prom1a / prom1b

prom1a / prom1b

Back to pairs

Bottom line: PARTITION at the level of expression, lopsided and only partly tested. prom1a keeps the broad,
maternal and multi-organ expression of the unduplicated gar gene; prom1b is zygotic, restricted to retina and brain,
and is the dominant prominin in photoreceptors. Only prom1b mutants lose outer-segment structure, so the ancestral
PROM1 photoreceptor role now rests on prom1b. In the adult brain and inner retina the two copies occupy
complementary domains. Both proteins keep the prominin architecture and no cross-rescue has been done, so a
protein-level contribution to the split cannot be excluded.

Sample record: fate=PARTITION; level=expression; evidence=experimental_both; identity=54.4%

prom1a prom1b
UniProt Q9W735 (Swiss-Prot, 826 aa) A0A8M2BI60 (TrEMBL, RefSeq isoform X8, 867 aa)
Human ortholog PROM1 (prominin-1, CD133) PROM1
Chromosome 14 1
ZFIN ZDB-GENE-030131-1577 ZDB-GENE-031003-1
Mutant alleles TALEN 4-bp deletion (frameshift; full text, see prom1a-notes.md) TALEN 4-bp deletion (frameshift; ZFIN genotype ZDB-GENO-200511-1)
Review genes/DANRE/prom1a genes/DANRE/prom1b

1. Evidence the pair comes from the TGD

PANTHER. The row in panther_tgd_pairs.tsv is:

tgd_call branch class family human orthologs (a / b) gar co-orthologs medaka co-orthologs medaka parallel dup
TGD_tree Neopterygii|Teleostei 1:1 PTHR22730 (PROMININ PROM PROTEIN) PROM1(LDO) / PROM1(O) 1 (same gar gene for both) 2 (blank)

The PANTHER row gives A0A8M9QBM3 as the prom1b UniProt entry; the review uses A0A8M2BI60, the entry that carries
the GOA rows.

Ensembl Compara (random_sample.tsv): duplication at Osteoglossocephalai, one gar ortholog for both copies
(ENSLOCG00000003057), and a separate one-to-one medaka ortholog for each copy
(RESULTS.md). prom2 is an older paralog.

Synteny (my check). Of the 61 protein-coding genes within 1.5 Mb of prom1a, 18 have a teleost-level zebrafish
paralogue, and 6 of these have their partner within 1.5 Mb of prom1b: anxa5a/b, fgfbp1a/b, fgfbp2a/b, tapt1a/b,
ldb2a/b and qdpra/qdprb.1 (output.txt, section 6). The reverse scan
from prom1b finds the same six pairs, so the two copies sit in a duplicated block. I did not check the gar side.

Literature. The duplication is described but not dated:
[PMID:21407811 "In contrast to other vertebrates, the zebrafish prominin-1 gene is duplicated and consequently, both co-orthologues of mammalian prominin-1 are referred as to prominin-1a and b [27]."]

Status. TGD origin well supported: PANTHER TGD_tree, Compara at the teleost node with a single gar
ortholog and two medaka orthologs, and a duplicated block of six neighbouring gene pairs retained in both copies.

2. Protein-level comparison

Does each copy keep the ancestral molecular function? Structurally, yes: no copy-specific loss of a conserved
landmark is visible. Prominins have no well-defined biochemical activity, and neither zebrafish protein has been
tested for one.

3. Expression

Summary: prom1a retains most of the ancestral breadth including maternal and epithelial expression; prom1b is
limited to retina and brain but dominates photoreceptors and the hindbrain germinative zones. The copies overlap in
photoreceptors and partly in the embryonic nervous system.

4. Experimental evidence of function

Alleles

Gene Allele Lesion Type Source
prom1a TALEN 4-bp deletion, frameshift (p.Asp46Glufs*15) PTC; prom1a mRNA not significantly reduced at 2 mpf full text of PMID:31362982, not cached (prom1a-notes.md)
prom1b TALEN 4-bp deletion (p.Pro59Valfs*62) PTC; prom1b mRNA reported lower at 7 dpf full text of PMID:31362982, not cached (prom1b-notes.md)

prom1b

prom1a

Both copies

5. Fate classification

PARTITION, at the level of expression; lopsided. Confidence: moderate.

Established

Inferred, not shown

Why not the other fates

What would change the call

6. GO annotation consistency across the pair

Source: annotation-comparison.md, after both reviews.

Annotated to prom1a only, from propagation. All localization rows (plasma membrane, apical membrane, microvillus,
cilium, prominosome, ER, ERGIC) and the process rows come from IBA, ISS and IEA on the Swiss-Prot entry. The ER and
ERGIC rows were marked as over-annotated (transit compartments). prom1b, a TrEMBL entry, receives almost none of the
PANTHER IBA rows, which is an artefact of entry status rather than biology; the family-level locations should apply
to both.

Photoreceptor process: on the wrong copy. The IBA row camera-type eye photoreceptor cell differentiation
(GO:0060219) sits on prom1a, which has no photoreceptor phenotype. I marked it as over-annotated with a
propagation_review (PROPAGATION_BAD, CONTEXT_OR_TISSUE_MISMATCH). The experimentally supported process, photoreceptor
cell outer segment organization (GO:0035845, IMP), is on prom1b and was accepted as core.

Should be copy-specific: photoreceptor outer segment organization (prom1b). Should be shared: apical plasma
membrane, microvillus, cilium (prom1b has only the apical membrane IDA row and the IEA microvillus membrane row).

7. Open questions

References

PMID:20503380, PMID:21407811, PMID:22492354, PMID:23723983, PMID:31362982, PMID:31704774, PMID:31704775,
PMID:32201384. Also panther_tgd_pairs.tsv, random_sample.tsv, annotation-comparison.md,
prom1a-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md,
output.txt,
expression_output.txt,
scrna_output.txt.