sh3glb2a / sh3glb2b

sh3glb2a / sh3glb2b

Back to pairs

Bottom line: UNRESOLVED. The two endophilin-B2 (SH3GLB2) co-orthologs keep the same domain architecture, evolve
at similar rates and are co-expressed in every adult tissue sampled, as the gar gene is. They differ mainly in level:
sh3glb2b dominates in the zygote and from segmentation onward. No functional data exist for either copy, so backup,
dosage and quantitative partition cannot be told apart.

Sample record: fate=UNRESOLVED; level=none; evidence=expression_only; identity=73.6%

sh3glb2a sh3glb2b
UniProt A0A8M1N8K5 (TrEMBL, 381 aa; RefSeq NP_001035087.2) A0A8M9Q303 (TrEMBL, 421 aa; RefSeq XP_021331719.1, isoform X1)
Human ortholog SH3GLB2 (endophilin-B2) SH3GLB2 (endophilin-B2)
Chromosome 8 5
ZFIN ZDB-GENE-061201-8 ZDB-GENE-040426-833
Ensembl ENSDARG00000008983 ENSDARG00000035470
Review genes/DANRE/sh3glb2a genes/DANRE/sh3glb2b

1. Evidence the pair comes from the TGD

PANTHER. The row in panther_tgd_pairs.tsv is:

tgd_call branch class family human orthologs (a / b) gar co-orthologs medaka co-orthologs medaka parallel dup
TGD_tree Neopterygii|Teleostei 1:1 PTHR14167 (SH3 DOMAIN-CONTAINING) DBNL(O);SH3GLB2(LDO) / DBNL(O);SH3GLB2(O) 1 (same gar gene for both) 2 (blank)

The PANTHER table used A0A8M6Z0F0 for sh3glb2a, which no longer resolves in UniProtKB; the reviewed accession
A0A8M1N8K5 carries the RefSeq reference protein. The DBNL ortholog calls reflect the broad PTHR14167 family
(SH3-domain proteins), not a relationship specific to this pair.

Ensembl Compara. The duplication node is Osteoglossocephalai (random_sample.tsv). Both copies share one gar
orthologue (ENSLOCG00000006193) and human SH3GLB2, and each has its own one-to-one medaka orthologue
(RESULTS.md).

Synteny. The copies are on different chromosomes (sh3glb2a chr8, sh3glb2b chr5). Three neighbouring gene
pairs with teleost-level duplications flank both copies within about 200 kb: zdhhc12a/b, slc25a25a/b and eeig1a/b
(RESULTS.md). This is double-conserved
synteny at the zebrafish level; I did not check the gar region directly.

Literature. No paper discusses this pair.

Status. TGD origin is well supported: PANTHER TGD_tree, a Compara duplication at Osteoglossocephalai with a
single gar orthologue, medaka retaining both copies, and three co-duplicated neighbouring genes.

2. Protein-level comparison

Does each copy keep the ancestral molecular function? Probably yes for both, on sequence grounds only.

3. Expression

From my queries of public resources
(RESULTS.md,
output.txt); no published expression study.

Shared vs copy-specific. Adult tissue expression is shared. The differences are quantitative and temporal:
maternal and post-gastrula embryonic expression is mostly sh3glb2b; the blastula peak is shared.

4. Experimental evidence of function

5. Fate classification

UNRESOLVED; no difference established at either the protein or the expression level (level: none); expression
data only. Confidence in any specific fate: low.

Established

Inferred, not shown

Why not the other fates

What would change the call

6. GO annotation consistency across the pair

Source: annotation-comparison.md, after both reviews.

7. Open questions

References

PMID:27112121, PMID:28455444. Also panther_tgd_pairs.tsv, random_sample.tsv,
annotation-comparison.md,
sh3glb2b-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md and
output.txt.