
|
IDA
PMID:17329248 Phosphodiesterase 2A forms a complex with the co-chaperone X... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IDA annotation to GO:0036004 (GAF domain binding) is based on de Oliveira et al. (PMID:17329248), which showed that XAP2 binds to the GAF-B domain of PDE2A. The binding was identified by yeast two-hybrid and confirmed by immunoprecipitation. The GAF-B domain was specifically mapped as the XAP2 binding site. This is a well-characterized, specific molecular interaction.
Reason: The interaction between AIP/XAP2 and the GAF-B domain of PDE2A was specifically mapped and validated by multiple methods (yeast two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation). This is a specific and informative MF annotation.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:17329248
We mapped the XAP2 binding site to the GAF-B domain of PDE2A.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
IDA
PMID:17329248 Phosphodiesterase 2A forms a complex with the co-chaperone X... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IDA annotation for cytosol localization is based on de Oliveira et al. (PMID:17329248), which performed immunofluorescence showing XAP2 in the cytosol. The study also showed that PDE2A colocalizes with XAP2 in the cytosol and at the plasma membrane.
Reason: Cytosolic localization demonstrated by immunofluorescence is consistent with all other evidence for AIP being primarily a cytosolic protein.
|
|
GO:0005886
plasma membrane
|
IDA
PMID:17329248 Phosphodiesterase 2A forms a complex with the co-chaperone X... |
KEEP AS NON CORE |
Summary: This IDA annotation with qualifier colocalizes_with records that AIP/XAP2 colocalizes with the plasma membrane, based on de Oliveira et al. (PMID:17329248). The study showed XAP2 and PDE2A colocalize at the plasma membrane in addition to the cytosol. This likely reflects AIP being recruited to the plasma membrane through its interaction with PDE2A, which has membrane association. This is a secondary, non-core localization dependent on the PDE2A interaction.
Reason: Plasma membrane colocalization is a secondary localization dependent on the interaction with PDE2A. AIP is primarily a cytosolic protein and does not have intrinsic membrane targeting. The colocalizes_with qualifier appropriately indicates indirect association.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:14557246 AIP is a mitochondrial import mediator that binds to both im... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IPI annotation records AIP interactions with Hsc70 (UniProtKB:P11142), TOMM20 (UniProtKB:Q15388), and/or TOMM20L (UniProtKB:Q9NS69) from Yano et al. (PMID:14557246). The paper demonstrated by two-hybrid and in vitro binding that AIP interacts with TOMM20 via its TPR domain and with Hsc70. AIP forms a ternary complex with preproteins and TOMM20. These are core, functionally important interactions for AIP's role in mitochondrial preprotein import.
Reason: The interactions of AIP with TOMM20 and Hsc70 demonstrated in PMID:14557246 are core to its mitochondrial import mediator function. The binding was validated by multiple methods including two-hybrid, in vitro binding, and co-precipitation.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:14557246
Using two-hybrid screening, we identified arylhydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP), an FK506-binding protein homologue, interacting with Tom20.
PMID:14557246
Hsc70 was also found to bind to AIP.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
TAS
PMID:14557246 AIP is a mitochondrial import mediator that binds to both im... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This TAS annotation for cytosol localization cites Yano et al. (PMID:14557246). The paper demonstrates AIP functions as a cytosolic factor mediating preprotein import into mitochondria. AIP was detected in cytosolic fractions of HeLa, HepG2, COS-7, and Hepa1c1c7 cells by immunoblot.
Reason: Cytosolic localization of AIP is well-documented by immunoblot analysis in multiple cell lines in this paper and is consistent with all other evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:14557246
When immunoblot analysis was done using anti-human AIP, AIP polypeptides were readily detected in the lysates of HeLa (human), HepG2 (human), COS-7 (monkey), and Hepa1c1c7 (mouse) cells.
|
|
GO:0051082
unfolded protein binding
|
IDA
PMID:14557246 AIP is a mitochondrial import mediator that binds to both im... |
MODIFY |
Summary: This IDA annotation to GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) is based on Yano et al. 2003 (PMID:14557246), which demonstrated that AIP has genuine chaperone-like (holdase) activity. The key evidence is from thermal aggregation suppression assays (Figure 6 of the paper). AIP suppressed thermal aggregation of rhodanese at 55C and citrate synthase at 43C in a dose-dependent manner. At equimolar concentrations, GST-AIP suppressed rhodanese aggregation at early time points, and completely suppressed citrate synthase aggregation. This activity was additive or synergistic with Hsc70. The paper also showed AIP binds specifically to mitochondrial preproteins via their presequences, maintaining them in an import-competent (unfolded) conformation. The chaperone activity is mechanistically linked to AIP's role in mitochondrial import, keeping preproteins unfolded for translocation through the TOM complex. GO:0051082 is being obsoleted (go-ontology issue 30962), and the activity described is better captured by GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone), which describes binding to proteins to assist the folding process, encompassing holdase activity that prevents aggregation of unfolded substrates.
Reason: GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. The experimental evidence from PMID:14557246 clearly demonstrates a chaperone-like holdase activity for AIP, not merely passive binding to unfolded proteins. AIP actively prevents thermal aggregation of model substrates (rhodanese and citrate synthase) and maintains mitochondrial preproteins in import-competent conformations. The replacement term GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) is the appropriate successor, capturing the active nature of this chaperone function. The evidence is robust -- the aggregation suppression assays used purified GST-AIP protein with proper GST-only controls, showed dose-dependent effects, and the physiological relevance was confirmed by in vivo import assays showing AIP maintains preprotein import competency.
Proposed replacements:
protein folding chaperone
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:14557246
AIP exhibited a chaperone-like activity to suppress the aggregation of substrate proteins.
PMID:14557246
When GST-AIP was added instead of GST, the aggregation of rhodanese was partially suppressed, and that of citrate synthase was completely suppressed. These results reconfirmed that AIP has chaperone-like activity.
PMID:14557246
AIP was found to function as a chaperone to suppress thermal aggregation of rhodanese and citrate synthase (Fig. 6). AIP may function as a chaperone to maintain mitochondria-targeted preproteins unfolded and to suppress their aggregation.
|
|
GO:0070585
protein localization to mitochondrion
|
IDA
PMID:14557246 AIP is a mitochondrial import mediator that binds to both im... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This IDA annotation to GO:0070585 (protein localization to mitochondrion) is based on Yano et al. (PMID:14557246), which provides extensive evidence that AIP mediates mitochondrial preprotein import. Key evidence includes in vitro import assays showing AIP maintains pOTC import competency, cell-based assays showing AIP overexpression enhances pOTC import by ~3-fold, siRNA depletion of AIP impairing pOTC import to ~40% of control, AIP binding specifically to mitochondrial preproteins via their presequences, AIP forming ternary complexes with preproteins and TOMM20, and AIP having chaperone-like activity to prevent preprotein aggregation. This is a well-supported core function of AIP.
Reason: The evidence for AIP mediating protein localization to mitochondria is extensive and robust, including in vitro import assays, overexpression and depletion experiments in cells, specific binding to preproteins and TOMM20, and ternary complex formation. This represents a core function of AIP alongside its role in the AHR-HSP90 complex.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:14557246
These results suggest that AIP functions as a cytosolic factor that mediates preprotein import into mitochondria.
PMID:14557246
Thus, depletion of AIP reduced the mitochondrial import of pOTC, which means that endogenous AIP facilitates pOTC import into mitochondria.
PMID:14557246
Formation of a ternary complex of Tom20, AIP, and preprotein was observed.
|
|
GO:0003713
transcription coactivator activity
|
TAS
PMID:9447995 Hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 is a subunit of the... |
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED |
Summary: This TAS annotation to GO:0003713 (transcription coactivator activity) is based on Meyer et al. (PMID:9447995), which showed that XAP2 enhanced AhR-driven transcription of a dioxin-responsive element reporter by about twofold when transiently expressed in Hepa 1c1c7 and HeLa cells. However, AIP does not function as a classical transcription coactivator. AIP enhances AhR signaling indirectly by stabilizing the cytosolic AHR-HSP90 complex, improving AhR receptivity for ligand and/or nuclear targeting. AIP does not directly contact DNA or recruit transcriptional machinery. The term "transcription coactivator activity" implies direct participation in transcriptional activation, which overstates AIP's role. A more accurate description would be that AIP modulates AhR signaling through its co-chaperone function.
Reason: AIP enhances AhR-driven transcription indirectly through its co-chaperone function in the AHR-HSP90 complex, not by acting as a direct transcription coactivator. The twofold enhancement of reporter activity (PMID:9447995) reflects improved AhR complex stability and signaling, not direct transcriptional coactivation. Calling AIP a transcription coactivator overstates its molecular role and is misleading about its mechanism of action.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:9447995
XAP2 enhanced the ability of endogenous murine and human AhR complexes to activate a dioxin-responsive element-luciferase reporter twofold, following transient expression of XAP2 in Hepa 1c1c7 and HeLa cells.
PMID:9447995
It was not required for the assembly of an AhR-hsp90 complex in vitro. Additionally, XAP2 did not directly associate with hsp90 upon in vitro translation, but was present in a 9S form when cotranslated in vitro with murine AhR.
|
|
GO:0005737
cytoplasm
|
TAS
PMID:8972861 XAP2, a novel hepatitis B virus X-associated protein that in... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: This TAS annotation for cytoplasm is based on Kuzhandaivelu et al. (PMID:8972861), the original paper identifying XAP2 as a hepatitis B virus X-associated protein. The paper showed by immunostaining with anti-XAP2 antiserum that XAP2 is a cytoplasmic protein with apparent molecular mass of 36 kDa.
Reason: Cytoplasmic localization of AIP/XAP2 was directly demonstrated by immunostaining in the original characterization paper and is consistent with all subsequent evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:8972861
Antiserum raised against XAP2 recognizes a cytoplasmic protein with an apparent molecular mass of 36 kDa.
|
|
GO:0051879
Hsp90 protein binding
|
IDA
PMID:19375531 XAP2 inhibits glucocorticoid receptor activity in mammalian ... |
NEW |
Summary: AIP/XAP2 binds HSP90 through its TPR motif, as demonstrated in multiple studies. Laenger et al. (PMID:19375531) showed that XAP2 inhibits GR through its interaction with Hsp90 via the TPR motif. The crystal structure of the AIP TPR domain bound to the HSP90 MEEVD peptide (PDB:4APO, PMID:23300914) confirms this interaction at atomic resolution. Salvatori et al. (PMID:28634279) showed disease-causing TPR mutations disrupt HSP90 binding. This is a core molecular function of AIP not currently captured by a specific GO annotation in the existing set.
Reason: AIP binding to HSP90 via its TPR domain is the most well-characterized core molecular function of AIP. While multiple IPI protein binding annotations record AIP-HSP90 interactions, the specific term GO:0051879 (Hsp90 protein binding) would more accurately capture this core function. This is supported by extensive experimental evidence including co-immunoprecipitation, structural data, and functional studies.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:19375531
The effect of XAP2 on GR requires its interaction with Hsp90 through the TPR motif.
PMID:28634279
The mutation results in the duplication of seven amino-acids in third TPR domain of AIP, leading to the disruption of protein-protein interactions and markedly reduced protein stability.
|
provider: falcon
model: Edison Scientific Literature
cached: false
start_time: '2026-02-20T14:57:10.805323'
end_time: '2026-02-20T15:04:28.297631'
duration_seconds: 437.49
template_file: templates/gene_research_go_focused.md
template_variables:
organism: human
gene_id: AIP
gene_symbol: AIP
uniprot_accession: O00170
protein_description: 'RecName: Full=AH receptor-interacting protein; Short=AIP;
AltName: Full=Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein; AltName: Full=HBV
X-associated protein 2; Short=XAP-2; AltName: Full=Immunophilin homolog ARA9;'
gene_info: Name=AIP; Synonyms=XAP2;
organism_full: Homo sapiens (Human).
protein_family: Not specified in UniProt
protein_domains: AIP/AIPL1/TTC9. (IPR039663); PPIase_AIP. (IPR056277); PPIase_dom_sf.
(IPR046357); PPIase_FKBP_dom. (IPR001179); TPR-like_helical_dom_sf. (IPR011990)
provider_config:
timeout: 600
max_retries: 3
parameters:
allowed_domains: []
temperature: 0.1
citation_count: 28
BEFORE YOU BEGIN RESEARCH: You MUST verify you are researching the CORRECT gene/protein. Gene symbols can be ambiguous, especially for less well-characterized genes from non-model organisms.
DO NOT PROCEED WITH RESEARCH ON A DIFFERENT GENE. Instead:
- State clearly: "The gene symbol 'AIP' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein"
- Explain what you found (e.g., "Found extensive literature on a different gene with the same symbol in a different organism")
- Describe the protein based ONLY on the UniProt information provided above
- Suggest that the protein function can be inferred from domain/family information
Please provide a comprehensive research report on the gene AIP (gene ID: AIP, UniProt: O00170) in human.
The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
Question: You are an expert researcher providing comprehensive, well-cited information.
Provide detailed information focusing on:
1. Key concepts and definitions with current understanding
2. Recent developments and latest research (prioritize 2023-2024 sources)
3. Current applications and real-world implementations
4. Expert opinions and analysis from authoritative sources
5. Relevant statistics and data from recent studies
Format as a comprehensive research report with proper citations. Include URLs and publication dates where available.
Always prioritize recent, authoritative sources and provide specific citations for all major claims.
BEFORE YOU BEGIN RESEARCH: You MUST verify you are researching the CORRECT gene/protein. Gene symbols can be ambiguous, especially for less well-characterized genes from non-model organisms.
DO NOT PROCEED WITH RESEARCH ON A DIFFERENT GENE. Instead:
- State clearly: "The gene symbol 'AIP' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein"
- Explain what you found (e.g., "Found extensive literature on a different gene with the same symbol in a different organism")
- Describe the protein based ONLY on the UniProt information provided above
- Suggest that the protein function can be inferred from domain/family information
Please provide a comprehensive research report on the gene AIP (gene ID: AIP, UniProt: O00170) in human.
The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
Title: Functional Annotation Research Report — Human AIP (AH receptor-interacting protein; UniProt O00170)
Publication window emphasized: 2023–2024 clinical genetics/guidelines; 2022 structural biology; foundational mechanistic work prior.
AIP (aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein) in Homo sapiens is a ~37 kDa, 330-aa cytoplasmic co-chaperone also known as XAP2 and ARA9 (UniProt O00170). It is best understood as a scaffold/co-chaperone that stabilizes specific client proteins—most prominently the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)—within an HSP90-based cytosolic chaperone complex, influencing AHR stability, cytosolic retention, and ligand-triggered nuclear signaling. In humans, germline loss-of-function AIP variants predispose to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs; especially somatotroph and lactotroph lineages) with incomplete penetrance, and AIP behaves as a tumor suppressor consistent with a two-hit model (loss of heterozygosity in tumors). (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37, cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3)
2.1 Verified identity
The literature retrieved explicitly uses AIP synonymy consistent with UniProt O00170: AIP is also called XAP2 and ARA9, and is described as a 330-aa (~37 kDa) protein. (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37, cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3)
2.2 Common aliases used in the literature
AIP is repeatedly referred to as XAP2/ARA9 and described as “immunophilin-like” due to an FKBP-like N-terminus, although it does not behave as a classical FKBP immunophilin (see §3.3). (cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3, trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37)
3.1 Domain architecture and structural definitions
AIP is composed of:
• An N-terminal FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase)-like domain (often called “PPIase-like” or “FKBP-type”), and
• A C-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) region containing three TPR motifs plus a terminal α-helix (often discussed as an α-7 helix) important for protein–protein interactions and client binding. (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37, hernandezramirez2018multichaperonefunctionmodulation pages 1-2, cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3)
3.2 Core biochemical function: co-chaperone/scaffold in the AHR–HSP90 complex
AIP participates in a cytosolic multiprotein complex with AHR and HSP90 (and p23), regulating AHR stability/cytosolic retention and nuclear translocation following ligand activation. (cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3, cain2010roleofthe pages 12-13)
Interaction mapping supports a model in which AIP binds the HSP90 C-terminus through its TPR-containing C-terminal half (residues ~154–330), and the terminal residues/helix are critical for AHR association. (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 41-44, cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3)
3.3 Is AIP an enzyme? (PPIase activity and substrate specificity)
Although AIP contains an FKBP-like “PPIase-like” domain, multiple sources indicate it does not function as an immunophilin and lacks detectable PPIase enzymatic activity; it also lacks binding to FKBP ligands (FK506/rapamycin) that typify catalytically active FKBPs. Therefore, AIP is best annotated as a non-enzymatic immunophilin-like co-chaperone/scaffold, not a PPIase enzyme with a defined substrate. (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37, hernandezramirez2018multichaperonefunctionmodulation pages 1-2, cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3)
3.4 Subcellular localization (where AIP carries out function)
AIP is described as a cytoplasmic protein and as part of the cytoplasmic AHR/HSP90/p23 complex; this complex translocates to the nucleus upon AHR ligand binding, enabling AHR to dimerize with ARNT and act as a transcription factor. (cain2010roleofthe pages 4-5)
In pituitary-focused proteomic work, AIP additionally co-localized with HSPA9 in the mitochondrial network, consistent with broader chaperone-network associations beyond the AHR complex. (hernandezramirez2018multichaperonefunctionmodulation pages 1-2)
3.5 Pathway context: AHR signaling and cAMP modulation (PDE interactions)
AIP’s best-established pathway context is AHR signaling via its co-chaperone role in the AHR cytosolic complex. (cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3, cain2010roleofthe pages 12-13)
AIP also binds phosphodiesterases (notably PDE4A5 and PDE2A3 are reported interactors), linking it to localized cAMP regulation and potentially to modulation of AHR nuclear translocation and pituitary tumor biology. (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37, cain2010roleofthe pages 12-13)
4.1 Cryo-EM architecture of the HSP90–AIP(XAP2)–AHR cytosolic complex
A high-resolution cryo-EM structure of the human agonist-bound AHR cytosolic complex with Hsp90 and XAP2/AIP provides a concrete architectural model: AIP/XAP2 acts as a brace associated with the Hsp90 dimer and the AHR client. This structure also shows the Hsp90 C-terminal MEEVD motif docked into the TPR domain region of AIP/XAP2, consistent with canonical TPR-mediated recruitment of HSP90 co-chaperones. (gruszczyk2022cryoemstructureof media 0a99161a, gruszczyk2022cryoemstructureof media a4609a97)
Interpretation for functional annotation: these structural data strongly support annotating AIP as an HSP90 co-chaperone/scaffold that physically stabilizes the AHR client complex in the cytosol and helps govern the activation-ready state. (gruszczyk2022cryoemstructureof media 0a99161a, gruszczyk2022cryoemstructureof media a4609a97)
5.1 Tumor suppressor role and “two-hit” behavior
AIP is widely described as a tumor suppressor in familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA), supported by loss of heterozygosity at the AIP locus in tumors consistent with a two-hit model. (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37, cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3)
5.2 Penetrance (current estimates and variability)
Penetrance among AIP variant carriers is incomplete and variable. Reported penetrance ranges in the literature include ~12–30% overall for pituitary adenomas among AIP variant carriers, with some variants/families reported as low as ~6% penetrance. (trofimiukmuldner2023aipgenegermline pages 9-10)
A 2024 review similarly summarizes limited penetrance estimates in the ~20–33% range and notes that onset is typically young (<30 years). (balinisteanu2024unlockingthegenetic pages 5-6)
5.3 Recent (2023–2024) statistics: prevalence of germline pathogenic variants in clinical cohorts
5.3.1 Prolactinomas (large 2023 cohort study)
In a multicenter cohort of 506 patients with isolated prolactinomas undergoing germline testing (MEN1, AIP, CDKN1B; plus SF3B1 in genetically negative cases), 14/506 (2.8%) carried a pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variant in MEN1 or AIP. All mutation-positive cases were macroprolactinomas diagnosed before age 30. (boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 1-5)
In sporadic isolated macroprolactinomas diagnosed ≤30 years, the germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant prevalence was 4.3% (11/258) overall, split into 2.3% MEN1 (6/258) and 1.9% AIP (5/258). (boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 8-11)
Age-stratified risk was strong: sporadic macroprolactinoma diagnosed before age 18 had ~9-fold higher odds of carrying a germline mutation than diagnosis at 18–30 (OR 9; 95% CI 2.3–43; p=0.0016). (boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 8-11)
The same study found no pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in sporadic microprolactinomas (including <30 years), and no (likely) pathogenic variants in macroprolactinomas diagnosed after age 30, supporting a targeted (not universal) testing approach. (boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 11-13)
5.3.2 Sporadic pituitary adenomas (2024 WES cohort)
In a 2024 whole-exome sequencing study of 134 apparently sporadic pituitary adenomas, one AIP variant (p.S256F) was considered VUS by ACMG but “likely pathogenic” by AlphaMissense (1/134, ~0.7%), illustrating an emerging trend: integrating AI-based variant effect prediction may change the set of candidates requiring follow-up functional/clinical validation. (alzahrani2024germlinevariantsin pages 4-5)
5.3.3 Pediatric/high-risk contexts (2024 consensus guideline)
A 2024 Nature Reviews Endocrinology consensus guideline reports that among childhood-onset GH-secreting pituitary tumours presenting as gigantism, AIP mutations account for ~29% of cases. (korbonits2024consensusguidelinefor pages 6-7)
For macroprolactinomas presenting before age 20, the guideline reports a genetic aetiology in ~14% (9% AIP, 5% MEN1). (korbonits2024consensusguidelinefor pages 6-7)
6.1 Genetic testing strategies (who to test)
Real-world testing criteria are increasingly risk-stratified by age, tumor size/behavior, and family history:
• In isolated prolactinoma care, a large 2023 cohort supports focusing germline testing on young patients with macroprolactinomas (especially <18 years) and/or familial context; the study does not support routine testing for sporadic microprolactinomas even in younger adults. (boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 11-13, boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 8-11)
• In pediatric/adolescent pituitary adenomas, a 2024 consensus guideline strongly recommends offering genetic testing to all children and young people with GH or prolactin excess, reflecting the higher yield and important implications for family counseling and surveillance. (korbonits2024consensusguidelinefor pages 6-7)
6.2 Surveillance of carriers
The 2024 pediatric guideline emphasizes that genetic assessment of potential carriers should occur before typical symptom onset, and that follow-up may include yearly clinical and biochemical review. It also cautions that if known genes are ruled out in the proband, routine family clinical assessment is not recommended because penetrance is incomplete and screening can cause harm. (korbonits2024consensusguidelinefor pages 6-7)
6.3 Variant interpretation as an implementation challenge
Clinical implementation depends heavily on rigorous variant classification. Recent cohort work highlights that variant reclassification (e.g., when a once-suspected pathogenic variant is found to be common in population databases) can substantially alter prevalence estimates and downstream family management. This is one reason some cohorts report lower pathogenic-variant frequencies than earlier literature. (trofimiukmuldner2023aipgenegermline pages 9-10)
Authoritative reviews and guidelines converge on two major, mechanistically grounded interpretations:
(1) AIP is primarily a co-chaperone/scaffold that binds HSP90 (via TPR interactions) and stabilizes client protein complexes, notably AHR; and
(2) germline AIP loss-of-function predisposes to pituitary tumors with incomplete penetrance, with highest diagnostic yield of testing in young-onset, macroadenoma, gigantism, and familial contexts. (cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3, korbonits2024consensusguidelinefor pages 6-7)
Protein class/function:
• Non-enzymatic immunophilin-like co-chaperone/scaffold protein; binds HSP90 via TPR motifs and participates in client protein stabilization complexes; lacks demonstrable PPIase catalytic activity despite FKBP-like fold homology. (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37, hernandezramirez2018multichaperonefunctionmodulation pages 1-2, cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3)
Key pathway/process:
• AHR signaling: component of cytosolic AHR–HSP90–AIP/p23 complex controlling AHR stability/cytosolic retention and ligand-dependent nuclear signaling. (cain2010roleofthe pages 4-5, cain2010roleofthe pages 12-13)
Localization:
• Primarily cytoplasmic as part of AHR chaperone complex; association with chaperone networks may extend to mitochondrial-associated chaperones (co-localization with HSPA9 in proteomic validation). (cain2010roleofthe pages 4-5, hernandezramirez2018multichaperonefunctionmodulation pages 1-2)
Disease association:
• Tumor suppressor in pituitary tumor predisposition (FIPA/PitNET), with incomplete penetrance; testing yield highest in childhood-onset GH excess/gigantism and early-onset macroprolactinoma. (trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37, korbonits2024consensusguidelinefor pages 6-7)
• Korbonits et al. “Consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence: Part 1, general recommendations.” Nature Reviews Endocrinology. Published Feb 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-023-00948-8 (korbonits2024consensusguidelinefor pages 6-7)
• Boukerrouni et al. “Genetic testing in prolactinomas: a cohort study.” European Journal of Endocrinology. Published Nov 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad148 (boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 8-11, boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 11-13)
• Trofimiuk-Müldner et al. “AIP gene germline variants in adult Polish patients with apparently sporadic pituitary macroadenomas.” Frontiers in Endocrinology. Published Feb 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1098367 (trofimiukmuldner2023aipgenegermline pages 9-10)
• Alzahrani et al. “Germline Variants in Sporadic Pituitary Adenomas.” Journal of the Endocrine Society. Published Apr 2024. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae085 (alzahrani2024germlinevariantsin pages 4-5)
• Balinisteanu et al. “Unlocking the Genetic Secrets of Acromegaly: Exploring the Role of Genetics in a Rare Disorder.” Current Issues in Molecular Biology. Published Aug 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46080538 (balinisteanu2024unlockingthegenetic pages 5-6)
• Cain et al. “Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein in familial isolated pituitary adenoma.” Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism. Published Sep 2010. https://doi.org/10.1586/eem.10.42 (cain2010roleofthe pages 4-5, cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3)
• Hernández-Ramírez et al. “Multi-chaperone function modulation and association with cytoskeletal proteins are key features of the function of AIP in the pituitary gland.” Oncotarget. Published Jan 2018. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24183 (hernandezramirez2018multichaperonefunctionmodulation pages 1-2)
• Cryo-EM figure evidence for complex architecture (human Hsp90–XAP2/AIP–AHR complex; AIP domains and Hsp90 MEEVD docking in TPR): (gruszczyk2022cryoemstructureof media 0a99161a, gruszczyk2022cryoemstructureof media a4609a97)
References
(trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 34-37): G Trivellin. Evaluation of the role of aip, cdkn1b, mir-107 and ahrr in the pathogenesis of sporadic and familial pituitary adenomas. Unknown journal, 2011.
(cain2010roleofthe pages 2-3): Joshua W Cain, Dragana Miljic, Vera Popovic, and Márta Korbonits. Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein in familial isolated pituitary adenoma. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism, 5:681-695, Sep 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1586/eem.10.42, doi:10.1586/eem.10.42. This article has 19 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(hernandezramirez2018multichaperonefunctionmodulation pages 1-2): Laura C. Hernández-Ramírez, Rhodri M.L. Morgan, Sayka Barry, Fulvio D’Acquisto, Chrisostomos Prodromou, and Márta Korbonits. Multi-chaperone function modulation and association with cytoskeletal proteins are key features of the function of aip in the pituitary gland. Oncotarget, 9:9177-9198, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24183, doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24183. This article has 50 citations.
(cain2010roleofthe pages 12-13): Joshua W Cain, Dragana Miljic, Vera Popovic, and Márta Korbonits. Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein in familial isolated pituitary adenoma. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism, 5:681-695, Sep 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1586/eem.10.42, doi:10.1586/eem.10.42. This article has 19 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(trivellin2011evaluationofthe pages 41-44): G Trivellin. Evaluation of the role of aip, cdkn1b, mir-107 and ahrr in the pathogenesis of sporadic and familial pituitary adenomas. Unknown journal, 2011.
(cain2010roleofthe pages 4-5): Joshua W Cain, Dragana Miljic, Vera Popovic, and Márta Korbonits. Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein in familial isolated pituitary adenoma. Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism, 5:681-695, Sep 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1586/eem.10.42, doi:10.1586/eem.10.42. This article has 19 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(gruszczyk2022cryoemstructureof media 0a99161a): Jakub Gruszczyk, Loic Grandvuillemin, Josephine Lai-Kee-Him, Matteo Paloni, Christos G. Savva, Pierre Germain, Marina Grimaldi, Abdelhay Boulahtouf, Hok-Sau Kwong, Julien Bous, Aurelie Ancelin, Cherine Bechara, Alessandro Barducci, Patrick Balaguer, and William Bourguet. Cryo-em structure of the agonist-bound hsp90-xap2-ahr cytosolic complex. Nature Communications, Jun 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w, doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w. This article has 114 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(gruszczyk2022cryoemstructureof media a4609a97): Jakub Gruszczyk, Loic Grandvuillemin, Josephine Lai-Kee-Him, Matteo Paloni, Christos G. Savva, Pierre Germain, Marina Grimaldi, Abdelhay Boulahtouf, Hok-Sau Kwong, Julien Bous, Aurelie Ancelin, Cherine Bechara, Alessandro Barducci, Patrick Balaguer, and William Bourguet. Cryo-em structure of the agonist-bound hsp90-xap2-ahr cytosolic complex. Nature Communications, Jun 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w, doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w. This article has 114 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(trofimiukmuldner2023aipgenegermline pages 9-10): Małgorzata Trofimiuk-Müldner, Bartosz Domagała, Grzegorz Sokołowski, Anna Skalniak, and Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk. Aip gene germline variants in adult polish patients with apparently sporadic pituitary macroadenomas. Frontiers in Endocrinology, Feb 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1098367, doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1098367. This article has 6 citations.
(balinisteanu2024unlockingthegenetic pages 5-6): Ioana Balinisteanu, Lavinia Caba, Andreea Florea, Roxana Popescu, Laura Florea, Maria-Christina Ungureanu, Letitia Leustean, Eusebiu Vlad Gorduza, and Cristina Preda. Unlocking the genetic secrets of acromegaly: exploring the role of genetics in a rare disorder. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 46:9093-9121, Aug 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb46080538, doi:10.3390/cimb46080538. This article has 6 citations.
(boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 1-5): Amina Boukerrouni, Thomas Cuny, Thibaut Anjou, Isabelle Raingeard, Amandine Ferrière, Solange Grunenwald, Jean-Christophe Maïza, Emeline Marquant, Nicolas Sahakian, Sarah Fodil-Cherif, Laurence Salle, Patricia Niccoli, Hanitra Randrianaivo, Emmanuel Sonnet, Nicolas Chevalier, Philippe Thuillier, Delphine Vezzosi, Rachel Reynaud, Henry Dufour, Thierry Brue, Antoine Tabarin, Brigitte Delemer, Véronique Kerlan, Frédéric Castinetti, Anne Barlier, and Pauline Romanet. Genetic testing in prolactinomas: a cohort study. European journal of endocrinology, 189:567-574, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad148, doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvad148. This article has 6 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 8-11): Amina Boukerrouni, Thomas Cuny, Thibaut Anjou, Isabelle Raingeard, Amandine Ferrière, Solange Grunenwald, Jean-Christophe Maïza, Emeline Marquant, Nicolas Sahakian, Sarah Fodil-Cherif, Laurence Salle, Patricia Niccoli, Hanitra Randrianaivo, Emmanuel Sonnet, Nicolas Chevalier, Philippe Thuillier, Delphine Vezzosi, Rachel Reynaud, Henry Dufour, Thierry Brue, Antoine Tabarin, Brigitte Delemer, Véronique Kerlan, Frédéric Castinetti, Anne Barlier, and Pauline Romanet. Genetic testing in prolactinomas: a cohort study. European journal of endocrinology, 189:567-574, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad148, doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvad148. This article has 6 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(boukerrouni2023genetictestingin pages 11-13): Amina Boukerrouni, Thomas Cuny, Thibaut Anjou, Isabelle Raingeard, Amandine Ferrière, Solange Grunenwald, Jean-Christophe Maïza, Emeline Marquant, Nicolas Sahakian, Sarah Fodil-Cherif, Laurence Salle, Patricia Niccoli, Hanitra Randrianaivo, Emmanuel Sonnet, Nicolas Chevalier, Philippe Thuillier, Delphine Vezzosi, Rachel Reynaud, Henry Dufour, Thierry Brue, Antoine Tabarin, Brigitte Delemer, Véronique Kerlan, Frédéric Castinetti, Anne Barlier, and Pauline Romanet. Genetic testing in prolactinomas: a cohort study. European journal of endocrinology, 189:567-574, Nov 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejendo/lvad148, doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvad148. This article has 6 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(alzahrani2024germlinevariantsin pages 4-5): Ali S Alzahrani, Abdulghani Bin Nafisah, Meshael Alswailem, Balgees Alghamdi, Burair Alsaihati, Hussain Aljafar, Batoul Baz, Hindi Alhindi, Yosra Moria, Muhammad Imran Butt, Abdulrahman Ghiatheddin Alkabbani, Omalkhaire M Alshaikh, Anhar Alnassar, Ahmed Bin Afeef, Reem AlQuraa, Rawan Alsuhaibani, Omar Alhadlaq, Fayha Abothenain, and Yasser A Altwaijry. Germline variants in sporadic pituitary adenomas. Journal of the Endocrine Society, Apr 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae085, doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae085. This article has 10 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(korbonits2024consensusguidelinefor pages 6-7): Márta Korbonits, Joanne C. Blair, Anna Boguslawska, John Ayuk, Justin H. Davies, Maralyn R. Druce, Jane Evanson, Daniel Flanagan, Nigel Glynn, Claire E. Higham, Thomas S. Jacques, Saurabh Sinha, Ian Simmons, Nicky Thorp, Francesca M. Swords, Helen L. Storr, and Helen A. Spoudeas. Consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence: part 1, general recommendations. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 20:278-289, Feb 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-023-00948-8, doi:10.1038/s41574-023-00948-8. This article has 39 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
id: O00170
gene_symbol: AIP
product_type: PROTEIN
status: IN_PROGRESS
taxon:
id: NCBITaxon:9606
label: Homo sapiens
description: AIP (AH receptor-interacting protein, also known as XAP2/ARA9) is a ~37 kDa,
330-amino acid FKBP-type immunophilin homolog that functions as a co-chaperone/scaffold
in the HSP90-AHR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) cytosolic complex and as a cytosolic factor
mediating mitochondrial preprotein import via interaction with the import receptor TOMM20.
It contains an N-terminal FKBP-type PPIase-like domain that is catalytically inactive
(lacking PPIase enzymatic activity and FK506/rapamycin binding) and C-terminal TPR
repeats (three TPR motifs plus a terminal alpha-7 helix) that mediate interactions with
HSP90 and TOMM20. Cryo-EM structural analysis of the human agonist-bound AHR cytosolic
complex (DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w) reveals AIP/XAP2 acting as a structural brace
associated with the HSP90 dimer and the AHR client, with the HSP90 C-terminal MEEVD
motif docked into the TPR domain of AIP. AIP exhibits chaperone-like (holdase) activity,
suppressing thermal aggregation of substrate proteins. Beyond the AHR complex, AIP also
interacts with phosphodiesterases PDE4A5 and PDE2A3, linking it to localized cAMP
regulation and modulation of AHR nuclear translocation. Proteomic studies show AIP
co-localizes with HSPA9 in the mitochondrial chaperone network, consistent with broader
chaperone-network functions beyond the AHR complex
(DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.24183). Germline loss-of-function AIP variants predispose to
pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) with incomplete penetrance (~12-30%), behaving
as a tumor suppressor with a two-hit model (loss of heterozygosity in tumors). AIP
mutations account for ~29% of childhood-onset GH-secreting pituitary tumors presenting
as gigantism and ~9% of macroprolactinomas presenting before age 20
(DOI:10.1038/s41574-023-00948-8).
existing_annotations:
- term:
id: GO:0045893
label: positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000108
review:
summary: This IEA annotation was inferred by logical inference from AIP having
transcription coactivator activity (GO:0003713). AIP/XAP2 was shown by Meyer et al.
(PMID:9447995) to enhance AhR-driven transcription from a dioxin-responsive element
by about twofold. This is an indirect consequence of AIP stabilizing the AHR-HSP90
complex in the cytosol, not a direct transcriptional activation function. The
annotation is logically consistent with the coactivator annotation but represents
a secondary downstream effect rather than a core function of AIP.
action: KEEP_AS_NON_CORE
reason: AIP does enhance AhR-driven transcription, but this is an indirect effect
of its co-chaperone function in stabilizing the AHR-HSP90 complex, not a direct
transcriptional regulatory activity. The annotation is technically correct as an
inference from the coactivator annotation, but represents a downstream biological
consequence rather than core function.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:9447995
supporting_text: XAP2 enhanced the ability of endogenous murine and human AhR
complexes to activate a dioxin-responsive element-luciferase reporter twofold,
following transient expression of XAP2 in Hepa 1c1c7 and HeLa cells.
- term:
id: GO:0003755
label: peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000002
review:
summary: This IEA annotation was automatically assigned based on InterPro domain
IPR001179 (FKBP-type PPIase domain). While AIP does contain an FKBP-type PPIase-like
domain, multiple studies have shown this domain is catalytically inactive. Laenger
et al. (PMID:19375531) explicitly demonstrated that the PPIase-like region of XAP2
is enzymatically inactive. The domain has diverged from catalytically active FKBP
family members and lacks key residues for PPIase catalysis.
action: REMOVE
reason: AIP contains an FKBP-type PPIase-like domain that is catalytically inactive
(PMID:19375531). The InterPro domain match is structurally correct but the functional
annotation of PPIase activity is incorrect for this protein. This is a well-documented
case of a domain homolog that has lost enzymatic activity.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:19375531
supporting_text: The PPIase-like region turned out to be enzymatically inactive.
Thus, PPIase activity is not essential for the action of XAP2 on GR, similarly
to FKBP51 and FKBP52.
- term:
id: GO:0005737
label: cytoplasm
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000044
review:
summary: This IEA annotation is based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Subcellular Location
mapping. AIP is well-established as a cytoplasmic protein. Kuzhandaivelu et al.
(PMID:8972861) showed by immunofluorescence that XAP2 is a cytoplasmic protein.
UniProt CC line states Subcellular location as Cytoplasm. This is consistent with
AIP functioning as a cytosolic co-chaperone in the AHR-HSP90 complex and as a
cytosolic factor in mitochondrial preprotein import.
action: ACCEPT
reason: AIP is well-established as a cytoplasmic protein across multiple studies.
This is consistent with its function as a cytosolic co-chaperone.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:8972861
supporting_text: Antiserum raised against XAP2 recognizes a cytoplasmic protein
with an apparent molecular mass of 36 kDa.
- term:
id: GO:0051082
label: unfolded protein binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000117
review:
summary: This IEA annotation of GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) was assigned
by ARBA machine learning models. GO:0051082 is being obsoleted (go-ontology issue
30962). While AIP does have experimentally demonstrated chaperone-like activity
that prevents thermal aggregation of substrate proteins (PMID:14557246), the
appropriate replacement term is GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone), which
better captures the holdase/chaperone function rather than implying simple binding
to unfolded proteins. The IEA annotation here is redundant with the IDA annotation
from the same gene also annotated to GO:0051082 based on PMID:14557246.
action: MODIFY
reason: GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. The experimental data from PMID:14557246
demonstrates genuine chaperone-like (holdase) activity for AIP, including suppression
of thermal aggregation of rhodanese and citrate synthase in vitro. The replacement
term GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) accurately captures this function.
Additionally, this IEA annotation is redundant with the experimentally supported
IDA annotation from PMID:14557246 on the same gene.
proposed_replacement_terms:
- id: GO:0044183
label: protein folding chaperone
additional_reference_ids:
- PMID:14557246
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: An aggregation suppression assay indicated that AIP has a chaperone-like
activity to prevent substrate proteins from aggregation.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:17329248
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP (XAP2) and PDE2A
(UniProtKB:O00408). De Oliveira et al. (PMID:17329248) identified XAP2 as a major
PDE2A-interacting protein via yeast two-hybrid screening and mapped the binding
site to the GAF-B domain of PDE2A. This is a functionally significant interaction
as PDE2A binding to XAP2 inhibits TCDD- and cAMP-induced nuclear translocation of
AhR in hepatocytes. The interaction is relevant to AIP function in cAMP signaling
regulation. However, protein binding is uninformative; the more specific annotation
GO:0036004 (GAF domain binding) already captures this interaction.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interaction between AIP and PDE2A is well-documented by yeast two-hybrid
and co-immunoprecipitation (PMID:17329248). While protein binding is a generic term,
the IPI evidence with specific interactor is standard practice and the more specific
GAF domain binding annotation is also present. Duplicates with different evidence
lines are acceptable.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:17329248
supporting_text: In a yeast two-hybrid screening we identified XAP2, a crucial
component of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) complex, as a major
PDE2A-interacting protein. We mapped the XAP2 binding site to the GAF-B domain
of PDE2A.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:19375531
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP (XAP2) and HSP90AB1
(UniProtKB:P08238). Laenger et al. (PMID:19375531) showed that XAP2 interacts with
Hsp90 through its TPR motif and that this interaction is required for XAP2 to
inhibit glucocorticoid receptor activity. The AIP-HSP90 interaction is one of the
most well-characterized interactions for this protein, mediated by the TPR domain
binding to the MEEVD motif at the C-terminus of HSP90. This is a core interaction
of AIP.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The AIP-HSP90 interaction is a core functional interaction, extensively
validated. This IPI evidence from PMID:19375531 provides additional confirmation
that the TPR domain mediates the HSP90 binding. Multiple independent studies
confirm this interaction.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:19375531
supporting_text: The effect of XAP2 on GR requires its interaction with Hsp90
through the TPR motif.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:20029029
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and EGFR
(UniProtKB:P00533) from a study on HDAC6 regulation of EGFR trafficking
(PMID:20029029). AIP was not the focus of this study. The interaction between AIP
and EGFR is likely detected in a high-throughput context and may represent an
indirect interaction mediated through the HSP90 chaperone machinery, since EGFR
is a known HSP90 client. Without more specific evidence for a direct, functional
AIP-EGFR interaction, this should be considered with caution.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interaction was detected by physical interaction evidence (IPI) and is
plausible given that AIP is part of the HSP90 co-chaperone system and EGFR is an
HSP90 client. While likely indirect, the IPI evidence is valid as recorded.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:21170051
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and HSP90AB1
(UniProtKB:P08238) from a study on mixed Hsp90-cochaperone complexes
(PMID:21170051). This study demonstrates that AIP forms part of mixed HSP90
co-chaperone complexes important for the chaperone reaction cycle. This is
consistent with AIP being a bona fide HSP90 co-chaperone via its TPR domain.
action: ACCEPT
reason: This confirms the well-established AIP-HSP90 co-chaperone interaction in
the context of functional chaperone cycle complexes.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:21903422
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and IRF7
(UniProtKB:Q92985) from a study mapping innate immunity protein interaction networks
(PMID:21903422). AIP was detected interacting with IRF7 in a high-throughput
innate immunity interaction mapping study. AIP is not known to have a role in
interferon signaling. This interaction may be indirect (mediated through HSP90
which is known to interact with various signaling proteins) or may represent a
non-physiological interaction from the high-throughput screen.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence in a systematic study. While
the biological relevance to AIP function is unclear, the physical evidence is
valid as recorded. It may reflect AIP participating in HSP90-mediated regulation
of signaling proteins.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:22113938
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and CSNK2A1/CK2alpha
(UniProtKB:P68400) from a large-scale kinase substrate identification study
(PMID:22113938). The interaction is from a high-throughput bead-based screen. CK2
is a ubiquitous kinase and the interaction may or may not be physiologically
significant for AIP function. AIP has a phosphoserine at position 43
(ECO:0007744|PubMed:23186163), which could be a CK2 substrate site.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence and is plausible given that
AIP is known to be phosphorylated. The evidence stands as a valid physical
interaction record.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:25036637
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and HSP90AB1
(UniProtKB:P08238) from a quantitative chaperone interaction network study
(PMID:25036637). This study systematically mapped the chaperone-cochaperone
interaction network and places AIP firmly within the HSP90 co-chaperone system.
This is one of the core interactions of AIP.
action: ACCEPT
reason: This further validates the well-established AIP-HSP90 co-chaperone
interaction in a comprehensive chaperone interactome study.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:28514442
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and PRAMEF10
(UniProtKB:O60809) from a large-scale interactome mapping study (PMID:28514442).
PRAMEF10 is a PRAME family member. This is from a high-throughput study and the
biological significance of AIP interacting with PRAMEF10 is unclear. PRAMEF10
is poorly characterized.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence in a systematic interactome
study. The biological relevance is uncertain, but the physical interaction evidence
is valid as recorded.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:28634279
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and HSP90AB1
(UniProtKB:P08238) from Salvatori et al. (PMID:28634279), which studied the
c.805_825dup AIP mutation. The study demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation that
wild-type AIP interacts with HSP90, and that the p.F269_H275dup mutation in TPR3
disrupts this interaction. This provides important functional validation that the
AIP-HSP90 interaction is mediated through the TPR domain and is disrupted by
disease-causing mutations.
action: ACCEPT
reason: This co-immunoprecipitation study confirms the AIP-HSP90 interaction and
demonstrates its functional importance, as disease-causing AIP mutations disrupt
the HSP90 binding. This is directly relevant to the tumor suppressor function of
AIP.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:28634279
supporting_text: The results of a co-immunoprecipitation experiment with mutant
AIP and HSP90 were consistent with lack of interaction between the two proteins
(Fig
- reference_id: PMID:28634279
supporting_text: The mutation results in the duplication of seven amino-acids in
third TPR domain of AIP, leading to the disruption of protein-protein interactions
and markedly reduced protein stability.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:31980649
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and EGFR
(UniProtKB:P00533) from a study on EGFR network rewiring in KRAS-mutant colorectal
cancer cells (PMID:31980649). AIP was not the focus of this study. The interaction
with EGFR is likely indirect, mediated through the HSP90 chaperone machinery.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence. While likely reflecting
indirect interaction through the HSP90 system, the physical evidence is valid
as recorded.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:33961781
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records interactions between AIP and PRAMEF10
(UniProtKB:O60809) and/or SYCN (UniProtKB:Q0VAF6) from a dual proteome-scale
network study (PMID:33961781). These are from a high-throughput interactome
study. The biological significance of these interactions for AIP function is
unclear.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interactions were detected by IPI evidence in a systematic
proteome-scale interactome study. While biological relevance to AIP function is
uncertain, the physical evidence is valid as recorded.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:35271311
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records the interaction between AIP and CSNK2A1/CK2alpha
(UniProtKB:P68400) from the OpenCell study (PMID:35271311), a large-scale
endogenous tagging and imaging study. This is a second independent confirmation
of the AIP-CK2alpha interaction after PMID:22113938.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interaction was detected by IPI evidence in an independent large-scale
study, providing a second line of evidence for the AIP-CK2alpha interaction.
- term:
id: GO:0003712
label: transcription coregulator activity
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000107
review:
summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl
Compara. AIP/XAP2 was shown to enhance AhR-mediated transcription (PMID:9447995),
which is the basis for the mouse ortholog annotation. The term GO:0003712
(transcription coregulator activity) is broader than the TAS annotation
GO:0003713 (transcription coactivator activity) also present for this gene. AIP
enhances AhR transcription indirectly by stabilizing the cytosolic AHR-HSP90
complex, not by acting as a direct transcriptional coregulator in the nucleus.
This is a secondary consequence of its co-chaperone function.
action: KEEP_AS_NON_CORE
reason: AIP does enhance AhR-dependent transcription, but this is an indirect
effect of its co-chaperone role in stabilizing the AHR complex. The broader IEA
term is acceptable as a non-core annotation consistent with the TAS coactivator
annotation.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:9447995
supporting_text: XAP2 enhanced the ability of endogenous murine and human AhR
complexes to activate a dioxin-responsive element-luciferase reporter twofold,
following transient expression of XAP2 in Hepa 1c1c7 and HeLa cells.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000107
review:
summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl
Compara. AIP is established as a cytosolic protein by multiple lines of evidence
including IDA annotations based on immunofluorescence (GO_REF:0000052) and direct
experimental evidence (PMID:17329248). This IEA is consistent with and redundant
with the experimental evidence.
action: ACCEPT
reason: Cytosolic localization of AIP is well-established by multiple experimental
methods. This IEA is consistent with experimental evidence.
- term:
id: GO:0016020
label: membrane
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000107
review:
summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl
Compara. AIP is primarily a cytosolic protein. The membrane annotation may reflect
AIP association with the outer mitochondrial membrane via its interaction with
TOMM20 (PMID:14557246), or its reported colocalization with the plasma membrane
via PDE2A interaction (PMID:17329248). AIP itself is not a membrane protein and
does not have a transmembrane domain. The term GO:0016020 (membrane) is very
broad and not very informative.
action: MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED
reason: AIP is not an integral membrane protein. While it may associate with
membranes through protein-protein interactions (TOMM20 at the mitochondrial
outer membrane, or PDE2A at the plasma membrane), the broad term "membrane" is
uninformative and potentially misleading for a primarily cytosolic co-chaperone
protein. More specific localization terms (cytosol, plasma membrane
colocalization) are already captured by other annotations.
- term:
id: GO:0017162
label: aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000107
review:
summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl
Compara. AIP/XAP2 was originally identified as a component of the AhR core
complex (PMID:9447995). Meyer et al. showed that XAP2 coprecipitates with
FLAG-tagged AhR and is present in the unliganded AhR 9S complex. AIP binding
to AhR is well-established as a core function of this protein and is the basis
for its name.
action: ACCEPT
reason: AIP binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor is one of its best-characterized
functions. This was demonstrated by coprecipitation and is the basis for the
protein name. The IEA transfer from mouse ortholog is appropriate.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:9447995
supporting_text: Here we report the purification of an approximately 38-kDa protein
(p38) from COS-1 cell cytosol that is a member of this complex by
coprecipitation with a FLAG-tagged AhR.
- term:
id: GO:0034751
label: aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000107
review:
summary: This IEA annotation was transferred from the mouse ortholog via Ensembl
Compara. AIP/XAP2 is an established subunit of the unliganded AhR core complex
(PMID:9447995). Meyer et al. demonstrated that XAP2 is part of the heterotetrameric
9S AhR complex consisting of AhR, two HSP90 molecules, and XAP2. Reactome entries
(R-HSA-8936849, R-HSA-8937169) also model AIP as part of the AHR:2xHSP90:AIP:PTGES3
complex. This is a core localization for AIP.
action: ACCEPT
reason: AIP is a bona fide subunit of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. This
is one of the defining characteristics of this protein and is supported by
multiple independent studies and Reactome pathway models.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:9447995
supporting_text: Prior to ligand activation, the unactivated aryl hydrocarbon
receptor (AhR) exists in a heterotetrameric 9S core complex consisting of the
AhR ligand-binding subunit, a dimer of hsp90, and an unknown subunit.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000052
review:
summary: This IDA annotation is based on curation of immunofluorescence data (HPA).
Cytosolic localization of AIP is well-established and consistent with its function
as a cytosolic co-chaperone. Multiple studies confirm AIP is primarily cytosolic
(PMID:8972861, PMID:14557246, PMID:17329248).
action: ACCEPT
reason: Immunofluorescence-based evidence for cytosolic localization of AIP is
consistent with extensive other evidence for cytosolic localization.
- term:
id: GO:0003755
label: peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:14557246
review:
summary: This IDA annotation citing PMID:14557246 (Yano et al. 2003) claims PPIase
activity for AIP. However, Yano et al. 2003 does NOT demonstrate PPIase enzymatic
activity for AIP. The paper focuses on AIP as a mitochondrial import mediator with
chaperone-like holdase activity. AIP belongs to the FKBP PPIase family structurally
but its PPIase domain is catalytically inactive. Laenger et al. (PMID:19375531)
explicitly showed the PPIase-like region is enzymatically inactive. This IDA
annotation appears to be an error in the original curation, conflating structural
homology to PPIases with actual catalytic activity.
action: REMOVE
reason: AIP does not have PPIase catalytic activity. PMID:14557246 does not
demonstrate PPIase activity; it describes chaperone-like holdase activity and
mitochondrial import function. PMID:19375531 explicitly demonstrated that the
PPIase-like region of AIP is enzymatically inactive. The IDA annotation based on
PMID:14557246 for PPIase activity is an error.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:19375531
supporting_text: The PPIase-like region turned out to be enzymatically inactive.
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: AIP belongs to a family of peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases
(PPIases) that are ubiquitous in prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Galat and Metcalfe,
1995).
- term:
id: GO:0051604
label: protein maturation
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:14557246
review:
summary: This IDA annotation to GO:0051604 (protein maturation) cites Yano et al.
(PMID:14557246). The paper demonstrates that AIP functions as a cytosolic factor
mediating mitochondrial preprotein import. AIP maintains preproteins in an
import-competent conformation and facilitates their import into mitochondria via
interaction with TOMM20. Overexpression of AIP enhanced mature OTC production
(processing of pOTC to mature OTC by mitochondrial import and cleavage), and
depletion reduced it. While the end result is maturation of mitochondrial
preproteins (signal peptide cleavage), AIP does not directly participate in the
proteolytic processing. A more accurate annotation would be GO:0070585 (protein
localization to mitochondrion), which is already annotated.
action: MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED
reason: AIP facilitates mitochondrial import but does not directly participate in
protein maturation (proteolytic processing). The observed effect on pOTC maturation
is an indirect consequence of enhanced mitochondrial import. The more appropriate
annotation GO:0070585 (protein localization to mitochondrion) is already present
for this gene and this reference. GO:0051604 is too broad and somewhat misleading
for what AIP actually does.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: AIP can enhance the mitochondrial import of pOTC.
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: All these results suggest strongly that AIP stabilizes pOTC in
the cytosol and facilitates its import into mitochondria.
- term:
id: GO:0005654
label: nucleoplasm
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-8937169
review:
summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8937169
(AHR:TCDD:2xHSP90AB1:AIP:PTGES3 translocates from cytosol to nucleoplasm). In
the Reactome model, the entire AHR complex including AIP translocates to the
nucleus upon ligand binding. AIP is primarily cytosolic and its presence in the
nucleoplasm is transient as part of the ligand-bound AHR complex before the
complex dissociates. This is a non-core localization.
action: KEEP_AS_NON_CORE
reason: AIP transiently enters the nucleoplasm as part of the ligand-activated
AHR-HSP90 complex, but this is not its primary localization. The Reactome
pathway model is accurate for the transient translocation event.
- term:
id: GO:0005654
label: nucleoplasm
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-8937191
review:
summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8937191
(AHR:TCDD:2xHSP90AB1:AIP:PTGES3 dissociates). This represents the dissociation
of the AHR complex in the nucleoplasm after translocation. AIP is released from
the complex in the nucleus. This is consistent with the transient nuclear
localization of AIP during AHR signaling.
action: KEEP_AS_NON_CORE
reason: This represents transient nuclear localization of AIP during AHR signaling,
consistent with the Reactome pathway model. Not the primary localization.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-8936849
review:
summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8936849
(AHR:2xHSP90:AIP:PTGES3 binds TCDD). AIP is part of the cytosolic AHR complex
that binds the TCDD ligand. Cytosolic localization of AIP is well-established.
action: ACCEPT
reason: Cytosolic localization of AIP as part of the AHR complex is well-supported
by multiple lines of evidence.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-8937169
review:
summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8937169
(AHR:TCDD:2xHSP90AB1:AIP:PTGES3 translocates from cytosol to nucleoplasm).
AIP starts in the cytosol as part of the AHR complex. Cytosol is the primary
localization.
action: ACCEPT
reason: Cytosolic localization is the primary and well-established localization
for AIP.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-8950201
review:
summary: This TAS annotation is based on Reactome pathway R-HSA-8950201
(Expression of Aryl Hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein). AIP is expressed
and localized in the cytosol. This is consistent with all other evidence.
action: ACCEPT
reason: Cytosolic localization of AIP is the primary and well-established
localization, supported by all available evidence.
- term:
id: GO:0036004
label: GAF domain binding
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:17329248
review:
summary: This IDA annotation to GO:0036004 (GAF domain binding) is based on de
Oliveira et al. (PMID:17329248), which showed that XAP2 binds to the GAF-B
domain of PDE2A. The binding was identified by yeast two-hybrid and confirmed
by immunoprecipitation. The GAF-B domain was specifically mapped as the XAP2
binding site. This is a well-characterized, specific molecular interaction.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interaction between AIP/XAP2 and the GAF-B domain of PDE2A was
specifically mapped and validated by multiple methods (yeast two-hybrid and
co-immunoprecipitation). This is a specific and informative MF annotation.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:17329248
supporting_text: We mapped the XAP2 binding site to the GAF-B domain of PDE2A.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:17329248
review:
summary: This IDA annotation for cytosol localization is based on de Oliveira et al.
(PMID:17329248), which performed immunofluorescence showing XAP2 in the cytosol.
The study also showed that PDE2A colocalizes with XAP2 in the cytosol and at the
plasma membrane.
action: ACCEPT
reason: Cytosolic localization demonstrated by immunofluorescence is consistent
with all other evidence for AIP being primarily a cytosolic protein.
- term:
id: GO:0005886
label: plasma membrane
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:17329248
review:
summary: This IDA annotation with qualifier colocalizes_with records that AIP/XAP2
colocalizes with the plasma membrane, based on de Oliveira et al. (PMID:17329248).
The study showed XAP2 and PDE2A colocalize at the plasma membrane in addition to
the cytosol. This likely reflects AIP being recruited to the plasma membrane
through its interaction with PDE2A, which has membrane association. This is a
secondary, non-core localization dependent on the PDE2A interaction.
action: KEEP_AS_NON_CORE
reason: Plasma membrane colocalization is a secondary localization dependent on
the interaction with PDE2A. AIP is primarily a cytosolic protein and does not
have intrinsic membrane targeting. The colocalizes_with qualifier appropriately
indicates indirect association.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:14557246
review:
summary: This IPI annotation records AIP interactions with Hsc70 (UniProtKB:P11142),
TOMM20 (UniProtKB:Q15388), and/or TOMM20L (UniProtKB:Q9NS69) from Yano et al.
(PMID:14557246). The paper demonstrated by two-hybrid and in vitro binding that
AIP interacts with TOMM20 via its TPR domain and with Hsc70. AIP forms a ternary
complex with preproteins and TOMM20. These are core, functionally important
interactions for AIP's role in mitochondrial preprotein import.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The interactions of AIP with TOMM20 and Hsc70 demonstrated in PMID:14557246
are core to its mitochondrial import mediator function. The binding was validated
by multiple methods including two-hybrid, in vitro binding, and co-precipitation.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: Using two-hybrid screening, we identified arylhydrocarbon
receptor-interacting protein (AIP), an FK506-binding protein homologue,
interacting with Tom20.
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: Hsc70 was also found to bind to AIP.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: PMID:14557246
review:
summary: This TAS annotation for cytosol localization cites Yano et al.
(PMID:14557246). The paper demonstrates AIP functions as a cytosolic factor
mediating preprotein import into mitochondria. AIP was detected in cytosolic
fractions of HeLa, HepG2, COS-7, and Hepa1c1c7 cells by immunoblot.
action: ACCEPT
reason: Cytosolic localization of AIP is well-documented by immunoblot analysis
in multiple cell lines in this paper and is consistent with all other evidence.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: When immunoblot analysis was done using anti-human AIP, AIP
polypeptides were readily detected in the lysates of HeLa (human), HepG2
(human), COS-7 (monkey), and Hepa1c1c7 (mouse) cells.
- term:
id: GO:0051082
label: unfolded protein binding
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:14557246
review:
summary: This IDA annotation to GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) is based on
Yano et al. 2003 (PMID:14557246), which demonstrated that AIP has genuine
chaperone-like (holdase) activity. The key evidence is from thermal aggregation
suppression assays (Figure 6 of the paper). AIP suppressed thermal aggregation
of rhodanese at 55C and citrate synthase at 43C in a dose-dependent manner. At
equimolar concentrations, GST-AIP suppressed rhodanese aggregation at early time
points, and completely suppressed citrate synthase aggregation. This activity was
additive or synergistic with Hsc70. The paper also showed AIP binds specifically
to mitochondrial preproteins via their presequences, maintaining them in an
import-competent (unfolded) conformation. The chaperone activity is mechanistically
linked to AIP's role in mitochondrial import, keeping preproteins unfolded for
translocation through the TOM complex. GO:0051082 is being obsoleted
(go-ontology issue 30962), and the activity described is better captured by
GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone), which describes binding to proteins to
assist the folding process, encompassing holdase activity that prevents
aggregation of unfolded substrates.
action: MODIFY
reason: GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. The experimental evidence from PMID:14557246
clearly demonstrates a chaperone-like holdase activity for AIP, not merely passive
binding to unfolded proteins. AIP actively prevents thermal aggregation of model
substrates (rhodanese and citrate synthase) and maintains mitochondrial preproteins
in import-competent conformations. The replacement term GO:0044183 (protein folding
chaperone) is the appropriate successor, capturing the active nature of this
chaperone function. The evidence is robust -- the aggregation suppression assays
used purified GST-AIP protein with proper GST-only controls, showed dose-dependent
effects, and the physiological relevance was confirmed by in vivo import assays
showing AIP maintains preprotein import competency.
proposed_replacement_terms:
- id: GO:0044183
label: protein folding chaperone
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: AIP exhibited a chaperone-like activity to suppress the aggregation
of substrate proteins.
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: When GST-AIP was added instead of GST, the aggregation of
rhodanese was partially suppressed, and that of citrate synthase was completely
suppressed. These results reconfirmed that AIP has chaperone-like activity.
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: AIP was found to function as a chaperone to suppress thermal
aggregation of rhodanese and citrate synthase (Fig. 6). AIP may function as
a chaperone to maintain mitochondria-targeted preproteins unfolded and to
suppress their aggregation.
- term:
id: GO:0070585
label: protein localization to mitochondrion
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:14557246
review:
summary: This IDA annotation to GO:0070585 (protein localization to mitochondrion)
is based on Yano et al. (PMID:14557246), which provides extensive evidence that
AIP mediates mitochondrial preprotein import. Key evidence includes in vitro
import assays showing AIP maintains pOTC import competency, cell-based assays
showing AIP overexpression enhances pOTC import by ~3-fold, siRNA depletion of
AIP impairing pOTC import to ~40% of control, AIP binding specifically to
mitochondrial preproteins via their presequences, AIP forming ternary complexes
with preproteins and TOMM20, and AIP having chaperone-like activity to prevent
preprotein aggregation. This is a well-supported core function of AIP.
action: ACCEPT
reason: The evidence for AIP mediating protein localization to mitochondria is
extensive and robust, including in vitro import assays, overexpression and
depletion experiments in cells, specific binding to preproteins and TOMM20,
and ternary complex formation. This represents a core function of AIP alongside
its role in the AHR-HSP90 complex.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: These results suggest that AIP functions as a cytosolic factor
that mediates preprotein import into mitochondria.
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: Thus, depletion of AIP reduced the mitochondrial import of pOTC,
which means that endogenous AIP facilitates pOTC import into mitochondria.
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: Formation of a ternary complex of Tom20, AIP, and preprotein
was observed.
- term:
id: GO:0003713
label: transcription coactivator activity
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: PMID:9447995
review:
summary: This TAS annotation to GO:0003713 (transcription coactivator activity) is
based on Meyer et al. (PMID:9447995), which showed that XAP2 enhanced AhR-driven
transcription of a dioxin-responsive element reporter by about twofold when
transiently expressed in Hepa 1c1c7 and HeLa cells. However, AIP does not function
as a classical transcription coactivator. AIP enhances AhR signaling indirectly by
stabilizing the cytosolic AHR-HSP90 complex, improving AhR receptivity for ligand
and/or nuclear targeting. AIP does not directly contact DNA or recruit
transcriptional machinery. The term "transcription coactivator activity" implies
direct participation in transcriptional activation, which overstates AIP's role.
A more accurate description would be that AIP modulates AhR signaling through its
co-chaperone function.
action: MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED
reason: AIP enhances AhR-driven transcription indirectly through its co-chaperone
function in the AHR-HSP90 complex, not by acting as a direct transcription
coactivator. The twofold enhancement of reporter activity (PMID:9447995) reflects
improved AhR complex stability and signaling, not direct transcriptional
coactivation. Calling AIP a transcription coactivator overstates its molecular
role and is misleading about its mechanism of action.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:9447995
supporting_text: XAP2 enhanced the ability of endogenous murine and human AhR
complexes to activate a dioxin-responsive element-luciferase reporter twofold,
following transient expression of XAP2 in Hepa 1c1c7 and HeLa cells.
- reference_id: PMID:9447995
supporting_text: It was not required for the assembly of an AhR-hsp90 complex in
vitro. Additionally, XAP2 did not directly associate with hsp90 upon in vitro
translation, but was present in a 9S form when cotranslated in vitro with murine
AhR.
- term:
id: GO:0005737
label: cytoplasm
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: PMID:8972861
review:
summary: This TAS annotation for cytoplasm is based on Kuzhandaivelu et al.
(PMID:8972861), the original paper identifying XAP2 as a hepatitis B virus
X-associated protein. The paper showed by immunostaining with anti-XAP2 antiserum
that XAP2 is a cytoplasmic protein with apparent molecular mass of 36 kDa.
action: ACCEPT
reason: Cytoplasmic localization of AIP/XAP2 was directly demonstrated by
immunostaining in the original characterization paper and is consistent with
all subsequent evidence.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:8972861
supporting_text: Antiserum raised against XAP2 recognizes a cytoplasmic protein
with an apparent molecular mass of 36 kDa.
- term:
id: GO:0051879
label: Hsp90 protein binding
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:19375531
review:
summary: AIP/XAP2 binds HSP90 through its TPR motif, as demonstrated in multiple
studies. Laenger et al. (PMID:19375531) showed that XAP2 inhibits GR through
its interaction with Hsp90 via the TPR motif. The crystal structure of the AIP
TPR domain bound to the HSP90 MEEVD peptide (PDB:4APO, PMID:23300914) confirms
this interaction at atomic resolution. Salvatori et al. (PMID:28634279) showed
disease-causing TPR mutations disrupt HSP90 binding. This is a core molecular
function of AIP not currently captured by a specific GO annotation in the
existing set.
action: NEW
reason: AIP binding to HSP90 via its TPR domain is the most well-characterized
core molecular function of AIP. While multiple IPI protein binding annotations
record AIP-HSP90 interactions, the specific term GO:0051879 (Hsp90 protein binding)
would more accurately capture this core function. This is supported by extensive
experimental evidence including co-immunoprecipitation, structural data, and
functional studies.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:19375531
supporting_text: The effect of XAP2 on GR requires its interaction with Hsp90
through the TPR motif.
- reference_id: PMID:28634279
supporting_text: The mutation results in the duplication of seven amino-acids in
third TPR domain of AIP, leading to the disruption of protein-protein interactions
and markedly reduced protein stability.
core_functions:
- molecular_function:
id: GO:0051879
label: Hsp90 protein binding
description: >-
AIP/XAP2 binds HSP90 via its C-terminal TPR domain (three TPR motifs plus a
terminal alpha-7 helix), serving as a co-chaperone/scaffold in the AHR-HSP90
complex. The TPR domain engages the MEEVD motif at the HSP90 C-terminus
(PDB:4APO). Cryo-EM structure of the human agonist-bound HSP90-XAP2-AHR
cytosolic complex (DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w) reveals AIP acting as a
structural brace associated with the HSP90 dimer and the AHR client, with the
MEEVD motif docked into the TPR domain of AIP, consistent with canonical
TPR-mediated recruitment of HSP90 co-chaperones. Disease-causing mutations in
the TPR domain disrupt HSP90 binding and are associated with pituitary
neuroendocrine tumor predisposition (PitNET/PITA1), consistent with a two-hit
tumor suppressor model (loss of heterozygosity in tumors).
directly_involved_in:
- id: GO:0006457
label: protein folding
locations:
- id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
in_complex:
id: GO:0034751
label: aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:19375531
supporting_text: >-
The effect of XAP2 on GR requires its interaction with Hsp90 through the
TPR motif.
- reference_id: PMID:28634279
supporting_text: >-
The mutation results in the duplication of seven amino-acids in third TPR
domain of AIP, leading to the disruption of protein-protein interactions
and markedly reduced protein stability.
- molecular_function:
id: GO:0044183
label: protein folding chaperone
description: >-
AIP exhibits chaperone-like holdase activity, suppressing thermal aggregation of
model substrates (rhodanese, citrate synthase) in vitro. This chaperone activity
is linked to its role in maintaining mitochondrial preproteins in an
import-competent conformation for translocation through the TOM complex.
directly_involved_in:
- id: GO:0070585
label: protein localization to mitochondrion
locations:
- id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: >-
AIP exhibited a chaperone-like activity to suppress the aggregation of
substrate proteins.
- reference_id: PMID:14557246
supporting_text: >-
AIP may function as a chaperone to maintain mitochondria-targeted
preproteins unfolded and to suppress their aggregation.
- molecular_function:
id: GO:0017162
label: aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding
description: >-
AIP/XAP2 is a stoichiometric component of the unliganded AHR 9S core complex
(AHR:2xHSP90:AIP:PTGES3), binding directly to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
It stabilizes the cytosolic AHR-HSP90 complex, enhancing AhR receptivity for
ligand and subsequent transcriptional activation. Cryo-EM structural analysis
(DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w) confirms the architectural arrangement of AIP
as a brace spanning the HSP90 dimer and AHR client within this complex.
directly_involved_in:
- id: GO:0045893
label: positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription
locations:
- id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
in_complex:
id: GO:0034751
label: aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:9447995
supporting_text: >-
Here we report the purification of an approximately 38-kDa protein (p38)
from COS-1 cell cytosol that is a member of this complex by
coprecipitation with a FLAG-tagged AhR.
- molecular_function:
id: GO:0036004
label: GAF domain binding
description: >-
AIP binds to the GAF-B domain of phosphodiesterase 2A (PDE2A), an interaction
that inhibits TCDD- and cAMP-induced nuclear translocation of AhR in
hepatocytes, providing a regulatory link between cAMP signaling and the AhR
pathway. AIP also interacts with PDE4A5, further linking it to localized cAMP
regulation (DOI:10.1586/eem.10.42). These phosphodiesterase interactions
suggest AIP may modulate pituitary tumor biology through cAMP pathway effects.
locations:
- id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:17329248
supporting_text: >-
We mapped the XAP2 binding site to the GAF-B domain of PDE2A.
references:
- id: GO_REF:0000002
title: Gene Ontology annotation through association of InterPro records with GO
terms
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000044
title: Gene Ontology annotation based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Subcellular Location
vocabulary mapping, accompanied by conservative changes to GO terms applied by
UniProt
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000052
title: Gene Ontology annotation based on curation of immunofluorescence data
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000107
title: Automatic transfer of experimentally verified manual GO annotation data to
orthologs using Ensembl Compara
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000108
title: Automatic assignment of GO terms using logical inference, based on on inter-ontology
links
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000117
title: Electronic Gene Ontology annotations created by ARBA machine learning models
findings: []
- id: PMID:14557246
title: AIP is a mitochondrial import mediator that binds to both import receptor
Tom20 and preproteins.
findings: []
- id: PMID:17329248
title: Phosphodiesterase 2A forms a complex with the co-chaperone XAP2 and regulates
nuclear translocation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.
findings: []
- id: PMID:19375531
title: XAP2 inhibits glucocorticoid receptor activity in mammalian cells.
findings: []
- id: PMID:20029029
title: Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor trafficking by lysine deacetylase
HDAC6.
findings: []
- id: PMID:21170051
title: Mixed Hsp90-cochaperone complexes are important for the progression of the
reaction cycle.
findings: []
- id: PMID:21903422
title: Mapping a dynamic innate immunity protein interaction network regulating
type I interferon production.
findings: []
- id: PMID:22113938
title: A bead-based approach for large-scale identification of in vitro kinase substrates.
findings: []
- id: PMID:23300914
title: 'Structure of the TPR domain of AIP: lack of client protein interaction with
the C-terminal α-7 helix of the TPR domain of AIP is sufficient for pituitary
adenoma predisposition.'
findings: []
- id: PMID:25036637
title: A quantitative chaperone interaction network reveals the architecture of
cellular protein homeostasis pathways.
findings: []
- id: PMID:28514442
title: Architecture of the human interactome defines protein communities and disease
networks.
findings: []
- id: PMID:28634279
title: In-frame seven amino-acid duplication in AIP arose over the last 3000 years,
disrupts protein interaction and stability and is associated with gigantism.
findings: []
- id: PMID:31980649
title: Extensive rewiring of the EGFR network in colorectal cancer cells expressing
transforming levels of KRAS(G13D).
findings: []
- id: PMID:33961781
title: Dual proteome-scale networks reveal cell-specific remodeling of the human
interactome.
findings: []
- id: PMID:35271311
title: 'OpenCell: Endogenous tagging for the cartography of human cellular organization.'
findings: []
- id: PMID:8972861
title: XAP2, a novel hepatitis B virus X-associated protein that inhibits X transactivation.
findings: []
- id: PMID:9447995
title: Hepatitis B virus X-associated protein 2 is a subunit of the unliganded aryl
hydrocarbon receptor core complex and exhibits transcriptional enhancer activity.
findings: []
- id: Reactome:R-HSA-8936849
title: AHR:2xHSP90:AIP:PTGES3 binds TCDD
findings: []
- id: Reactome:R-HSA-8937169
title: AHR:TCDD:2xHSP90AB1:AIP:PTGES3 translocates from cytosol to nucleoplasm
findings: []
- id: Reactome:R-HSA-8937191
title: AHR:TCDD:2xHSP90AB1:AIP:PTGES3 dissociates
findings: []
- id: Reactome:R-HSA-8950201
title: Expression of Aryl Hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein
findings: []
- id: DOI:10.1038/s41467-022-34773-w
title: Cryo-EM structure of the agonist-bound Hsp90-XAP2-AHR cytosolic complex
findings:
- statement: >-
High-resolution cryo-EM structure of the human agonist-bound AHR cytosolic
complex with Hsp90 and XAP2/AIP reveals AIP acting as a structural brace
associated with the Hsp90 dimer and the AHR client; the Hsp90 C-terminal
MEEVD motif docks into the TPR domain of AIP, consistent with canonical
TPR-mediated recruitment of HSP90 co-chaperones.
- id: DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.24183
title: Multi-chaperone function modulation and association with cytoskeletal
proteins are key features of the function of AIP in the pituitary gland
findings:
- statement: >-
Proteomic analysis shows AIP co-localizes with HSPA9 in the mitochondrial
chaperone network, consistent with broader chaperone-network associations
beyond the AHR complex.
- id: DOI:10.1586/eem.10.42
title: Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein in familial
isolated pituitary adenoma
findings:
- statement: >-
AIP interacts with phosphodiesterases PDE4A5 and PDE2A3, linking it to
localized cAMP regulation and potentially to modulation of AHR nuclear
translocation and pituitary tumor biology.
- id: DOI:10.1038/s41574-023-00948-8
title: Consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of pituitary
adenomas in childhood and adolescence
findings:
- statement: >-
Among childhood-onset GH-secreting pituitary tumours presenting as
gigantism, AIP mutations account for approximately 29% of cases; for
macroprolactinomas presenting before age 20, the genetic aetiology
includes approximately 9% AIP and 5% MEN1.
- id: DOI:10.1093/ejendo/lvad148
title: Genetic testing in prolactinomas - a cohort study
findings:
- statement: >-
In sporadic isolated macroprolactinomas diagnosed at age 30 or younger,
the germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant prevalence was 4.3%
overall, with 1.9% AIP; sporadic macroprolactinoma diagnosed before age
18 had approximately 9-fold higher odds of carrying a germline mutation
than diagnosis at 18-30.
- id: DOI:10.3389/fendo.2023.1098367
title: AIP gene germline variants in adult Polish patients with apparently
sporadic pituitary macroadenomas
findings:
- statement: >-
Penetrance among AIP variant carriers is incomplete and variable, with
reported estimates ranging from approximately 12-30%, and some
variants/families as low as approximately 6%.