View original ARBA rule on UniProt
Deprecated ARBA rule that inappropriately annotated ribosomal protein L12.1/L12A with ribophagy function
Condition-set counts describe the sets recorded in this review, which may omit the full rule.
ARBA00095398 was identified as a problematic rule that annotated ribosomal proteins L12.1/L12A with ribophagy function. This represents a fundamental biological error as: 1. Ribosomal proteins are structural components essential for translation 2. Ribophagy is a selective autophagy process that DEGRADES ribosomes 3. No literature supports L12 proteins having any role in autophagy mechanisms 4. The annotation contradicts basic cell biology principles The rule has been appropriately removed from the ARBA system, indicating that quality control mechanisms identified and corrected this error. This case highlights the importance of biological validation in automated annotation systems.
This rule represents a fundamental biological error by annotating structural ribosomal proteins with a process (ribophagy) that degrades ribosomes. The rule has been correctly removed from the ARBA system. Key issues: 1. Functional contradiction - ribosomal structural proteins cannot mediate ribosome degradation 2. No literature support for L12 proteins in autophagy mechanisms 3. Violates basic cell biology principles 4. Reported in GitHub issue #6365 as problematic
Rule attempted to assign a degradative process to structural proteins, indicating fundamental design flaw in annotation logic
Ribosomal protein L12 is a structural component essential for translation, not involved in ribophagy which targets ribosomes for degradation
Rule no longer exists; cannot analyze condition sets for overlap
Ribophagy annotation is biologically inappropriate for ribosomal structural proteins
While S. pombe was the reported organism, the fundamental biological error makes taxonomic scope evaluation secondary to the annotation error
id: ARBA00095398
description: "Deprecated ARBA rule that inappropriately annotated ribosomal protein L12.1/L12A with ribophagy function"
status: COMPLETE
rule_type: ARBA
rule:
rule_id: ARBA00095398
condition_sets: []
go_annotations: []
entries: []
action: DEPRECATE
action_rationale: |
This rule represents a fundamental biological error by annotating structural ribosomal proteins with a process (ribophagy) that degrades ribosomes. The rule has been correctly removed from the ARBA system.
Key issues:
1. Functional contradiction - ribosomal structural proteins cannot mediate ribosome degradation
2. No literature support for L12 proteins in autophagy mechanisms
3. Violates basic cell biology principles
4. Reported in GitHub issue #6365 as problematic
review_summary: |
ARBA00095398 was identified as a problematic rule that annotated ribosomal proteins L12.1/L12A with ribophagy function.
This represents a fundamental biological error as:
1. Ribosomal proteins are structural components essential for translation
2. Ribophagy is a selective autophagy process that DEGRADES ribosomes
3. No literature supports L12 proteins having any role in autophagy mechanisms
4. The annotation contradicts basic cell biology principles
The rule has been appropriately removed from the ARBA system, indicating that quality control
mechanisms identified and corrected this error. This case highlights the importance of biological
validation in automated annotation systems.
confidence: 1.0
parsimony:
assessment: OVERLY_COMPLEX
notes: Rule attempted to assign a degradative process to structural proteins, indicating fundamental design flaw in annotation logic
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00095398/ARBA00095398-deep-research-manual.md
supporting_text: "Annotating a ribosomal component with the process that degrades it is logically inconsistent"
literature_support:
assessment: CONTRADICTED
notes: Ribosomal protein L12 is a structural component essential for translation, not involved in ribophagy which targets ribosomes for degradation
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00095398/ARBA00095398-deep-research-manual.md
supporting_text: "L12 proteins are well-characterized as structural ribosomal components with no reported involvement in autophagy or ribophagy"
condition_overlap:
assessment: NONE
notes: Rule no longer exists; cannot analyze condition sets for overlap
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00095398/ARBA00095398-deep-research-manual.md
supporting_text: "The rule no longer exists in the UniProt ARBA system, suggesting it has been removed or deprecated"
go_specificity:
assessment: MISMATCHED
notes: Ribophagy annotation is biologically inappropriate for ribosomal structural proteins
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00095398/ARBA00095398-deep-research-manual.md
supporting_text: "The annotation of ribosomal protein L12 with ribophagy represents a fundamental biological error"
taxonomic_scope:
assessment: APPROPRIATE
notes: While S. pombe was the reported organism, the fundamental biological error makes taxonomic scope evaluation secondary to the annotation error
supported_by:
- reference_id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00095398/ARBA00095398-deep-research-manual.md
supporting_text: "S. pombe has functional autophagy machinery and ribophagy occurs under stress conditions, but L12 proteins have no reported involvement"
references:
- id: file:rules/arba/ARBA00095398/ARBA00095398-deep-research-manual.md
title: "Deep Research Analysis: ARBA00095398 - Ribosomal Protein and Ribophagy Annotation"