Consistency: Internal review/notes are self-consistent and accurate: DENR is the SUI1 half of the MCTS1-DENR heterodimer (eIF2D split), a reinitiation / 40S-recycling factor. But this CONTRADICTS the PN placement under "Translation termination" and the projected GO:0006415. DENR is not a release factor and does no peptide release.
PN story / NEW pressure: Dossier projects GO:0006415 translational termination as new_to_goa. Verified (OLS): GO:0006415 = "release of a polypeptide chain from the ribosome ... in response to a termination codon" — i.e. eRF1/eRF3 activity, NOT DENR's. DENR's true process, GO:0002188 translation reinitiation, is already in GOA (IBA + IDA PMID:37875108) and accepted as core in the review; GO:0001731 and GO:0032790 (recycling) are also present. So the PN node mis-assigns DENR to termination; the real function is already captured. The projected term over-reaches / is biologically wrong for this gene.
Mapping strategy: This gene argues the Translation termination|tRNA, mRNA release node mixes genuine release factors with post-termination recycling/reinitiation factors (DENR, EIF2D). Recommend re-placing DENR (and EIF2D) under a reinitiation/recycling node, or at minimum not propagating GO:0006415 to them.
Evidence alignment: Dossier row carries no reference titles; review evidence (PMID:20713520 recycling, PMID:29889857 heterodimer, PMID:37875108 JAK2/IFN-γ) is rich and verified — no overlap to compare, divergence is by omission in the dossier.
Verdict: Mapping mismatch — PN "translation termination" + GO:0006415 contradicts DENR's reinitiation/recycling biology (already in GOA as GO:0002188). Recommended edits: [MAP] do not project GO:0006415 to DENR; reclassify the PN node as translation reinitiation/40S recycling (GO:0002188 already in GOA).