Consistency: Fully consistent. Deep research (falcon), review YAML, PN annotation and PN-node mapping all describe FBXW10 as a poorly characterized SCF F-box/WD40 substrate receptor (non-catalytic adaptor). The review's proposed_new_terms explicitly proposes GO:1990756, exactly matching the PN projection. No contradictions.
PN story / NEW pressure: PN asserts the substrate-adaptor MF (GO:1990756) which is NOT in FBXW10's GOA (no MF adaptor/scaffold term present — confirmed in goa.tsv). GO:1990756 is real (OLS verified: "brings together a ubiquitin-like ligase and its substrate... F-box/BTB/POZ proteins") and is the canonical F-box receptor MF. Verdict: ADD GO:1990756 — already independently proposed in the review.
Mapping strategy: Correct. FBXW10 is a Cul1/SCF F-box WD40 receptor; catalysis is RBX1's. GO:1990756 (receptor/adaptor) is the right category, not scaffold (GO:0160072) and not catalytic (GO:0061630). Scope ok_for_propagation. The class-level GO:0061630 is correctly held as too_broad context_only.
Evidence alignment: Aligned. PN ref 15340381 = PMID:20498703 (lamin A mutants target HP1 via FBXW10), which is the review's sole experimental PMID and is marked relevance HIGH / correctness VERIFIED. Falcon adds interactome (Poirson 2017) and disease genetics; no divergence.
Verdict: Consistent; PN GO:1990756 add is defensible and already mirrored in the review. No changes needed.