ARHGAP21

UniProt ID: Q5T5U3
Organism: Homo sapiens
Review Status: COMPLETE
πŸ“ Provide Detailed Feedback

Gene Description

ARHGAP21 (also known by its former symbol ARHGAP10, which now belongs to a different gene) is a 1958-residue multidomain Rho-family GTPase-activating protein built from an N-terminal PDZ domain, a central pleckstrin-homology domain and a C-terminal RhoGAP domain. Its RhoGAP domain accelerates GTP hydrolysis on Rho-family GTPases using the conserved arginine finger R1184; reported substrates differ between studies and include Cdc42, RhoA and RhoC, and the preference appears to depend on cell type and stimulus. The PH domain and an adjacent C-terminal helix together form an ARF-binding domain that engages the switch regions of GTP-loaded ARF1, and this interaction recruits ARHGAP21 to Golgi membranes; ARHGAP21 is an ARF effector rather than an ARF GAP. At the Golgi it restrains Cdc42 to control Arp2/3-dependent F-actin dynamics and dynein-driven, microtubule-dependent positioning of the Golgi ribbon near the centrosome. A separate pool is recruited transiently to nascent cell-cell contacts, where ARHGAP21 binds alpha-catenin through a region in its C-terminal half and is required for alpha-catenin to be recruited to adherens junctions, linking it to junction integrity, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and InlA-dependent entry of Listeria monocytogenes. Its GAP activity is inhibited by direct binding of beta-arrestin 1 across the GAP domain downstream of angiotensin II type 1A receptor stimulation. The protein is widely expressed with highest levels in brain, heart, skeletal muscle and placenta, is extensively phosphorylated and binds 14-3-3 proteins, and is modified by SUMO2/3.

Existing Annotations Review

GO Term Evidence Action Reason
GO:0000139 Golgi membrane
IEA
GO_REF:0000044
ACCEPT
Summary: Golgi membrane, mapped from the UniProt subcellular-location vocabulary. ARHGAP21 is a peripheral Golgi membrane protein whose Golgi recruitment depends on binding GTP-loaded ARF1.
Reason: The IEA mapping agrees with direct evidence: ARHGAP21 is recruited to Golgi membranes by GTP-ARF1, and UniProt's SUBCELLULAR LOCATION states 'Golgi apparatus membrane; Peripheral membrane protein' with the note that localization to the Golgi depends on the GTP-bound ARF1 interaction. This is a core location, more informative than the plain GO:0005794 rows because it records the membrane association.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15793564
Here, we identify ARHGAP10--a novel Rho GTPase-activating protein (Rho-GAP) that is recruited to Golgi membranes through binding to GTP-ARF1.
GO:0005096 GTPase activator activity
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: GAP activity for Rho-family GTPases, propagated from the PANTHER node PTN008592632. This is the gene's central molecular function.
Reason: ARHGAP21's GAP activity is the one thing every study agrees on: both founding papers independently built the R1184A arginine-finger mutant and both saw loss of activity and loss of function (UniProt records the mutagenesis with ECO:0000269 evidence from PubMed:15793564 and PubMed:16184169). What is contested is the substrate -- Cdc42 (Dubois 2005, Hehnly 2010, Barcellos 2013), RhoA and Cdc42 (Sousa 2005), RhoA (Anthony 2011), RhoA and RhoC (Lazarini 2013). GO:0005096 is substrate-agnostic and therefore correct under every one of those readings. GO:0005096 is also already maximal: QuickGO's /complete endpoint shows that GO:0005099 (Ras), GO:0005100 (Rho), GO:0008060 (ARF) and GO:0005097 (Rab) GAP terms have all been MERGED into GO:0005096, which now has zero is_a children. There is no more specific term to move to, so no replacement is proposed and no new term is requested to re-create what GO deliberately merged. The substrate is recorded machine-readably instead, via core_functions[].substrates and a has_input (RO:0002233) extension. The WITH/FROM is the PANTHER ancestral node plus ARHGAP21's own accession (UniProtKB:Q5T5U3). A self-referential source is the expected marker that a PAINT curator judged the function core on the strength of the target's own experimental annotation; it is not circular and not redundant.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE CORE
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN008592632 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
PANTHER ancestral node, not a protein. PTHR23175 contains 5182 proteins of which 7 are reviewed; ARHGAP21 sits in subfamily SF16 with its mouse and Xenopus orthologs, and ARHGAP23 in SF5.
UniProtKB:Q5T5U3 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
The target's own accession. ARHGAP21 carries its own IDA to this term from PMID:15793564, so it is legitimately among the descendant evidences used to place the ancestral assertion.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15793564
We show that ARHGAP10 functions preferentially as a GAP for Cdc42 and
GO:0005096 GTPase activator activity
IDA
PMID:15793564
Golgi-localized GAP for Cdc42 functions downstream of ARF1 t...
ACCEPT
Summary: Direct assay of GAP activity, from the paper that identified the protein as a Golgi-localized Rho-family GAP acting downstream of ARF1. This single row is the experimental anchor of ARHGAP21's entire GO record.
Reason: ARHGAP21's GAP activity is the one thing every study agrees on: both founding papers independently built the R1184A arginine-finger mutant and both saw loss of activity and loss of function (UniProt records the mutagenesis with ECO:0000269 evidence from PubMed:15793564 and PubMed:16184169). What is contested is the substrate -- Cdc42 (Dubois 2005, Hehnly 2010, Barcellos 2013), RhoA and Cdc42 (Sousa 2005), RhoA (Anthony 2011), RhoA and RhoC (Lazarini 2013). GO:0005096 is substrate-agnostic and therefore correct under every one of those readings. GO:0005096 is also already maximal: QuickGO's /complete endpoint shows that GO:0005099 (Ras), GO:0005100 (Rho), GO:0008060 (ARF) and GO:0005097 (Rab) GAP terms have all been MERGED into GO:0005096, which now has zero is_a children. There is no more specific term to move to, so no replacement is proposed and no new term is requested to re-create what GO deliberately merged. The substrate is recorded machine-readably instead, via core_functions[].substrates and a has_input (RO:0002233) extension. Note what GO does and does not say here: because the term is substrate-agnostic, GOA is not asserting Cdc42 -- it asserts only that ARHGAP21 is a GAP. The Cdc42-versus-RhoA/RhoC disagreement is therefore invisible in GO rather than resolved by it.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15793564
We show that ARHGAP10 functions preferentially as a GAP for Cdc42 and
PMID:16184169
The GAP domain of ARHGAP10 has GAP activity for RhoA and Cdc42.
GO:0005096 GTPase activator activity
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-8981637
ACCEPT
Summary: GAP activity, asserted by Reactome from the reaction 'RHOA GAPs stimulate RHOA GTPase activity'.
Reason: Redundant with the IDA and IBA rows but not wrong, and it carries a detail worth noticing: Reactome places ARHGAP21 among the RhoA GAPs, i.e. the pathway database sides with the RhoA half of the contested specificity. That substrate information survives only in the Reactome reaction name and is lost in the mapping to GO, because GO:0005096 cannot carry a substrate. This is a concrete instance of the ontology gap recorded in knowledge_gaps.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:23200924
In PC3 cells, ARHGAP21 presented GAP activity for RhoA and RhoC and induced changes in cell morphology.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:15161933
Comprehensive proteomic analysis of interphase and mitotic 1...
MODIFY
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered as a 14-3-3 (zeta) interactor by peptide-elution affinity chromatography from HeLa extracts. 14-3-3 binding is corroborated across four independent publications and three orthogonal methods in IntAct (anti-tag coIP, proximity-dependent biotin identification, pull down), so this is genuine replication rather than one screen logged several ways.
Reason: The partner is a 14-3-3 protein and GO:0071889 '14-3-3 protein binding' is active and exactly describes the interaction, so the uninformative generic term should be replaced rather than removed. The assignment is consistent with ARHGAP21 being heavily phosphorylated -- UniProt lists roughly twenty phosphoserine sites -- and 14-3-3 proteins binding phosphoserine motifs. This is a binding call only: no downstream function of the 14-3-3 interaction has been demonstrated for ARHGAP21, so nothing more is claimed.
Proposed replacements: 14-3-3 protein binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15161933
14-3-3-binding proteins were purified from extracts of interphase and mitotic HeLa cells using specific peptide elution from 14-3-3 zeta affinity columns.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:15778465
Targeted proteomic analysis of 14-3-3 sigma, a p53 effector ...
MODIFY
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered as a 14-3-3 (sigma) interactor by tandem affinity purification coupled to MudPIT. 14-3-3 binding is corroborated across four independent publications and three orthogonal methods in IntAct (anti-tag coIP, proximity-dependent biotin identification, pull down), so this is genuine replication rather than one screen logged several ways.
Reason: The partner is a 14-3-3 protein and GO:0071889 '14-3-3 protein binding' is active and exactly describes the interaction, so the uninformative generic term should be replaced rather than removed. The assignment is consistent with ARHGAP21 being heavily phosphorylated -- UniProt lists roughly twenty phosphoserine sites -- and 14-3-3 proteins binding phosphoserine motifs. This is a binding call only: no downstream function of the 14-3-3 interaction has been demonstrated for ARHGAP21, so nothing more is claimed.
Proposed replacements: 14-3-3 protein binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15778465
The majority of identified proteins contained one or several phosphorylatable 14-3-3-binding sites indicating a potential direct interaction with 14-3-3 sigma.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:17347647
Structural basis for ARF1-mediated recruitment of ARHGAP21 t...
MODIFY
Summary: Binding to GTP-bound ARF1, recorded as generic protein binding. The evidence is a 2.1 A crystal structure of ARF1-GTP bound to ARHGAP21's Arf-binding domain -- the strongest single interaction datum on this gene.
Reason: ARF1 is a small GTPase, so GO:0031267 'small GTPase binding' is available and far more informative than GO:0005515; it is also the term that the merged GO:0017048 and GO:0017137 now resolve to, so it is where GO expects this class of annotation to sit. The structure defines the interface as a PH domain plus a C-terminal helix engaging the ARF1 switch regions, and IntAct records the ARHGAP21 side of this interaction against the PH domain by x-ray diffraction and cosedimentation. The same region binds ARF6 (UniProt SUBUNIT: 'Interacts with GTP-bound ARF1 and ARF6'). Worth stating explicitly because the symbol invites the opposite reading: this is an ARF-BINDING domain, not an ArfGAP domain, and an independent study classifies ARHGAP21 as an ARF6 effector while contrasting it with the Arf GAPs assayed alongside it. ARHGAP21 has no ArfGAP domain and no ARF-GAP annotation, which is correct.
Proposed replacements: small GTPase binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:17347647
We show that ArfBD comprises a PH domain adjoining a C-terminal alpha helix, and that ARF1 interacts with both of these structural motifs through its switch regions and triggers structural rearrangement of the PH domain.
PMID:16527809
We also found that the tandem mutation Q37E/S38I prevented the binding of two Arf GAPs, but not the effector ARHGAP10, and blocked the formation of membrane protrusion and actin reorganization.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:17510365
Wilms tumor suppressor WTX negatively regulates WNT/beta-cat...
REMOVE
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered with beta-catenin in an affinity-purification experiment reported in a paper about the Wilms tumour suppressor WTX.
Reason: A single mass-spectrometry co-purification in a study whose subject is a different protein, with no ARHGAP21-specific follow-up anywhere in the literature and no demonstrated function for the association. There is no informative molecular-function term this evidence would support. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:20195357
A comprehensive resource of interacting protein regions for ...
REMOVE
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered with elongation factor 1-delta in an in vitro virus / display-technology screen built to refine transcription-factor networks.
Reason: The weakest interaction row on the gene: IntAct records only 'display technology' and 'tap' for this pair, from a single publication, with no domain mapping on the ARHGAP21 side and no orthogonal method. The screen's subject matter is unrelated to ARHGAP21's biology. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:26496610
A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organiz...
REMOVE
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered with AXIN1 in a quantitative affinity-purification interactome built to assign stoichiometries and abundances.
Reason: A large-scale interactome row with no ARHGAP21-specific follow-up. The same AXIN1 pairing also appears in the PDZ/PBM holdup survey, so the association is probably a genuine PDZ-motif interaction -- but as explained on those rows, GO has no term for the PDZ-domain side of a PDZ/PBM pair, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:26496610
A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organiz...
REMOVE
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered with APC in a quantitative affinity-purification interactome built to assign stoichiometries and abundances.
Reason: A large-scale interactome row with no ARHGAP21-specific follow-up. The same APC pairing also appears in the PDZ/PBM holdup survey, so the association is probably a genuine PDZ-motif interaction -- but as explained on those rows, GO has no term for the PDZ-domain side of a PDZ/PBM pair, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:26496610
A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organiz...
REMOVE
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered with MYO18A in a quantitative affinity-purification interactome built to assign stoichiometries and abundances.
Reason: A large-scale interactome row with no ARHGAP21-specific follow-up. The same MYO18A pairing also appears in the PDZ/PBM holdup survey, so the association is probably a genuine PDZ-motif interaction -- but as explained on those rows, GO has no term for the PDZ-domain side of a PDZ/PBM pair, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:28514442
Architecture of the human interactome defines protein commun...
MODIFY
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered as a 14-3-3 (zeta) interactor by affinity-purification mass spectrometry (BioPlex). 14-3-3 binding is corroborated across four independent publications and three orthogonal methods in IntAct (anti-tag coIP, proximity-dependent biotin identification, pull down), so this is genuine replication rather than one screen logged several ways.
Reason: The partner is a 14-3-3 protein and GO:0071889 '14-3-3 protein binding' is active and exactly describes the interaction, so the uninformative generic term should be replaced rather than removed. The assignment is consistent with ARHGAP21 being heavily phosphorylated -- UniProt lists roughly twenty phosphoserine sites -- and 14-3-3 proteins binding phosphoserine motifs. This is a binding call only: no downstream function of the 14-3-3 interaction has been demonstrated for ARHGAP21, so nothing more is claimed.
Proposed replacements: 14-3-3 protein binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:28514442
Here we present BioPlex 2.0 (Biophysical Interactions of ORFeome-derived complexes), which uses robust affinity purification-mass spectrometry methodology to elucidate protein interaction networks and co-complexes nucleated by more than 25% of protein-coding genes from the human genome
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:33961781
Dual proteome-scale networks reveal cell-specific remodeling...
MODIFY
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered as a 14-3-3 (zeta) interactor by affinity-purification mass spectrometry (BioPlex 3.0). 14-3-3 binding is corroborated across four independent publications and three orthogonal methods in IntAct (anti-tag coIP, proximity-dependent biotin identification, pull down), so this is genuine replication rather than one screen logged several ways.
Reason: The partner is a 14-3-3 protein and GO:0071889 '14-3-3 protein binding' is active and exactly describes the interaction, so the uninformative generic term should be replaced rather than removed. The assignment is consistent with ARHGAP21 being heavily phosphorylated -- UniProt lists roughly twenty phosphoserine sites -- and 14-3-3 proteins binding phosphoserine motifs. This is a binding call only: no downstream function of the 14-3-3 interaction has been demonstrated for ARHGAP21, so nothing more is claimed.
Proposed replacements: 14-3-3 protein binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:33961781
The first, BioPlex 3.0, results from affinity purification of 10,128 human proteins
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:33961781
Dual proteome-scale networks reveal cell-specific remodeling...
REMOVE
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered with SAPCD1 in a proteome-scale affinity-purification network.
Reason: A large-scale interactome row. SAPCD1 is a 148-residue protein of little characterised function and the pairing has no follow-up; it also appears in the PDZ/PBM holdup survey, where GO offers no term for ARHGAP21's side. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36012204
Differential CFTR-Interactome Proximity Labeling Procedures ...
REMOVE
Summary: ARHGAP21 detected in a proximity-labelling map of the CFTR interactome.
Reason: Proximity labelling reports neighbourhood, not binding, and the study's subject is CFTR rather than ARHGAP21. CFTR does carry a C-terminal PDZ-binding motif and the pair is also seen in the holdup survey, so the association is plausible -- but no informative GO term exists for the PDZ-domain side, and nothing here establishes a function. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the AXIN1 PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. This partner additionally has an orthogonal anti-tag coIP row from a different publication in IntAct, so the interaction is not a single-method hit. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the human papillomavirus type 16 E6 PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. This partner is a viral oncoprotein whose C-terminal PBM hijacks host PDZ proteins; the row records a host-virus interaction rather than a human cellular function. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the human papillomavirus type 18 E6 PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. This partner is a viral oncoprotein whose C-terminal PBM hijacks host PDZ proteins; the row records a host-virus interaction rather than a human cellular function. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the CFTR PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the APC PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. This partner additionally has an orthogonal anti-tag coIP row from a different publication in IntAct, so the interaction is not a single-method hit. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the beta-catenin (CTNNB1) PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. This partner additionally has an orthogonal anti-tag coIP row from a different publication in IntAct, so the interaction is not a single-method hit. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the PTEN PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the RPS6KA1 PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the SAPCD1 PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. This partner additionally has an orthogonal anti-tag coIP row from a different publication in IntAct, so the interaction is not a single-method hit. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36115835
Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interac...
REMOVE
Summary: Affinity of the ARHGAP21 PDZ domain for the MYO18A PDZ-binding motif, measured by holdup assay in a 65,000-interaction PDZ/PBM survey.
Reason: These rows come from a systematic PDZ-domain / PDZ-binding-motif affinity survey. IntAct's recorded participant ranges place the ARHGAP21 side of every holdup measurement at residues 50-159, i.e. the PDZ domain, which is worth checking rather than assuming because the paper's full text never names ARHGAP21. The measurement is real and quantitative, but GO cannot express it: the only non-obsolete PDZ term is GO:0030165, defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM. ARHGAP21 is on the opposite side of the interaction and GO offers no reciprocal term, so there is nothing more informative to modify to. Recorded as an ONTOLOGY knowledge gap. This partner additionally has an orthogonal anti-tag coIP row from a different publication in IntAct, so the interaction is not a single-method hit. GO:0005515 carries no functional information. Removal does not mean the reported interaction is false or that the underlying experiment is unsound -- it means the annotation does not say what ARHGAP21 does.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36115835
Here, we measure the affinities of 65,000 interactions involving PDZ domains and their target PDZ-binding motifs (PBM) within a human interactome region particularly relevant for viral infection and cancer.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36931259
A central chaperone-like role for 14-3-3 proteins in human c...
MODIFY
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered as a 14-3-3 (sigma) interactor by systematic paralog-resolved 14-3-3 interactome mapping. 14-3-3 binding is corroborated across four independent publications and three orthogonal methods in IntAct (anti-tag coIP, proximity-dependent biotin identification, pull down), so this is genuine replication rather than one screen logged several ways.
Reason: The partner is a 14-3-3 protein and GO:0071889 '14-3-3 protein binding' is active and exactly describes the interaction, so the uninformative generic term should be replaced rather than removed. The assignment is consistent with ARHGAP21 being heavily phosphorylated -- UniProt lists roughly twenty phosphoserine sites -- and 14-3-3 proteins binding phosphoserine motifs. This is a binding call only: no downstream function of the 14-3-3 interaction has been demonstrated for ARHGAP21, so nothing more is claimed.
Proposed replacements: 14-3-3 protein binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36931259
Here, we map the interactomes of all human 14-3-3 paralogs and systematically characterize the effect of disrupting these interactions on client localization.
GO:0005515 protein binding
IPI
PMID:36931259
A central chaperone-like role for 14-3-3 proteins in human c...
MODIFY
Summary: ARHGAP21 recovered as a 14-3-3 (zeta) interactor by systematic paralog-resolved 14-3-3 interactome mapping. 14-3-3 binding is corroborated across four independent publications and three orthogonal methods in IntAct (anti-tag coIP, proximity-dependent biotin identification, pull down), so this is genuine replication rather than one screen logged several ways.
Reason: The partner is a 14-3-3 protein and GO:0071889 '14-3-3 protein binding' is active and exactly describes the interaction, so the uninformative generic term should be replaced rather than removed. The assignment is consistent with ARHGAP21 being heavily phosphorylated -- UniProt lists roughly twenty phosphoserine sites -- and 14-3-3 proteins binding phosphoserine motifs. This is a binding call only: no downstream function of the 14-3-3 interaction has been demonstrated for ARHGAP21, so nothing more is claimed.
Proposed replacements: 14-3-3 protein binding
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:36931259
Here, we map the interactomes of all human 14-3-3 paralogs and systematically characterize the effect of disrupting these interactions on client localization.
GO:0005794 Golgi apparatus
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: Golgi apparatus, propagated from PANTHER node PTN002754039 with the is_active_in qualifier. ARHGAP21 acts at the Golgi, where ARF1 recruits it.
Reason: Correct and core, and corroborated on the target itself by an IDA. is_active_in is the right qualifier: the Golgi is where ARHGAP21's GAP activity is exercised, not merely where the protein can be found. The WITH/FROM is the PANTHER ancestral node plus ARHGAP21's own accession (UniProtKB:Q5T5U3). A self-referential source is the expected marker that a PAINT curator judged the function core on the strength of the target's own experimental annotation; it is not circular and not redundant.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE CORE
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN002754039 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
PANTHER ancestral node carrying the Golgi, actin-cytoskeleton, cell-junction and microtubule-transport terms for this clade.
UniProtKB:Q5T5U3 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
The target's own accession; ARHGAP21 holds its own IDA to GO:0005794 from PMID:20525016.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:17347647
ARHGAP21 is recruited to the Golgi by binding to another small GTPase, ARF1.
GO:0005794 Golgi apparatus
IDA
PMID:20525016
Cdc42 regulates microtubule-dependent Golgi positioning.
ACCEPT
Summary: Golgi localisation observed directly in human cells.
Reason: Direct localisation evidence in the paper that also established ARHGAP21's role in repositioning the Golgi after microtubule depolymerisation. Core location, consistent with the ARF1-dependent recruitment mechanism. The quote is this paper's own imaging result; an earlier draft cited an introduction sentence that merely restated prior work with reference callouts, which is not IDA evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20525016
The GFP-tagged ARHGAP21 fragment was localized to the Golgi apparatus as expected (Figure 1B).
GO:0005829 cytosol
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-8981637
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Cytosol, asserted by Reactome as the compartment of the 'RHOA GAPs stimulate RHOA GTPase activity' reaction.
Reason: A Reactome compartment label is a property of the reaction as modelled, not a measurement of where ARHGAP21 was observed, so it should not be read as primary localisation evidence. It is nonetheless not wrong: ARHGAP21 is a peripheral membrane protein and necessarily has a soluble cytosolic pool, and independent studies report nuclear and cytoplasmic signal. But the functionally meaningful pools are the Golgi membrane and the cell junction, which are separately annotated, so cytosol is retained as non-core rather than accepted as a core location.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:23200924
ARHGAP21 is located in the nucleus and cytoplasm of both cell lines and its depletion resulted in decreased proliferation and increased migration of PC3 cells but not LNCaP cells.
GO:0005856 cytoskeleton
IEA
GO_REF:0000044
ACCEPT
Summary: Cytoskeleton, mapped from the UniProt subcellular-location vocabulary.
Reason: Broad, but correct and consistent with UniProt's 'Cytoplasm, cytoskeleton' location and with the more specific GO:0015629 actin cytoskeleton rows the gene already carries. An IEA being more general than the experimental annotations alongside it is not a defect.
GO:0007030 Golgi organization
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: Golgi organization, propagated from PANTHER node PTN002754039 and independently supported by knockdown experiments on the human protein.
Reason: Core biological process, and the propagation lands on exactly the term the target's own IMP supports. The WITH/FROM is the PANTHER ancestral node plus ARHGAP21's own accession (UniProtKB:Q5T5U3). A self-referential source is the expected marker that a PAINT curator judged the function core on the strength of the target's own experimental annotation; it is not circular and not redundant.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE CORE
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN002754039 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
Ancestral node for the Golgi/cytoskeleton term set.
UniProtKB:Q5T5U3 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
The target's own accession; ARHGAP21 holds its own IMP to GO:0007030 from PMID:20525016.
GO:0007030 Golgi organization
IMP
PMID:20525016
Cdc42 regulates microtubule-dependent Golgi positioning.
ACCEPT
Summary: Knockdown of ARHGAP21 impairs the ability of dispersed Golgi membranes to reposition at the centrosome, establishing a role in Golgi organization.
Reason: A clean loss-of-function experiment in human cells with a structural readout. Core process, and mechanistically coherent with the ARF1/Cdc42 axis the same paper works out.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20525016
Here we show that reduced expression of the Cdc42-specific GTPase-activating protein, ARHGAP21, inhibits the ability of dispersed Golgi membranes to reposition at the centrosome following nocodazole treatment and washout.
GO:0007165 signal transduction
IEA
GO_REF:0000002
MODIFY
Summary: Signal transduction, mapped electronically from the InterPro RhoGAP domain signature IPR000198.
Reason: The mapping is sound in direction but pitched several levels too high: GO:0007165 is one of the broadest terms in the biological-process branch, while the domain it derives from is specifically a Rho-family GAP domain. GO:0051056 'regulation of small GTPase mediated signal transduction' is exactly what a RhoGAP domain licenses, and the gene already carries it from Reactome, which shows the term is considered apt here. Duplicate terms from different evidence are acceptable, so this is a specificity upgrade rather than a removal.
GO:0015629 actin cytoskeleton
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: Actin cytoskeleton, propagated from PANTHER node PTN002754039 with is_active_in.
Reason: ARHGAP21 controls Arp2/3-dependent F-actin dynamics through its GAP activity, so the actin cytoskeleton is genuinely where it acts rather than merely where it is found. Corroborated on the target by an independent HPA immunofluorescence IDA. The WITH/FROM is the PANTHER ancestral node plus ARHGAP21's own accession (UniProtKB:Q5T5U3). A self-referential source is the expected marker that a PAINT curator judged the function core on the strength of the target's own experimental annotation; it is not circular and not redundant.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE CORE
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN002754039 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
Ancestral node for the Golgi/cytoskeleton term set.
UniProtKB:Q5T5U3 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
The target's own accession; ARHGAP21 holds an independent HPA IDA to GO:0015629.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15793564
regulates the Arp2/3 complex and F-actin dynamics at the Golgi through the control of Cdc42 activity.
GO:0015629 actin cytoskeleton
IDA
GO_REF:0000052
ACCEPT
Summary: Actin cytoskeleton localisation from HPA immunofluorescence.
Reason: Independent imaging evidence that agrees with the IBA row and with the protein's established role in F-actin regulation.
GO:0030054 cell junction
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: Cell junction, propagated from PANTHER node PTN002754039 with is_active_in.
Reason: Well supported on the human protein: ARHGAP21 is transiently recruited to cell-cell junctions during adhesion formation, where it lowers Cdc42 activity, and it binds alpha-catenin there. is_active_in is appropriate because this is where the GAP activity is exercised. The WITH/FROM is the PANTHER ancestral node plus ARHGAP21's own accession (UniProtKB:Q5T5U3). A self-referential source is the expected marker that a PAINT curator judged the function core on the strength of the target's own experimental annotation; it is not circular and not redundant.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE CORE
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN002754039 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
Ancestral node for the Golgi/cytoskeleton term set.
UniProtKB:Q5T5U3 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
The target's own accession; ARHGAP21 holds an independent HPA IDA to GO:0030054.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:23235160
ARHGAP21 interacts with Cdc42, and decreased Cdc42 activity coincides with the appearance of ARHGAP21 at the cell-cell junctions.
GO:0030054 cell junction
IDA
GO_REF:0000052
ACCEPT
Summary: Cell junction localisation from HPA immunofluorescence.
Reason: Independent imaging evidence consistent with the junction biology established by the alpha-catenin and Cdc42 studies.
GO:0030659 cytoplasmic vesicle membrane
IEA
GO_REF:0000044
ACCEPT
Summary: Cytoplasmic vesicle membrane, mapped from the UniProt subcellular-location vocabulary.
Reason: Consistent with UniProt's 'Cytoplasmic vesicle membrane; Peripheral membrane protein' location and with ARHGAP21's role in retrograde and post-Golgi trafficking. A peripheral association with transport-vesicle membranes follows naturally from ARF1-dependent recruitment. Non-controversial IEA.
GO:0051056 regulation of small GTPase mediated signal transduction
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-9012999
ACCEPT
Summary: Regulation of small GTPase mediated signal transduction, asserted by Reactome from the RHO GTPase cycle.
Reason: The correct process-level description of what a Rho-family GAP does, and pitched at the right level given that the substrate is contested. It is the term this review also proposes as the replacement for the over-broad GO:0007165 InterPro mapping.
GO:0051683 establishment of Golgi localization
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
ACCEPT
Summary: Establishment of Golgi localization, propagated from PANTHER node PTN002754039.
Reason: Matches the target's own IDA for the same term, so the propagation lands at exactly the right specificity rather than above its evidence. The WITH/FROM is the PANTHER ancestral node plus ARHGAP21's own accession (UniProtKB:Q5T5U3). A self-referential source is the expected marker that a PAINT curator judged the function core on the strength of the target's own experimental annotation; it is not circular and not redundant.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE CORE
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN002754039 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
Ancestral node for the Golgi/cytoskeleton term set.
UniProtKB:Q5T5U3 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
The target's own accession; ARHGAP21 holds its own IDA to GO:0051683 from PMID:20525016.
GO:0051683 establishment of Golgi localization
IDA
PMID:20525016
Cdc42 regulates microtubule-dependent Golgi positioning.
ACCEPT
Summary: Establishment of Golgi localization, from the nocodazole washout assay in which ARHGAP21-dependent Cdc42 signalling is required for dispersed Golgi membranes to re-cluster at the centrosome.
Reason: Direct, well-controlled evidence in human cells, and the term is precisely what the assay measures.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20525016
Together, our results reveal that dynein and microtubule-dependent Golgi positioning is regulated by ARF1-, coatomer-, and ARHGAP21-dependent Cdc42 signaling.
GO:0051684 maintenance of Golgi location
IMP
PMID:20525016
Cdc42 regulates microtubule-dependent Golgi positioning.
ACCEPT
Summary: Maintenance of Golgi location, from knockdown experiments in the same study.
Reason: Distinct from establishment of Golgi localization and separately supported -- and the distinction turns on which experiment is cited. The nocodazole washout assay measures RE-establishment of position after dispersal, so it belongs on GO:0051683; the evidence for maintenance is the steady-state observation that Golgi membranes are already partially dispersed in unperturbed cells when ARHGAP21 is knocked down. This row is quoted with the latter. Retained as a core process.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20525016
Golgi membranes were partially dispersed in cells when ARHGAP21 levels were reduced by RNA interference but not in control cells (Figures 1A and S1B).
GO:0070161 anchoring junction
IEA
GO_REF:0000044
ACCEPT
Summary: Anchoring junction, mapped from the UniProt subcellular-location vocabulary.
Reason: Correct and better-specified than the plain cell-junction rows: the junction ARHGAP21 is documented at is the adherens junction, where it binds alpha-catenin, and adherens junction is a kind of anchoring junction.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:16184169
This protein colocalized with alpha-catenin at cell-cell junctions and was recruited at L. monocytogenes entry sites.
GO:0072384 organelle transport along microtubule
IBA
GO_REF:0000033
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Organelle transport along microtubule, propagated from PANTHER node PTN002754039.
Reason: Supported on the target by its own IMP, so the propagation is sound. Marked non-core rather than core because ARHGAP21 does not itself move cargo: it acts upstream, restraining Cdc42 so that dynein-dependent motility of Golgi membranes proceeds normally. The transport is executed by dynein and microtubules; ARHGAP21 regulates it. The WITH/FROM is the PANTHER ancestral node plus ARHGAP21's own accession (UniProtKB:Q5T5U3). A self-referential source is the expected marker that a PAINT curator judged the function core on the strength of the target's own experimental annotation; it is not circular and not redundant.
Propagation Review
Root cause: NO FAILURE CORE
Sources checked:
PANTHER:PTN002754039 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
Ancestral node for the Golgi/cytoskeleton term set.
UniProtKB:Q5T5U3 SUPPORTS TRANSFER
The target's own accession; ARHGAP21 holds its own IMP to GO:0072384 from PMID:20525016.
GO:0072384 organelle transport along microtubule
IMP
PMID:20525016
Cdc42 regulates microtubule-dependent Golgi positioning.
KEEP AS NON CORE
Summary: Organelle transport along microtubule, from the permeabilised-cell Golgi capture and motility assay.
Reason: The experiment is sound and the term describes the process affected. Kept as non-core for the same reason as the IBA row: ARHGAP21 is an upstream regulator of dynein-dependent Golgi motility rather than a component of the transport machinery, and the motility readout was blocked by an inhibitory dynein antibody.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20525016
Together, our results reveal that dynein and microtubule-dependent Golgi positioning is regulated by ARF1-, coatomer-, and ARHGAP21-dependent Cdc42 signaling.
GO:0045294 alpha-catenin binding
IPI
PMID:16184169
ARHGAP10 is necessary for alpha-catenin recruitment at adher...
NEW
Summary: ARHGAP21 was identified as a direct partner of alpha-catenin in a two-hybrid screen using alpha-catenin as bait, colocalises with it at cell-cell junctions, and UniProt maps the interaction to residues 1592-1861 with ECO:0000269 evidence from this paper.
Reason: This is the single largest curation gap on the gene. Querying QuickGO by reference shows PMID:16184169 produced two annotations in all of GOA, both on alpha-catenin (CTNNA1, P35221) and neither on ARHGAP21 -- even though the paper is titled for ARHGAP21's requirement in alpha-catenin recruitment, and even though UniProt records the interaction in both FUNCTION and SUBUNIT and maps a binding region for it. GO:0045294 'alpha-catenin binding' is active and defined as 'Binding to catenin complex alpha subunit', which is exactly this interaction, so the gap is not an ontology limitation but an uncurated paper. IPI is the correct code: both proteins are human and the assay is a direct interaction assay.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:16184169
Using a two-hybrid screen, we identified a new partner of alpha-catenin: ARHGAP10.
PMID:16184169
This protein colocalized with alpha-catenin at cell-cell junctions and was recruited at L. monocytogenes entry sites.
GO:0034333 adherens junction assembly
IMP
PMID:16184169
ARHGAP10 is necessary for alpha-catenin recruitment at adher...
NEW
Summary: Knockdown of ARHGAP21 impairs recruitment of alpha-catenin to cell-cell contacts, and its overexpression raises alpha-catenin and cortical actin at junctions; an independent knockdown study finds weaker cell-cell adhesions.
Reason: ARHGAP21 does part of the work of building the junction rather than merely being required for it: it binds alpha-catenin directly through a mapped region, is itself recruited to the junction during adhesion formation, and determines whether alpha-catenin -- a core structural component linking cadherin to actin -- arrives there. Loss and gain of function move the phenotype in opposite directions, which is what distinguishes participation from being a passive requirement. Two independent human knockdown studies agree. The alternative framing would be a regulation-level term such as GO:1903393, which a curator may prefer if the effect is judged to run entirely through GAP activity; the direct alpha-catenin interaction is why the assembly term is proposed instead. Species caveat, stated because an experimental code asserts the experiment was done in the annotated organism: both supporting papers are abstract-only in the cache, neither abstract names a cell line, and PMID:16184169 is not in PMC or Europe PMC full text and returns no text-mined annotations, so the cell system could not be confirmed from any source available here. IMP is retained because the two-hybrid partner is human alpha-catenin and the annotation target is human ARHGAP21, but a curator with the full text should confirm the cell line before accepting the code.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:16184169
In ARHGAP10-knockdown cells, L. monocytogenes entry and alpha-catenin recruitment at cell-cell contacts were impaired.
PMID:16184169
Its overexpression disrupted actin cables, enhanced alpha-catenin and cortical actin levels at cell-cell junctions and inhibited L. monocytogenes entry.
PMID:23235160
Cells lacking ARHGAP21 expression show weaker cell-cell adhesions, increased cell migration, and a diminished ability to undergo hepatocyte growth factor-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).
GO:0032956 regulation of actin cytoskeleton organization
IMP
PMID:15793564
Golgi-localized GAP for Cdc42 functions downstream of ARF1 t...
NEW
Summary: ARHGAP21 controls Arp2/3-complex and F-actin dynamics at the Golgi through its GAP activity toward Cdc42. The direction of the effect is context-dependent: overexpression disrupts actin cables and raises cortical actin at junctions, while antisense knockdown in neonatal mouse pancreatic islets lowers F-actin.
Reason: The gene's founding paper is titled for control of the Arp2/3 complex and F-actin dynamics, yet ARHGAP21 carries no actin-related biological process term at all -- only the cellular-component rows for actin cytoskeleton. A regulation term is the right shape, and is right for a second reason: ARHGAP21 does not nucleate or bundle actin itself, it sets the activity level of the Rho GTPase that drives Arp2/3-dependent polymerisation, and the reported sign of the effect differs between systems (overexpression disrupts actin cables in epithelial cells; antisense knockdown reduces F-actin in mouse islets). GO:0032956 is sign-agnostic and so accommodates both, where a directional regulation term would not. Evidence-code caveat: PMID:15793564 is abstract-only in the cache, so the assay detail behind the F-actin phenotype cannot be read here; IMP is retained because the abstract states the control of Arp2/3 and F-actin dynamics as this paper's own result on the human protein, but a curator with the full text should confirm the perturbation used. Note the supporting PMID:25744409 experiment is in MOUSE islets and is cited only to show the direction is not fixed, not as evidence for the human annotation. On the evidence structure: the human data on this row is GAIN-of-function (PMID:16184169, overexpression in epithelial cells); no human LOSS-of-function actin readout is quotable from the cache. UniProt's MISCELLANEOUS line records the human depletion phenotype, but it spans a CC continuation (ARHGAP21-uniprot.txt:274-275), so the only fragment quotable on one physical line truncates at 'induces cell spreading and' and drops the F-actin clause that would make it relevant. Left uncited rather than quoted misleadingly.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:15793564
regulates the Arp2/3 complex and F-actin dynamics at the Golgi through the control of Cdc42 activity.
PMID:16184169
Its overexpression disrupted actin cables, enhanced alpha-catenin and cortical actin levels at cell-cell junctions and inhibited L. monocytogenes entry.
PMID:25744409
F-actin was reduced in AS-islets, as judged by lower phalloidin intensity.
GO:0031005 filamin binding
IPI
PMID:41957357
ARHGAP21 enhances metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma by ...
NEW
Summary: ARHGAP21 binds filamin A directly, with the PDZ domain implicated in the interaction with FLNA's 1-1200 aa fragment, and recruits HSP90-alpha to protect FLNA from ubiquitination and degradation.
Reason: GO:0031005 'filamin binding' is active and partner-appropriate, so unlike the ten PDZ holdup rows this interaction CAN be expressed informatively -- which is why it is proposed as a row rather than left as generic binding. It also corrects the darkness framing of the PDZ knowledge gap: the domain does have one reported cellular ligand. The paper hedges the domain mapping ('functions as a potential mediator'), so the row is deliberately scoped to the binding itself, which the paper states directly, rather than to a PDZ-dependence claim. Both proteins are human and the work is in human HCC cell lines, so IPI is the correct code. The downstream FLNA-stabilisation and metastasis phenotypes are not proposed as process terms here: they are effects of the interaction in a cancer context rather than a demonstrated normal function, and the HSP90-alpha arm would need its own evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:41957357
Mechanistically, we demonstrated that ARHGAP21 directly binds to FLNA, and the PDZ domain of ARHGAP21 functions as a potential mediator of its binding to the 1-1200 aa fragment of FLNA.

Core Functions

Rho-family GTPase-activating protein: accelerates GTP hydrolysis on Cdc42, and on RhoA and RhoC in some settings, via the R1184 arginine finger of its RhoGAP domain, thereby switching off Rho-GTPase signalling to the actin cytoskeleton.

Supporting Evidence:
  • PMID:15793564
    We show that ARHGAP10 functions preferentially as a GAP for Cdc42 and
  • PMID:16184169
    The GAP domain of ARHGAP10 has GAP activity for RhoA and Cdc42.
  • PMID:23200924
    In PC3 cells, ARHGAP21 presented GAP activity for RhoA and RhoC and induced changes in cell morphology.
  • file:human/ARHGAP21/ARHGAP21-deep-research-affinage.md
    At its catalytic core it inactivates Cdc42, and also RhoA and RhoC, thereby controlling actin dynamics in contexts ranging from dynein-dependent retrograde transport of Shiga toxin to the Golgi and surface delivery of influenza neuraminidase

ARF1/ARF6 effector: binds the switch regions of GTP-loaded ARF1 through a bipartite ARF-binding domain formed by the PH domain and an adjacent C-terminal helix, which is what recruits ARHGAP21 to Golgi membranes and couples ARF1 signalling to Cdc42 inactivation.

Supporting Evidence:
  • PMID:17347647
    We show that ArfBD comprises a PH domain adjoining a C-terminal alpha helix, and that ARF1 interacts with both of these structural motifs through its switch regions and triggers structural rearrangement of the PH domain.
  • PMID:16527809
    We also found that the tandem mutation Q37E/S38I prevented the binding of two Arf GAPs, but not the effector ARHGAP10, and blocked the formation of membrane protrusion and actin reorganization.

Adherens-junction component: binds alpha-catenin through a region in its C-terminal half and is required for alpha-catenin recruitment to nascent cell-cell contacts, coupling junction assembly to local Cdc42 inactivation and cortical actin remodelling.

Molecular Function:
alpha-catenin binding
Directly Involved In:
Supporting Evidence:
  • PMID:16184169
    In ARHGAP10-knockdown cells, L. monocytogenes entry and alpha-catenin recruitment at cell-cell contacts were impaired.
  • PMID:23235160
    ARHGAP21 interacts with Cdc42, and decreased Cdc42 activity coincides with the appearance of ARHGAP21 at the cell-cell junctions.

References

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

Suggested Questions for Experts

Q: Is ARHGAP21's GAP substrate preference intrinsic or contextual? No study has assayed Cdc42, RhoA and RhoC side by side with the same purified protein and the same assay; the two 2005 papers used different constructs and readouts, and the PC3-versus-LNCaP split in the prostate study hints that cell context matters. A single comparative kinetic experiment would settle whether the literature disagreement is a real biological switch or a methodological artefact.

Suggested experts: Philippe Chavrier, Anne J. Ridley, Sara T. O. Saad

Q: Should GO reinstate substrate-specific GAP terms, or should has_input extensions become the standard way to record GAP substrates? GO:0005099 (Ras), GO:0005100 (Rho), GO:0008060 (ARF) and GO:0005097 (Rab) GAP terms have all been merged into GO:0005096, which now has zero is_a children, so the most heavily curated property of the GAP families is no longer expressible. ARHGAP21 is a good test case because its substrate is genuinely contested and a curator would want to record both readings rather than choose.

Q: Should GO add a term for the PDZ-domain side of a PDZ/PDZ-binding-motif interaction? GO:0030165 'PDZ domain binding' models only the ligand side (binding TO a PDZ domain). Systematic PDZ affinity surveys now measure thousands of interactions from the PDZ-domain side, and those results are currently unrepresentable for the PDZ-containing protein -- ten of ARHGAP21's generic binding rows are exactly this case.

Suggested experts: Gilles TravΓ©, Gergo Gogl

Q: Which PDZ ligands does ARHGAP21 engage in cells, and where? The holdup survey gives affinities for isolated fragments, and only one cellular ligand has been reported for the domain so far -- filamin A, in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, and the mapping is hedged as a 'potential mediator'. Whether the PDZ domain is occupied at the Golgi, at junctions, or not at all in a given cell type remains untested.

Suggested experts: Gilles TravΓ©, Philippe Chavrier

Q: Does the alpha-catenin interaction require ARHGAP21's GAP activity? The alpha-catenin interaction region (roughly 1592-1861) is separate from the RhoGAP domain (1147-1339), so binding and catalysis are in principle separable. Testing the catalytically dead R1184A mutant for alpha-catenin recruitment would show whether ARHGAP21 acts at junctions as a scaffold, as an enzyme, or as both.

Suggested experts: Pascale Cossart, Sandra Sousa

Q: Would curators consider annotating PMID:16184169? It is a Nature Cell Biology paper whose title finding concerns ARHGAP21, and it has produced two GO annotations in all of GOA, both on its partner alpha-catenin and neither on ARHGAP21. Note that the paper calls the protein ARHGAP10, which is now a different gene's symbol -- a plausible reason it was passed over, and worth checking systematically for other genes that have been renamed into a symbol collision.

Suggested Experiments

Experiment: Express and purify a single ARHGAP21 RhoGAP-domain construct (residues ~1147-1339) and measure steady-state and single-turnover GTP hydrolysis against Cdc42, RhoA, RhoC and Rac1 under identical conditions, using the catalytically dead R1184A mutant as the negative control and a well-characterised single-specificity GAP as the positive control. Report kcat/Km for each pair so preference is quantitative rather than qualitative.

Hypothesis: ARHGAP21's RhoGAP domain has an intrinsic substrate preference that is the same in every cell type, and the published Cdc42-versus-RhoA/RhoC disagreement reflects differences in construct and assay rather than biology.

Type: in vitro GTPase-activating protein kinetic assay

Experiment: Knock down ARHGAP21 in a panel spanning the systems where the conflicting results were obtained (HeLa, Caco-2, PC3, LNCaP) and quantify active Cdc42-GTP, RhoA-GTP and RhoC-GTP in parallel by effector-domain pulldown or FRET biosensor, with rescue by wild-type and R1184A ARHGAP21. A cell-type-dependent pattern would convert the literature disagreement into a finding.

Hypothesis: Which Rho GTPase ARHGAP21 engages in cells depends on cell context, so the same protein is a Cdc42 GAP in one lineage and a RhoA/RhoC GAP in another.

Type: loss-of-function with parallel active-GTPase measurement

Experiment: In ARHGAP21-null cells, compare rescue by wild type, R1184A (catalytically dead), a PDZ-domain deletion, a PH/ArfBD point mutant (Y1000A or I1054A, both known to abolish ARF1 binding and membrane association) and a deletion of the 1592-1861 alpha-catenin-binding region. Score Golgi repositioning after nocodazole washout, alpha-catenin recruitment to nascent contacts, and junction strength. This assigns each phenotype to a module rather than to the protein as a whole.

Hypothesis: ARHGAP21's Golgi, junction and PDZ functions are separable and map to distinct modules of the protein.

Type: structure-function rescue in knockout cells

Experiment: Express the isolated ARHGAP21 PDZ domain as a proximity-labelling bait alongside a carboxylate-binding-loop mutant that cannot bind a PBM, and compare the labelled proteomes. Proteins enriched only by the wild-type bait, and present in the holdup hit list, are candidate in vivo ligands; validate the top candidates by C-terminal PBM truncation in the partner.

Hypothesis: The ARHGAP21 PDZ domain engages a specific PDZ-binding-motif ligand in cells, and that ligand is among the high-affinity holdup hits.

Type: proximity labelling with a binding-deficient control

Experiment: Map the 14-3-3 binding site(s) by systematic serine-to-alanine mutagenesis across the roughly twenty documented phosphoserines, then test the binding-deficient mutant for Golgi recruitment, GAP activity toward Cdc42 and RhoA, and junction localisation. A phenotype would convert a well-replicated but currently functionless interaction into a mechanism; no phenotype would justify leaving GO:0071889 as a binding-only annotation.

Hypothesis: 14-3-3 binding is a regulatory input to ARHGAP21 rather than an incidental consequence of its heavy phosphorylation.

Type: phosphosite mutagenesis with interaction and activity readouts

Knowledge Gaps

What is not known β€” curated, literature-grounded statements of the open unknowns (the inverse of core functions).

Gap: GO cannot record which GTPase a GAP acts on. ARHGAP21's best-characterised and most contested property is its substrate preference -- Cdc42 versus RhoA versus RhoC -- and the molecular-function branch has no vocabulary for it.

OPEN ONTOLOGY

What is known: What is known: ARHGAP21 is a GAP, and the R1184 arginine finger is required (two independent groups). What GO can express: GO:0005096 'GTPase activator activity', and nothing finer. QuickGO's /complete endpoint shows GO:0005099 (Ras), GO:0005100 (Rho), GO:0008060 (ARF) and GO:0005097 (Rab) GAP terms were all merged into GO:0005096, which now has zero is_a children. The merge was deliberate, so this is recorded as a gap rather than a request to undo it.

Significance: The consequence is visible in this gene's own record: Reactome's reaction name 'RHOA GAPs stimulate RHOA GTPase activity' carries substrate information that is lost the moment it is mapped to GO:0005096. Any consumer reading GO alone cannot tell a Cdc42 GAP from a RhoA GAP from an ARF GAP. For a family curated largely on substrate specificity this is a systematic loss, not an ARHGAP21-specific one.

What would resolve it: In the absence of ontology terms, substrate identity is recorded machine-readably in this review as core_functions[].substrates and as has_input (RO:0002233) extensions on the annotations. A general fix would need either substrate-specific GAP terms reinstated or the has_input extension applied systematically across GAP annotations.

Gap: GO has no term for the PDZ-domain side of a PDZ/PDZ-binding-motif interaction, so neither the quantitative affinity survey of ARHGAP21's PDZ domain nor its one reported cellular ligand can be recorded as anything more informative than generic protein binding.

OPEN ONTOLOGY

What is known: GO:0030165 'PDZ domain binding' exists but is defined as 'Binding to a PDZ domain of a protein' -- the ligand side, for proteins carrying a PBM -- and has no descendants. A QuickGO full-text search over GO returns exactly two PDZ terms, the other being obsolete. ARHGAP21 carries the PDZ domain and binds the motifs, which is the direction GO does not model. Note this is an ontology gap, NOT a darkness claim about the domain: PMID:41957357 reports that the PDZ domain mediates binding to filamin A, so the module does have a reported cellular ligand.

Significance: Ten of ARHGAP21's twenty-four GO:0005515 rows are holdup-assay affinity measurements whose ARHGAP21 side maps to residues 50-159, the PDZ domain. All ten are removed in this review as uninformative because no better term exists, which means real biophysical data leaves no trace in GO. The same applies to every PDZ-domain protein assayed in that survey. The filamin A interaction escapes the gap only because GO happens to have a partner-specific term (GO:0031005 filamin binding), which is proposed here as a NEW row -- a ligand-by-ligand workaround that does not scale.

Gap: Seven of the ten primary papers on human ARHGAP21 have produced no GO annotation anywhere in GOA. This gene's problem is missing curation, not over-annotation.

NARROWING CURATION

What is known: Measured by querying QuickGO by reference for each primary paper (none of the ten result sets was truncated, so the counts are complete). Only PMID:15793564 (one row), PMID:17347647 (one generic protein-binding row) and PMID:20525016 (five rows) have contributed. PMID:16184169, PMID:16527809, PMID:21173159, PMID:22922005, PMID:23200924, PMID:23235160 and PMID:29212046 have contributed nothing.

Significance: Every paper reporting RhoA or RhoC GAP activity is in the uncurated set, so the GO record is silent on that half of the literature for a reason independent of the ontology gap. A 2.1 A crystal structure of the ARF1-ARHGAP21 complex is recorded only as 'protein binding'. Three NEW rows in this review recover part of the shortfall, but SUMOylation at K1444, the beta-arrestin 1 inhibition of GAP activity, the alpha-tubulin interaction and the haematopoietic RhoC role all remain uncaptured.

Deep Research

Affinage

(ARHGAP21-deep-research-affinage.md)

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

πŸ“š Additional Documentation

Notes

(ARHGAP21-notes.md)

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

Bioinformatics Results

(RESULTS.md)

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)

πŸ“„ View Raw YAML

Loading supporting content…

Download this section (compressed HTML)