FAO module vs Reactome mitochondrial β-oxidation

Cross-check: our FAO module vs the Reactome mitochondrial β-oxidation pathway

← back to the Fatty Acid β-Oxidation project

Our human gene reviews already ingest and adjudicate Reactome at the
annotation level — every human FAO review carries original_reference_id: Reactome:R-HSA-… TAS annotations for the individual chain-length-specific
reactions, each reviewed (ACCEPT / KEEP_AS_NON_CORE). This page is the
pathway-level cross-check that was missing: does our cross-species module
(MODULE:fatty_acid_beta_oxidation)
agree with how Reactome models the mitochondrial FAO spiral?

Source: the cached Reactome reaction entries under reactome/R-HSA-77*.md
(the Homo sapiens mitochondrial β-oxidation reaction set; catalysts read from
each reaction's "mediated by the '…' of '…'" statement).

Reactome's reaction inventory, by step and chain length

Reactome models the spiral one chain length at a time, with each turn's four
reactions catalysed as follows:

Chain (acyl-CoA in) ① dehydrogenase ② hydratase ③ 3-OH-acyl-CoA DH ④ thiolase
C16 palmitoyl VLCAD (77299) MTP (77301) MTP (77303) MTP (77304)
C14 myristoyl MTP (77277) MTP (77283) MTP (77271)
C12 lauroyl ECHS1 (77256) HADH (77254) MTP (77309)
C10 decanoyl ACADM (77345) ECHS1 (77344) HADH (77342) MTP (77340)
C8 octanoyl ACADM (77338) ECHS1 (77333) HADH (77331) MTP (77329)
C6 hexanoyl (77327) ECHS1 (77325) HADH (77323) MTP (77321)
C4 butanoyl ACADS (77319) ECHS1 (77314) HADH (77312)

("MTP" = Reactome's "Trifunctional Protein" complex.)

Agreements — our module and Reactome match on steps ①–③

Divergence — the thiolase step ④

Reactome attributes the thiolase step across the entire modelled spiral
(C6→C16) to the "Trifunctional Protein" complex
, and neither ACAA2 nor
ACAT1 appears in any cited reaction
. Our reviews resolve step ④ more finely:

So Reactome models steps ②–③ with the chain-length-appropriate soluble S/MC
enzymes (ECHS1/HADH) but keeps step ④ on MTP even at C6–C10, over-attributing
the medium/short-chain thiolysis to the trifunctional complex and omitting the
dedicated soluble thiolases. This is a granularity difference, not an obvious
error
— MTP does carry a thiolase (HADHB) activity — but our per-gene reviews
capture the ACAA2 (M/LC) and ACAT1 (SC/ketone) contributions that this Reactome
pathway does not separate out. Flagged here for curators comparing the two
models.

Scope note

The cached Reactome set begins at C16 palmitoyl-CoA (VLCAD) and does not
model the very-long-chain (C17–C22) entry that VLCAD/ACADVL and ACAD9 cover;
our module and the ACAD9/ACADVL reviews (and the ACAD9 GO:0017099GO:0004466
chain-length MODIFY) address that end of the range separately.

Bottom line

The module and Reactome agree on the pathway skeleton and on steps ①–③
(including the same S/MC-vs-LC enzyme split and the honestly-documented RHEA
mapping gap). The one substantive difference is step ④: our reviews resolve the
mitochondrial thiolase into ACAA2 (M/LC) and ACAT1 (SC/ketone), whereas the
Reactome pathway routes the whole thiolase step through the MTP complex.