View original ARBA rule on UniProt
Rule predicts GO:0032206 (positive regulation of telomere maintenance) using 9 condition sets covering diverse protein families: TRiC chaperonin subunits, TRF2 (shelterin), ATM kinase, PARP enzymes, RTEL1 helicase, MAPK, RuvB-like helicase, and SLX4 endonuclease. The rule combines OR logic across mechanistically distinct families involved in telomere biology, but contains significant redundancy, questionable domain choices, and taxonomic errors.
Condition-set counts describe the sets recorded in this review, which may omit the full rule.
Interactive prediction matrix showing how row entries PREDICT column entries. Cell (i,j) shows what fraction of proteins with row domain i also have column domain j. Click cells to view intersection in UniProt. Click domain IDs to view proteins with that domain.
Legend: Each cell shows PREDICTS % (fraction of row entry proteins that also have column entry - row PREDICTS column), Jaccard similarity (J:%), and intersection count. CS = Condition Set(s), TGT = GO annotation target.
ARBA00047239 attempts to capture diverse mechanisms of telomere maintenance regulation but suffers from critical flaws: (1) Complete redundancy in CS3 where both ATM FunFams match identical proteins (Jaccard=1.0); (2) Multiple subset relationships indicating redundant domain coverage; (3) Taxonomic errors mixing archaeal thermosome with eukaryotic CCT under Primates; (4) Overly narrow and scientifically unjustified taxonomic restrictions (Haplorrhini, Homo, Mus); (5) Inclusion of broad multifunctional families (ATM, MAPK, RUVBL) where family membership does not predict telomere function; (6) Functional misclassification where ATM primarily triggers senescence at dysfunctional telomeres (negative regulation) rather than promoting maintenance; (7) Very low average Jaccard similarity (0.043) across condition sets indicating poor biological coherence; (8) Most condition sets are completely disjoint (no protein overlap), suggesting the rule captures unrelated protein families rather than functionally coherent mechanisms. Strong biological support exists for SLX4, RTEL1, and specific PARP family members (tankyrases, PARP1/2), but rule design undermines accuracy through permissive OR logic and inadequate domain specificity.
The rule has a legitimate biological foundation - several of the targeted protein families (SLX4, RTEL1, TRF2, specific PARPs, TRiC) do play roles in telomere maintenance. However, the implementation is fundamentally flawed. The complete redundancy in CS3 (Jaccard=1.0 for ATM FunFams) demonstrates inadequate quality control in rule construction. The taxonomic errors (mixing archaeal and eukaryotic domains) and arbitrary restrictions (Homo, Mus, Haplorrhini) suggest automated generation without expert review. Most critically, broad family signatures for ATM, MAPK, and RUVBL will generate extensive false positives, as these are large multifunctional families where membership does not predict telomere function. ATM's functional role is particularly problematic - it responds to dysfunctional telomeres by triggering cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (negative regulation), not positive maintenance. The very low average Jaccard similarity (0.043) and predominant disjoint relationships between condition sets indicate this rule conflates mechanistically distinct processes rather than capturing coherent biological function. Modification is recommended rather than removal because core components (SLX4, RTEL1) have strong literature support, but substantial restructuring is required: remove redundant FunFam pairs, eliminate ATM/MAPK/RUVBL conditions or add strict context constraints, correct taxonomic scope, and consider splitting into mechanism-specific rules for telomerase biogenesis vs. ALT pathway vs. telomere protection.
Combines eukaryotic CCT/TRiC chaperonin with archaeal thermosome. IPR054827 is subset of IPR002194 (Jaccard=0.697, containment=1.0). TRiC promotes telomere maintenance via TCAB1 folding for telomerase trafficking, but mixing archaeal/eukaryotic domains under Primates is taxonomically incorrect.
TRF2 shelterin component. Second FunFam is subset of first (Jaccard=0.5, containment=1.0). TRF2 protects telomeres and regulates T-loop formation but functions primarily as protective factor rather than active promoter of lengthening.
| Condition A | Condition B | Count A | Count B | Intersection | Jaccard | A in B | B in A | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.10.10.60:FF:000129
|
1.25.40.210:FF:000002
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 1.000 | SUBSET |
COMPLETE REDUNDANCY: Both FunFams match identical proteins (Jaccard=1.0, intersection=3, no unique proteins in either). ATM responds to dysfunctional telomeres by triggering senescence/apoptosis - negative regulation, not positive. Broad eukaryotic scope compounds false positive risk.
| Condition A | Condition B | Count A | Count B | Intersection | Jaccard | A in B | B in A | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
|
3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
|
3 | 3 | 3 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | REDUNDANT |
PARP family includes tankyrases and PARP1/2 with documented telomere roles. Second FunFam shows high overlap with first (Jaccard=0.833, containment=1.0). However, PARP signatures are broad and many family members lack telomere function. Primate restriction unjustified.
| Condition A | Condition B | Count A | Count B | Intersection | Jaccard | A in B | B in A | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.10.150.50:FF:000012
|
1.25.40.20:FF:000009
|
4 | 5 | 4 | 0.800 | 1.000 | 0.800 | SUBSET |
CCT2/TCP1-eta is TRiC subunit. Both FunFams are from same superfamily (1.10.560.10), likely representing variants. Redundant with CS1. Haplorrhini restriction (dry-nosed primates only) is overly narrow for conserved chaperonin function.
| Condition A | Condition B | Count A | Count B | Intersection | Jaccard | A in B | B in A | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.10.560.10:FF:000017
|
1.10.560.10:FF:000045
|
36 | 13 | 12 | 0.324 | 0.333 | 0.923 | MODERATE |
RTEL1 is bona fide telomere helicase unwinding G4 structures and T-loops. Strong genetic evidence from dyskeratosis congenita. No taxonomic restriction appropriate given conservation. Multiple FunFams may capture different domains of same protein.
| Condition A | Condition B | Count A | Count B | Intersection | Jaccard | A in B | B in A | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
|
1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
|
6 | 6 | 6 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | REDUNDANT |
1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
|
3.40.50.300:FF:000431
|
6 | 23 | 6 | 0.261 | 1.000 | 0.261 | SUBSET |
1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
|
3.40.50.300:FF:000431
|
6 | 23 | 6 | 0.261 | 1.000 | 0.261 | SUBSET |
MAPK family (ERK, p38, JNK) has indirect effects on telomere biology through signaling. Relationship is context-dependent and not diagnostic for positive telomere regulation. Genus-level restriction to Homo is arbitrary and scientifically unjustified.
RUVBL1/2 are AAA+ ATPases involved in H/ACA RNP assembly and chromatin remodeling. Indirect telomerase biogenesis role but not telomere-specific. Restriction to Mus genus is peculiar and lacks biological justification.
SLX4 scaffold for structure-specific endonucleases, recruited by TRF2 to process telomeric joint molecules. Direct role in ALT pathway regulation. Metazoan scope reasonable. This is one of the strongest conditions in the rule.
The rule combines 9 condition sets with 16 domain signatures to predict a single GO term, but analysis reveals extensive redundancy and poor biological coherence. CS3 contains complete redundancy (Jaccard=1.0) with both FunFams matching identical proteins. Multiple subset relationships exist (IPR054827 ⊆ IPR002194 in CS1; FunFam pairs in CS2, CS4, CS5) indicating unnecessary duplication. Most condition sets are completely disjoint with no protein overlap, averaging Jaccard similarity of only 0.043 across 120 domain-domain comparisons. This suggests the rule attempts to capture unrelated mechanisms through permissive OR logic rather than identifying parsimonious signatures for coherent biological function. The inclusion of broad multifunctional families (ATM, MAPK, RUVBL) without context constraints adds complexity that undermines rather than enhances predictive accuracy. CS1 and CS5 both target TRiC subunits with different taxonomic restrictions, creating arbitrary bifurcation. A parsimonious design would: (1) eliminate all redundant FunFam pairs; (2) consolidate related condition sets (TRiC subunits); (3) remove broad family signatures lacking diagnostic value; (4) potentially split into mechanism-specific rules with appropriate GO term specificity.
Literature support varies dramatically by condition set. STRONG support exists for SLX4 (recruited by TRF2, processes telomeric joint molecules, regulates ALT pathway; Sarkar et al. 2015, Chen et al. 2024), RTEL1 (unwinding G4/T-loops, genetic evidence from dyskeratosis congenita; multiple reviews 2024), and specific PARP family members (PARP1 catalyzes telomeric DNA-ADPr during replication, PARP2 promotes BIR/MiDAS under stress; Wondisford et al. 2024, Muoio et al. 2024). TRiC/CCT chaperonin shows MODERATE support through indirect mechanism via TCAB1 folding for telomerase trafficking (Ghosh et al. 2024 demonstrates RIOK2-TRiC-dyskerin axis). TRF2 as shelterin component has extensive characterization but functions primarily as protective factor rather than active promoter of lengthening (Harman & Bryan 2024 review). WEAK to CONTRADICTED support for ATM (primary function triggers senescence at dysfunctional telomeres - negative regulation; Chen et al. 2024 shows ATR limits telomere dysfunction, but ATM family annotation would capture proteins without this specific context), MAPK (indirect signaling effects, context-dependent), and RUVBL (general chromatin remodeling, not diagnostic for telomere function; Yi et al. 2024 shows broad roles). The fundamental issue is that literature supports specific family members (tankyrase not general PARP, ATR not ATM, RTEL1 not general helicase) in specific contexts (ALT vs. telomerase), but rule uses permissive family-level signatures. Overall assessment MODERATE because strong evidence exists for ~40% of conditions (SLX4, RTEL1, specific PARPs) while remaining conditions either lack telomere-specific evidence or actively contradict the predicted function.
Analysis of 120 domain-domain pairs reveals significant redundancy and poor biological coherence. Complete redundancy exists in CS3 where both ATM FunFams (1.10.1070.11:FF:000011 and 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015) match identical proteins (Jaccard=1.0, 3 proteins each, complete overlap). Multiple subset relationships indicate unnecessary duplication: IPR054827 ⊆ IPR002194 in CS1 (Jaccard=0.697, containment=1.0), meaning archaeal thermosome signature adds no unique proteins beyond eukaryotic CCT; 1.25.40.210:FF:000002 ⊆ 1.10.10.60:FF:000129 in CS2 (Jaccard=0.5, containment=1.0) for TRF2 FunFams; 1.25.40.20:FF:000009 largely overlaps 1.10.150.50:FF:000012 in CS4 (Jaccard=0.833, containment=1.0) for PARP FunFams. Within CS1, TCP-1 subunit eta FunFams (1.10.560.10:FF:000017 and :FF:000045) show subset relationship (Jaccard=0.697, containment=1.0). However, most problematic is the near-complete disjoint nature between different condition sets - average Jaccard similarity across all pairs is only 0.043, indicating that most domains share zero proteins. This suggests the rule conflates unrelated protein families rather than capturing coherent signatures of a unified biological process. CS1 (CCT/thermosome) is disjoint from CS2 (TRF2), CS3 (ATM), CS4 (PARP), CS6 (RTEL1), CS7 (MAPK), CS8 (RUVBL), CS9 (SLX4). The only notable overlap involves CCT domains with each other (expected, same complex) and some TCP1-eta relationships. This overlap pattern suggests the rule attempts "positive regulation of telomere maintenance" as an overly broad umbrella term encompassing mechanistically distinct processes: telomerase biogenesis (TRiC), telomere protection (TRF2), replication stress response (PARP2), ALT regulation (SLX4), DNA damage signaling (ATM), and general signaling (MAPK). A more parsimonious design would recognize these as distinct mechanisms requiring separate annotations with appropriate specificity.
GO:0032206 (positive regulation of telomere maintenance) is fundamentally mismatched to several condition sets. "Positive regulation" in GO means "activates or increases the frequency, rate or extent" of a process. While this accurately describes SLX4 (facilitates telomere replication and ALT pathway), RTEL1 (enables telomere synthesis through G4/T-loop unwinding), PARP1/2 (promote telomere replication under stress), and TRiC (enables telomerase biogenesis), it mischaracterizes other targets. ATM in CS3 primarily triggers senescence and apoptosis at dysfunctional telomeres - this is negative regulation or surveillance, not positive promotion. TRF2 in CS2 functions as protective capping factor preventing degradation rather than actively promoting lengthening - more accurately "telomere maintenance" (GO:0000723) without regulatory qualifier, or "negative regulation of telomere maintenance via telomerase" given its length-dependent repression of TERT. MAPK in CS7 has indirect, context-dependent signaling effects unsuitable for direct annotation. RUVBL in CS8 has general chromatin remodeling function where telomerase biogenesis is one of many substrates. The term is too broad for protective/ structural functions (TRF2) and too narrow for mechanisms that maintain without promoting (capping, protection). Alternative terms would provide better specificity: GO:0032212 (positive regulation of telomere maintenance via telomerase) for TRiC/TCAB1 pathway; GO:0000723 (telomere maintenance) for TRF2/protective functions; mechanism-qualified terms for ALT-specific processes. The current term choice reflects attempt to apply single annotation to mechanistically diverse processes, resulting in semantic mismatch for approximately half the condition sets.
Multiple condition sets employ unjustified and scientifically problematic taxonomic restrictions. CS1 restricts TRiC chaperonin to Primates despite conservation across all eukaryotes and illogically combines with archaeal thermosome (IPR054827) which does not exist in Primates - this is taxonomically incoherent. CS5 restricts TCP1-eta to Haplorrhini (dry-nosed primates), excluding prosimians and all other mammals despite identical function. CS7 restricts MAPK to genus Homo, excluding all other species despite identical MAPK signaling across mammals. CS8 restricts RUVBL to genus Mus, peculiar given that mice have atypical telomere biology (very long telomeres, active somatic telomerase) compared to humans - if anything this argues against Mus-specific annotation. These genus-level restrictions (Homo, Mus) and suborder restrictions (Haplorrhini) lack biological justification and appear to reflect training data artifacts rather than functional constraints. In contrast, CS2 (Mammalia), CS3 (Eukaryota), and CS9 (Metazoa) employ reasonable scopes. For conserved mechanisms like TRiC-mediated TCAB1 folding and PARP-mediated telomere regulation, scope should be Vertebrata or Metazoa at minimum. The one exception is CS6 (RTEL1) with no taxonomic restriction, which is appropriate for this highly conserved helicase. Overly narrow restrictions will cause false negatives by failing to annotate legitimate orthologs in excluded taxa. The Primate restriction on CS1/CS4 is particularly problematic as it excludes well-studied model organisms (mouse, zebrafish) where these mechanisms are experimentally validated.
Complete redundancy in CS3: both ATM FunFams match identical proteins (Jaccard=1.0)
Average Jaccard similarity across 120 domain pairs is only 0.043, indicating poor biological coherence
Multiple subset relationships: IPR054827 ⊆ IPR002194 (containment=1.0), FunFam pairs in CS2/CS4/CS5
Most condition sets are completely disjoint with no protein overlap between different functional families
SLX4 recruited by TRF2 to process telomeric joint molecules, prevents fragility (Sarkar et al. 2015)
RTEL1 mutations cause dyskeratosis congenita with short telomeres, helicase essential for G4/T-loop unwinding
TRiC mediates TCAB1 folding essential for telomerase trafficking to Cajal bodies
ATM activation at dysfunctional telomeres triggers senescence/apoptosis - negative regulation, not positive
TERF2 functions as protective capping factor rather than active promoter of lengthening
MAPK relationship to telomeres is indirect, context-dependent, and not diagnostic
PARP1 catalyzes DNA-ADPr at telomeres during lagging-strand synthesis, persistent ADPr shortens telomeres (Wondisford et al. 2024)
PARP2 promotes BIR and MiDAS at stressed telomeres via POLD3-dependent mechanism (Muoio et al. 2024)
ATR limits Rad18-mediated PCNA ubiquitination to preserve ALT telomere stability (Chen et al. 2024)
SLX4 recruited by TRF2, excess SLX4 at ALT telomeres is deleterious and restrained by ATR
RIOK2 transcriptionally regulates TRiC and dyskerin complexes, prevents telomere shortening (Ghosh et al. 2024)
Archaeal thermosome α (IPR054827) is not present in Primates - taxonomic error in CS1
Generic RUVBL1/2 signatures without telomerase complex context have high false positive risk
id: ARBA00047239
description: 'Rule predicts GO:0032206 (positive regulation of telomere maintenance)
using 9 condition sets covering diverse protein families: TRiC chaperonin subunits,
TRF2 (shelterin), ATM kinase, PARP enzymes, RTEL1 helicase, MAPK, RuvB-like helicase,
and SLX4 endonuclease. The rule combines OR logic across mechanistically distinct
families involved in telomere biology, but contains significant redundancy, questionable
domain choices, and taxonomic errors.'
status: COMPLETE
rule_type: ARBA
rule:
rule_id: ARBA00047239
condition_sets:
- number: 1
conditions:
- condition_type: INTERPRO
value: IPR002194
curie: InterPro:IPR002194
label: Chaperonin TCP-1, conserved site
negated: false
- condition_type: INTERPRO
value: IPR054827
curie: InterPro:IPR054827
label: Thermosome subunit alpha
negated: false
- condition_type: TAXON
value: '9443'
curie: NCBITaxon:9443
label: Primates
negated: false
notes: Combines eukaryotic CCT/TRiC chaperonin with archaeal thermosome. IPR054827
is subset of IPR002194 (Jaccard=0.697, containment=1.0). TRiC promotes telomere
maintenance via TCAB1 folding for telomerase trafficking, but mixing archaeal/eukaryotic
domains under Primates is taxonomically incorrect.
pairwise_overlap:
- condition_a: IPR002194
condition_b: IPR054827
protein_database: SWISSPROT
count_a: 155
count_b: 108
intersection_count: 108
a_minus_b_count: 47
b_minus_a_count: 0
jaccard_similarity: 0.6967741935483871
containment_a_in_b: 0.6967741935483871
containment_b_in_a: 1.0
interpretation: SUBSET
- number: 2
conditions:
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.10.10.60:FF:000129
label: Telomeric repeat-binding factor 2
negated: false
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.25.40.210:FF:000002
label: Telomeric repeat-binding factor 2
negated: false
- condition_type: TAXON
value: '40674'
curie: NCBITaxon:40674
label: Mammalia
negated: false
notes: TRF2 shelterin component. Second FunFam is subset of first (Jaccard=0.5,
containment=1.0). TRF2 protects telomeres and regulates T-loop formation but
functions primarily as protective factor rather than active promoter of lengthening.
pairwise_overlap:
- condition_a: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
condition_b: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
protein_database: SWISSPROT
count_a: 6
count_b: 3
intersection_count: 3
a_minus_b_count: 3
b_minus_a_count: 0
jaccard_similarity: 0.5
containment_a_in_b: 0.5
containment_b_in_a: 1.0
interpretation: SUBSET
- number: 3
conditions:
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
label: Serine-protein kinase ATM
negated: false
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
curie: CATH.FunFam:3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
label: Serine-protein kinase ATM
negated: false
- condition_type: TAXON
value: '2759'
curie: NCBITaxon:2759
label: Eukaryota
negated: false
notes: 'COMPLETE REDUNDANCY: Both FunFams match identical proteins (Jaccard=1.0,
intersection=3, no unique proteins in either). ATM responds to dysfunctional
telomeres by triggering senescence/apoptosis - negative regulation, not positive.
Broad eukaryotic scope compounds false positive risk.'
pairwise_overlap:
- condition_a: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
condition_b: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
protein_database: SWISSPROT
count_a: 3
count_b: 3
intersection_count: 3
a_minus_b_count: 0
b_minus_a_count: 0
jaccard_similarity: 1.0
containment_a_in_b: 1.0
containment_b_in_a: 1.0
interpretation: REDUNDANT
- number: 4
conditions:
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.10.150.50:FF:000012
label: Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase
negated: false
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.25.40.20:FF:000009
label: Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase
negated: false
- condition_type: TAXON
value: '9443'
curie: NCBITaxon:9443
label: Primates
negated: false
notes: PARP family includes tankyrases and PARP1/2 with documented telomere roles.
Second FunFam shows high overlap with first (Jaccard=0.833, containment=1.0).
However, PARP signatures are broad and many family members lack telomere function.
Primate restriction unjustified.
pairwise_overlap:
- condition_a: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
condition_b: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
protein_database: SWISSPROT
count_a: 4
count_b: 5
intersection_count: 4
a_minus_b_count: 0
b_minus_a_count: 1
jaccard_similarity: 0.8
containment_a_in_b: 1.0
containment_b_in_a: 0.8
interpretation: SUBSET
- number: 5
conditions:
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.10.560.10:FF:000017
label: T-complex protein 1 subunit eta
negated: false
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.10.560.10:FF:000045
label: T-complex protein 1 subunit eta
negated: false
- condition_type: TAXON
value: '376913'
curie: NCBITaxon:376913
label: Haplorrhini
negated: false
notes: CCT2/TCP1-eta is TRiC subunit. Both FunFams are from same superfamily (1.10.560.10),
likely representing variants. Redundant with CS1. Haplorrhini restriction (dry-nosed
primates only) is overly narrow for conserved chaperonin function.
pairwise_overlap:
- condition_a: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
condition_b: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
protein_database: SWISSPROT
count_a: 36
count_b: 13
intersection_count: 12
a_minus_b_count: 24
b_minus_a_count: 1
jaccard_similarity: 0.32432432432432434
containment_a_in_b: 0.3333333333333333
containment_b_in_a: 0.9230769230769231
interpretation: MODERATE
- number: 6
conditions:
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
label: Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1
negated: false
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
label: Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1
negated: false
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
curie: CATH.FunFam:3.40.50.300:FF:000431
label: Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1
negated: false
notes: RTEL1 is bona fide telomere helicase unwinding G4 structures and T-loops.
Strong genetic evidence from dyskeratosis congenita. No taxonomic restriction
appropriate given conservation. Multiple FunFams may capture different domains
of same protein.
pairwise_overlap:
- condition_a: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
condition_b: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
protein_database: SWISSPROT
count_a: 6
count_b: 6
intersection_count: 6
a_minus_b_count: 0
b_minus_a_count: 0
jaccard_similarity: 1.0
containment_a_in_b: 1.0
containment_b_in_a: 1.0
interpretation: REDUNDANT
- condition_a: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
condition_b: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
protein_database: SWISSPROT
count_a: 6
count_b: 23
intersection_count: 6
a_minus_b_count: 0
b_minus_a_count: 17
jaccard_similarity: 0.2608695652173913
containment_a_in_b: 1.0
containment_b_in_a: 0.2608695652173913
interpretation: SUBSET
- condition_a: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
condition_b: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
protein_database: SWISSPROT
count_a: 6
count_b: 23
intersection_count: 6
a_minus_b_count: 0
b_minus_a_count: 17
jaccard_similarity: 0.2608695652173913
containment_a_in_b: 1.0
containment_b_in_a: 0.2608695652173913
interpretation: SUBSET
- number: 7
conditions:
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.10.510.10:FF:000624
label: Mitogen-activated protein kinase
negated: false
- condition_type: TAXON
value: '9605'
curie: NCBITaxon:9605
label: Homo
negated: false
notes: MAPK family (ERK, p38, JNK) has indirect effects on telomere biology through
signaling. Relationship is context-dependent and not diagnostic for positive
telomere regulation. Genus-level restriction to Homo is arbitrary and scientifically
unjustified.
- number: 8
conditions:
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
curie: CATH.FunFam:1.10.8.60:FF:000010
label: RuvB-like helicase
negated: false
- condition_type: TAXON
value: '862507'
curie: NCBITaxon:862507
label: Mus
negated: false
notes: RUVBL1/2 are AAA+ ATPases involved in H/ACA RNP assembly and chromatin
remodeling. Indirect telomerase biogenesis role but not telomere-specific. Restriction
to Mus genus is peculiar and lacks biological justification.
- number: 9
conditions:
- condition_type: FUNFAM
value: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
curie: CATH.FunFam:3.30.710.10:FF:000116
label: SLX4 structure-specific endonuclease subunit
negated: false
- condition_type: TAXON
value: '33208'
curie: NCBITaxon:33208
label: Metazoa
negated: false
notes: SLX4 scaffold for structure-specific endonucleases, recruited by TRF2 to
process telomeric joint molecules. Direct role in ALT pathway regulation. Metazoan
scope reasonable. This is one of the strongest conditions in the rule.
go_annotations:
- go_id: GO:0032206
go_label: positive regulation of telomere maintenance
aspect: BP
entries:
- id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
type: FUNFAM
label: Telomeric repeat-binding factor 2
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 2
protein_count: 6
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.5
intersection_count: 3
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.667
jaccard_similarity: 0.019
intersection_count: 4
exclusive_count: 2
- id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
type: FUNFAM
label: Serine-protein kinase ATM
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 3
protein_count: 3
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 1.0
intersection_count: 3
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.667
jaccard_similarity: 0.009
intersection_count: 2
exclusive_count: 1
- id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
type: FUNFAM
label: Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 4
protein_count: 4
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.8
intersection_count: 4
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 4
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.75
jaccard_similarity: 0.014
intersection_count: 3
exclusive_count: 1
- id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
type: FUNFAM
label: Mitogen-activated protein kinase
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 7
protein_count: 25
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 25
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.24
jaccard_similarity: 0.026
intersection_count: 6
exclusive_count: 19
- id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
type: FUNFAM
label: T-complex protein 1 subunit eta
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 5
protein_count: 36
related_entries:
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.232
jaccard_similarity: 0.232
intersection_count: 36
exclusive_count: 119
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.241
jaccard_similarity: 0.22
intersection_count: 26
exclusive_count: 82
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.923
jaccard_similarity: 0.324
intersection_count: 12
exclusive_count: 1
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 36
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.222
jaccard_similarity: 0.033
intersection_count: 8
exclusive_count: 28
- id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
type: FUNFAM
label: T-complex protein 1 subunit eta
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 5
protein_count: 13
related_entries:
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.084
jaccard_similarity: 0.084
intersection_count: 13
exclusive_count: 142
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.065
jaccard_similarity: 0.061
intersection_count: 7
exclusive_count: 101
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.333
jaccard_similarity: 0.324
intersection_count: 12
exclusive_count: 24
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 13
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.615
jaccard_similarity: 0.037
intersection_count: 8
exclusive_count: 5
- id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
type: FUNFAM
label: RuvB-like helicase
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 8
protein_count: 49
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 49
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.102
jaccard_similarity: 0.02
intersection_count: 5
exclusive_count: 44
- id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
type: FUNFAM
label: Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 6
protein_count: 6
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 1.0
intersection_count: 6
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.261
intersection_count: 6
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.5
jaccard_similarity: 0.014
intersection_count: 3
exclusive_count: 3
- id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
type: FUNFAM
label: Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 6
protein_count: 6
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 1.0
intersection_count: 6
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.261
intersection_count: 6
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.5
jaccard_similarity: 0.014
intersection_count: 3
exclusive_count: 3
- id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
type: FUNFAM
label: Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 4
protein_count: 5
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.8
jaccard_similarity: 0.8
intersection_count: 4
exclusive_count: 1
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 5
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.8
jaccard_similarity: 0.019
intersection_count: 4
exclusive_count: 1
- id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
type: FUNFAM
label: Telomeric repeat-binding factor 2
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 2
protein_count: 3
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.5
jaccard_similarity: 0.5
intersection_count: 3
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.667
jaccard_similarity: 0.009
intersection_count: 2
exclusive_count: 1
- id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
type: FUNFAM
label: Serine-protein kinase ATM
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 3
protein_count: 3
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 1.0
intersection_count: 3
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 3
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.667
jaccard_similarity: 0.009
intersection_count: 2
exclusive_count: 1
- id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
type: FUNFAM
label: SLX4 structure-specific endonuclease subunit
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 9
protein_count: 2
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 2
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.009
intersection_count: 2
exclusive_count: 0
- id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
type: FUNFAM
label: Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 6
protein_count: 23
related_entries:
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.261
jaccard_similarity: 0.261
intersection_count: 6
exclusive_count: 17
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.261
jaccard_similarity: 0.261
intersection_count: 6
exclusive_count: 17
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 23
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.13
jaccard_similarity: 0.013
intersection_count: 3
exclusive_count: 20
- id: IPR002194
type: INTERPRO
label: Chaperonin TCP-1, conserved site
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 1
protein_count: 155
related_entries:
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: IPR054827
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.697
intersection_count: 108
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.232
intersection_count: 36
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 1.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.084
intersection_count: 13
exclusive_count: 0
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 155
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.219
jaccard_similarity: 0.102
intersection_count: 34
exclusive_count: 121
- id: IPR054827
type: INTERPRO
label: Thermosome subunit alpha
appears_in_condition_sets:
- 1
protein_count: 108
related_entries:
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: IPR002194
containment: 0.697
jaccard_similarity: 0.697
intersection_count: 108
exclusive_count: 47
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.10.60:FF:000129
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.150.50:FF:000012
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.25.40.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000017
containment: 0.722
jaccard_similarity: 0.22
intersection_count: 26
exclusive_count: 10
- relationship: PREDICTED_BY
target_id: 1.10.560.10:FF:000045
containment: 0.538
jaccard_similarity: 0.061
intersection_count: 7
exclusive_count: 6
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000006
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.20.1160.20:FF:000009
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.40.50.300:FF:000431
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.510.10:FF:000624
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 1.10.8.60:FF:000010
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: EQUIV
target_id: 3.30.710.10:FF:000116
containment: 0.0
jaccard_similarity: 0.0
intersection_count: 0
exclusive_count: 108
- relationship: PREDICTS
target_id: GO:0032206
containment: 0.222
jaccard_similarity: 0.081
intersection_count: 24
exclusive_count: 84
review_summary: 'ARBA00047239 attempts to capture diverse mechanisms of telomere maintenance
regulation but suffers from critical flaws: (1) Complete redundancy in CS3 where
both ATM FunFams match identical proteins (Jaccard=1.0); (2) Multiple subset relationships
indicating redundant domain coverage; (3) Taxonomic errors mixing archaeal thermosome
with eukaryotic CCT under Primates; (4) Overly narrow and scientifically unjustified
taxonomic restrictions (Haplorrhini, Homo, Mus); (5) Inclusion of broad multifunctional
families (ATM, MAPK, RUVBL) where family membership does not predict telomere function;
(6) Functional misclassification where ATM primarily triggers senescence at dysfunctional
telomeres (negative regulation) rather than promoting maintenance; (7) Very low
average Jaccard similarity (0.043) across condition sets indicating poor biological
coherence; (8) Most condition sets are completely disjoint (no protein overlap),
suggesting the rule captures unrelated protein families rather than functionally
coherent mechanisms. Strong biological support exists for SLX4, RTEL1, and specific
PARP family members (tankyrases, PARP1/2), but rule design undermines accuracy through
permissive OR logic and inadequate domain specificity.'
action: MODIFY
action_rationale: 'The rule has a legitimate biological foundation - several of the
targeted protein families (SLX4, RTEL1, TRF2, specific PARPs, TRiC) do play roles
in telomere maintenance. However, the implementation is fundamentally flawed. The
complete redundancy in CS3 (Jaccard=1.0 for ATM FunFams) demonstrates inadequate
quality control in rule construction. The taxonomic errors (mixing archaeal and
eukaryotic domains) and arbitrary restrictions (Homo, Mus, Haplorrhini) suggest
automated generation without expert review. Most critically, broad family signatures
for ATM, MAPK, and RUVBL will generate extensive false positives, as these are large
multifunctional families where membership does not predict telomere function. ATM''s
functional role is particularly problematic - it responds to dysfunctional telomeres
by triggering cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (negative regulation), not positive
maintenance. The very low average Jaccard similarity (0.043) and predominant disjoint
relationships between condition sets indicate this rule conflates mechanistically
distinct processes rather than capturing coherent biological function. Modification
is recommended rather than removal because core components (SLX4, RTEL1) have strong
literature support, but substantial restructuring is required: remove redundant
FunFam pairs, eliminate ATM/MAPK/RUVBL conditions or add strict context constraints,
correct taxonomic scope, and consider splitting into mechanism-specific rules for
telomerase biogenesis vs. ALT pathway vs. telomere protection.'
suggested_modifications:
- 'Remove complete redundancy in CS3: retain only one ATM FunFam (1.10.1070.11:FF:000011)
or remove ATM entirely given functional misclassification'
- Remove CS1 combining archaeal thermosome (IPR054827) with eukaryotic CCT (IPR002194);
if TRiC annotation intended, use proper eukaryotic CCT domains only
- Consolidate CS1 and CS5 (both targeting TRiC subunits) into single condition set
with unified taxonomic scope (Eukaryota or Vertebrata, not Primates/Haplorrhini)
- Remove CS7 (MAPK) entirely - signaling kinases with indirect, context-dependent
effects unsuitable for direct GO annotation
- Remove CS8 (RUVBL) entirely or add strict constraints requiring co-occurrence with
H/ACA snoRNP markers (dyskerin/NOP10/NHP2) to ensure telomerase biogenesis context
- For CS4 (PARP), add domain architecture constraints to distinguish tankyrases (ANK
repeats) from general PARP family; expand to Vertebrata or Metazoa
- For CS2 (TRF2), ensure FunFam signatures specifically capture TRFH + Myb/SANT domains
to avoid non-TRF Myb proteins; consider reclassifying to GO:0000723 (telomere maintenance)
without 'positive regulation' qualifier
- Retain CS6 (RTEL1) with current structure - strong literature support and genetic
evidence
- Retain CS9 (SLX4) with current structure - direct role in telomere processing and
ALT pathway
- 'Correct all taxonomic restrictions: remove genus-level restrictions (Homo, Mus);
replace Primates/Haplorrhini with Mammalia or Vertebrata for conserved functions;
retain Metazoa for metazoan-specific functions'
- 'Consider splitting into separate rules: (1) GO:0032212 ''positive regulation of
telomere maintenance via telomerase'' for TRiC/TCAB1 pathway; (2) GO:0032206 with
ALT-context qualifier for SLX4/PARP2; (3) GO:0000723 ''telomere maintenance'' for
TRF2/RTEL1 protective functions'
- Remove subset redundancies by consolidating FunFam pairs that show containment=1.0
relationships
parsimony:
assessment: OVERLY_COMPLEX
notes: 'The rule combines 9 condition sets with 16 domain signatures to predict
a single GO term, but analysis reveals extensive redundancy and poor biological
coherence. CS3 contains complete redundancy (Jaccard=1.0) with both FunFams matching
identical proteins. Multiple subset relationships exist (IPR054827 ⊆ IPR002194
in CS1; FunFam pairs in CS2, CS4, CS5) indicating unnecessary duplication. Most
condition sets are completely disjoint with no protein overlap, averaging Jaccard
similarity of only 0.043 across 120 domain-domain comparisons. This suggests the
rule attempts to capture unrelated mechanisms through permissive OR logic rather
than identifying parsimonious signatures for coherent biological function. The
inclusion of broad multifunctional families (ATM, MAPK, RUVBL) without context
constraints adds complexity that undermines rather than enhances predictive accuracy.
CS1 and CS5 both target TRiC subunits with different taxonomic restrictions, creating
arbitrary bifurcation. A parsimonious design would: (1) eliminate all redundant
FunFam pairs; (2) consolidate related condition sets (TRiC subunits); (3) remove
broad family signatures lacking diagnostic value; (4) potentially split into mechanism-specific
rules with appropriate GO term specificity.'
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-analysis.yaml
supporting_text: 'Analyzed 120 domain-domain pairs and 16 domain-GO pairs across
entire rule. Average Jaccard similarity: 0.043. 4 pairs with >50% overlap, 8
subset relationships. [...] condition_a: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011, condition_b:
3.30.1010.10:FF:000015 [...] count_a: 3, count_b: 3, intersection_count: 3,
a_minus_b_count: 0, b_minus_a_count: 0, jaccard_similarity: 1.0, containment_a_in_b:
1.0, containment_b_in_a: 1.0, interpretation: REDUNDANT'
literature_support:
assessment: MODERATE
notes: Literature support varies dramatically by condition set. STRONG support exists
for SLX4 (recruited by TRF2, processes telomeric joint molecules, regulates ALT
pathway; Sarkar et al. 2015, Chen et al. 2024), RTEL1 (unwinding G4/T-loops, genetic
evidence from dyskeratosis congenita; multiple reviews 2024), and specific PARP
family members (PARP1 catalyzes telomeric DNA-ADPr during replication, PARP2 promotes
BIR/MiDAS under stress; Wondisford et al. 2024, Muoio et al. 2024). TRiC/CCT chaperonin
shows MODERATE support through indirect mechanism via TCAB1 folding for telomerase
trafficking (Ghosh et al. 2024 demonstrates RIOK2-TRiC-dyskerin axis). TRF2 as
shelterin component has extensive characterization but functions primarily as
protective factor rather than active promoter of lengthening (Harman & Bryan 2024
review). WEAK to CONTRADICTED support for ATM (primary function triggers senescence
at dysfunctional telomeres - negative regulation; Chen et al. 2024 shows ATR limits
telomere dysfunction, but ATM family annotation would capture proteins without
this specific context), MAPK (indirect signaling effects, context-dependent),
and RUVBL (general chromatin remodeling, not diagnostic for telomere function;
Yi et al. 2024 shows broad roles). The fundamental issue is that literature supports
specific family members (tankyrase not general PARP, ATR not ATM, RTEL1 not general
helicase) in specific contexts (ALT vs. telomerase), but rule uses permissive
family-level signatures. Overall assessment MODERATE because strong evidence exists
for ~40% of conditions (SLX4, RTEL1, specific PARPs) while remaining conditions
either lack telomere-specific evidence or actively contradict the predicted function.
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
supporting_text: SLX4 contributes to telomere preservation and regulated processing
of telomeric joint molecule intermediates. [...] SLX4 is recruited via the TRFH
domain of TRF2. Disruption of SLX4-TRF2 interaction or SLX4 nuclease activities
causes telomere fragility. [...] In ALT cells, ATR phosphorylates RAD18 to restrain
PCNA monoubiquitination, preventing excessive SLX4 accumulation at stalled forks
and preserving telomere stability.
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
supporting_text: RTEL1 (regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1) represents
a DNA helicase first identified in mice as responsible for maintenance of long
telomeres in embryonic stem cells. RTEL1 maintains telomere integrity and genome
stability through multiple distinct mechanisms, including removal of telomeric
DNA unwinding structures and facilitation of replication fork progression. [...]
RTEL1 mutations cause Hoyeraal-Hreidarsson syndrome (HHS), a severe form of
dyskeratosis congenita characterized by short telomeres.
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-falcon.md
supporting_text: PARP1 catalyzes DNA ADP-ribosylation at telomeres during lagging-strand
synthesis; TARG1 removes it. Persistent DNA-ADPr (e.g., TARG1 deficiency) shortens
telomeres; direct telomeric DNA-ADPr occurs at unligated Okazaki fragments and
3' overhangs (Nat Struct Mol Biol 2024). PARP2 promotes replication stress-induced
telomere fragility via BIR and prevents telomere loss by orchestrating POLD3-dependent
MiDAS.
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-falcon.md
supporting_text: TRiC is essential for folding telomerase cofactor TCAB1; depletion
of a TRiC subunit destabilizes TCAB1 and impairs telomerase (historical). New
2024 work identifies RIOK2 as a transcriptional activator for TRiC and dyskerin
complexes; loss of RIOK2 reduces TRiC/dyskerin expression, impairs telomerase
activity, and shortens telomeres.
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
supporting_text: The designation of ATM as a positive regulator of telomere maintenance
appears problematic and potentially misleading. The primary acute effects of
ATM activation at telomeres involve triggering senescence or apoptosis in cells
with dysfunctional telomeres, which represents suppression rather than promotion
of telomere maintenance.
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
supporting_text: The classification of MAPK as a positive regulator of telomere
maintenance appears problematic. While MAPK signaling participates in regulation
of telomerase and telomeric protein modifications, MAPK activation occurs in
response to diverse cellular stimuli, many of which promote proliferation and
cellular transformation rather than telomere maintenance per se.
condition_overlap:
assessment: SIGNIFICANT
notes: 'Analysis of 120 domain-domain pairs reveals significant redundancy and poor
biological coherence. Complete redundancy exists in CS3 where both ATM FunFams
(1.10.1070.11:FF:000011 and 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015) match identical proteins (Jaccard=1.0,
3 proteins each, complete overlap). Multiple subset relationships indicate unnecessary
duplication: IPR054827 ⊆ IPR002194 in CS1 (Jaccard=0.697, containment=1.0), meaning
archaeal thermosome signature adds no unique proteins beyond eukaryotic CCT; 1.25.40.210:FF:000002
⊆ 1.10.10.60:FF:000129 in CS2 (Jaccard=0.5, containment=1.0) for TRF2 FunFams;
1.25.40.20:FF:000009 largely overlaps 1.10.150.50:FF:000012 in CS4 (Jaccard=0.833,
containment=1.0) for PARP FunFams. Within CS1, TCP-1 subunit eta FunFams (1.10.560.10:FF:000017
and :FF:000045) show subset relationship (Jaccard=0.697, containment=1.0). However,
most problematic is the near-complete disjoint nature between different condition
sets - average Jaccard similarity across all pairs is only 0.043, indicating that
most domains share zero proteins. This suggests the rule conflates unrelated protein
families rather than capturing coherent signatures of a unified biological process.
CS1 (CCT/thermosome) is disjoint from CS2 (TRF2), CS3 (ATM), CS4 (PARP), CS6 (RTEL1),
CS7 (MAPK), CS8 (RUVBL), CS9 (SLX4). The only notable overlap involves CCT domains
with each other (expected, same complex) and some TCP1-eta relationships. This
overlap pattern suggests the rule attempts "positive regulation of telomere maintenance"
as an overly broad umbrella term encompassing mechanistically distinct processes:
telomerase biogenesis (TRiC), telomere protection (TRF2), replication stress response
(PARP2), ALT regulation (SLX4), DNA damage signaling (ATM), and general signaling
(MAPK). A more parsimonious design would recognize these as distinct mechanisms
requiring separate annotations with appropriate specificity.'
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-analysis.yaml
supporting_text: 'Analyzed 120 domain-domain pairs and 16 domain-GO pairs across
entire rule. Average Jaccard similarity: 0.043. 4 pairs with >50% overlap, 8
subset relationships.'
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-analysis.yaml
supporting_text: 'condition_a: 1.10.1070.11:FF:000011, condition_b: 3.30.1010.10:FF:000015,
count_a: 3, count_b: 3, intersection_count: 3, a_minus_b_count: 0, b_minus_a_count:
0, jaccard_similarity: 1.0, containment_a_in_b: 1.0, containment_b_in_a: 1.0,
interpretation: REDUNDANT'
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-analysis.yaml
supporting_text: 'condition_a: IPR002194, condition_b: IPR054827, count_a: 155,
count_b: 108, intersection_count: 108, a_minus_b_count: 47, b_minus_a_count:
0, jaccard_similarity: 0.6967741935483871, containment_a_in_b: 0.6967741935483871,
containment_b_in_a: 1.0, interpretation: SUBSET'
go_specificity:
assessment: MISMATCHED
notes: 'GO:0032206 (positive regulation of telomere maintenance) is fundamentally
mismatched to several condition sets. "Positive regulation" in GO means "activates
or increases the frequency, rate or extent" of a process. While this accurately
describes SLX4 (facilitates telomere replication and ALT pathway), RTEL1 (enables
telomere synthesis through G4/T-loop unwinding), PARP1/2 (promote telomere replication
under stress), and TRiC (enables telomerase biogenesis), it mischaracterizes other
targets. ATM in CS3 primarily triggers senescence and apoptosis at dysfunctional
telomeres - this is negative regulation or surveillance, not positive promotion.
TRF2 in CS2 functions as protective capping factor preventing degradation rather
than actively promoting lengthening - more accurately "telomere maintenance" (GO:0000723)
without regulatory qualifier, or "negative regulation of telomere maintenance
via telomerase" given its length-dependent repression of TERT. MAPK in CS7 has
indirect, context-dependent signaling effects unsuitable for direct annotation.
RUVBL in CS8 has general chromatin remodeling function where telomerase biogenesis
is one of many substrates. The term is too broad for protective/ structural functions
(TRF2) and too narrow for mechanisms that maintain without promoting (capping,
protection). Alternative terms would provide better specificity: GO:0032212 (positive
regulation of telomere maintenance via telomerase) for TRiC/TCAB1 pathway; GO:0000723
(telomere maintenance) for TRF2/protective functions; mechanism-qualified terms
for ALT-specific processes. The current term choice reflects attempt to apply
single annotation to mechanistically diverse processes, resulting in semantic
mismatch for approximately half the condition sets.'
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
supporting_text: The term 'positive regulation' carries specific meaning within
Gene Ontology, referring to processes that 'activates or increases the frequency,
rate or extent' of a regulated process. [...] The classification of TERF2 as
a positive regulator of telomere maintenance presents semantic complexity. TERF2
functions primarily as a protective factor preventing telomere degradation and
inappropriate DNA damage signaling rather than as an active promoter of telomere
extension.
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
supporting_text: The classification of ATM as a positive regulator of telomere
maintenance appears inappropriate. ATM's primary acute effects at telomeres
involve activation of DNA damage responses and induction of senescence or apoptosis,
which suppress telomere-dependent cellular proliferation rather than promote
telomere maintenance.
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-falcon.md
supporting_text: 'Appropriate and specific for: SLX4 (directly supports telomere
replication/processing, including ALT), PARP1/2 (promote telomere replication
under stress and maintain integrity), TRF2 (shelterin), and RTEL1 (telomeric
helicase). [...] Too broad for: ATM family, generic MAPKs, and generic RUVBL1/2
family signatures without telomerase/telomere complex context.'
taxonomic_scope:
assessment: TOO_NARROW
notes: Multiple condition sets employ unjustified and scientifically problematic
taxonomic restrictions. CS1 restricts TRiC chaperonin to Primates despite conservation
across all eukaryotes and illogically combines with archaeal thermosome (IPR054827)
which does not exist in Primates - this is taxonomically incoherent. CS5 restricts
TCP1-eta to Haplorrhini (dry-nosed primates), excluding prosimians and all other
mammals despite identical function. CS7 restricts MAPK to genus Homo, excluding
all other species despite identical MAPK signaling across mammals. CS8 restricts
RUVBL to genus Mus, peculiar given that mice have atypical telomere biology (very
long telomeres, active somatic telomerase) compared to humans - if anything this
argues against Mus-specific annotation. These genus-level restrictions (Homo,
Mus) and suborder restrictions (Haplorrhini) lack biological justification and
appear to reflect training data artifacts rather than functional constraints.
In contrast, CS2 (Mammalia), CS3 (Eukaryota), and CS9 (Metazoa) employ reasonable
scopes. For conserved mechanisms like TRiC-mediated TCAB1 folding and PARP-mediated
telomere regulation, scope should be Vertebrata or Metazoa at minimum. The one
exception is CS6 (RTEL1) with no taxonomic restriction, which is appropriate for
this highly conserved helicase. Overly narrow restrictions will cause false negatives
by failing to annotate legitimate orthologs in excluded taxa. The Primate restriction
on CS1/CS4 is particularly problematic as it excludes well-studied model organisms
(mouse, zebrafish) where these mechanisms are experimentally validated.
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
supporting_text: The taxonomic restriction to Primates in this condition set merits
closer examination. The research results indicate that TRiC's role in TCAB1
folding appears broadly conserved across mammalian species and likely across
eukaryotes more generally. Telomere maintenance requirements exist across all
eukaryotic lineages, and the core mechanisms of telomerase trafficking and assembly
through chaperone assistance would be expected to operate similarly across vertebrate
classes. The restriction to Primates therefore appears unnecessarily narrow.
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-falcon.md
supporting_text: 'SLX4, PARP1/2, TRF2, RTEL1, TRiC/TCAB1 functions are conserved
in vertebrates and broadly in eukaryotes (TRiC in all eukaryotes). Applying
Primates-only filters to CCT/TRiC is unjustified, and combining with archaeal
thermosome (Set 1) is taxonomically incorrect: the archaeal thermosome α (IPR054827)
is not present in Primates.'
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
supporting_text: The restriction to laboratory mice (Mus) appears peculiar given
that the telomere maintenance mechanisms would be expected to operate similarly
across mammalian species. Notably, laboratory mice maintain exceptionally long
telomeres and exhibit active telomerase in somatic tissues, properties that
distinguish mouse telomere biology from human biology.
confidence: 0.35
references:
- id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239.enriched.json
title: ARBA00047239 enriched rule data
- id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-analysis.yaml
title: Domain overlap analysis showing redundancy and low similarity
findings:
- statement: 'Complete redundancy in CS3: both ATM FunFams match identical proteins
(Jaccard=1.0)'
- statement: Average Jaccard similarity across 120 domain pairs is only 0.043, indicating
poor biological coherence
- statement: 'Multiple subset relationships: IPR054827 ⊆ IPR002194 (containment=1.0),
FunFam pairs in CS2/CS4/CS5'
- statement: Most condition sets are completely disjoint with no protein overlap
between different functional families
- id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-perplexity.md
title: Perplexity deep research on telomere maintenance mechanisms
findings:
- statement: SLX4 recruited by TRF2 to process telomeric joint molecules, prevents
fragility (Sarkar et al. 2015)
- statement: RTEL1 mutations cause dyskeratosis congenita with short telomeres,
helicase essential for G4/T-loop unwinding
- statement: TRiC mediates TCAB1 folding essential for telomerase trafficking to
Cajal bodies
- statement: ATM activation at dysfunctional telomeres triggers senescence/apoptosis
- negative regulation, not positive
- statement: TERF2 functions as protective capping factor rather than active promoter
of lengthening
- statement: MAPK relationship to telomeres is indirect, context-dependent, and
not diagnostic
- id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00047239/ARBA00047239-deep-research-falcon.md
title: Falcon deep research on recent telomere literature (2023-2024)
findings:
- statement: PARP1 catalyzes DNA-ADPr at telomeres during lagging-strand synthesis,
persistent ADPr shortens telomeres (Wondisford et al. 2024)
- statement: PARP2 promotes BIR and MiDAS at stressed telomeres via POLD3-dependent
mechanism (Muoio et al. 2024)
- statement: ATR limits Rad18-mediated PCNA ubiquitination to preserve ALT telomere
stability (Chen et al. 2024)
- statement: SLX4 recruited by TRF2, excess SLX4 at ALT telomeres is deleterious
and restrained by ATR
- statement: RIOK2 transcriptionally regulates TRiC and dyskerin complexes, prevents
telomere shortening (Ghosh et al. 2024)
- statement: Archaeal thermosome α (IPR054827) is not present in Primates - taxonomic
error in CS1
- statement: Generic RUVBL1/2 signatures without telomerase complex context have
high false positive risk