DNAJA4 is a class I J-domain protein (HSP40 co-chaperone) belonging to the DNAJA subfamily. It contains an N-terminal J-domain (with conserved HPD motif) that stimulates the ATPase activity of HSP70 family members, a glycine/phenylalanine-rich region, a cysteine-rich zinc finger domain (CR-type, with four CXXCXGXG repeats coordinating two zinc ions) involved in substrate recognition, two C-terminal beta-barrel substrate-binding domains (CTDI and CTDII), and a dimerization domain. As a co-chaperone, DNAJA4 binds unfolded or misfolded client proteins and delivers them to HSP70 (HSPA) partners for ATP-dependent protein folding. Hageman et al. (2011) demonstrated that DNAJA4 supports luciferase refolding and suppresses polyQ aggregation when co-expressed with HSP70 partners (PMID:21231916). Systematic interactome profiling of the human Hsp70 network (AP-MS and BioID) places DNAJA4 in the densely connected cytoplasmic class A JDP core, with robust interactions with DNAJA1, DNAJA2, and DNAJB1 (DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.012). DNAJA4 is farnesylated and membrane-associated, and is also found in the cytosol. It participates in the HSP90 chaperone cycle for steroid hormone receptors via the HSP70-HSP40-HOP-HSP90 relay pathway. DNAJA4 is transcriptionally upregulated during heat stress in human neuronal models (log2 fold-change 1.5-5 at 1 h post-heat shock; DOI:10.3390/biology12030416). Beyond generic chaperoning, DNAJA4 has a specific role in suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by promoting PSMD2-mediated ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of MYH9, an interaction requiring the DnaJ domain (DOI:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w). DNAJA4 promoter hypermethylation and silencing is observed in multiple cancers including NPC, stomach adenocarcinoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma (DOI:10.3390/ijms222413527).
| GO Term | Evidence | Action | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
IBA
GO_REF:0000033 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IBA annotation for cytosol localization propagated from orthologs including yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008), S. pombe Mas5 (PomBase:SPBC1734.11), DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884), and DNAJA4 itself. This is well supported by direct experimental evidence: Hageman et al. (2011) showed that DNAJA4 is localized in the cytosol (PMID:21231916). The IDA annotation from the same paper (see below) independently confirms this localization. Cytosolic localization is consistent with DNAJA4's role as a cytosolic HSP70 co-chaperone.
Reason: Cytosol localization is a core localization for DNAJA4 as a cytosolic J-domain co-chaperone. This IBA annotation is independently confirmed by IDA evidence from PMID:21231916.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
|
|
GO:0001671
ATPase activator activity
|
IBA
GO_REF:0000033 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IBA annotation for ATPase activator activity propagated from orthologs including yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008), Sis1 (SGD:S000005021), DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884), and others. All class I J-domain proteins stimulate HSP70 ATPase activity through their conserved J-domain, which directly contacts the HSP70 ATPase domain and accelerates ATP hydrolysis. Kampinga and Craig (2010) describe that J-domain cochaperones stimulate "the ATPase activity of HSP70" (PMID:20651708). Hageman et al. (2011) confirmed that J-proteins including DNAJA4 stimulate the intrinsic ATPase activity of HSP70 family members (PMID:21231916). The Reactome entry R-HSA-3371422 (ATP hydrolysis by HSP70) explicitly describes that "This ATPase activity of HSP70 is stimulated by protein substrates in synergism with J domain cochaperones (HSP40s)." This is a core molecular function of all J-domain proteins.
Reason: ATPase activator activity is a fundamental and well-established molecular function of J-domain proteins. DNAJA4 contains a conserved J-domain that stimulates HSP70 ATPase activity. This IBA annotation is phylogenetically sound and supported by the general biochemistry of J-domain proteins.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20651708
Much of the functional diversity of the HSP70s is driven by a diverse class of cofactors: J proteins
PMID:21231916
HSPA6 has a functional substrate-binding domain and possesses intrinsic ATPase activity that is as high as that of the canonical HSPA1A when stimulated by J-proteins
|
|
GO:0034605
cellular response to heat
|
IBA
GO_REF:0000033 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IBA annotation for cellular response to heat propagated from orthologs including yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008) and S. pombe Mas5 (PomBase:SPBC1734.11). HSP40/DNAJ proteins are heat shock proteins by definition -- they are induced by and function during heat stress to assist in protein folding and prevent aggregation. Hageman et al. (2011) specifically tested DNAJA4 in the context of heat-denatured substrates, showing it supports refolding of heat-denatured luciferase (PMID:21231916). The IEA annotation for response to heat (GO:0009408, a parent term) via InterPro also supports this. This is a broader but appropriate term given the IBA evidence.
Reason: Cellular response to heat is an appropriate annotation for a heat shock co-chaperone. DNAJA4 functions in protein refolding after heat denaturation, which is a core aspect of the cellular heat stress response. The IBA annotation is phylogenetically well supported.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
|
|
GO:0042026
protein refolding
|
IBA
GO_REF:0000033 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IBA annotation for protein refolding propagated from orthologs including yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008), S. pombe Mas5 (PomBase:SPBC1734.11), DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884), and DNAJA4 itself. Hageman et al. (2011) directly demonstrated that DNAJA4 supports HSP70-dependent refolding of heat-denatured luciferase (PMID:21231916). This is a core biological process for J-domain co-chaperones that assist HSP70 in the ATP-dependent refolding cycle.
Reason: Protein refolding is a core function of J-domain co-chaperones working with HSP70. This IBA is directly confirmed by experimental evidence from Hageman et al. (2011) showing DNAJA4 supports luciferase refolding.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
|
|
GO:0051082
unfolded protein binding
|
IBA
GO_REF:0000033 |
MODIFY |
Summary: GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) is being obsoleted (go-ontology#30962). This IBA annotation was propagated via phylogenetic inference from orthologs including yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008, S000005021), DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884), and DNAJA4 itself (UniProtKB:Q8WW22). While it is true that class I J-domain proteins like DNAJA4 bind unfolded substrates, the term "unfolded protein binding" is being replaced because it does not capture the functional role of the protein as a chaperone. DNAJA4 functions as an HSP70 co-chaperone: it binds client proteins and delivers them to HSP70, stimulating HSP70 ATPase activity via its J-domain (PMID:21231916). Kampinga and Craig (2010) describe how J proteins "bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70 and directly determining their fate" (PMID:20651708). The correct replacement term is GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone), defined as "Binding to a protein or a protein-containing complex to assist the protein folding process."
Reason: GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. DNAJA4 is a class I J-domain protein that functions as a protein folding chaperone, not merely as an unfolded protein binder. The replacement term GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) accurately captures the functional role of DNAJA4 in binding client proteins and delivering them to HSP70 for ATP-dependent refolding.
Proposed replacements:
protein folding chaperone
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
Overexpressed chaperones that suppressed polyQ aggregation were found not to be able to stimulate luciferase refolding. Inversely, chaperones that supported luciferase refolding were poor suppressors of polyQ aggregation.
PMID:20651708
others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70 and directly determining their fate
|
|
GO:0051087
protein-folding chaperone binding
|
IBA
GO_REF:0000033 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IBA annotation for protein-folding chaperone binding propagated from orthologs including DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884), DNAJA1 (UniProtKB:P31689), and DNAJA4 itself. This term captures the binding of DNAJA4 to HSP70 chaperone partners. Hageman et al. (2011) demonstrated that DNAJA4 physically interacts with multiple HSP70 family members including HSPA1A (P0DMV8), HSPA1B (P0DMV9), and HSPA6 (P17066) (PMID:21231916). The IPI annotations from the same paper independently confirm this interaction. Binding to HSP70 chaperones is a core molecular function of all J-domain proteins, mediated through the J-domain interaction with the HSP70 ATPase domain.
Reason: Protein-folding chaperone binding (i.e., binding to HSP70 partners) is a core function of J-domain co-chaperones. DNAJA4 has been experimentally shown to interact with multiple HSP70 family members. This IBA is well supported by direct experimental evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
PMID:20651708
Some target HSP70 activity to clients at precise locations in cells and others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70 and directly determining their fate
|
|
GO:0005524
ATP binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000002 |
REMOVE |
Summary: IEA annotation for ATP binding inferred from InterPro domain IPR012724 (DnaJ). While the DnaJ/J-domain does interact with the HSP70 ATPase domain and stimulates its ATPase activity, the J-domain protein itself does not bind ATP. It is the HSP70 partner that binds and hydrolyzes ATP. DNAJA4 does not have an ATPase domain or ATP-binding domain. The InterPro2GO mapping from IPR012724 to GO:0005524 appears to be an incorrect transitive annotation -- the DnaJ domain stimulates the ATPase of HSP70, but does not itself bind ATP.
Reason: J-domain proteins like DNAJA4 do not bind ATP themselves. The J-domain stimulates the ATPase activity of HSP70 partners, but it is the HSP70 that binds ATP, not the co-chaperone. This IEA annotation based on the DnaJ InterPro domain is an incorrect transitive inference.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20651708
Heat shock 70 kDa proteins (HSP70s) are ubiquitous molecular chaperones that function in a myriad of biological processes, modulating polypeptide folding, degradation and translocation across membranes, and protein-protein interactions. This multitude of roles is not easily reconciled with the universality of the activity of HSP70s in ATP-dependent client protein-binding and release cycles
|
|
GO:0006457
protein folding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000120 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IEA annotation for protein folding inferred from multiple sources (ARBA, InterPro IPR008971 HSP40/DnaJ_pept-bd, IPR012724 DnaJ, IPR044713 DNJA1/2-like). As a J-domain co-chaperone, DNAJA4 participates in protein folding by binding client proteins and delivering them to HSP70 for ATP-dependent folding. Hageman et al. (2011) showed DNAJA4 supports refolding of heat-denatured luciferase (PMID:21231916). The more specific term GO:0042026 (protein refolding) is already annotated with IDA and IBA evidence. This broader term is acceptable as a parent-level IEA annotation.
Reason: Protein folding is an appropriate broad process annotation for DNAJA4. The more specific child term protein refolding (GO:0042026) is already annotated with experimental evidence. This IEA correctly captures the general biological process in which DNAJA4 participates.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
|
|
GO:0008270
zinc ion binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000043 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IEA annotation for zinc ion binding inferred from UniProtKB keyword KW-0863 (Zinc). DNAJA4 contains a CR-type zinc finger domain (residues 122-206) with four CXXCXGXG repeats that coordinate two zinc ions. This is confirmed by the UniProt feature annotations showing eight cysteine residues that bind Zn(2+) ions (positions 135, 138, 151, 154, 178, 181, 194, 197). The zinc finger domain is characteristic of class I J-domain proteins and is important for client protein recognition and binding.
Reason: Zinc ion binding is structurally confirmed for DNAJA4 via its CR-type zinc finger domain with four CXXCXGXG repeats coordinating two zinc ions. This is a well-characterized structural feature of class I J-domain proteins.
|
|
GO:0009408
response to heat
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000002 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IEA annotation for response to heat inferred from InterPro domain IPR012724 (DnaJ). This is a broader parent term of GO:0034605 (cellular response to heat), which is already annotated by IBA evidence. As a heat shock co-chaperone, DNAJA4 is involved in the cellular response to heat stress through its role in protein refolding and prevention of aggregation. Hageman et al. (2011) tested DNAJA4 function using heat-denatured substrates (PMID:21231916). This broader IEA annotation is acceptable alongside the more specific IBA annotation.
Reason: Response to heat is an appropriate broad annotation for a heat shock co-chaperone. The more specific child term cellular response to heat (GO:0034605) is already annotated by IBA. This broader IEA is acceptable.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
|
|
GO:0016020
membrane
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000044 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IEA annotation for membrane localization inferred from UniProt subcellular location vocabulary (SL-0162). DNAJA4 is farnesylated at Cys-394 (S-farnesyl cysteine, by sequence similarity) and is annotated as membrane-associated via lipid anchor in UniProt. Hageman et al. (2011) provided IDA evidence for membrane localization (PMID:21231916), independently confirming this IEA. The lipid anchor (farnesylation) is a distinctive feature of DNAJA4 among the DNAJA subfamily members and mediates its membrane association.
Reason: Membrane localization is supported by the farnesylation of DNAJA4 at Cys-394 and is independently confirmed by IDA evidence from PMID:21231916. This is a valid localization for DNAJA4.
|
|
GO:0030544
Hsp70 protein binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000002 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IEA annotation for Hsp70 protein binding inferred from InterPro domain IPR044713 (DNJA1/2-like). DNAJA4 is a J-domain co-chaperone whose primary molecular function involves binding HSP70 family members via its J-domain. Hageman et al. (2011) demonstrated that DNAJA4 physically interacts with HSP70 family members HSPA1A, HSPA1B, and HSPA6 (PMID:21231916). However, GO:0030544 (Hsp70 protein binding) is a less informative term than GO:0051087 (protein-folding chaperone binding), which is already annotated with IBA and IPI evidence. The term GO:0030544 simply describes binding without capturing the functional context. Nevertheless, as an IEA annotation it is not incorrect and can be accepted alongside the more specific IBA/IPI annotations.
Reason: Hsp70 protein binding is correct -- DNAJA4 binds HSP70 partners via its J-domain. While the more informative term protein-folding chaperone binding (GO:0051087) is already annotated, this IEA is not incorrect and reflects the InterPro domain-based inference.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
PMID:20651708
Often, multiple J proteins function with a single HSP70
|
|
GO:0031072
heat shock protein binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000002 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IEA annotation for heat shock protein binding inferred from InterPro domain IPR001305 (HSP_DnaJ_Cys-rich_dom). This is a broader parent of GO:0030544 (Hsp70 protein binding) and a broader relative of GO:0051087 (protein-folding chaperone binding), both of which are already annotated with higher-quality evidence. As a J-domain co-chaperone, DNAJA4 binds HSP70 (and participates in the HSP90 chaperone cycle via HOP). This annotation is not incorrect but is less informative than the existing more specific annotations.
Reason: Heat shock protein binding is a broad but correct annotation. DNAJA4 binds HSP70 partners and participates in the HSP90 chaperone cycle. More specific terms are already annotated (GO:0030544, GO:0051087), but this broader IEA is acceptable.
|
|
GO:0046872
metal ion binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000043 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IEA annotation for metal ion binding inferred from UniProtKB keyword KW-0479 (Metal-binding). DNAJA4 contains a CR-type zinc finger domain coordinating two zinc ions. The more specific term GO:0008270 (zinc ion binding) is already annotated with the same evidence type (IEA). This broader term is redundant but not incorrect.
Reason: Metal ion binding is correct but overly broad compared to the already annotated GO:0008270 (zinc ion binding). As an IEA annotation it is acceptable even though it provides less specificity.
|
|
GO:0051082
unfolded protein binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000002 |
MODIFY |
Summary: GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) is being obsoleted (go-ontology#30962). This IEA annotation was inferred from InterPro domain matches (IPR001305 HSP_DnaJ_Cys-rich_dom, IPR008971 HSP40/DnaJ_pept-bd, IPR012724 DnaJ). These domains are characteristic of class I J-domain proteins that function as HSP70 co-chaperones. The InterPro domains correctly identify DNAJA4 as a DnaJ family member with substrate-binding capability, but the GO term "unfolded protein binding" is being replaced because it fails to convey the chaperone function. Kampinga and Craig (2010) explain that J proteins function with HSP70 through "ATP-dependent client protein-binding and release cycles" and that some J proteins "bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70" (PMID:20651708). The correct replacement is GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone).
Reason: GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. The InterPro-based annotation correctly identifies DNAJA4 as having substrate-binding domains characteristic of J-domain protein co-chaperones, but the term should be replaced with GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) which properly captures the functional role of binding client proteins to assist in the protein folding process.
Proposed replacements:
protein folding chaperone
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:20651708
Much of the functional diversity of the HSP70s is driven by a diverse class of cofactors: J proteins
PMID:20651708
others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70 and directly determining their fate
|
|
GO:0051087
protein-folding chaperone binding
|
IEA
GO_REF:0000117 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IEA annotation for protein-folding chaperone binding inferred by ARBA machine learning model (ARBA:ARBA00088077). This is consistent with DNAJA4's well-established role as a J-domain co-chaperone that binds HSP70 chaperone partners. This annotation is independently confirmed by IBA (GO_REF:0000033) and IPI (PMID:21231916) evidence for the same GO term. Hageman et al. (2011) showed DNAJA4 interacts with HSPA1A, HSPA1B, and HSPA6 (PMID:21231916).
Reason: Protein-folding chaperone binding is a core function of J-domain co-chaperones. This IEA annotation is independently confirmed by both IBA and IPI evidence.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:25036637 A quantitative chaperone interaction network reveals the arc... |
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED |
Summary: IPI annotation for protein binding from Taipale et al. (2014), a large-scale quantitative chaperone interaction network study. The GOA data shows interactions with DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884) and ENDOG (UniProtKB:Q14249). The DNAJA2 interaction (homodimerization/heterodimerization between DNAJA family members) is plausible for co-chaperone function. The ENDOG interaction is from a high-throughput screen. However, "protein binding" (GO:0005515) is uninformative -- the DNAJA2 interaction could be more accurately captured by a more specific binding term, and the interaction with ENDOG lacks functional context.
Reason: GO:0005515 (protein binding) is uninformative and does not convey the functional significance of the interactions. The DNAJA2 interaction is better captured by existing annotations for protein-folding chaperone binding. Per curation guidelines, protein binding should be avoided in favor of more specific MF terms.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:33961781 Dual proteome-scale networks reveal cell-specific remodeling... |
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED |
Summary: IPI annotation for protein binding from Huttlin et al. (2021), a dual proteome-scale interaction network study. The GOA data shows an interaction with DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884). This DNAJA4-DNAJA2 interaction is also supported by the UniProt interaction data (4 experiments in IntAct). While the interaction may be real, "protein binding" is uninformative and the interaction between DNAJA co-chaperones is better captured by existing chaperone binding annotations.
Reason: GO:0005515 (protein binding) is uninformative. The DNAJA4-DNAJA2 interaction detected in this high-throughput study does not add functional information beyond what is captured by the existing protein-folding chaperone binding annotations.
|
|
GO:0005515
protein binding
|
IPI
PMID:40205054 Multimodal cell maps as a foundation for structural and func... |
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED |
Summary: IPI annotation for protein binding from a multimodal cell maps study. The GOA data shows an interaction with DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884). This is the third independent detection of the DNAJA4-DNAJA2 interaction (also seen in PMID:25036637 and PMID:33961781), suggesting it is a robust interaction. However, "protein binding" remains uninformative.
Reason: GO:0005515 (protein binding) is uninformative. While the DNAJA4-DNAJA2 interaction is robustly detected across multiple studies, the functional significance is better captured by existing chaperone binding annotations. Per curation guidelines, protein binding should be avoided.
|
|
GO:0010596
negative regulation of endothelial cell migration
|
IMP
PMID:23142051 Convergent multi-miRNA targeting of ApoE drives LRP1/LRP8-de... |
KEEP AS NON CORE |
Summary: IMP annotation from Pencheva et al. (2012), which studied miRNA-mediated regulation of melanoma metastasis. The study found that miR-1908, miR-199a-5p, and miR-199a-3p convergently target DNAJA4 and ApoE. DNAJA4 was shown to promote ApoE expression, and ApoE suppresses metastatic endothelial recruitment (MER). The negative regulation of endothelial cell migration is an indirect downstream consequence of DNAJA4 promoting ApoE expression, rather than a direct molecular function of DNAJA4 as a co-chaperone. This is a context-specific phenotypic observation in melanoma cells, not a core function of DNAJA4.
Reason: The negative regulation of endothelial cell migration is a downstream phenotypic consequence observed in the specific context of melanoma metastasis. DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression, and ApoE is the effector that suppresses endothelial migration. This is not a core evolved function of DNAJA4 as a J-domain co-chaperone, but the IMP evidence from PMID:23142051 supports the annotation in this specific biological context.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:23142051
Cancer-secreted ApoE suppresses invasion and metastatic endothelial recruitment (MER) by engaging melanoma cell LRP1 and endothelial cell LRP8 receptors, respectively, while DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression
|
|
GO:0010628
positive regulation of gene expression
|
IMP
PMID:23142051 Convergent multi-miRNA targeting of ApoE drives LRP1/LRP8-de... |
MARK AS OVER ANNOTATED |
Summary: IMP annotation from Pencheva et al. (2012) showing that DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression. The study demonstrated that miRNAs targeting DNAJA4 reduce ApoE expression, and DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression. However, GO:0010628 (positive regulation of gene expression) is extremely broad and does not specify what gene expression is being regulated. The mechanism by which a J-domain co-chaperone regulates gene expression is unclear -- it could be through chaperoning a transcription factor or signaling protein. The annotation is overly vague and the mechanism is indirect.
Reason: GO:0010628 (positive regulation of gene expression) is overly broad and does not capture the specificity of what was observed. DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression, but the mechanism is not well characterized and could involve chaperoning of upstream regulators. This vague process annotation does not add meaningful information about DNAJA4's function. The connection to ApoE regulation in melanoma is a context-specific observation.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:23142051
DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression
|
|
GO:0051087
protein-folding chaperone binding
|
IPI
PMID:21231916 The diverse members of the mammalian HSP70 machine show dist... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IPI annotation for protein-folding chaperone binding based on physical interaction evidence from Hageman et al. (2011). The GOA data shows three separate IPI entries from this paper with different interactors: HSPA1A (UniProtKB:P0DMV8), HSPA1B (UniProtKB:P0DMV9), and HSPA6 (UniProtKB:P17066). This annotation entry corresponds to the interaction with HSPA1A. DNAJA4 binds HSP70 chaperone partners through its J-domain, which is a core molecular function of all J-domain co-chaperones. Hageman et al. systematically tested interactions between mammalian HSP40 and HSP70 family members and found that DNAJA4 functionally interacts with these HSP70 partners to support protein refolding.
Reason: Protein-folding chaperone binding is a core molecular function of DNAJA4. The IPI evidence from Hageman et al. (2011) directly demonstrates physical interaction between DNAJA4 and HSP70 family member HSPA1A.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
PMID:20651708
Often, multiple J proteins function with a single HSP70
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-3371422 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: TAS annotation for cytosol localization from Reactome pathway R-HSA-3371422 (ATP hydrolysis by HSP70). The Reactome entry describes the HSP70 chaperone cycle in which HSP40 co-chaperones (including DNAJA4) stimulate HSP70 ATPase activity in the cytosol. This localization is independently confirmed by IDA evidence from PMID:21231916 and IBA evidence from GO_REF:0000033.
Reason: Cytosol localization is well supported for DNAJA4 by multiple independent evidence sources. This Reactome TAS annotation is consistent with the IDA and IBA evidence.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-3371503 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: TAS annotation for cytosol localization from Reactome pathway R-HSA-3371503 (STIP1/HOP binds HSP90 and HSP70:HSP40:nascent protein). The Reactome entry describes the HSP70-HSP40-HOP-HSP90 relay pathway in the cytosol, in which DNAJA4 participates as a HSP40 co-chaperone. This localization is independently confirmed by IDA (PMID:21231916) and IBA evidence.
Reason: Cytosol localization is well established. This Reactome TAS annotation is consistent with the HSP90 chaperone cycle in which DNAJA4 participates as part of the HSP70-HSP40-HOP-HSP90 relay.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
TAS
Reactome:R-HSA-3371590 |
ACCEPT |
Summary: TAS annotation for cytosol localization from Reactome pathway R-HSA-3371590 (HSP70 binds to HSP40:nascent protein). The Reactome entry describes the initial step of client protein binding by HSP40 co-chaperones followed by HSP70 recruitment in the cytosol. DNAJA4 is included as one of the HSP40 family members. This localization is independently confirmed by IDA and IBA evidence.
Reason: Cytosol localization is well established for DNAJA4 as a cytosolic HSP70 co-chaperone. This is the third Reactome TAS annotation for the same localization, all consistent with experimental evidence.
|
|
GO:0005829
cytosol
|
IDA
PMID:21231916 The diverse members of the mammalian HSP70 machine show dist... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IDA annotation for cytosol localization from Hageman et al. (2011). The study included subcellular localization analysis of mammalian HSP70 and HSP40 family members, reporting that "most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol" (PMID:21231916). This direct experimental evidence confirms the cytosolic localization of DNAJA4, consistent with its role as a cytosolic co-chaperone.
Reason: Direct experimental evidence (IDA) confirms cytosol localization. This is the strongest evidence for DNAJA4's cytosolic localization and is consistent with its function as a cytosolic HSP70 co-chaperone.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
|
|
GO:0016020
membrane
|
IDA
PMID:21231916 The diverse members of the mammalian HSP70 machine show dist... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IDA annotation for membrane localization from Hageman et al. (2011). DNAJA4 is farnesylated at Cys-394 (S-farnesyl cysteine), which anchors it to cellular membranes. UniProt annotates the subcellular location as "Membrane; Lipid-anchor." Hageman et al. (2011) provided direct assay evidence confirming membrane association (PMID:21231916). This dual localization (cytosol and membrane) is distinctive for DNAJA4 among DNAJA subfamily members and may reflect regulation of its availability for different substrates.
Reason: Membrane localization is directly supported by IDA evidence and is consistent with the farnesylation of DNAJA4 at Cys-394. This is a distinctive and functionally relevant localization for this co-chaperone.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
|
|
GO:0042026
protein refolding
|
IDA
PMID:21231916 The diverse members of the mammalian HSP70 machine show dist... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IDA annotation for protein refolding from Hageman et al. (2011). The study directly demonstrated that overexpression of DNAJA4 with HSP70 partners supports refolding of heat-denatured luciferase. The authors "assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase" (PMID:21231916). This is a core function of J-domain co-chaperones that assist HSP70 in the ATP-dependent protein refolding cycle.
Reason: Protein refolding is a core biological process for J-domain co-chaperones. Hageman et al. (2011) directly demonstrated DNAJA4's ability to support luciferase refolding with HSP70 partners. This IDA annotation represents strong experimental evidence for a fundamental function.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
|
|
GO:0051082
unfolded protein binding
|
IDA
PMID:21231916 The diverse members of the mammalian HSP70 machine show dist... |
MODIFY |
Summary: GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) is being obsoleted (go-ontology#30962). This IDA annotation from PMID:21231916 (Hageman et al. 2011) is based on direct experimental evidence showing that DNAJA4 functions as an HSP70 co-chaperone. The study demonstrated that DNAJA4 supports HSP70-dependent luciferase refolding and suppresses polyQ aggregation, activities that reflect its role as a protein folding chaperone rather than simply binding unfolded proteins. The authors "assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment" (PMID:21231916). The same paper provides evidence for DNAJA4 interacting with multiple HSP70 family members (HSPA1A/P0DMV8, HSPA1B/P0DMV9, HSPA6/P17066) as IPI evidence for GO:0051087 (protein-folding chaperone binding). The correct replacement term is GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone), which captures the functional role of DNAJA4 as a co-chaperone that binds client proteins and delivers them to HSP70 for ATP-dependent refolding.
Reason: GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. The experimental evidence from Hageman et al. (2011) demonstrates that DNAJA4 functions as a protein folding chaperone -- it supports luciferase refolding and suppresses polyQ aggregation in cooperation with HSP70 partners. This is consistent with the well-established role of class I J-domain proteins as co-chaperones that bind unfolded substrates and deliver them to HSP70. The replacement term GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) accurately describes this molecular function.
Proposed replacements:
protein folding chaperone
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
PMID:21231916
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
PMID:20651708
others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70 and directly determining their fate
|
|
GO:0090084
negative regulation of inclusion body assembly
|
IDA
PMID:21231916 The diverse members of the mammalian HSP70 machine show dist... |
ACCEPT |
Summary: IDA annotation for negative regulation of inclusion body assembly from Hageman et al. (2011). The study demonstrated that DNAJA4 suppresses aggregation of polyQ-expanded Huntingtin fragments, which form inclusion bodies. The authors specifically tested "suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment" (PMID:21231916). This is a direct experimental observation and reflects DNAJA4's anti-aggregation chaperone activity. However, it is worth noting that this is a specific experimental readout rather than a primary evolved function, as polyQ expansion is a pathological context. The ability to suppress aggregation is a general property of chaperones that bind misfolded substrates.
Reason: The IDA evidence directly demonstrates that DNAJA4 suppresses polyQ inclusion body formation. While this is tested in a pathological context (polyQ-expanded Huntingtin), it reflects the genuine anti-aggregation chaperone activity of DNAJA4. Suppression of protein aggregation is a core function of J-domain co-chaperones.
Supporting Evidence:
PMID:21231916
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
|
provider: falcon
model: Edison Scientific Literature
cached: false
start_time: '2026-02-20T14:57:10.810208'
end_time: '2026-02-20T15:25:35.615883'
duration_seconds: 1704.81
template_file: templates/gene_research_go_focused.md
template_variables:
organism: human
gene_id: DNAJA4
gene_symbol: DNAJA4
uniprot_accession: Q8WW22
protein_description: 'RecName: Full=DnaJ homolog subfamily A member 4; Flags: Precursor;'
gene_info: Name=DNAJA4;
organism_full: Homo sapiens (Human).
protein_family: Not specified in UniProt
protein_domains: DnaJ. (IPR012724); DnaJ_C. (IPR002939); DnaJ_domain. (IPR001623);
DnaJ_domain_CS. (IPR018253); DNJA1/2-like. (IPR044713)
provider_config:
timeout: 600
max_retries: 3
parameters:
allowed_domains: []
temperature: 0.1
citation_count: 18
BEFORE YOU BEGIN RESEARCH: You MUST verify you are researching the CORRECT gene/protein. Gene symbols can be ambiguous, especially for less well-characterized genes from non-model organisms.
DO NOT PROCEED WITH RESEARCH ON A DIFFERENT GENE. Instead:
- State clearly: "The gene symbol 'DNAJA4' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein"
- Explain what you found (e.g., "Found extensive literature on a different gene with the same symbol in a different organism")
- Describe the protein based ONLY on the UniProt information provided above
- Suggest that the protein function can be inferred from domain/family information
Please provide a comprehensive research report on the gene DNAJA4 (gene ID: DNAJA4, UniProt: Q8WW22) in human.
The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
Question: You are an expert researcher providing comprehensive, well-cited information.
Provide detailed information focusing on:
1. Key concepts and definitions with current understanding
2. Recent developments and latest research (prioritize 2023-2024 sources)
3. Current applications and real-world implementations
4. Expert opinions and analysis from authoritative sources
5. Relevant statistics and data from recent studies
Format as a comprehensive research report with proper citations. Include URLs and publication dates where available.
Always prioritize recent, authoritative sources and provide specific citations for all major claims.
BEFORE YOU BEGIN RESEARCH: You MUST verify you are researching the CORRECT gene/protein. Gene symbols can be ambiguous, especially for less well-characterized genes from non-model organisms.
DO NOT PROCEED WITH RESEARCH ON A DIFFERENT GENE. Instead:
- State clearly: "The gene symbol 'DNAJA4' is ambiguous or literature is limited for this specific protein"
- Explain what you found (e.g., "Found extensive literature on a different gene with the same symbol in a different organism")
- Describe the protein based ONLY on the UniProt information provided above
- Suggest that the protein function can be inferred from domain/family information
Please provide a comprehensive research report on the gene DNAJA4 (gene ID: DNAJA4, UniProt: Q8WW22) in human.
The research report should be a detailed narrative explaining the function, biological processes, and localization of the gene product. Citations should be given for all claims.
You should prioritize authoritative reviews and primary scientific literature when conducting research. You can supplement
this with annotations you find in gene/protein databases, but these can be outdated or inaccurate.
We are specifically interested in the primary function of the gene - for enzymes, what reaction is catalyzed, and what is the substrate specificity? For transporters, what is the substrate? For structural proteins or adapters, what is the broader structural role? For signaling molecules, what is the role in the pathway.
We are interested in where in or outside the cell the gene product carries out its function.
We are also interested in the signaling or biochemical pathways in which the gene functions. We are less interested in broad pleiotropic effects, except where these elucidate the precise role.
Include evidence where possible. We are interested in both experimental evidence as well as inference from structure, evolution, or bioinformatic analysis. Precise studies should be prioritized over high-throughput, where available.
Gene research report: Human DNAJA4 (UniProt Q8WW22; gene DNAJA4)
DNAJA4 in this report refers to the human gene DNAJA4 encoding “DnaJ homolog subfamily A member 4,” a class A HSP40/J-domain protein (JDP) that functions as a co-chaperone of Hsp70/Hsc70 systems. Across independent human-focused sources, DNAJA4 is consistently discussed as a mammalian class A HSP40/JDP and not as an unrelated or non-human protein; it is also placed in the cytoplasmic Hsp70–JDP network by systematic interactome mapping, aligning with UniProt’s domain expectations for a DnaJ/Hsp40 family member. (piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5, kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4)
Evidence constraints: In the retrieved full-text snippets, no source explicitly spells out the UniProt accession Q8WW22; therefore, the UniProt-to-literature mapping is supported indirectly by concordant gene symbol (DNAJA4), organism context (human/mammals), and class-A JDP domain architecture/localization described in authoritative reviews and interaction mapping studies. (kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4, piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
2.1. What DNAJA4 is (protein class and core biochemical function)
DNAJA4 is a class A HSP40/J-domain protein (JDP). Class A JDPs are characterized by the canonical domain architecture: an N-terminal J-domain (containing the conserved HPD motif that stimulates Hsp70 ATPase activity), a Gly/Phe-rich region, C-terminal substrate-binding β-barrel domains, a dimerization region, and a class-A-specific zinc-finger insertion in the C-terminal substrate-binding region. This domain organization underlies the core biochemical role of JDPs as Hsp70 co-chaperones: they help recruit substrates (misfolded or nascent proteins) to Hsp70 and stimulate Hsp70’s ATPase cycle to drive client binding and processing. (kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4)
A neurodegeneration-focused review situates DNAJA4 within the DNAJA subfamily and depicts the DNAJA subfamily’s domain composition (J-domain, G/F region, Zn-binding region, and C-terminal client-binding/dimerization-related region), reinforcing that DNAJA4 belongs to the canonical class A JDP group. (zarouchlioti2018dnajproteinsin pages 2-3)
2.2. Subcellular localization
A compiled table of mammalian DNAJA-family proteins reports DNAJA4 localization as cytosolic (“Cyt”). (teo2020dnaja3acochaperone pages 1-4)
Additionally, systematic proximity-labeling and affinity-purification mapping of the human Hsp70 network assigns DNAJA4 to the cytoplasmic class A JDP set and shows its proximity/interaction patterns cluster with other cytoplasmic chaperone-system components, consistent with a primarily cytoplasmic role. (piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
2.3. Pathway context: The Hsp70–JDP–NEF proteostasis system
Large-scale interactome profiling of the human Hsp70 network demonstrates that many JDPs (including class A JDPs) form a connected system involving Hsp70s and nucleotide-exchange factors (NEFs), and that JDP–Hsp70 interactions can be transient, meaning interaction maps may undercount some true functional pairings. DNAJA4 is positioned in the dense core of this cytoplasmic JDP network, supporting its role within the general proteostasis machinery. (piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
3.1. Heat/proteotoxic stress response in human neuronal models (2023)
In a 2023 study of heat-induced proteotoxic stress models in human neuronal cell systems, DNAJA4 is identified as part of a shared set of stress-induced chaperone/co-chaperone genes upregulated across three neuronal models after heat stress. The study used a targeted RT-qPCR array platform (Qiagen RT2 Profiler Human Heat Shock Proteins and Chaperones PCR Array; 84 genes) and defined upregulation using statistical significance p<0.05 and a log2 fold-change cutoff (≥1.5). DNAJA4 was among the genes common to all three models meeting these criteria. (alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 7-9)
In this same work, DNAJA4 is described as an overexpressed co-chaperone/cofactor with a reported log-fold increase range of ~1.5–5 at the maximal response timepoint (1 h post–heat stress), placing DNAJA4 within acute stress-induced proteostasis remodeling. (alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 9-11)
Note on interpretation: While this study includes DNAJA4 in stress-induced expression signatures, it does not provide DNAJA4-specific p-values or exact fold-change per cell type in the available excerpt, so DNAJA4’s quantitative effect size beyond the stated log-fold range cannot be independently recalculated from the retrieved text. (alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 9-11, alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 7-9)
3.2. DNAJA4 as an epigenetically regulated suppressor of EMT/metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (2023)
A 2023 mechanistic study reports DNAJA4 promoter hypermethylation and downregulation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), supported by analysis of methylation-array datasets and validation cohorts. Functional experiments show that DNAJA4 overexpression suppresses NPC cell migration, invasion, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vitro, and reduces lymph node metastasis and lung metastatic colonization in vivo without affecting viability or proliferation. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 1-2, zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 3-6)
Mechanism: DNAJA4 promotes ubiquitin–proteasome–dependent degradation of MYH9 (non-muscle myosin IIA), without changing MYH9 mRNA levels, consistent with post-translational control. DNAJA4 increases MYH9 ubiquitination and accelerates MYH9 turnover; the effect is rescued by proteasome inhibition (MG132) but not lysosome inhibition (CQ), supporting proteasome dependence. PSMD2, a proteasome 26S non-ATPase subunit, binds both DNAJA4 and MYH9, and DNAJA4 recruits PSMD2 to mediate MYH9 ubiquitination/degradation. Domain mapping indicates the DnaJ domain of DNAJA4 and a Pfam domain in PSMD2 are required for these interactions. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 6-9, zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 3-6)
Causal linkage to phenotype: MYH9 overexpression reverses DNAJA4-mediated suppression of migration, invasion, and EMT, supporting MYH9 as a key downstream effector. The authors propose a “DNAJA4–PSMD2–MYH9” axis as a metastasis-regulatory pathway in NPC, while noting that the E3 ligase responsible for MYH9 ubiquitination in the complex remains to be identified. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 1-2, zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 13-14)
Quantitative epigenetic and cohort details: the NPC study reports a hypermethylated CpG island with multiple CpG sites, and pyrosequencing validation at cg16358679 comparing 6 NPC vs 6 normal tissues. The demethylating agent DAC increased DNAJA4 levels by at least 15-fold in NPC cell lines (but not in a normal nasopharyngeal cell line). Transcriptomic cohort analysis referenced includes 113 NPC tissues (GSE102349) for gene-set enrichment comparisons of low vs high DNAJA4 expression. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 2-3, zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 3-6)
3.3. Systems-biology and method papers implicating DNAJA4 in cancer subtype divergence (2024)
A 2024 NAR Genomics & Bioinformatics paper introducing the CWGCNA method reports DNAJA4 as a “driver gene” mediating a gene-module effect on Luminal A vs non-Luminal A breast cancer subtype divergence in a TCGA BRCA multi-omics case study. The authors state DNAJA4 correlated with patient survival only within Luminal A samples, and they use this as supporting evidence that DNAJA4 might contribute to subtype divergence. The case study includes 752 TCGA BRCA samples (reported as 411 Luminal A and 341 non-Luminal A after grouping), and a highlighted module ME1 with 888 genes. However, DNAJA4-specific hazard ratios or p-values for survival are not provided in the excerpt. (liu2024cwgcnaanr pages 11-12)
4.1. Placement in the human Hsp70/JDP network
Systematic interactome profiling of the human Hsp70 network (AP-MS and BioID) identifies DNAJA4 as a cytoplasmic class A JDP with robust interactions with other class A JDPs DNAJA1 and DNAJA2 and with DNAJB1, and additional connectivity to class B JDPs (e.g., DNAJB4, DNAJB6, DNAJB12). This places DNAJA4 among the densely connected JDP core that is expected to support broad proteostasis functions (client recognition/transfer and potentially disaggregation cooperation). (piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
4.2. DNAJA4 interactions beyond generic chaperoning: metastasis/EMT axis in NPC
In NPC, DNAJA4 is experimentally shown to associate with and promote degradation of MYH9 via a PSMD2-linked ubiquitin–proteasome mechanism. This is a DNAJA4-specific pathway-level mechanism beyond generic “co-chaperone” labeling and provides a concrete client/effector (MYH9) and pathway output (EMT/metastasis suppression). (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 6-9, zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 1-2)
5.1. Prognostic biomarker / epigenetic biomarker in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)
The 2023 NPC study provides direct clinical association evidence: low DNAJA4 expression correlates with worse outcomes and a higher fraction of distant metastasis. Figure-based results show that low DNAJA4 expression is associated with a higher percentage of distant metastasis (p=0.0088), and high DNAJA4 expression corresponds to better relapse-free survival (p=0.0023), distant metastasis-free survival (p=0.0044), and overall survival (p=0.0003). Multivariate Cox regression analyses identify DNAJA4 expression as an independent prognostic indicator with p=0.001 for relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survival in the displayed forest plots. Collectively, these data support DNAJA4 (and its methylation-associated downregulation) as a potential prognostic and metastasis-risk biomarker and the DNAJA4–PSMD2–MYH9 axis as a candidate therapeutic target pathway. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal media 8986c757, zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 1-2)
5.2. Prognostic association in glioma datasets
A glioma network/survival analysis reports that higher DNAJA4 expression associates with longer survival in glioma. A Kaplan–Meier panel for DNAJA4 (Figure 8) shows p=0.004 with group sizes low expression N=8 and high expression N=69. This supports DNAJA4 as a candidate prognostic marker in glioma, though external validation and mechanistic studies would be required for clinical implementation. (sun2020networkanalysesof media b1c2ca08)
5.3. Broader cancer epigenetic context (review synthesis)
A 2021 review of HSP40/JDPs in p53/cancer signaling notes that DNAJA4 can be epigenetically silenced: reduced DNAJA4 mRNA expression due to gene methylation correlates with poorer disease-free survival in stomach adenocarcinoma, and DNAJA4 hypermethylation has been observed in pediatric embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. The review also notes that little is known about DNAJA4’s association with p53, indicating a gap in mechanistic understanding in the p53 context despite epigenetic observations. (kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4)
5.4. Stress-response biology as an application context
The 2023 neuronal heat-stress profiling suggests DNAJA4 participates in core heat/proteotoxic stress response programs, a context relevant to heat injury and potentially neurodegeneration-related proteostasis, although this is an experimental model and not yet a clinical implementation. (alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 7-9, alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 9-11)
6.1. DNAJA4 as a class A JDP (consensus view)
Authoritative reviews position DNAJA4 within mammalian class A HSP40/JDPs and emphasize that JDPs are first-line detectors/handlers of misfolded proteins and aggregates, acting via the J-domain/HPD motif to stimulate Hsp70 ATPase activity and drive client processing. These reviews provide the accepted conceptual framework for interpreting DNAJA4 function even when DNAJA4-specific biochemical assays are limited in the retrieved corpus. (kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4)
6.2. Network biology perspective
High-quality interactome mapping in Molecular Cell emphasizes that Hsp70 machinery is organized as an interconnected network whose localization patterns and transient interactions complicate direct mapping of all functional contacts; DNAJA4’s position in the cytoplasmic network core implies broad system-level importance rather than a single dedicated pathway. (piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
Stress-response (2023 human neuronal models)
• DNAJA4 is included among genes commonly upregulated across three neuronal models under heat stress using a statistical filter (p<0.05) and a log2 fold-change cutoff (≥1.5). (alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 7-9)
• Reported DNAJA4 log-fold increase range: ~1.5–5. (alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 9-11)
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) epigenetics and metastasis (2023)
• Cohort size for transcriptomic analyses: 113 NPC samples (GSE102349). (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 2-3)
• Pyrosequencing methylation validation: 6 NPC vs 6 normal. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 2-3)
• DAC demethylation response: DNAJA4 increased ≥15-fold in NPC cell lines. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 2-3)
• Distant metastasis association: p=0.0088. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal media 8986c757)
• Survival associations: relapse-free survival p=0.0023; distant metastasis-free survival p=0.0044; overall survival p=0.0003. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal media 8986c757)
• Multivariate Cox regression (displayed): DNAJA4 is an independent prognostic indicator with p=0.001 for relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survival. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal media 8986c757)
Glioma survival association (2020)
• Kaplan–Meier DNAJA4 panel: p=0.004; low N=8 vs high N=69. (sun2020networkanalysesof media b1c2ca08)
Primary molecular function: DNAJA4 is a cytoplasmic class A Hsp40/J-domain co-chaperone that acts in the Hsp70 system to regulate client-protein binding and processing, consistent with JDP stimulation of Hsp70 ATPase activity via the J-domain/HPD motif and class-A substrate-binding domains. (kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4, piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
Cellular location: evidence supports a predominantly cytosolic/cytoplasmic localization for DNAJA4 in human cells. (teo2020dnaja3acochaperone pages 1-4, piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
Biological processes (supported by recent and mechanistic studies):
• Proteostasis/stress response: DNAJA4 is induced in heat/proteotoxic stress programs in human neuronal models and is embedded in a cytoplasmic Hsp70/JDP network. (alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 9-11, piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
• Cancer metastasis regulation in NPC: DNAJA4 suppresses EMT and metastasis by promoting PSMD2-mediated ubiquitin–proteasome degradation of MYH9, linking a chaperone-family protein to cytoskeleton-associated EMT control. (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 1-2, zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 6-9)
• UniProt accession mapping: Q8WW22 was not explicitly recoverable from the retrieved paper texts; mapping rests on consistent gene symbol/organism/domain context. (piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5, kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4)
• Client specificity: Outside NPC (MYH9) and stress-expression signatures, many DNAJA4 functional claims in older reviews (e.g., cholesterol biosynthesis, hERG quality control, viral interactions) are referenced but not mechanistically detailed in the retrieved excerpts; direct primary data for these topics would require pulling and reading the original cited primary studies. (teo2020dnaja3acochaperone pages 4-8)
• Some disease associations are observational (correlation with survival or methylation), and causality/therapeutic targetability will require prospective validation. (sun2020networkanalysesof media b1c2ca08, kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4)
Selected references (URLs and publication dates)
• Zhang Q et al. “DNAJA4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via PSMD2-mediated MYH9 degradation.” Cell Death & Disease. Published Oct 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w (zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 1-2)
• Alharbi BM et al. “Profiling the Hsp70 Chaperone Network in Heat-Induced Proteotoxic Stress Models of Human Neurons.” Biology (Basel). Published Mar 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030416 (alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 9-11)
• Liu Y. “CWGCNA: an R package to perform causal inference from the WGCNA framework.” NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. Published Apr 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqae042 (liu2024cwgcnaanr pages 11-12)
• Piette BL et al. “Comprehensive interactome profiling of the human Hsp70 network highlights functional differentiation of J domains.” Molecular Cell. Published Jun 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.012 (piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5)
• Kaida A, Iwakuma T. “Regulation of p53 and Cancer Signaling by Heat Shock Protein 40/J-Domain Protein Family Members.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Published Dec 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413527 (kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4)
• Sun H et al. “Network Analyses of the Differential Expression of Heat Shock Proteins in Glioma.” DNA and Cell Biology. Published Jul 2020. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2020.5425 (sun2020networkanalysesof pages 11-12)
References
(piette2021comprehensiveinteractomeprofiling pages 4-5): Benjamin L. Piette, Nader Alerasool, Zhen-Yuan Lin, Jessica Lacoste, Mandy Hiu Yi Lam, Wesley Wei Qian, Stephanie Tran, Brett Larsen, Eric Campos, Jian Peng, Anne-Claude Gingras, and Mikko Taipale. Comprehensive interactome profiling of the human hsp70 network highlights functional differentiation of j domains. Molecular Cell, 81:2549-2565.e8, Jun 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.012, doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.012. This article has 92 citations and is from a highest quality peer-reviewed journal.
(kaida2021regulationofp53 pages 2-4): Atsushi Kaida and Tomoo Iwakuma. Regulation of p53 and cancer signaling by heat shock protein 40/j-domain protein family members. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22:13527, Dec 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413527, doi:10.3390/ijms222413527. This article has 35 citations.
(zarouchlioti2018dnajproteinsin pages 2-3): Christina Zarouchlioti, David A. Parfitt, Wenwen Li, Lauren M. Gittings, and Michael E. Cheetham. Dnaj proteins in neurodegeneration: essential and protective factors. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373:20160534, Jan 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0534, doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0534. This article has 159 citations and is from a domain leading peer-reviewed journal.
(teo2020dnaja3acochaperone pages 1-4): Wan-Huai Teo, Yu-Ning Fann, and Jeng-Fan Lo. Dnaja3, a co-chaperone in development and tumorigenesis. ArXiv, pages 1-17, Jan 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/7515_2020_33, doi:10.1007/7515_2020_33. This article has 2 citations.
(alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 7-9): Bothina Mohammed Alharbi, Tahani H. Albinhassan, Razan Ali Alzahrani, Abderrezak Bouchama, Sameer Mohammad, Awatif Abdulaziz Alomari, May Nasser Bin-Jumah, Entissar S. AlSuhaibani, and Shuja Shafi Malik. Profiling the hsp70 chaperone network in heat-induced proteotoxic stress models of human neurons. Biology, 12:416, Mar 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030416, doi:10.3390/biology12030416. This article has 7 citations.
(alharbi2023profilingthehsp70 pages 9-11): Bothina Mohammed Alharbi, Tahani H. Albinhassan, Razan Ali Alzahrani, Abderrezak Bouchama, Sameer Mohammad, Awatif Abdulaziz Alomari, May Nasser Bin-Jumah, Entissar S. AlSuhaibani, and Shuja Shafi Malik. Profiling the hsp70 chaperone network in heat-induced proteotoxic stress models of human neurons. Biology, 12:416, Mar 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12030416, doi:10.3390/biology12030416. This article has 7 citations.
(zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 1-2): Qun Zhang, Ping Feng, Xun-Hua Zhu, Shi-Qing Zhou, Ming-Liang Ye, Xiao-Jing Yang, Sha Gong, Sheng-Yan Huang, Xi-Rong Tan, Shi-Wei He, and Ying-Qing Li. Dnaja4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via psmd2-mediated myh9 degradation. Cell Death & Disease, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w, doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w. This article has 18 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 3-6): Qun Zhang, Ping Feng, Xun-Hua Zhu, Shi-Qing Zhou, Ming-Liang Ye, Xiao-Jing Yang, Sha Gong, Sheng-Yan Huang, Xi-Rong Tan, Shi-Wei He, and Ying-Qing Li. Dnaja4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via psmd2-mediated myh9 degradation. Cell Death & Disease, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w, doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w. This article has 18 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 6-9): Qun Zhang, Ping Feng, Xun-Hua Zhu, Shi-Qing Zhou, Ming-Liang Ye, Xiao-Jing Yang, Sha Gong, Sheng-Yan Huang, Xi-Rong Tan, Shi-Wei He, and Ying-Qing Li. Dnaja4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via psmd2-mediated myh9 degradation. Cell Death & Disease, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w, doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w. This article has 18 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 13-14): Qun Zhang, Ping Feng, Xun-Hua Zhu, Shi-Qing Zhou, Ming-Liang Ye, Xiao-Jing Yang, Sha Gong, Sheng-Yan Huang, Xi-Rong Tan, Shi-Wei He, and Ying-Qing Li. Dnaja4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via psmd2-mediated myh9 degradation. Cell Death & Disease, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w, doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w. This article has 18 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal pages 2-3): Qun Zhang, Ping Feng, Xun-Hua Zhu, Shi-Qing Zhou, Ming-Liang Ye, Xiao-Jing Yang, Sha Gong, Sheng-Yan Huang, Xi-Rong Tan, Shi-Wei He, and Ying-Qing Li. Dnaja4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via psmd2-mediated myh9 degradation. Cell Death & Disease, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w, doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w. This article has 18 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(liu2024cwgcnaanr pages 11-12): Yu Liu. Cwgcna: an r package to perform causal inference from the wgcna framework. NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics, Apr 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqae042, doi:10.1093/nargab/lqae042. This article has 18 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(zhang2023dnaja4suppressesepithelialmesenchymal media 8986c757): Qun Zhang, Ping Feng, Xun-Hua Zhu, Shi-Qing Zhou, Ming-Liang Ye, Xiao-Jing Yang, Sha Gong, Sheng-Yan Huang, Xi-Rong Tan, Shi-Wei He, and Ying-Qing Li. Dnaja4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma via psmd2-mediated myh9 degradation. Cell Death & Disease, Oct 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w, doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w. This article has 18 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(sun2020networkanalysesof media b1c2ca08): Hong Sun, Hai-Ying Zou, Xin-Yi Cai, Hao-Feng Zhou, Xiao-Qi Li, Wei-Jie Xie, Wen-Ming Xie, Ze-Peng Du, Li-Yan Xu, En-Min Li, and Bing-Li Wu. Network analyses of the differential expression of heat shock proteins in glioma. Jul 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2020.5425, doi:10.1089/dna.2020.5425. This article has 24 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
(teo2020dnaja3acochaperone pages 4-8): Wan-Huai Teo, Yu-Ning Fann, and Jeng-Fan Lo. Dnaja3, a co-chaperone in development and tumorigenesis. ArXiv, pages 1-17, Jan 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/7515_2020_33, doi:10.1007/7515_2020_33. This article has 2 citations.
(sun2020networkanalysesof pages 11-12): Hong Sun, Hai-Ying Zou, Xin-Yi Cai, Hao-Feng Zhou, Xiao-Qi Li, Wei-Jie Xie, Wen-Ming Xie, Ze-Peng Du, Li-Yan Xu, En-Min Li, and Bing-Li Wu. Network analyses of the differential expression of heat shock proteins in glioma. Jul 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2020.5425, doi:10.1089/dna.2020.5425. This article has 24 citations and is from a peer-reviewed journal.
id: Q8WW22
gene_symbol: DNAJA4
product_type: PROTEIN
status: IN_PROGRESS
taxon:
id: NCBITaxon:9606
label: Homo sapiens
description: >-
DNAJA4 is a class I J-domain protein (HSP40 co-chaperone) belonging to the DNAJA
subfamily. It contains an N-terminal J-domain (with conserved HPD motif) that
stimulates the ATPase activity of HSP70 family members, a glycine/phenylalanine-rich
region, a cysteine-rich zinc finger domain (CR-type, with four CXXCXGXG repeats
coordinating two zinc ions) involved in substrate recognition, two C-terminal
beta-barrel substrate-binding domains (CTDI and CTDII), and a dimerization domain.
As a co-chaperone, DNAJA4 binds unfolded or misfolded client proteins and delivers
them to HSP70 (HSPA) partners for ATP-dependent protein folding. Hageman et al.
(2011) demonstrated that DNAJA4 supports luciferase refolding and suppresses polyQ
aggregation when co-expressed with HSP70 partners (PMID:21231916). Systematic
interactome profiling of the human Hsp70 network (AP-MS and BioID) places DNAJA4
in the densely connected cytoplasmic class A JDP core, with robust interactions
with DNAJA1, DNAJA2, and DNAJB1 (DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.012). DNAJA4 is
farnesylated and membrane-associated, and is also found in the cytosol. It
participates in the HSP90 chaperone cycle for steroid hormone receptors via the
HSP70-HSP40-HOP-HSP90 relay pathway. DNAJA4 is transcriptionally upregulated
during heat stress in human neuronal models (log2 fold-change 1.5-5 at 1 h
post-heat shock; DOI:10.3390/biology12030416). Beyond generic chaperoning, DNAJA4
has a specific role in suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and
metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by promoting PSMD2-mediated
ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of MYH9, an interaction requiring the DnaJ domain
(DOI:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w). DNAJA4 promoter hypermethylation and silencing
is observed in multiple cancers including NPC, stomach adenocarcinoma, and
rhabdomyosarcoma (DOI:10.3390/ijms222413527).
alternative_products:
- name: '1'
id: Q8WW22-1
- name: '2'
id: Q8WW22-2
sequence_note: VSP_038965
- name: '3'
id: Q8WW22-3
sequence_note: VSP_045696
existing_annotations:
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: IBA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
review:
summary: >-
IBA annotation for cytosol localization propagated from orthologs including
yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008), S. pombe Mas5 (PomBase:SPBC1734.11), DNAJA2
(UniProtKB:O60884), and DNAJA4 itself. This is well supported by direct
experimental evidence: Hageman et al. (2011) showed that DNAJA4 is localized
in the cytosol (PMID:21231916). The IDA annotation from the same paper
(see below) independently confirms this localization. Cytosolic localization
is consistent with DNAJA4's role as a cytosolic HSP70 co-chaperone.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Cytosol localization is a core localization for DNAJA4 as a cytosolic
J-domain co-chaperone. This IBA annotation is independently confirmed by
IDA evidence from PMID:21231916.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding
genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
- term:
id: GO:0001671
label: ATPase activator activity
evidence_type: IBA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
review:
summary: >-
IBA annotation for ATPase activator activity propagated from orthologs
including yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008), Sis1 (SGD:S000005021), DNAJA2
(UniProtKB:O60884), and others. All class I J-domain proteins stimulate
HSP70 ATPase activity through their conserved J-domain, which directly
contacts the HSP70 ATPase domain and accelerates ATP hydrolysis. Kampinga
and Craig (2010) describe that J-domain cochaperones stimulate "the ATPase
activity of HSP70" (PMID:20651708). Hageman et al. (2011) confirmed that
J-proteins including DNAJA4 stimulate the intrinsic ATPase activity of HSP70
family members (PMID:21231916). The Reactome entry R-HSA-3371422 (ATP
hydrolysis by HSP70) explicitly describes that "This ATPase activity of
HSP70 is stimulated by protein substrates in synergism with J domain
cochaperones (HSP40s)." This is a core molecular function of all J-domain
proteins.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
ATPase activator activity is a fundamental and well-established molecular
function of J-domain proteins. DNAJA4 contains a conserved J-domain that
stimulates HSP70 ATPase activity. This IBA annotation is phylogenetically
sound and supported by the general biochemistry of J-domain proteins.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
Much of the functional diversity of the HSP70s is driven by a diverse class
of cofactors: J proteins
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
HSPA6 has a functional substrate-binding domain and possesses intrinsic
ATPase activity that is as high as that of the canonical HSPA1A when
stimulated by J-proteins
- term:
id: GO:0034605
label: cellular response to heat
evidence_type: IBA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
review:
summary: >-
IBA annotation for cellular response to heat propagated from orthologs
including yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008) and S. pombe Mas5
(PomBase:SPBC1734.11). HSP40/DNAJ proteins are heat shock proteins by
definition -- they are induced by and function during heat stress to
assist in protein folding and prevent aggregation. Hageman et al. (2011)
specifically tested DNAJA4 in the context of heat-denatured substrates,
showing it supports refolding of heat-denatured luciferase (PMID:21231916).
The IEA annotation for response to heat (GO:0009408, a parent term) via
InterPro also supports this. This is a broader but appropriate term given
the IBA evidence.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Cellular response to heat is an appropriate annotation for a heat shock
co-chaperone. DNAJA4 functions in protein refolding after heat denaturation,
which is a core aspect of the cellular heat stress response. The IBA
annotation is phylogenetically well supported.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
- term:
id: GO:0042026
label: protein refolding
evidence_type: IBA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
review:
summary: >-
IBA annotation for protein refolding propagated from orthologs including
yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008), S. pombe Mas5 (PomBase:SPBC1734.11), DNAJA2
(UniProtKB:O60884), and DNAJA4 itself. Hageman et al. (2011) directly
demonstrated that DNAJA4 supports HSP70-dependent refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase (PMID:21231916). This is a core biological
process for J-domain co-chaperones that assist HSP70 in the ATP-dependent
refolding cycle.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Protein refolding is a core function of J-domain co-chaperones working
with HSP70. This IBA is directly confirmed by experimental evidence from
Hageman et al. (2011) showing DNAJA4 supports luciferase refolding.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
- term:
id: GO:0051082
label: unfolded protein binding
evidence_type: IBA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
review:
summary: >-
GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) is being obsoleted (go-ontology#30962).
This IBA annotation was propagated via phylogenetic inference from orthologs
including yeast Ydj1 (SGD:S000005008, S000005021), DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884),
and DNAJA4 itself (UniProtKB:Q8WW22). While it is true that class I J-domain
proteins like DNAJA4 bind unfolded substrates, the term "unfolded protein binding"
is being replaced because it does not capture the functional role of the protein
as a chaperone. DNAJA4 functions as an HSP70 co-chaperone: it binds client proteins
and delivers them to HSP70, stimulating HSP70 ATPase activity via its J-domain
(PMID:21231916). Kampinga and Craig (2010) describe how J proteins "bind client
proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70 and directly
determining their fate" (PMID:20651708). The correct replacement term is
GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone), defined as "Binding to a protein or a
protein-containing complex to assist the protein folding process."
action: MODIFY
reason: >-
GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. DNAJA4 is a class I J-domain protein that functions
as a protein folding chaperone, not merely as an unfolded protein binder. The
replacement term GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) accurately captures the
functional role of DNAJA4 in binding client proteins and delivering them to HSP70
for ATP-dependent refolding.
proposed_replacement_terms:
- id: GO:0044183
label: protein folding chaperone
additional_reference_ids:
- PMID:20651708
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Overexpressed chaperones that suppressed polyQ aggregation were found not to
be able to stimulate luciferase refolding. Inversely, chaperones that supported
luciferase refolding were poor suppressors of polyQ aggregation.
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to
HSP70 and directly determining their fate
- term:
id: GO:0051087
label: protein-folding chaperone binding
evidence_type: IBA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000033
review:
summary: >-
IBA annotation for protein-folding chaperone binding propagated from orthologs
including DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884), DNAJA1 (UniProtKB:P31689), and DNAJA4
itself. This term captures the binding of DNAJA4 to HSP70 chaperone partners.
Hageman et al. (2011) demonstrated that DNAJA4 physically interacts with
multiple HSP70 family members including HSPA1A (P0DMV8), HSPA1B (P0DMV9),
and HSPA6 (P17066) (PMID:21231916). The IPI annotations from the same paper
independently confirm this interaction. Binding to HSP70 chaperones is a core
molecular function of all J-domain proteins, mediated through the J-domain
interaction with the HSP70 ATPase domain.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Protein-folding chaperone binding (i.e., binding to HSP70 partners) is a
core function of J-domain co-chaperones. DNAJA4 has been experimentally
shown to interact with multiple HSP70 family members. This IBA is well
supported by direct experimental evidence.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding
genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
Some target HSP70 activity to clients at precise locations in cells and
others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to
HSP70 and directly determining their fate
- term:
id: GO:0005524
label: ATP binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000002
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for ATP binding inferred from InterPro domain IPR012724
(DnaJ). While the DnaJ/J-domain does interact with the HSP70 ATPase domain
and stimulates its ATPase activity, the J-domain protein itself does not
bind ATP. It is the HSP70 partner that binds and hydrolyzes ATP. DNAJA4 does
not have an ATPase domain or ATP-binding domain. The InterPro2GO mapping
from IPR012724 to GO:0005524 appears to be an incorrect transitive
annotation -- the DnaJ domain stimulates the ATPase of HSP70, but does not
itself bind ATP.
action: REMOVE
reason: >-
J-domain proteins like DNAJA4 do not bind ATP themselves. The J-domain
stimulates the ATPase activity of HSP70 partners, but it is the HSP70
that binds ATP, not the co-chaperone. This IEA annotation based on the
DnaJ InterPro domain is an incorrect transitive inference.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
Heat shock 70 kDa proteins (HSP70s) are ubiquitous molecular chaperones that
function in a myriad of biological processes, modulating polypeptide folding,
degradation and translocation across membranes, and protein-protein
interactions. This multitude of roles is not easily reconciled with the
universality of the activity of HSP70s in ATP-dependent client protein-binding
and release cycles
- term:
id: GO:0006457
label: protein folding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000120
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for protein folding inferred from multiple sources (ARBA,
InterPro IPR008971 HSP40/DnaJ_pept-bd, IPR012724 DnaJ, IPR044713
DNJA1/2-like). As a J-domain co-chaperone, DNAJA4 participates in
protein folding by binding client proteins and delivering them to HSP70
for ATP-dependent folding. Hageman et al. (2011) showed DNAJA4 supports
refolding of heat-denatured luciferase (PMID:21231916). The more specific
term GO:0042026 (protein refolding) is already annotated with IDA and IBA
evidence. This broader term is acceptable as a parent-level IEA annotation.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Protein folding is an appropriate broad process annotation for DNAJA4.
The more specific child term protein refolding (GO:0042026) is already
annotated with experimental evidence. This IEA correctly captures the
general biological process in which DNAJA4 participates.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
- term:
id: GO:0008270
label: zinc ion binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000043
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for zinc ion binding inferred from UniProtKB keyword
KW-0863 (Zinc). DNAJA4 contains a CR-type zinc finger domain (residues
122-206) with four CXXCXGXG repeats that coordinate two zinc ions. This
is confirmed by the UniProt feature annotations showing eight cysteine
residues that bind Zn(2+) ions (positions 135, 138, 151, 154, 178, 181,
194, 197). The zinc finger domain is characteristic of class I J-domain
proteins and is important for client protein recognition and binding.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Zinc ion binding is structurally confirmed for DNAJA4 via its CR-type
zinc finger domain with four CXXCXGXG repeats coordinating two zinc ions.
This is a well-characterized structural feature of class I J-domain proteins.
- term:
id: GO:0009408
label: response to heat
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000002
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for response to heat inferred from InterPro domain IPR012724
(DnaJ). This is a broader parent term of GO:0034605 (cellular response to
heat), which is already annotated by IBA evidence. As a heat shock
co-chaperone, DNAJA4 is involved in the cellular response to heat stress
through its role in protein refolding and prevention of aggregation.
Hageman et al. (2011) tested DNAJA4 function using heat-denatured substrates
(PMID:21231916). This broader IEA annotation is acceptable alongside the
more specific IBA annotation.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Response to heat is an appropriate broad annotation for a heat shock
co-chaperone. The more specific child term cellular response to heat
(GO:0034605) is already annotated by IBA. This broader IEA is acceptable.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
- term:
id: GO:0016020
label: membrane
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000044
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for membrane localization inferred from UniProt subcellular
location vocabulary (SL-0162). DNAJA4 is farnesylated at Cys-394 (S-farnesyl
cysteine, by sequence similarity) and is annotated as membrane-associated via
lipid anchor in UniProt. Hageman et al. (2011) provided IDA evidence for
membrane localization (PMID:21231916), independently confirming this IEA.
The lipid anchor (farnesylation) is a distinctive feature of DNAJA4 among
the DNAJA subfamily members and mediates its membrane association.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Membrane localization is supported by the farnesylation of DNAJA4 at
Cys-394 and is independently confirmed by IDA evidence from
PMID:21231916. This is a valid localization for DNAJA4.
- term:
id: GO:0030544
label: Hsp70 protein binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000002
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for Hsp70 protein binding inferred from InterPro domain
IPR044713 (DNJA1/2-like). DNAJA4 is a J-domain co-chaperone whose primary
molecular function involves binding HSP70 family members via its J-domain.
Hageman et al. (2011) demonstrated that DNAJA4 physically interacts with
HSP70 family members HSPA1A, HSPA1B, and HSPA6 (PMID:21231916). However,
GO:0030544 (Hsp70 protein binding) is a less informative term than
GO:0051087 (protein-folding chaperone binding), which is already annotated
with IBA and IPI evidence. The term GO:0030544 simply describes binding
without capturing the functional context. Nevertheless, as an IEA annotation
it is not incorrect and can be accepted alongside the more specific IBA/IPI
annotations.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Hsp70 protein binding is correct -- DNAJA4 binds HSP70 partners via its
J-domain. While the more informative term protein-folding chaperone binding
(GO:0051087) is already annotated, this IEA is not incorrect and reflects
the InterPro domain-based inference.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding
genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
Often, multiple J proteins function with a single HSP70
- term:
id: GO:0031072
label: heat shock protein binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000002
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for heat shock protein binding inferred from InterPro domain
IPR001305 (HSP_DnaJ_Cys-rich_dom). This is a broader parent of GO:0030544
(Hsp70 protein binding) and a broader relative of GO:0051087 (protein-folding
chaperone binding), both of which are already annotated with higher-quality
evidence. As a J-domain co-chaperone, DNAJA4 binds HSP70 (and participates
in the HSP90 chaperone cycle via HOP). This annotation is not incorrect but
is less informative than the existing more specific annotations.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Heat shock protein binding is a broad but correct annotation. DNAJA4 binds
HSP70 partners and participates in the HSP90 chaperone cycle. More specific
terms are already annotated (GO:0030544, GO:0051087), but this broader IEA
is acceptable.
- term:
id: GO:0046872
label: metal ion binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000043
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for metal ion binding inferred from UniProtKB keyword
KW-0479 (Metal-binding). DNAJA4 contains a CR-type zinc finger domain
coordinating two zinc ions. The more specific term GO:0008270 (zinc ion
binding) is already annotated with the same evidence type (IEA). This
broader term is redundant but not incorrect.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Metal ion binding is correct but overly broad compared to the already
annotated GO:0008270 (zinc ion binding). As an IEA annotation it is
acceptable even though it provides less specificity.
- term:
id: GO:0051082
label: unfolded protein binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000002
review:
summary: >-
GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) is being obsoleted (go-ontology#30962).
This IEA annotation was inferred from InterPro domain matches (IPR001305
HSP_DnaJ_Cys-rich_dom, IPR008971 HSP40/DnaJ_pept-bd, IPR012724 DnaJ). These
domains are characteristic of class I J-domain proteins that function as HSP70
co-chaperones. The InterPro domains correctly identify DNAJA4 as a DnaJ family
member with substrate-binding capability, but the GO term "unfolded protein
binding" is being replaced because it fails to convey the chaperone function.
Kampinga and Craig (2010) explain that J proteins function with HSP70 through
"ATP-dependent client protein-binding and release cycles" and that some J proteins
"bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70"
(PMID:20651708). The correct replacement is GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone).
action: MODIFY
reason: >-
GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. The InterPro-based annotation correctly identifies
DNAJA4 as having substrate-binding domains characteristic of J-domain protein
co-chaperones, but the term should be replaced with GO:0044183 (protein folding
chaperone) which properly captures the functional role of binding client proteins
to assist in the protein folding process.
proposed_replacement_terms:
- id: GO:0044183
label: protein folding chaperone
additional_reference_ids:
- PMID:20651708
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
Much of the functional diversity of the HSP70s is driven by a diverse class
of cofactors: J proteins
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to
HSP70 and directly determining their fate
- term:
id: GO:0051087
label: protein-folding chaperone binding
evidence_type: IEA
original_reference_id: GO_REF:0000117
review:
summary: >-
IEA annotation for protein-folding chaperone binding inferred by ARBA
machine learning model (ARBA:ARBA00088077). This is consistent with
DNAJA4's well-established role as a J-domain co-chaperone that binds
HSP70 chaperone partners. This annotation is independently confirmed
by IBA (GO_REF:0000033) and IPI (PMID:21231916) evidence for the same
GO term. Hageman et al. (2011) showed DNAJA4 interacts with HSPA1A,
HSPA1B, and HSPA6 (PMID:21231916).
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Protein-folding chaperone binding is a core function of J-domain
co-chaperones. This IEA annotation is independently confirmed by both
IBA and IPI evidence.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding
genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:25036637
review:
summary: >-
IPI annotation for protein binding from Taipale et al. (2014), a large-scale
quantitative chaperone interaction network study. The GOA data shows
interactions with DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884) and ENDOG (UniProtKB:Q14249).
The DNAJA2 interaction (homodimerization/heterodimerization between DNAJA
family members) is plausible for co-chaperone function. The ENDOG interaction
is from a high-throughput screen. However, "protein binding" (GO:0005515) is
uninformative -- the DNAJA2 interaction could be more accurately captured
by a more specific binding term, and the interaction with ENDOG lacks
functional context.
action: MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED
reason: >-
GO:0005515 (protein binding) is uninformative and does not convey the
functional significance of the interactions. The DNAJA2 interaction
is better captured by existing annotations for protein-folding chaperone
binding. Per curation guidelines, protein binding should be avoided in
favor of more specific MF terms.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:33961781
review:
summary: >-
IPI annotation for protein binding from Huttlin et al. (2021), a dual
proteome-scale interaction network study. The GOA data shows an interaction
with DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884). This DNAJA4-DNAJA2 interaction is also
supported by the UniProt interaction data (4 experiments in IntAct). While
the interaction may be real, "protein binding" is uninformative and the
interaction between DNAJA co-chaperones is better captured by existing
chaperone binding annotations.
action: MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED
reason: >-
GO:0005515 (protein binding) is uninformative. The DNAJA4-DNAJA2
interaction detected in this high-throughput study does not add
functional information beyond what is captured by the existing
protein-folding chaperone binding annotations.
- term:
id: GO:0005515
label: protein binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:40205054
review:
summary: >-
IPI annotation for protein binding from a multimodal cell maps study.
The GOA data shows an interaction with DNAJA2 (UniProtKB:O60884). This
is the third independent detection of the DNAJA4-DNAJA2 interaction
(also seen in PMID:25036637 and PMID:33961781), suggesting it is a
robust interaction. However, "protein binding" remains uninformative.
action: MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED
reason: >-
GO:0005515 (protein binding) is uninformative. While the DNAJA4-DNAJA2
interaction is robustly detected across multiple studies, the functional
significance is better captured by existing chaperone binding annotations.
Per curation guidelines, protein binding should be avoided.
- term:
id: GO:0010596
label: negative regulation of endothelial cell migration
evidence_type: IMP
original_reference_id: PMID:23142051
review:
summary: >-
IMP annotation from Pencheva et al. (2012), which studied miRNA-mediated
regulation of melanoma metastasis. The study found that miR-1908,
miR-199a-5p, and miR-199a-3p convergently target DNAJA4 and ApoE. DNAJA4
was shown to promote ApoE expression, and ApoE suppresses metastatic
endothelial recruitment (MER). The negative regulation of endothelial cell
migration is an indirect downstream consequence of DNAJA4 promoting ApoE
expression, rather than a direct molecular function of DNAJA4 as a
co-chaperone. This is a context-specific phenotypic observation in melanoma
cells, not a core function of DNAJA4.
action: KEEP_AS_NON_CORE
reason: >-
The negative regulation of endothelial cell migration is a downstream
phenotypic consequence observed in the specific context of melanoma
metastasis. DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression, and ApoE is the effector
that suppresses endothelial migration. This is not a core evolved function
of DNAJA4 as a J-domain co-chaperone, but the IMP evidence from
PMID:23142051 supports the annotation in this specific biological context.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:23142051
supporting_text: >-
Cancer-secreted ApoE suppresses invasion and metastatic endothelial
recruitment (MER) by engaging melanoma cell LRP1 and endothelial cell
LRP8 receptors, respectively, while DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression
- term:
id: GO:0010628
label: positive regulation of gene expression
evidence_type: IMP
original_reference_id: PMID:23142051
review:
summary: >-
IMP annotation from Pencheva et al. (2012) showing that DNAJA4 promotes
ApoE expression. The study demonstrated that miRNAs targeting DNAJA4
reduce ApoE expression, and DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression. However,
GO:0010628 (positive regulation of gene expression) is extremely broad
and does not specify what gene expression is being regulated. The mechanism
by which a J-domain co-chaperone regulates gene expression is unclear --
it could be through chaperoning a transcription factor or signaling
protein. The annotation is overly vague and the mechanism is indirect.
action: MARK_AS_OVER_ANNOTATED
reason: >-
GO:0010628 (positive regulation of gene expression) is overly broad and
does not capture the specificity of what was observed. DNAJA4 promotes
ApoE expression, but the mechanism is not well characterized and could
involve chaperoning of upstream regulators. This vague process annotation
does not add meaningful information about DNAJA4's function. The connection
to ApoE regulation in melanoma is a context-specific observation.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:23142051
supporting_text: >-
DNAJA4 promotes ApoE expression
- term:
id: GO:0051087
label: protein-folding chaperone binding
evidence_type: IPI
original_reference_id: PMID:21231916
review:
summary: >-
IPI annotation for protein-folding chaperone binding based on physical
interaction evidence from Hageman et al. (2011). The GOA data shows
three separate IPI entries from this paper with different interactors:
HSPA1A (UniProtKB:P0DMV8), HSPA1B (UniProtKB:P0DMV9), and HSPA6
(UniProtKB:P17066). This annotation entry corresponds to the interaction
with HSPA1A. DNAJA4 binds HSP70 chaperone partners through its J-domain,
which is a core molecular function of all J-domain co-chaperones.
Hageman et al. systematically tested interactions between mammalian
HSP40 and HSP70 family members and found that DNAJA4 functionally
interacts with these HSP70 partners to support protein refolding.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Protein-folding chaperone binding is a core molecular function of DNAJA4.
The IPI evidence from Hageman et al. (2011) directly demonstrates physical
interaction between DNAJA4 and HSP70 family member HSPA1A.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding
genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
Often, multiple J proteins function with a single HSP70
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-3371422
review:
summary: >-
TAS annotation for cytosol localization from Reactome pathway
R-HSA-3371422 (ATP hydrolysis by HSP70). The Reactome entry describes
the HSP70 chaperone cycle in which HSP40 co-chaperones (including DNAJA4)
stimulate HSP70 ATPase activity in the cytosol. This localization is
independently confirmed by IDA evidence from PMID:21231916 and IBA
evidence from GO_REF:0000033.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Cytosol localization is well supported for DNAJA4 by multiple independent
evidence sources. This Reactome TAS annotation is consistent with the
IDA and IBA evidence.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-3371503
review:
summary: >-
TAS annotation for cytosol localization from Reactome pathway
R-HSA-3371503 (STIP1/HOP binds HSP90 and HSP70:HSP40:nascent protein).
The Reactome entry describes the HSP70-HSP40-HOP-HSP90 relay pathway
in the cytosol, in which DNAJA4 participates as a HSP40 co-chaperone.
This localization is independently confirmed by IDA (PMID:21231916)
and IBA evidence.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Cytosol localization is well established. This Reactome TAS annotation
is consistent with the HSP90 chaperone cycle in which DNAJA4 participates
as part of the HSP70-HSP40-HOP-HSP90 relay.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: TAS
original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-3371590
review:
summary: >-
TAS annotation for cytosol localization from Reactome pathway
R-HSA-3371590 (HSP70 binds to HSP40:nascent protein). The Reactome
entry describes the initial step of client protein binding by HSP40
co-chaperones followed by HSP70 recruitment in the cytosol. DNAJA4
is included as one of the HSP40 family members. This localization is
independently confirmed by IDA and IBA evidence.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Cytosol localization is well established for DNAJA4 as a cytosolic
HSP70 co-chaperone. This is the third Reactome TAS annotation for the
same localization, all consistent with experimental evidence.
- term:
id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:21231916
review:
summary: >-
IDA annotation for cytosol localization from Hageman et al. (2011).
The study included subcellular localization analysis of mammalian HSP70
and HSP40 family members, reporting that "most of the corresponding
proteins are localized in the cytosol" (PMID:21231916). This direct
experimental evidence confirms the cytosolic localization of DNAJA4,
consistent with its role as a cytosolic co-chaperone.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Direct experimental evidence (IDA) confirms cytosol localization.
This is the strongest evidence for DNAJA4's cytosolic localization
and is consistent with its function as a cytosolic HSP70 co-chaperone.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding
genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
- term:
id: GO:0016020
label: membrane
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:21231916
review:
summary: >-
IDA annotation for membrane localization from Hageman et al. (2011).
DNAJA4 is farnesylated at Cys-394 (S-farnesyl cysteine), which anchors
it to cellular membranes. UniProt annotates the subcellular location
as "Membrane; Lipid-anchor." Hageman et al. (2011) provided direct
assay evidence confirming membrane association (PMID:21231916). This
dual localization (cytosol and membrane) is distinctive for DNAJA4
among DNAJA subfamily members and may reflect regulation of its
availability for different substrates.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Membrane localization is directly supported by IDA evidence and is
consistent with the farnesylation of DNAJA4 at Cys-394. This is a
distinctive and functionally relevant localization for this co-chaperone.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding
genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
- term:
id: GO:0042026
label: protein refolding
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:21231916
review:
summary: >-
IDA annotation for protein refolding from Hageman et al. (2011). The
study directly demonstrated that overexpression of DNAJA4 with HSP70
partners supports refolding of heat-denatured luciferase. The authors
"assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding
of heat-denatured luciferase" (PMID:21231916). This is a core function
of J-domain co-chaperones that assist HSP70 in the ATP-dependent
protein refolding cycle.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
Protein refolding is a core biological process for J-domain co-chaperones.
Hageman et al. (2011) directly demonstrated DNAJA4's ability to support
luciferase refolding with HSP70 partners. This IDA annotation represents
strong experimental evidence for a fundamental function.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
- term:
id: GO:0051082
label: unfolded protein binding
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:21231916
review:
summary: >-
GO:0051082 (unfolded protein binding) is being obsoleted (go-ontology#30962).
This IDA annotation from PMID:21231916 (Hageman et al. 2011) is based on direct
experimental evidence showing that DNAJA4 functions as an HSP70 co-chaperone.
The study demonstrated that DNAJA4 supports HSP70-dependent luciferase refolding
and suppresses polyQ aggregation, activities that reflect its role as a protein
folding chaperone rather than simply binding unfolded proteins. The authors
"assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a non-foldable
polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment" (PMID:21231916). The same
paper provides evidence for DNAJA4 interacting with multiple HSP70 family members
(HSPA1A/P0DMV8, HSPA1B/P0DMV9, HSPA6/P17066) as IPI evidence for GO:0051087
(protein-folding chaperone binding). The correct replacement term is GO:0044183
(protein folding chaperone), which captures the functional role of DNAJA4 as a
co-chaperone that binds client proteins and delivers them to HSP70 for
ATP-dependent refolding.
action: MODIFY
reason: >-
GO:0051082 is being obsoleted. The experimental evidence from Hageman et al.
(2011) demonstrates that DNAJA4 functions as a protein folding chaperone --
it supports luciferase refolding and suppresses polyQ aggregation in cooperation
with HSP70 partners. This is consistent with the well-established role of class I
J-domain proteins as co-chaperones that bind unfolded substrates and deliver them
to HSP70. The replacement term GO:0044183 (protein folding chaperone) accurately
describes this molecular function.
proposed_replacement_terms:
- id: GO:0044183
label: protein folding chaperone
additional_reference_ids:
- PMID:20651708
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
Humans contain many HSP (heat-shock protein) 70/HSPA- and HSP40/DNAJ-encoding
genes and most of the corresponding proteins are localized in the cytosol
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to
HSP70 and directly determining their fate
- term:
id: GO:0090084
label: negative regulation of inclusion body assembly
evidence_type: IDA
original_reference_id: PMID:21231916
review:
summary: >-
IDA annotation for negative regulation of inclusion body assembly from
Hageman et al. (2011). The study demonstrated that DNAJA4 suppresses
aggregation of polyQ-expanded Huntingtin fragments, which form inclusion
bodies. The authors specifically tested "suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment"
(PMID:21231916). This is a direct experimental observation and reflects
DNAJA4's anti-aggregation chaperone activity. However, it is worth noting
that this is a specific experimental readout rather than a primary evolved
function, as polyQ expansion is a pathological context. The ability to
suppress aggregation is a general property of chaperones that bind
misfolded substrates.
action: ACCEPT
reason: >-
The IDA evidence directly demonstrates that DNAJA4 suppresses polyQ
inclusion body formation. While this is tested in a pathological context
(polyQ-expanded Huntingtin), it reflects the genuine anti-aggregation
chaperone activity of DNAJA4. Suppression of protein aggregation is a
core function of J-domain co-chaperones.
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
references:
- id: GO_REF:0000002
title: Gene Ontology annotation through association of InterPro records with GO
terms
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000033
title: Annotation inferences using phylogenetic trees
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000043
title: Gene Ontology annotation based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot keyword mapping
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000044
title: Gene Ontology annotation based on UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot Subcellular Location
vocabulary mapping, accompanied by conservative changes to GO terms applied by
UniProt
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000117
title: Electronic Gene Ontology annotations created by ARBA machine learning models
findings: []
- id: GO_REF:0000120
title: Combined Automated Annotation using Multiple IEA Methods
findings: []
- id: PMID:20651708
title: 'The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity.'
findings: []
- id: PMID:21231916
title: The diverse members of the mammalian HSP70 machine show distinct chaperone-like
activities.
findings: []
- id: PMID:23142051
title: Convergent multi-miRNA targeting of ApoE drives LRP1/LRP8-dependent melanoma
metastasis and angiogenesis.
findings: []
- id: PMID:25036637
title: A quantitative chaperone interaction network reveals the architecture of
cellular protein homeostasis pathways.
findings: []
- id: PMID:33961781
title: Dual proteome-scale networks reveal cell-specific remodeling of the human
interactome.
findings: []
- id: PMID:40205054
title: Multimodal cell maps as a foundation for structural and functional genomics.
findings: []
- id: Reactome:R-HSA-3371422
title: ATP hydrolysis by HSP70
findings: []
- id: Reactome:R-HSA-3371503
title: STIP1(HOP) binds HSP90 and HSP70:HSP40:nascent protein
findings: []
- id: Reactome:R-HSA-3371590
title: HSP70 binds to HSP40:nascent protein
findings: []
- id: DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.012
title: Comprehensive interactome profiling of the human Hsp70 network highlights
functional differentiation of J domains.
findings:
- statement: >-
DNAJA4 is positioned in the densely connected cytoplasmic class A JDP core
of the human Hsp70 network, with robust interactions with DNAJA1, DNAJA2,
and DNAJB1.
- id: DOI:10.3390/biology12030416
title: Profiling the Hsp70 chaperone network in heat-induced proteotoxic stress
models of human neurons.
findings:
- statement: >-
DNAJA4 is among the chaperone/co-chaperone genes commonly upregulated across
three neuronal models after heat stress (log2 fold-change 1.5-5 at 1 h
post-heat shock).
- id: DOI:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w
title: DNAJA4 suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in
nasopharyngeal carcinoma via PSMD2-mediated MYH9 degradation.
findings:
- statement: >-
DNAJA4 promotes ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation of MYH9 via
PSMD2 recruitment, suppressing EMT and metastasis in NPC.
- statement: >-
DNAJA4 promoter hypermethylation and downregulation in NPC; DAC
demethylation restores DNAJA4 levels at least 15-fold in NPC cell lines.
- id: DOI:10.3390/ijms222413527
title: Regulation of p53 and cancer signaling by heat shock protein 40/J-domain
protein family members.
findings:
- statement: >-
DNAJA4 can be epigenetically silenced in cancers; reduced DNAJA4 expression
due to promoter methylation correlates with poorer disease-free survival in
stomach adenocarcinoma, and hypermethylation is observed in rhabdomyosarcoma.
- id: DOI:10.1098/rstb.2016.0534
title: DNAJ proteins in neurodegeneration - essential and protective factors.
findings:
- statement: >-
Review situating DNAJA4 within the DNAJA subfamily with canonical class A
JDP domain composition (J-domain, G/F region, Zn-binding region, and
C-terminal client-binding/dimerization region).
core_functions:
- description: >-
DNAJA4 functions as a cytoplasmic class A HSP70 co-chaperone (J-domain protein)
that stimulates the ATPase activity of HSP70 family members via its conserved
J-domain HPD motif, binds unfolded client proteins through its zinc finger
cysteine-rich domain and C-terminal beta-barrel substrate-binding domains (CTDI
and CTDII), and delivers them to HSP70 for ATP-dependent refolding. It supports
refolding of heat-denatured substrates and suppresses protein aggregation
(PMID:21231916). Systematic Hsp70 network profiling places DNAJA4 in the densely
connected cytoplasmic JDP core (DOI:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.04.012), and it is
acutely upregulated during heat stress in human neuronal models
(DOI:10.3390/biology12030416). DNAJA4 also has a specific role in promoting
PSMD2-mediated ubiquitin-proteasome degradation of MYH9, linking its co-chaperone
function to cytoskeletal remodeling and EMT suppression in NPC
(DOI:10.1038/s41419-023-06225-w). DNAJA4 is farnesylated at Cys-394, providing
dual cytosol/membrane localization.
molecular_function:
id: GO:0044183
label: protein folding chaperone
directly_involved_in:
- id: GO:0042026
label: protein refolding
- id: GO:0034605
label: cellular response to heat
locations:
- id: GO:0005829
label: cytosol
- id: GO:0016020
label: membrane
supported_by:
- reference_id: PMID:21231916
supporting_text: >-
assessed the effect of overexpression of each of these HSPs on refolding of
heat-denatured luciferase and on the suppression of aggregation of a
non-foldable polyQ (polyglutamine)-expanded Huntingtin fragment
- reference_id: PMID:20651708
supporting_text: >-
others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to
HSP70 and directly determining their fate