vcla / vclb

vcla / vclb

Back to pairs

Bottom line: MIXED. The two vinculin proteins are conserved and behave the same in the one
side-by-side cell assay. Only vclb substitutes Y822 (to F), and its effect in vivo is unknown. The
copies differ mainly in where they are expressed. vclb is the main copy in the embryonic heart,
epicardium, endocardium and endothelium. Loss of vclb alone disorganizes the coronary vessels and kills
juveniles, so in that domain the relationship is a PARTITION. Loss of vcla alone, even
maternal-zygotic, has no visible phenotype. Losing both copies adds mild vascular leakage and
lethality before adulthood.

Sample record: fate=MIXED; level=expression; evidence=experimental_both; identity=81.4%

vcla nonsense mutants that degrade their mRNA upregulate vclb mRNA by transcriptional adaptation. That
response is triggered by mutant mRNA decay, not by loss of Vcla protein. It shows that the vclb locus
responds, not that Vclb protein makes up for Vcla. A Western blot of another vcla nonsense allele found
no rise in vinculin protein. So "backup" is possible for vcla but has not been shown at the protein
level.

vcla vclb
UniProt B3DI32 (TrEMBL; metavinculin-type isoform, 1131 aa) A0A0S2I7K2 (TrEMBL; vinculin-type isoform, 1066 aa)
Human ortholog VCL VCL
Chromosome 13 12
ZFIN ZDB-GENE-050506-61 ZDB-GENE-131017-1
Review genes/DANRE/vcla genes/DANRE/vclb

1. Evidence the pair comes from the TGD

PANTHER. The row in panther_tgd_pairs.tsv is:

tgd_call branch class family human orthologs (a / b) gar co-orthologs medaka co-orthologs medaka parallel dup
TGD_tree Neopterygii|Teleostei 1:1 PTHR46180 (VINCULIN) VCL(LDO) / VCL(O) 1 (same gar gene for both) 2 (blank)

This is the strictest call the project uses. PANTHER places the duplication after the split from gar
and before the split between zebrafish and medaka. Both zebrafish copies share one gar co-ortholog, and
medaka also keeps two copies.

Literature. The paper that first described the pair attributes it to the teleost duplication. It
does not give a synteny or gene-tree analysis:
[PMID:28767718 "Zebrafish are members of the teleost family, which have undergone an additional genome duplication event compared to other vertebrates [43]."]
[PMID:28767718 "The first isoform, vinculin a (vcla) present on chromosome 13, was well annotated, while its paralog vinculin b (vclb) on chromosome 12 was not (as of assembly Zv9)."]

Status. TGD origin is supported by the PANTHER gene tree (a TGD_tree call with a single gar
co-ortholog). I found no published double-conserved synteny analysis with gar for this pair. The
statement is therefore tree-based, and that is what the project's strictest criterion requires. Which
medaka copy is orthologous to which zebrafish copy was not checked.

2. Protein-level comparison

Does each copy keep the ancestral molecular function? Probably yes, for talin and alpha-catenin
engagement and actin linkage. The evidence is sequence conservation plus the MDCK localization assay.
No binding assay, cross-rescue or coding-sequence swap has been done in zebrafish. Whether Vclb binds
beta-catenin is open, because of F822.

3. Expression

The picture is broad overlap (notochord sheath, cell culture behaviour) with a clear bias: vclb
dominates in heart and endothelium, and vcla dominates in total embryonic protein and may be the source
of metavinculin. There are no published in situ comparisons of the two copies side by side outside the
heart.

4. Experimental evidence of function

Alleles used

Gene Allele Lesion Type Source
vcla hu10818 8-bp deletion, stop at codon 160 (TALEN) PTC; transcript still present in cDNA PMID:28767718
vcla bns241 (Δ13) frameshift PTC with mutant mRNA decay; shows transcriptional adaptation PMID:30944477
vcla sa14599 point nonsense (ENU) PTC without mRNA decay; no transcriptional adaptation PMID:30944477
vcla bns300 (exon22_ins1) insertion in last exon NMD-insensitive position PMID:30944477
vcla bns605 72.44-kb deletion of the locus RNA-less; no transcriptional adaptation PMID:36427314
vclb gene trap insertional trap loss of function (details in full text only) PMID:27578788
vclb hu11202 7-bp deletion, stop at codon 22 PTC PMID:28767718
vclb bns247 16-bp deletion frameshift (PTC expected; not characterized for mRNA decay) PMID:30635353
vcla morpholino ZDB-MRPHLNO-100114-3 splice-blocking, zygotic vcla only knockdown PMID:19800866, PMID:26954676

Allele sources:
[PMID:28767718 "The vcla Δ8B mutation results in a frameshift that creates a premature stopcodon at amino acid position 160."]
[PMID:28767718 "This frameshift mutation generates a premature stopcodon at position 22 (Fig 4D) and is the vclb mutant allele we describe from here on, unless otherwise specified, and is designated as vclbhu11202."]
[PMID:36427314 "In addition, we generated an RNA-less allele of vcla (a 72.44-kb deletion that removes the vcla locus; fig. S3, C and D) and found that it does not display TA (fig. S3E)."]
[PMID:30635353 "We generated a vclb allele carrying a 16-bp deletion (vclbbns247; Fig."]
[PMID:28767718 "Moreover, the splice-site morpholino that was used, only targeted the zygotic vinculin A isoform, keeping maternally supplied mRNA and vinculin B intact."]

vcla

vclb

Both copies

Compensation and transcriptional adaptation: what is shown

What the compensation data do not show

5. Fate classification

MIXED: a conserved protein with an expression-biased PARTITION. Backup of vcla by vclb is possible
but not demonstrated. Confidence: moderate.

Established

Inferred, not shown

Why not the other fates

What would change the call

6. GO annotation consistency across the pair

Source: annotation-comparison.md, after both reviews.

Shared, and correctly so. Every IEA and IBA row is present on both copies and was reviewed with the
same wording. This covers:

Each copy has its own IDA for adherens junction from the same MDCK assay (PMID:28767718). Both copies
therefore appear among the PAINT descendant evidence for the adherens junction IBA, which is expected
and not circular. The same-node IBA is right for this pair: the protein is conserved and both copies
behave the same in the one direct test. The same "over-annotated" calls were made on both copies:
structural molecule activity (a vague parent of the linker function) and perinuclear region. For
consistency, I added the same NEW term to both copies: GO:0061028 establishment of endothelial barrier,
as IGI from the double-mutant leakage data (PMID:36260739). The in vivo evidence needs loss of both
copies.

Asymmetric, and correctly so.

Asymmetries that come from which copy was studied or which construct was used, not from biology.

None of these was added to vclb.
- The vcla focal-adhesion IDA/IMP rows come from a cardiac antibody study (PMID:26954676) whose antibody
does not tell the paralogs apart. The location is correct for both copies anyway. vclb has the
equivalent location through its IBA and IEA rows, and endothelial Vinculinb-eGFP marks focal
adhesions (PMID:36314606).

Should be copy-specific: coronary vasculature and epicardial roles (vclb).

Should be shared: vinculin molecular function; focal adhesion and adherens junction location; cell
adhesion; endothelial barrier. Cardiac contractility and myofibril maturation should also be shared if
the Fukuda 2019 data (paralog not stated in the abstract) turn out to come from double mutants.

7. Open questions

References

PMID:19800866, PMID:24952909, PMID:26954676, PMID:27578788, PMID:28767718, PMID:30635353,
PMID:30944477, PMID:31495694, PMID:35417696, PMID:36260739, PMID:36314606, PMID:36427314,
PMID:38697108, PMID:40128410. Also the files panther_tgd_pairs.tsv,
annotation-comparison.md and
vcla-bioinformatics/RESULTS.md.